Mr. Obama’s criminal usurpation of the office of the president of the United States of America must be regarded as an Islamic attack upon the United States.

Mr. Obama’s ongoing criminal usurpation of the presidency presents an unparalleled threat to the national security of the United States as well as the entire non-Muslim world.


In the light of the evident affinity with all things Islamic that the ‘Manchurian’ Muslim from Mombasa, Mr. Barack, or Barry Hussein Obama, or Soetoro, or Soebarkah, has clearly demonstrated repeatedly while illegally occupying the presidency, and in view of the fact that Mr.


Obama/Soetoro/Soebarkah has presented fraudulent electronic files and documents to the American people as purported evidence of his constitutional eligibility to be president of the United States of America in a cover-up attempt which amounts to nothing less than an ongoing conspiracy to contravene the Constitution, America’s leaders are

remiss in their duty to honor their oaths to defend the Constitution if they permit Mr. Obama/Soetoro/Soebarkah to carry on in the commission of his criminal usurpation of the presidency even one more hour.


‘Bath House’ Barry Soetoro has demonstrated his allegiance to Islam time and time again while in the commission of his criminal usurpation of the presidency as well as throughout his life prior to having criminally usurped the office of the president.


Obama’s criminal usurpation of the presidency should be regarded by Americans as nothing less than an infiltration into and attack upon the American experiment in government of, by, and for the people by an enemy agent of the murderous religious cult and totalitarian political ideology of Islam practicing taqiyya.


PASTOR CARL GALLUPS On Usurpation Of The Presidency:

obama-born-in-kenyalong.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm _campaign=Feed%3A+Ppsimmons+%28PPSIMMONS%29

America presently has no legal sitting president—she has a criminal usurper in the White House; a fraud, forger, and impostor; an enemy agent of Islam practicing taqqiya.


The U.S.A. is in the midst of a constitutional crisis of unparalleled magnitude yet America’s elected officials in both major political parties proceed with business as usual—in complete denial—as if the criminal usurpation of the presidency is not taking place on their watch.



Dr. Keyes commenced his article with the words, “The Constitution puts the onus of stopping ongoing abuses of Executive power squarely on the shoulders of the representatives of the people in Congress.


If I might be so bold as to offer my opinion in a paragraph that rather accidentally followed what Dr. Keyes wrote when I was editing this treatment of subject matter related to Obama’s usurpation of the presidency and the true nature of the spiritual and ideological roots of those responsible for such a catastrophe that might well fit in the same spot in his article consistently; some accidental typing really…, while typing over the words I lost my train of thought and for a moment I thought I had written, or rather was in the process of writing that first paragraph of Dr. Keyes, thinking it mine at first, and following through logically. MY apologies to Dr. Keyes, I don’t mean to be rude in offering the paragraph of mine. I would never presume to attempt to


edit his work—your work, but my incidental conclusions concisely conveyed my own personal belief and so, if I may be so rude to beg your pardon Dr. Keyes, I humbly offer them for Dr. Keyes’ and you, the reader’s perusal.
“The Constitution puts the onus of stopping ongoing abuses of Executive power squarely on the shoulders of the representatives of the people in Congress.” (Dr. Alan Keyes….)
Such grievous failure on the part of America’s representatives of the people as is presently the case wherein the American people’s representation in Congress deliberately turn a blind eye along with the collective body of the US Supreme Court to the most sinister crime ever committed against the Constitution and the American experiment in government of the people—The criminal


usurpation of the presidency of the most powerful nation in human history by a constitutionally ineligible fraud and enemy agent of Islam practicing taqiyya—must be regarded as such a failure as to demand a correcting direct response by ‘We the People’ that the failure of those trusted with guarding the Constitution, that their facilitation of the mockery of the Constitution, shall not be taken lightly now nor in the future.

All those complicit in Obama’s criminal usurpation of the presidency, including major news media outlets which have not held to any journalistic ethic, but worshipfully protected Mr. Obama from legitimate news media scrutiny, must be brought to account for their treason in courts of law.

(I would ask that if Dr. Keyes read this and found fault in my opinion injected into what he wrote that he would correct me.)


…and Dr. Keyes continued with his article:
“The House of Representatives has the power to indict (impeach) a lawless Chief Executive. Representatives can then use the bill of particulars contained in that indictment to inform and mobilize citizens willing to stand in defense of Godendowed right. In just this way, America’s founders used the indictment of King George set forth in the Declaration of Independence, to mobilize patriots against the British government’s violation of their right of self-government.

One benefit of the Constitution those patriots eventually produced is that we don’t have to go to war.

The 2014 midterm elections offer the ideal opportunity to translate such a mobilization of opinion into an electoral result.

A strong showing for impeachment would increase pressure for removing the Obama and his cronies from office, when the actual impeachment/removal process formally got under way


in the new year, in a new Congress reformed for that purpose by the election’s results.”

“But by God’s Providence, the focal point and general executor of the elitist faction’s strategy has overplayed his hand.

The general threat he poses to all our rights, including liberty itself, has become clear to a substantial segment of the body politic, including even some of his supporters.”

“Impeach Obama” is thus the cry that rallies Americans on every front to assemble and show the strength of their will to do political battle, one and all, against the general threat to rightful liberty Obama represents.”
“2nd Amendment rights are not the only ones against which Obama’s tyrant mold is set.”


“Indeed, the elitist faction’s adamant assault on the rights of the God-endowed family is aimed at subverting the very idea of unalienable right. Once that idea is suppressed, there will be no peaceful hope for right and justice on any front, against the superior forces those in government lawlessly command.”

(Dr. Alan Keyes.)

Elect an impeachment Congress in 2014!
The Constitution of the United States provides only one way to stop a despotic president—IMPEACHMENT: The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors. (Article 2, Section 4)


It is therefore our duty as a people, while we still can, to expose treasonous, criminal behavior by those in high office through impeachment, and to demand that our representatives follow through and convict.

Impeachment is America's last remaining hope of blocking the dictatorial reign of the imposter and usurper in the White House, Barack Hussein Obama. And the window for doing so is closing fast upon us. The longer we wait, the more the man will continue to dismantle our constitutional republic, our national security, our electoral system, our economic strength, our rights and liberties—and we may be left to see the foolishness of our inaction from the hindsight of harsh reality.

We will wish then that we had acted when it was timely to do so.

Take action!


The best way to make sure Obama is impeached and removed in a timely way is to elect an "IMPEACHMENT CONGRESS" in 2014—a Congress willing to initiate impeachment hearings in the House, and convict in the Senate, if the evidence presented against the president (and his inner circle) is sufficiently compelling.

It's up to THE PEOPLE to bring this about! That would be every one of us—and everyone in our SOCIAL NETWORK. Send every contact you know to this website, and let's get going! First priority: Commit to vote only for those candidates for House and Senate who pledge, plainly and openly, to do their constitutional duty to impeach and convict Mr. Obama upon sound evidence— Please sign our PETITION TO IMPEACH, and encourage others to do the same. The petition declares this voter commitment. Second priority: Help good candidates win their primaries, so they are on the ballot in the fall. Lend your time, means, and social resources to this effort. Above all, make sure these candidates—


Sign our CANDIDATE PLEDGE TO IMPEACH, affirming they will support impeachment hearings in the House, and conviction in the Senate, if the evidence warrants such action. And if you are a candidate—whether for House or Senate— please take the initiative to sign that CANDIDATE PLEDGE, so conservative voters are aware of your commitment to impeach and convict the president and his fellow collaborators upon presentation of sufficient evidence. Let's make the 2014 election a POWERFUL REFERENDUM ON BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA! To do this, we must elect an "IMPEACHMENT CONGRESS." (

And after Mr. Obama is impeached ‘We the People’ must move to

both of his illegal elections to the presidency along with everything that the ‘Manchurian’ Muslim from Mombasa’s illegitimate administrations


have accomplished in the commission of their conspiracy to contravene the Constitution including the appointment of two justices to the United States Supreme Court.

Please see the last page of this document for the ‘Petition To Retroactively Abrogate.’


Mr. Obama is employing Socialist tactics in order to pursue Communist objectives so as to facilitate the advance of Islam within every aspect of our culture unto the intermediate objective of the dhimmitudinization of non-Muslims and the recognition of supremacy of Sharia law over America’s legal system established in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.

Mr. Obama’s ultimate goal is a one-world Islamic Caliphate under Sharia.

Socialism is a red carpet laid out for the advance of Islam within a society under siege by Islam. Dr. Jerome Corsi explains the diabolical method to Obama’s economic madness; just how the ‘Empty Chair’ plans to expand welfare programs to the point of pushing the capitalist system to the breaking point, the Cloward-Piven plan, in his new book available at ‘President

Obama’s Plan to Bankrupt the USA.’




“Jeremiah Wright: I “Made It Comfortable” For Obama to Accept Christianity Without Having to Renounce Islam (Video Report)” Posted by Jim Hoft on Tuesday, May 15, 2012. iah-wright-i-made-it-comfortable-for-obama-toaccept-christianity-without-having-to-renounceislam/.


The American people’s representatives in Congress and the Supreme Court have failed to protect the Constitution according to each member’s oath to serve in public office from the insult and injury that is Obama’s criminal usurpation of the presidency and from the broader conspiracy to contravene the Constitution that Mr. Obama’s illegal administration represents is the most grievously unfathomable failure of any American generation’s representatives in government since the incipiency of the American experiment in government of, by, and for the people.


Obama is but a putrid symptom of an horrific disease infecting Mankind known as Islam.



Since it is a fact that young Obama was indoctrinated into Islam during his formative years in Indonesia where he attended Muslim madras “schooling,” it is reasonable and rational to conclude that Mr. Obama/Soetoro/Soebarkah— middle name Hussein, first name Barack or Barry, is culturally a Muslim.




Hey Obama! Your ‘mutha’!
The following is taken from the article ‘10 Commandments Judge” Roy Moore: No Convincing Evidence That “Obama” is a U.S. Citizen’ by George M. Jan. 21. 2013:
Staunch defender of the 10 Commandments and graduate of West Point Judge Ray Moore took the oath of office on Jan. 11th as chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court.


The Judge said in an interview with, that, Lt. Colonel “Lakin “not only has a right to follow his personal convictions under the Constitution, he has a duty,” Moore said. “And if the authority running the efforts of the war is not a citizen in violation of the Constitution, the order is unlawful.”

“The highest law in this country is not the order of the Supreme Court of the U.S., not the order of the commander in chief, or any subordinate officer,” he said. Instead, it is the Constitution, which in this particular case demands that the president be a “natural born citizen,” a requirement not imposed on other officers.

There have been dozens of lawsuits and challenges over the fact that Obama’s eligibility never has been documented. The “Certification of Live Birth” his campaign posted online is a document that Hawaii has made available to those not born in the state.

“Lt. Col. Lakin has every right to question the lawfulness of the orders of the commander in chief. He’s not only the


commander in chief, he dictates the whole war effort, as shown by the recent firing of [Gen. Stanley McChrystal+,” Moore said.

It doesn’t matter, he said, that orders come from a colonel, or a general or even the Pentagon.

“The same thing applies in the military as in the judicial system,” he explained. “The

Constitution is the supreme law of the land, not the order of a higher officer, not the order of a judge.”
His comments came today in an interview with WND about Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, who yesterday was denied permission by Army Col. Denise R. Lind to obtain evidence that could document Obama is not eligible to occupy the Oval Office.

Col. Denise Lind found that since Congress allocates money for the war effort and the Pentagon was created, an order tracing back to the military hierarchy should have been sufficient for Lakin.


“That’s wrong,” Moore said. “They’re not the commander in chief.

“No order in the military can be issued without the authority that backs the order. The president didn’t give the order, but he is the authority that backs the order,” he said.

With the current protocol to simply follow orders, Moore warned, the U.S. will develop more incidents like that involving Lt. William Calley in Vietnam. The atrocities of My Lai were carried out under the guise of “following orders,” Moore noted.

Lakin “not only has a right to follow his personal convictions under the Constitution, he has a duty,” Moore said. “And if the authority running the efforts of the war is not a citizen in violation of the Constitution, the order is unlawful.”


Moore said he’s seen no convincing evidence that Obama is a “natural born citizen” and a lot of evidence that suggests he is not.

“This is the strangest thing indeed. The president has never produced [evidence] in the face of substantial evidence he was not born in our country. People are accepting it blindly based on their feelings, not on the law,” he said.

“They can’t fool all of the people all of the time, and that’s what they’re trying to do,” he said.” (End of excerpts from article.)


“OFFICER'S OATH is a story that everyone should read. It is not a 'birther' story. It is, rather, the story of a man who made a principled decision to adhere to the oath he willingly took as an officer in the United States Army. It is a story of the personal


consequences of that decision and the far-reaching effect it has had on the eligibility issue. Jack Cashill, author of numerous books, assisted Terry in telling his story. David Mercaldo, a New York-based author, has interviewed and written vignettes of the many people who contributed to Terry's case. A number of notable individuals have also contributed essays on key subjects relating to the issue. The book is a complete story of Terry's decision, the immediate consequences, and the long-range effect of Terry's decision and should generate a substantive and engaging dialogue on the issues addressed.” (

The ongoing mockery of our constitution must be brought to an end—one way or another. The 'Manchurian' Muslim from Mombasa must be brought to justice. Congress refuses to do their duty according to their oath and defend the Constitution.

Congresswoman Michele Bachmann has called for an investigation into the depths of the Muslim Brotherhood's infiltration into the White House administration and for this she was being threatened with removal from a congressional committee. (‘Bull’s-eye on Bachmann Over Islamist Threat,’ by Dave
Tombers,, 01/17/2013.)



Yo! ‘bama! Yo’ Baby-daddy! Right?
The reality is apparent to all but those who simply don’t want to recognize the truth that Mr. Obama/Soetoro/Soebarkah is an enemy agent of Islam practicing taqiyya who has achieved the inconceivable: The criminal usurpation of the presidency of the most powerful nation in human history.






„Malik Obama Genie out of the Bottle in the Arab World‟
By Walid Shoebat. February 25, 2014.


Malik Obama, best man at the wedding of Barack H. Obama, Oct. 3, 1992


By Walid Shoebat and Ben Barrack

While in Sanaa, Yemein in 2010, President Barack Obama‟s brother Malik Obama was at an event billed as the Orphans Development Fund (ODF) Conference. It‟s quite the ironic title considering a group photo Malik is in that he has posted to his website. In the photo, he can be seen wearing a Hamas scarf (keffiyeh) that bears a wellknown Palestinian slogan – „Jerusalem is ours – WE ARE COMING!‟ It also includes a map of Palestine that says, „From the River to the Sea!‟ In other words, Malik is saying, THERE IS NO ISRAEL. (



The most appropriate metaphor for a Muslim practicing taqiyya is the cliché of the illusive wolf in sheep’s clothing.

Taqiyya is the Islamic deceptive practice of a Muslim feigning an homogenous nature with those within a nonMuslim population of a society under siege by the many deceptive dimensions of Islamic Civilization, or Cultural Jihad.


Obama is behaving consistently in a manner one might rationally expect to observe in the conduct of an enemy agent of Islam practicing taqiyya whose ultimate objective is a oneworld Caliphate.

“The jihad conception classifies infidels under three categories: 1) those who oppose the Islamic call with arms; 2) those who belong to the countries of truce; 3) those who have surrendered to Islamic domination, exchanging their land for peace; they become “dhimmis,” “protected” from the ongoing jihad war against non-Muslims by a treaty of subjection and protection (dhimma)”—Bat Ye’Or, Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis.

“The infidels of the first category are called “harbis,” which belong to the dar al-harb, the region where warfare is mandatory as long as they refuse to recognize Islam’s supremacy.”

“The infidels of the second category are in a situation of respite between two wars since, in principle, the truce with infidels cannot exceed ten years, after which jihad must resume. They live under the regime of dar al-sulh, the land of temporary truce. There are two possible motivations for Islamic


authorities to conclude a truce with infidels: 1) Muslims are too weak to win the war; 2) the infidel leaders agree to pay a tribute…” (the jizyah), “…to the Muslim ruler to obtain the cessation of hostilities, those latter including rampages, abductions, enslavement, and killings. 8 The countries of dar alsulh must also abstain from hindering the development of Islam in their lands.”

“In the event of war, they should provide military contingents to the Islamic armies. 9 Moreover, only the treaties that conform to the stipulations of Islamic jurisprudence are valid, and they must be renewed every ten years. If those conditions are not fulfilled the treaties are invalidated. The refusal to allow the propagation of Islam in the lands of truce is tantamount to a casus belli, and jihad can resume.”

The infidels of the third category are those who have surrendered without fighting to the Muslim ruler. Their lands are integrated into the dar al-Islam, the territory of Islam, and their non-Muslim vanquished inhabitants are protected from the jihad onslaught by a treaty, the dhimma, which establishes their rights and duties. They become dhimmis, whose dhimma protection pact safeguards them as infidels against the rules of jihad targeting non-Muslims.”


“Hence it was within the religious, political, intellectual, and economic domains of the Christian world that the system of dhimmitude developed and grew.”

“Now in the twenty-first century, we again live in context of jihad, and the Islamists have made it clear that they still subscribe to the traditional classification of the infidels into these three categories, jihad is being waged today on all continents through terrorist activities, abductions for ransom, the indiscriminate killing of civilians and, in Sudan, ongoing slavery. While some countries—America, India, Israel, Russia, the Phillipines, Sudan, Kenya, Nigeria, and now Spain—are directly targeted by jihadist forces, others are considered to be dar al-sulh, countries of temporary treaties. In the Islamic view of international relations, the European Union can today be placed in the category of “lands of temporary truce,” as Osama bin Laden implied in his summer 2004 message.”

“The ideology, strategy, and tactics of jihad have constituted throughout history a fundamental part of Islamic jurisprudence and literature, since it is through jihad that the Islamic community developed and expanded. Muslim

theologians explained that jihad is a collective


religious duty (fard al-kifaya) binding the entire Muslim community and each individual (fard alayn) in certain situations and circumstances. The collective effort can be pursued by military means or peaceful methods—propaganda, speech, or subversive activities—within a nonMuslim nation.” (‘Eurabia’ by Bat Ye’Or. Assoc. Univ. Presses.
Cranbury, NJ 08512. 2006. ISBN 0-8386-4076-1. Pp. 32, 35, and 36.)



Islam In Our Government: Muslims Get Their Own Official Caucus On Capitol Hill Backed By Obama



A branch of Islam is getting official representation through a new House caucus, and it was officially unveiled on Friday. The new Ahmadiyya Musim Caucus will represent the estimated 15,000 to 20,000 Ahmadis living in America, a small percentage of the nearly 3 million Muslims living in the United States, according to The Washington Times. President Obama recently stood up for Muslims under persecution around the world at the National Prayer Breakfast, and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi has also praised the religious efforts of Muslims throughout the world. “We are talking on the global level to wherever people are being persecuted and prosecuted for their faith,” said


Naseem Mahdi, missionary-in-charge and national vice president of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community USA. “We will not take the selfish approach that we will only talk about the rights of Ahmadiyya Muslims. We will talk about the rights of every human being, especially the rights of every believer.” Ahmadiyya Muslims claim that they are the single largest Muslim group worldwide united under one leader. Ahmadis believe in the basic Islamic principles, but recognize Ahmad as a prophet and messiah of Islam. According to The Washington Times, there

are two Muslim members of Congress Democratic Reps. Keith Ellison of Minnesota and Andre Carson of Indiana.
The Ahmadiyya Muslims Caucus claims to have formed in an effort to better represent like-minded Muslims, and to help educate Muslims on the policies of the U.S. Government.




Obama ‘letting Muslim Brotherhood run antiterror ops.’ New book documents infiltration, putting extremists in power in Mideast
Posted on September 10, 2013 - See more at: 0/obama-letting-muslim-brotherhoodrun-anti-terror-ops-new-bookdocuments-infiltration-puttingextremists-in-power-inmideast/#sthash.FAzWBmqk.dpuf


The Indonesian exposure within a Muslim madras environment to indoctrination into the totalitarian and supremacist philosophical and religious ideology, economic system and system of jurisprudence, a.k.a. Sharia Law, during Barry or Barack Hussein Obama or Soetoro’s formative years in his youth forces those within the American government and military tasked with America’s national security—in fact all Americans who would defend the Constitution—to recognize and take immediate action against the criminal usurpation of the presidency by an obvious adherent to the murderous religious cult and totalitarian and supremacist philosophical and political ideology that is Islam.



Socialism is but a stepping stone for the infiltration and eventual domination over a non-Muslim people by Islamist elements, be they Sunni or Shiite, within a society under siege by Islamist forces.



An appropriately insulting graphic portrayal of Islam’s so-called ‘prophet’ Mohammed engaging in bestiality.




Those who permit Liberal-socialists to facilitate the advance of Islam within any non-Muslim society are in deliberate denial of the reality of observable Isamo-fascist Civilization, or Cultural jihad tactics currently being implemented by Muslims of every stripe against Western, Judeo-christian culture along with all other non-Muslim cultural traditions; tactics which aim to subjugate all non-Muslims within any non-Muslim society to a de facto slave status of what Muslims term the “dhimmi.”



The Islamo-fascist facilitating Liberal-socialist element prevalent within the fabric of American society yet denying the fundamental truths that Americans hold as self-evident is a threat to the preservation of the American experiment in government of, by, and for the people. In order for Islam to be defeated by the Judeo-Christian West Liberalism must be utterly refuted and driven from the Body of Christ, his Church militant, and from every other dimension of society including academia and the mass media.


CDR Kerchner (Ret)'s Blog
February 28, 2014

Lt Gen William “Jerry” Boykin (Retired)

Lt Gen (Ret.) William “Jerry” Boykin — The Muslim Brotherhood has deeply infiltrated our government to the highest levels since Obama has been in office. Listen to his video statement here:

Delusional, willingly blind Liberal idiots within a society under siege by Islamists—within American society to be more specific; those same Liberals who assert the enigmatic, narcissistic, stereotypical Liberal elitist position of assumed authority for they themselves alone to determine the moral


posture to be nationally adopted regarding how to deal with the pan-Islamic strategy for world domination that faces America and the world today; those same presumptuous, pompous, supposedly enigmatically gifted with what Sociologists describe as a “verstehen”—an higher insight— nothing new really, just revived and repackaged Gnostic concepts; those very same Liberals who consider themselves to be of ‘superior clay’ or ‘Supermen,’ as Frederic Bastiat points out in his landmark work on the malady of Liberalism, ‘The Law’, and continue to point out to the rest of we mere mortals as if they actually have the authority to do so what is right and what is wrong on any given topic of discussion related to the subject among many of Islam; these Liberal self-idolizing totalitarian supremacists—for Liberal-socialism is just that: totalitarian and supremacist in nature—persistently attempt to convince the rest of America; or at the very least demand that we concur with how they dictate that the dialogue on the subject—on any given subject—shall proceed; in the case of Islam, that Islamists simply want to coexist, to get along.





Developmental Deception:
Liberalism is a religious embracing by the spiritually blinded of the original abominable dualistic lie: That God did not surely say what he had truly said, hence the efforts of the Liberal ‘theologians’ who embrace faulty methods of textual criticism, the Radical Historical-critical approach based upon the pure supposition—conjecture –of purported J/E/P/D source documents despite the fact that there is not a scrap of evidence that such material ever existed, to undermine the authority of Scripture, and the lie that man might be as gods knowing good from evil, hence the Liberal-socialist’s preoccupation with achieving political power since they believe in their delusional minds that they have an inherent right to tell the rest of Mankind that which is good from that which is evil—what is morally right and what is morally wrong.

Liberal “theologians” first ask rhetorically, just like the serpent in the Garden, “Now

the serpent was more cunning than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said to the


woman, “Has God indeed said, ‘You shall not eat of every tree of the garden’?” (Genesis 3:1)
Then the Liberal theologians go about attempting to prove by way of their indefensible, faulty methods of textual criticism, what they like to describe as “Higher” criticism though the Radical Historical-critical schools of textual criticism fall under many identifying titles: Source criticism, Liberal criticism, “Progressive” criticism, Form criticism, Redaction criticism, but they all basically assume that the Graff-Wellhausen Documentary Hypothesis which is based upon complete conjecture that the Bible was written by men imbued with an higher insight, a Gnostic wisdom, motivated by the situational dictates of their particular Sitz im Leben—the needs of their manufactured concept of a ‘Creative Community.

The Liberal ‘theologians’ manufactured concept of gnostically elevated men within a ‘Creative Community’ in its Sitz im Lebin addressing its needs in the compilation of documents to define those needs is mirrored today in the Liberal’s incessant assertion of all things political revolving around the demands of their current delusional construct of their nebulously defined ‘Community,’ demands they define as


existent though not actually derived from any particular “community” consensus, but determined by those selfproclaimed Liberal ‘Legislative Leader,’ ‘Supermen,’ ‘Community Organizers’ imbued with an higher insight than the rest of humanity, a verstehen from their Holy Spirit counterfeit spirit of the age they identify as the Zeitgeist. Make no mistake: Liberalism is a religion.

The elitist ‘Community Organizer’s’ proclaim the needs of their delusional construct of a ‘Community,’ a ‘Community’ they will never establish parameters for because doing so would exclude those who hold opposing worldviews and they are loathe to appear intolerant or exclusive, within its Sitz im Leben, howsoever they choose to define and re-define their conveniently constructed delusional replacement for reality that illegitimately justifies in their own delusional minds their so-called ‘Community’s’ purported needs.

The Liberal self-elevated god-men, their ‘Community Organizers,’ assert that it was men who determined the Text of the Bible according to their colloquial, contemporaneous needs and that they themselves are the men who today have the authority to do the same: They maintain that God really did not indeed say, or convey in His Word in a literary voice, precisely


what is in fact written in the Bible. They deny the God-breathed authority of Scripture.

Pay close attention to what the Serpent said. He not only questioned whether or not God had actually said something, but twisted the actual command God had in fact given, for God had not commanded that Man not eat, as Satan posited, “…of every tree of the garden…,’ but only that man should not eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.

Liberal ‘theologians’ proceed to insert into their contrived developmental theories of biblical textual criticism that they assert are a reality surrounding the compilation of the Texts assembled within the Bible Man's motives behind the authorship of the Texts within, as they maintain, Man’s contemporaneous and colloquial ‘Creative Community’s’ Sitz im Leben, or cultural circumstances at the time and place of the original writing of any biblical Text in question: Men inspired of course by the spirit of the age in question, the Zeitgeist of that age.

Liberal ‘theologians’ assert as reality any situational construct they wish to posit—to dream up—as a reality and


define as any Sitz im Leben they wish to propose as having been a reality defining any given historical social setting as they whimsically decide that they want to define it.

They delusionally fabricate an alternative reality—their so called Sitz im Leben—based not on historical evidence, but as if writing a fairy tale which in reality is all that their historical revisionism amounts to.

They simply concoct a convenient definition of a composite “Community” howsoever they wish to define its parameters at any given moment in time and relative to any specific place in order to facilitate their delusional, manufactured construct of an alternate reality—their Sitz im Leben—in order to attempt to justify whatever changes they should like to make upon the interpretation, translation, or writing of the biblical Text in question to suit their delusional, Neo-gnostic, Liberal-socialist, “Progressive” agenda because they are delusional—they actually believe that they do in fact know what is morally right and what is morally wrong; what is good and what is evil.


Liberals have believed the lie that they may be as gods knowing good from evil, and the lie that God did not really say, in a literary voice, that which He has said to Mankind, in a literary voice, in the Bible, the inspired, inerrant Word of God.

The liberal ‘theologians’ and ‘Community Organizers’ maintain that man, or certain elite men to be more specific, Sociologically defined as "Master Thinkers," or as Bastiat facetiously identified them ‘Supermen’ or ‘Legislative Leaders,’ purportedly endowed with greater mental and spiritual capacities by an enigmatic, never defined spirit of the age—the Zeitgeist—with a Sociologically described verstehen, (higher knowledge, superhuman insight, i.e. γνώσίς, ‘gnosis’), men who have embraced the second part of Satan’s original lie as truth and believe that they are superior beings—who actually do believe that they can ‘be as gods,’ (“For God doth know, that in the day ye eat of it, then your eyes shall be opened: and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.” (Gen. 3:5, Webster’s Bible Translation).)

From their self-assumed lofty positions from where their minds and eyes are according to them open more widely than the rest of mere mortals the elitist ‘Community Organizer,’ ‘Legislative Leader,’ ‘Supermen’ believing themselves to be


imbued with a sociologically defined verstehen, to have an higher gnostic insight, to be ‘Master Thinkers’ with a superhuman ability to know good and evil—that is to say what is or is not morally right or wrong—take upon themselves the authority to direct the re-writing of the Bible and the redetermination of biblical doctrines according to the Liberal’s never-to-be-defined-lest-its-true nature-be-revealed indefensible construct of their so-called “Community’s” current situational, (i.e. Sitz im Leben), needs just as their contemporaneous counterparts who put together any and all extant writings to be regarded as Scripture would have—so they assert without evidence—done when, Liberal theologians, and ‘Community Organizers’ presumptuously maintain, the respective autographical biblical texts were first written.

The Liberal’s situational needs conveniently change over time, (Hence the imperative for morality to be relative!), as do, according to their delusional re-definition of reality, their morally relative situational ethics which they assert the right to assert, to re-define, in their re-interpretation and even rewriting of the Word of God, as well as to impose over the rest of society in their re-writing, their ‘Organizing’ of the ‘Community’s’ law.


The godless ‘Community’ construct of the Liberals is a counterfeit for the traditional American value of ‘One Nation under God.’ It is a counterfeit for true Christian unity in the Body of Christ Jesus, the Creator from whom all men are endowed with certain unalienable rights. Liberal “theology” is the height of arrogance and pride and advances the arguments that underlie the illegitimate justification in the deluded minds of the religion of Liberalism’s self-proclaimed elite that they are in fact superior to the rest of society. Liberal “theology” is the morally relative shifting sands foundation underlying the Liberal-socialist’s stereo-typical personality disorder malignant narcissism. Liberal “theologians” literally believe that they can do a better job at writing the Bible than God and they believe that they have an inherent right to rule over the rest of society, to ‘Organize’ society’s ‘Community’ as ‘Master Thinkers’ endowed with verstehen: Not a new concept. Bastiat identified those suffering from the mental disorder of Liberal elitism as ‘Legislative Leaders’ or ‘Supermen’ and long before him the Gnostic heresies elevated certain gnostically, read


“verstehenly,” endowed with an higher insight to an elite level in their own minds.

Liberals incessantly insist like demanding spoiled children of the devil himself that they have the right to dictate to the rest of Mankind precisely what it is that they determine at any given time and place—within their contemporaneous Sitz im Leben just exactly, according to them, is to be regarded as right or wrong, as good or evil since of course they are imbued with an enigmatic higher insight availed to them by the spirit of the age or Zeitgeist.


The supremacist-in-nature malignant narcissism personality disorder stereotypical of Liberal-socialists leads them to believe that they are superior to everybody else and have the authority to decide upon questions of morality for the rest of Mankind. Adherents to the religion of Liberalism also presume to re-define reality in order to fit their convenient redefining of their conveniently defined so-called ‘Community’ and their ‘Community’s’ Sitz im Leben in order to illegitimately justify the morality of any decisions they may wish to make regarding Church doctrine or the law.

Totalitarian Liberal elitists engaged in politics like to call themselves ‘Community Organizers’ today and they can be found in the Republican Party as well as within the party of the Democrats.

Liberalism’s or Liberal-Socialism’s characteristic moral relativism—as opposed to the belief in absolute truth—is the cornerstone of the Liberal perversions of the concepts of pluralism, diversity, multiculturalism, unity, inclusiveness, and tolerance, that are all deviously united as a counterfeit to the absolute truth incorporated in the Word of God—the full spectrum of the Light of the world—in a diabolical intellectual and spiritual truth obscuring counterfeit rainbow of faulty


assertions that are the foundational arguments of myriad godless organizations and ideologies advanced under an intellectually indefensible banner of ‘Political Correctness.’


The coming of the lawless one will be in accordance with how Satan works. He will use all sorts of displays of power through signs and wonders that serve the lie, 10 and all the ways that wickedness deceives those who are perishing. They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. 11 For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie.…” (II Thessalonians 2: 9-11.)



Liberalism’s characteristic supremacist, narcissistic attitude motivates adherents of the religion to establish tyrannical rule over the rest of humanity.


”For the wrath of God is revealed from Heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them. For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse,

because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became


futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Professing to be wise, they became fools.
and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man—and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things. Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves,

who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever, Amen. For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due.


And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting; being filled with all unrighteousness, sexual immorality, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness, full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evilmindedness, they are whisperers, backbiters, haters of God, violent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, undiscerning, untrustworthy, un-loving, unforgiving, unmerciful; who knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them.” (Romans 1:18-32. The Spirit Filled
Bible. Personal Study Bible Unveiling God’s Fullness in All God’s Word. New King James Version. Thomas Neal, Inc. Nashville, Tennessee. Copyright 1983. Pp. 1688-89. Emphasis added.)


What is The American View?
“Briefly stated, "The American View" of government is that there is a God, the God of the Bible, our rights come from Him, and the purpose of civil government is to secure our rights. There are many views of government, from equally numerous world views. Americans are blessed that our Founders' Biblical Worldview informed their political philosophy and the framing of our founding documents.” (




"The Vicious Circle of Socialism
We shall never escape from this circle: the idea of passive mankind, and the power of the law being used by a great man to propel the people.

Once on this incline, will society enjoy some liberty? (Certainly.) And what is liberty..." (The Law. Pg. 58) "...liberty is power. Of what does this power consist? (Of being educated and of being given the tools of production.) Who is to give the education and the tools of production? (Society, which owes them to everyone.) By what action is society to give tools of production to those who do not own them? (why by the action of the state.) And from whom will the state take them?

Let the reader answer that question. Let him also notice the direction in which this is taking us.

The Doctrine of the Democrats
The strange phenomenon of our times -- one which will probably astound our descendants -- is the doctrine based on


this triple hypothesis: the total inertness of mankind, the omnipotence of the law, and the infallibility of the legislator. These three ideas form the sacred symbol of those who proclaim themselves totally democratic.

The advocates of this doctrine also profess to be social. So far as they are democratic, they place unlimited faith in mankind. But so far as they are social, they regard mankind as little better than mud. Let us examine this contrast in greater detail.

What is the attitude of the democratic when political rights are under discussion? How does he regard the people when a legislator is to be chosen? Ah, then it is claimed that the people have an instinctive wisdom; they are gifted with the finest perception; their will is always right; the general will cannot err; voting cannot be too universal.

When it is time to vote, apparently the voter is not to be asked for any guarantee of his wisdom. His will and capacity to choose wisely are taken for granted. Can the people be mistaken? Are we not living in an age of enlightenment? What! Are the people always to be kept on leashes? Have they not


won their rights by great effort and sacrifice? Have they not given ample proof of their intelligence and wisdom? Are they not adults Are they not capable of judging for themselves? Do they not know what is best for themselves? Is there a class or a man who would be so bold as to set himself above the people, and judge and act for them? No, no, the people are and should be free. They desire to manage their own affairs, and they shall do so.

But when the legislator is finally elected—ah! Then indeed the tone of his speech undergoes radical change. The people are returned to passiveness, inertness, and unconsciousness; the legislator enters into omnipotence. Now it is time for him to initiate, to direct, to propel, and to organize. Mankind has only to submit; the hour of despotism has struck. We now observe this fatal idea: The people who, during the election, were so wise, so moral, and so perfect, now have no tendencies whatever; or if they have any, they are tendencies that lead downward into degradation." (‘The Law.’ Pp. 59-61.)

"...the conscience of the social democrats cannot permit persons to have any liberty because they believe that the nature of mankind tends always toward every kind of degradation and disaster. Thus, of course, the legislators must


make plans for the people in order to save them from themselves." (‘The Law.’ Pg. 63.)

Until America returns to biblical standards of righteousness and the Christian Church in America adamantly refutes the infiltration of the liberal "theology" into the Church, and puts out that which it has up to now put up with, there is no hope for our nation recovering from the dismal situation in which she presently finds herself—domination within many cultural arenas by the religion of Liberalism. America’s problems are fundamentally spiritual in nature.


The Religion of Liberalism
The religion of Liberalism’s elevation of elite ‘Superman’ ‘Legislative Leaders,’ their ‘Community Organizers,’ characterized within the doctrines of the cult of Liberalism that are incorporated in the writings of the highly subjective “science” of Sociology as “Master Thinkers,” (‘Developing as
Rational Persons: Viewing Our Development in Stages’ (1996. By Elder, L. with Paul, R., is a delusional

manifestation of the mental and spiritual disorder among those who consider themselves so superiorly elevated above the rest of we ‘mere mortals’ known as malignant narcissism that is nothing less than a reflection in men’s hearts and minds of the arrogant pride which preceded Lucifer’s being cast down from Heaven.

The Christian Church in the United States and the Republican Party must weed out Liberal tares among their proverbial wheat lest the American experiment in government of the people perish from the earth.

Many so-called ‘Christian Conservatives’ have bought into the false creation paradigm constructed by delusional Liberal-


socialists in order to defend their faulty Humanist, Materialist, Naturalist, Liberal-socialist, ‘Progressive’ worldview which, at its root, denies the Creator, the risen Lord Jesus Christ of the Bible, from whom all men are endowed with certain unalienable rights, and elevates Man, or more specifically certain ‘Master Thinkers’ or ‘Community Organizers,’ self-appointed elites, above the rest of we ‘mere mortals’ to be recognized as mysteriously endowed with an innate authority, a verstehen, to rule—to have dominion over the rest of Mankind.

The Christian Church in America must weed out the Liberal tares which now propagate the seeds which Satan planted in the Garden of Eden for the lying Liberal legions promote that same original lie employed by Satan in the Garden of Eden.

Likewise, the Republican Party must weed out the Liberal infestation within the field of its ranks or face continued political defeat and its ultimate demise.


The Developmental Foundation of Liberalism’s “Theology” Are The Faulty Methods of Higher Literary Textual Criticism Which Facilitate The Embracing Of Moral Relativisim:
“An evolutionary understanding of history and an anthropocentric view of religion dominated the 19th century. The prevailing thinkers viewed religion as devoid of any divine intervention, explaining it as a natural development produced by man’s subjective needs.” (‘Evidence That Demands a Verdict' by
Josh McDowell, Volume II, Pg. 55. Here’s Life Publishers, Inc. ISBN 0918956-73-0.)

“That the then-current evolutionary philosophy of Hegel had a definite effect on Old Testament studies is clearly attested to by Herbert Hahn: “The conception of historical development was the chief contribution of the liberal critics to the exegesis of the Old Testament. It is true of course that this conception did not grow merely from an objective reading of the sources. In a larger sense, it was a reflection of the intellectual temper of the


times. The genetic conception of Old Testament history fitted in with the evolutionary principle of interpretation prevailing in contemporary science and philosophy. In the natural sciences, the influence of Darwin had made the theory of evolution the predominant hypothesis affecting research.”

“In every department of historical investigation the conception of development was being used to explain the history of man’s thought, his institutions, and even his religious faiths. It was not strange that the same principle should be applied to the explanation of Old Testament history. In every age exegesis has concormed (Sic) to the thought forms of the time, and in the latter half of the nineteenth century thought was dominated by the scientific methos and an evolutionary view of history. 31/9,10”” (‘Evidence That Demands a Verdict' by Josh McDowell,
Volume II, Pg. 55. Here’s Life Publishers, Inc. ISBN 0-918956-73-0. Siting 31: Hahn, Herbert F. The Old Testament in Modern Research. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1966.)

“In the historical sciences and in the areas of religious and philosophical thought, the evolutionary concept had begun to exercise a powerful influence after Hegel had substituted the notion of ‘becoming’ for the idea of ‘being.’ He had arrived at the notion by a priori reasoning without testing it by scientific


application to observable fact, but Hegel was none the less the intellectual progenitor of the modern point of view.” (McDowell,
Pg.55. 31/9,10. Siting 31: Hahn, Herbert F. The Old Testament in Modern Research. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1966.)

The Graf-Wellhausen Documentary Hypothesis was spawned in the age when Darwinian evolutionary thought permeated all areas of investigation. It was spawned from Wellhausen’s application of Hegel’s developmental conclusions to literary textual criticism to biblical higher textual criticism.

The 'Darwinian' theory of evolution—existent long before Mr. Darwin popularized it—exerted its developmental aspects on the age in which Wellhausen adopted Hegel’s earlier developmental conclusions surrounding literary textual criticism and employed Hegel’s developmental conclusions in the textual criticism of biblical Text source documents—real or supposed.

The Graf-Wellhausen Hypothesis is based upon conjecture and pre-supposition and outright fabrication: Fabrication such as the purported J/E/P/D structure of supposed source documents for which not a single scrap of evidence exists, and it was the


embracing of the Graff-Wellhausen Documentary Hypothesis that spawned the complete spectrum of blind Radical Historical-Critical schools of textual criticism: Form Criticism, "Modern" Criticism, Source Criticism, Redaction Criticism, Radical Criticism, Liberal Criticism, "Progressive" Criticism, etc. ad nauseum, which are collectively employed by those who deny the authority of Scripture holding to the claims of the Form Critics that the biblical Text source documents developed and that the development was directed by the needs of a ‘Creative Community’ within its Sitz im Leben. The flip side of their irrational, indefensible argument is that today’s ‘Master Thinkers,’ those enigmatically gifted with a sociologically defined verstehen, have the authority to continue in the ‘developing’ process of the biblical Texts—the authority to reinterpret those Texts according to today’s ‘Creative Community’ within its Sitz im Lebin, guided by the prevailing Zeitgeist of the modern day spirit of the present age.

Make no mistake about it: Liberalism is a religion. Its priests are its ‘Community Organizers,’ its ‘Master Thinkers,’ its ‘Legislative Leader’ ‘Supermen.’ The doctrines of the religion of Liberalism are codified in Sociology and Collectivist ideology. Liberalism is a religious worldview.


Liberals often claim to be Agnostic, (the Greek word transliterated ‘Agnostic’ in English is translated ‘IGNORAMUS’ in Latin—Just saying!), or Secular-Humanist, or Naturalists, or Materialists, but theirs is a religion, plain and simple, yet they continuously fight to for a ‘separation of Church and state’ as if their religion is not a religion.

To understand the religion of Liberalism, or Liberalsocialism, or Socialism, or National Socialism, or ‘Progressivism,’ or Humanism, or Secular-Humanism, or ‘Modernism,’ or Atheism, or Agnosticism, or Marxism, or Collectivism, or by whatever definition in chooses to re-invent itself, one must understand the invalid Liberal schools of higher textual criticism in order to understand the enemy that all free people face, and how the roots of those invalid methods of textual criticism actually have roots that go all the way back to the lies of the devil in the Garden of Eden. Liberalism is the oldest religion in the world: It is the worship of self, or anything else, above God.

Liberal ‘theologians’ firstly deny that Scripture says in a literary voice what it says, then they assert that their existed within the ‘Creative Community’ construction contemporaneous with the original writing of the biblical Texts certain elite individuals who had a Zeitgeist-given authority, a


gnostic-like higher insight originating or emanating from the Zeitgeist or ‘spirit of the age’ and motivated by the specific needs of the ‘Creative Community’ over which they had some enigmatic authority to lead, to direct the writing of the biblical Texts in whatever morally relative direction said enigmatically gifted with an higher verstehen said ‘Master Thinkers’ were moved at any given time and place, or Sitz im Leben, by their contemporaneous Zeitgeist within said Sitz im Leben to FEEL was the right direction in which to move FORWARD with their determination as to how to ‘Organize’ said Documents as well as said ‘Community’—in such a fashion as to establish just what was to be considered by their ‘Community’ as morally right or morally wrong—as good or as evil.

Liberal theology denies the authority of Scripture and provides an indefensible morally relative excuse within the blinded minds of adherents of the religion of Liberalism, or Humanism, or Secular-Humanism, or ‘Progressivism,’ or Collectivism, or Marxism, or Modernism, etc…, etc…, who are commonly found within America’s Democrat Party, for their self-proclaimed ‘Master Thinker’ ‘Community Organizers,’ or as Frederic Bastiat identified them in ‘The Law,’ ‘Legislative Leader’ ‘Supermen,’ to advance ‘Forward’ and proceed with their infiltration into every cultural arena within society—much


as Islam infiltrates a society under siege—in order to ‘Organize,’ presuming the authority to do so, according to the morally relative standards that they themselves proclaim as acceptable, that is to say as ‘good,’ or as unacceptable—as ‘evil.’

The only other supremacist religion/philosophical-political ideology that exerts itself so ubiquitously into every sphere of human existence within a society in such a totalitarian/supremacist manner is the murderous religious cult and totalitarian/supremacist philosophical and political ideology of Islam.

Wellhausen Applied Hegel’s Developmental Philosophy To Biblical Textual Criticism In An Age Dominated By Darwinist Evolutionary Thought
"Religion is not, as Hegel declared, a kind of knowing; for it would then be only an incomplete form of philosophy, and the measure of knowledge in each case would be the measure of piety." "Hegel's error was in regarding life as a process of thought, rather than in regarding thought as a process of life."


(Systematic Theology Augustus Strong, D.D., LL D. President and Professor of Biblical Theology in The Rochester Theological Seminary. Judson Press, Valley Forge, PA. Thirty-First Printing. 1976. ISB No. 08170-0177-8. Pg.20.)

“Hegel presupposes that the whole of human history is a process through which mankind has been making spiritual and moral progress, it is what human mind has done in the course of its advance to self-knowledge…” (McDowell, Pg. 56.) Nota bene hyphenated word ‘self-knowledge’: That would be the “Self”-idolizing, narcissistic, revived gnostic concept of those who believe themselves cut from a superior clothe.

“W.F. Albright, W.W. Spence Professor of Semitic Languages from 1929-1958 at John Hopkins University and sometime director of the American Schools of Oriental Research in Jerusalem, was, until his death in 1971, considered by many to be the foremost biblical archaeologist in the world. His work has forced many critics to completely reassess their conclusions regarding the history of Israel. About Wellhausen’s application of Hegel’s philosophical theories to the history of Israel, Albright said: “He tried, by means of Hegelian analogy with pre-Islamic and Islamic Arabia, to build a system for the development of Israel’s


history, religion, and literature which would fit his critical analysis. Wellhausen’s structure was so brilliant and afforded such a simple, apparently uniform interpretation that it was adopted almost universally by liberal Protestant scholars, and even largely by Catholic and Jewish scholars. There were, of course some exceptions, but in nearly all places where men were thoroughly schooled by learning Hebrew and Greek and absorbing the critical method, they also learned Wellhausenian principles. Unfortunately all of this was developed in the infancy of archaeology, and was of very little value in interpreting history.” 6/15” (‘Evidence That Demands a Verdict' by
Josh McDowell, Volume II, Pp. 56-57. Here’s Life Publishers, Inc. ISBN 0918956-73-0. Siting 6: Albright, W.F. Archaeology, Historical Analogy, and Early Biblical Tradition. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1966.)

“Wright speaking of Albright says that he “has amassed archaeological fact upon fact in his review of the Bible’s setting in the world in order to show that Wellhausen’s developmental scheme, ultimately drawn from the idealistic philosophy of Hegel, no longer fits the facts as they are now known.” 199/45”
(‘Evidence That Demands a Verdict' by Josh McDowell, Volume II, Pg. 67. Here’s Life Publishers, Inc. ISBN 0-918956-73-0. Siting 199: Wright, G. Ernest. “Archaeology and Old Testament Studies,” Journal of Biblical Literature. December, 1958. Vol. 77, pp. 39-51.)


The Stones Cry Out:
“…all six of the documentarians’ presuppositions…” “…must be regarded as invalid. Anti-supernaturalism…” “…must be rejected on the grounds that it claims to have absolute truth regarding the existence of God or the extent and nature of His intervention in the natural order of the universe, i.e., either His existence or His divine intervention is ruled out as an impossibility on an a priori basis.

Another of these presuppositions (an a priori distrust of Old Testament record) must be rejected since it flies in the face of an accepted cannon of criticism that has stood the test of time, having guided literary and historical scholars since the time of Aristotle.

The remaining four presuppositions (evolutionary view of Israel’s history; priority of source analysis over verifiable methodology; legendary view of patriarchal narratives; and the assumption that there was no writing in Israel during the Mosaic age) have all been soundly refuted by archaeology.”
(‘Evidence That Demands a Verdict' by Josh McDowell, Volume II, Pg. 86. Here’s Life Publishers, Inc. ISBN 0-918956-73-0.)


Watch Alfred Hitchcock’s recently released documentary on National Socialism and the Holocaust:




The disease like spread of Secular Humanist moral relativity throughout the leadership of and rank and file members within both major political parties of the American body politic— throughout all of Western, Judeo-Christian culture really—by the vehicle of Liberalsocialist philosophical and political ideology is well documented, but the spiritually blind are simply unable to see.


“In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.” (2 Corinthians


Liberalism is a most convenient religion. In the cult of Liberalism, its adherents may claim that a word means whatsoever it is that they wish the word to mean. Such solipsistic employment of imagination in constructing philosophical or political arguments by way of first re-defining terms within an indefensible framework of a non-existent, false reality—a reality so manufactured without regard for facts— facilitates the Liberal-socialist's construction of irrational arguments based upon terms created to define or re-define reality as they so choose. Liberalism at its very core is delusional.



The religion of Liberalism and its political and philosophical dimension of Liberal-socialism are the definition of hypocrisy, for while waiving their profane banner of “Political Correctness” while shouting out, “Inclusiveness!” over an undefinable composite ‘Community,’ they categorically and vehemently reject the concept of inclusiveness when considering any other party that happens to hold a biblical worldview, and contrary to their profession of advocating tolerance, they will not tolerate the introduction of biblically foundational reason into an ongoing dialogue pertaining to any issue—they will not permit the facts to get in the way of their delusional construct of an hallucinatory fabrication of a ‘Community,’ a concept mirroring Islam’s assertion of a panIslamic ‘Umma,’ out of whatever disparate parts they wish to include or exclude from among their purported ‘Community’s’ constituent elements.
Liberalism’s moral relativism—as opposed to the belief in absolute truth—is the cornerstone of the Liberal perversions of the concepts of pluralism, diversity, multiculturalism, inclusiveness, unity, and tolerance; which are all deviously united as a counterfeit to the absolute truth incorporated in the Word of God—the Light of the world—in a diabolical, truth obscuring rainbow of faulty assertions advanced under an intellectually indefensible banner of ‘Political Correctness.’


"America’s elites have been thoroughly infected. They seem now almost entirely enthralled by forces hostile to the wise moderation of the American founding and the reverence for God’s authority that is its strong foundation. In service to that hostility they seek quite literally to demoralize the American people." (Dr. Alan
Keyes. ‘Why America’s Elite Hate the American Way.’ 2/28/2013.


“Because this is an age of religious pluralism and syncretism (that is, a diluting of truth for the sake of unity), Christ’s lordship is deemed irrelevant by many religious groups that believe one religion is as good as another. His preeminence is denied by others that place the Christian stamp upon a fusion of beliefs from several religions. Usually hailed as an advance beyond apostolic Christianity, this blend promises self-fulfillment and


freedom without surrender to Christ.” (The Spirit Filled Bible.
Personal Study Bible Unveiling God’s Fullness In All God’s Word. New King James Version. Thomas Neal, Inc. Nashville, Tennessee. Copyright 1983. ‘Personal Application’ Pg. 1811.)

“‘Pluralism is inadmissible whenever it is at variance with what God has revealed in His Word.19.’” “It is quite obvious that fragments of truth are to be found in the prophetic repositories of pluralism. Those whom the apostle called to account for preaching ‘another gospel’ are not said to completely lack truth. But their message is adulterated and laced with errors, violating the essential criterion of the Word concerning the glorious person and all-sufficiency of the finished redemption of Christ (1 Timothy 3:16; 1 John 2: 1,2), The false gospels of non-Christian religions, in fact, frequently add doctrines that are as dangerous as what they omit and may well turn the hearer’s hearts against Christian truth. ‘The challenge of pluralism, therefore, is not to compound this mixture of truth with untruth in the gospels of pluralism but to displace the perverted gospel of the world with the pure gospel revealed from heaven by the Spirit of God in the Person of Christ.’20.”
(Demons In the World Today. A Study of Occultism in the Light of God’s Word. By Merrill F. Unger. Th. D., Ph. D., Copyright 1971. Ch. 8. Pp. 158-159.)


“People who feel that all religions are good and who are unable to ‘discern spirits’ (1 Corinthians 12:10) are ready prospects
for demonic deception.” (Demons in the World Today. A Study of Occultism in the Light of God's Word. By: Merrill F. Unger. Th. D., Ph. D. copyright 1971. Pg.155.)


Section 313 in Chapter 2 of the Immigration and Naturalization Act expressly forbids citizenship for anyone espousing any totalitarian ideology.


Doctrinal Delusion
"The danger of delusion increases in these last days as demonic activity accelerates and serious study of God’s Word wanes. It is a patent fact that sound Bible teaching often is lacking in circles that highlight miracles and healings and gifts of the Spirit. Sometimes the so-called ‘distinctive truths’ are mere doctrinal hobbies and perversions of the Word of God. When these focus on anything other than Jesus Christ and the full scriptural revelation, counterfeit powers of demons may infiltrate lives.

This warning is desperately needed by God’s born-again people (1 John 4:1). Present-day Christians must recognize that the Bible, rightly understood and implicitly obeyed, is the only sure protection against demonic delusion and despoilment. Evil powers can accomplish their deceptions only when the Word of God is ignored or disdained—and many Christians are susceptible to demonic influence today because they have ignored God’s revelation in his Word. The Bible is impregnable armor for the Christian—when he lives in it!” (Merrill F. Unger, Th.
D., Ph. D. Demons in the World Today. A Study of Occultism in the Light of God’s Word. Carol Stream, IL 60188: Tyndale House Publishers, 1971.)


“Although some people regard the pursuit of doctrinal accuracy as an unspiritual intellectualism, sound doctrine is actually very important to sound spirituality. Christian doctrine teaches us about God, His purposes and will for our lives, what we are like spiritually apart from God’s grace, how God’s grace changes us; in short, everything we need to know in order to pursue true spirituality (Rom. 6:17-18; 1 Tim. 1:5, 10; 2 Tim. 3:16-17). Doctrine provides external, objective controls for our inward, subjective experiences so that we may discern genuine spirituality from fraudulent, artificial, or even demonic spirituality (Col. 2:22-23; 1 John 4:1-3).

In pursuing an accurate understanding of Christian doctrine, we are fulfilling one aspect of God’s greatest commandment—that we love God with all our minds (Matt. 22:37). This commandment surely implies that we should take great care and make every effort to conform our beliefs and convictions to the truth (cf. Rom. 12:2)—and this means doctrine.” (Bowman,
Robert M., Jr. “A Biblical Guide To Orthodoxy and Heresy (Part One: The Case For Doctrinal Discernment).” Christian Research Institute Statement DO080.)


“The Bible clearly teaches that the end times will be characterized by a strong spiritual delusion that blinds many from the true gospel and also leads those who have believed into apostasy.” (Another Jesus: The Ecumenical Christ and the New
Evangelization. By Roger Oakland with Jim Tetlow.Copyright 2004. Pg. 12.)


Liberal-socialism is nothing more than an application of Gnostic philosophy to political ideology; it is in effect neognosticism . “The

thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.” (King James Bible
"Authorized Version", Pure Cambridge Edition.)


The delusional wishful utopian thinking of the Liberalsocialists lays down an inviting metaphorical red carpet for Islamo-fascism to metastasize within a society under siege. Collectivists are dupes of Islam.


‘Progressive,’ Liberal-Socialist, ‘Supermen,’ ‘Legislative Leader,’’Master Thinker’ ‘Community Organizers’:
(This is what your children are being fed in Liberal academia. I received the article referenced as a hand-out in class while attending a local community college approximately two years ago.)

In the article ‘Developing as Rational Persons: Viewing Our Development in Stages’ (1996. By Elder, L. with Paul, R., the authors describe ‘The Inner Logic of their purportedly intellectually superior “Master Thinker” as an inner logic wherein, “Having formed their identities in terms of reasonability, not in terms of any particular belief or belief system, they are able to shift beliefs without trauma or selfdoubt.” This statement epitomizes the syncretistic nature of the current sociological philosophical ideology which is the philosophical foundation of a Liberal-socialist worldview and its refutation of absolute truth in favor of the sliding-scale continuum of moral relativism. They preposterously postulate that a person who is able to ‘shift beliefs’ is superior to one firmly established in their faith in Christ Jesus!


In the sub-heading within the article “We Reach the Fifth Stage When We Have Established Good Habits of Thought Across the Domains of Our Lives” is listed the stage the article’s authors call “The Advanced Thinker Stage.” The authors proceed to equate the adoption of their suggestions for rational thinking and the embracing of their philosophical ideology underlying the development they assert is necessary in a person’s thinking—that is to say the re-aligning of one’s own values with their more manipulative and relative morality—with achieving a state of “…rational living….”


suggesting that those who embrace this system of theology shall then find “…that it is no longer a strain to aspire to reasonability.” thereby implying that an individual’s systematic approach to thinking prior to embracing the author’s suggestions for developing one’s cognitive processes was necessarily unreasonable! A preposterous and presumptuous non-sequitor!

In the same manner of disingenuously setting up a straw man assertion as fact, the authors maintain that in achieving stage five, the “Advanced Thinker” stage, one “…no longer…” finds “…it difficult to admit when…” they “…are wrong….” presupposing that a proselyte of his assertions, before having embraced them as truth, found it difficult to admit when he was wrong!

The authors propose that at stage five “We now have deep insight…” , (i.e. γνώσίς, ‘gnosis’) or as sociologists would identify it, verstehen), “…into the fact that our development…”, (that is to say increasing adoption of a pluralistic philosophical ideology as a new value system based on a neo-gnostic enigmatic insight also known by sociologists terminology of verstehen), “…is directly dependent on the extent to which we are successful at decreasing the role of egocentric thinking in


our daily lives.” The assertion that people necessarily think egocentrically before adopting the proposed ideology is preposterous and antithetical to the reality that those in Christ Jesus think 'Christo-centrically,' that is to say we pray that we ourselves diminish and Christ Jesus increase in every aspect of our being.

The authors maintain that “At the advanced stage,…“ one is “…now skilled at monitoring the role in thinking in concepts, assumptions, inferences, implications, points of view, questions purposes, and information.” This statement pre-supposes that said adherents to the author's beliefs concerning the rational development of thinking are morally qualified to monitor their own roles in thinking concepts, assumptions, inferences, et cetera, etc..., but without a Moral Lawgiver the proponents of this nonsensical "Master Thinker" argument would extend to each and every would-be 'Master Thinker' the authority to determine just what is or is not moral.

Interesting that in introducing stage six, the “Master Thinker” stage, the authors describe the current era as “this age of irrationality.” In all recorded human history no other era can be held-up as any more or less rational than the present.


The author proceeds to describe the “Master Thinker” stage as a useful concept “…, for it sets out what we are striving for…” presupposing that the reader has thus far bought into the erroneous ideology and faulty arguments in support of the liberal worldview underlying their proposed stages of development.

The authors lengthily describe their construct of a “Master Thinker”: “Master thinkers have not only a high degree of knowledge of thinking, but a high degree of practical insight as well.” “Master thinkers have deep insights into the systematic internalization of critical thinking into their habits.” “Their knowledge of the qualities of their thinking is outstanding.”

The authors elaborate on the list of qualities of their purported ‘Master Thinker’ in a numbered list with headings which read: “… 1) conscious of the ‘workings’ of their minds; 2) highly integrated; 3) powerful; 4) logical; 5) far-sighted; 6) deep; 7) self-correcting; and 8) emancipated.”, but their insupportable assertions listed, when reflected upon and subjected to critical analysis, are ridiculous fabrications of their imagination at best.


The authors presume that their construct of idealized “Master Thinkers” would “…achieve a high level of success in bringing their thoughts, emotions, and actions in line with their espoused ideals,…” and that it would follow that, because of said congruency, “…they would function with a high level of fulfillment and sense of well-being. One might argue that, were the ideals espoused by said 'Master Thinkers' or 'supermen' to be erroneous then the congruency to said error would too manifest itself in the thought, emotions, and actions of the thinkers and prove them not masters at all for it is written “He who sins is a slave to sin.” That being the case it is unlikely that erroneous ideals embraced which enslave would not result in an ’…high level of fulfillment and sense of wellbeing.” for “…the wages of sin is death,” i.e. separation from God.

What of their individually ‘espoused ideals’ anyways? The proposed stages of development explicitly aim to impart a belief system in which adherents are free to ‘shift’ to whatever newly constructed ideals they themselves might choose to espouse at any given moment in time.

This concept of “Master Thinker” too is not new. Frederic Bastiat recognized the concept and labeled it the 'Superman Idea.'


The Neo-Gnostic, so-called "Progressive," Liberal-socialist, Humanist Democrat’s rejection and condemnation of 'faith in God and His works’ and replacement of God, from Whom ‘We the People’ recognize as a self-evident truth Man is endowed with certain unalienable rights, with their ludicrous Big Bang Theory of creation, (Just where did the supposed material that went ‘Bang!’ come from?), and insupportable multiple theories of Evolution threaten American liberty for ‘liberty is an acknowledgement of faith in God and His works.’

Sociology vs. Faith
“Faith is belief in what has not been observed by the senses (see Hebrews 11:1). In order to reason logically, a person must believe in laws of logic. However, laws of logic are immaterial and therefore cannot be observed by the senses. So, belief in laws of logic is a type of faith. Moreover, laws of logic only have rational justification in the Christian faith system.”
(answering Logical Fallacies: Bifurcation. By Dr. Lisle, AiGUS, on Sept. 7, 2009. Footnote number 3. Emphasis added.)

Sociologists like "...Robin Williams (1970) …” have “…offered lists of basic values…” which

include achievement, efficiency, material comfort, nationalism, equality, and the supremacy of science and reason over faith.”
(Sociology: A Brief Introduction. 8th Edition. By Richard T. Schaefer. McGraw Hill. Copyright 2009. N.Y., N.Y.)

An assertion such as that of the supremacy of science and reason over faith is audacious and unreasonable and lacks scientific evidence - it amounts to no more than wishful thinking. Such a belief makes idols out of science and reason and is foundational to modern sociological perspectives and their underlying philosophical arguments which determine a liberal, socialist, secular humanist worldview. ‘Science’ and ‘Reason’ have become their belief system, their religion.

Sociologists, disillusioned with the supernatural, that is to say, with God, construct, in embracing their faulty philosophical ideologies - their own religion. Theirs is a religion of mysterious insight, referred to by sociologists as verstehen, accessed by their elite 'superman' leaders through their perversions of 'Science’ and ‘Reason’, devoid of faith in God, and is existentialist in nature and hedonistic in essence. Liberalism is nothing more than a modern revival of Gnosticism. One need


only ask the question: From where does their supposed enigmatic insight, their supposed verstehen, originate?

“B. Faith is a knowledge conditioned by holy affection.— The faith which apprehends God’s being and working is not opinion or imagination. It is certitude with regard to spiritual realities, upon the testimony of our rational nature and upon the testimony of God. Its only peculiarity as a cognitive act of the reason is that it is conditioned by holy affection. As the science of aesthetics is a product of reason as including a power of recognizing beauty practically inseparable from a love for beauty, and as the science of ethics is a product of reason as including a power of recognizing the morally right practically inseparable from a love for the morally right, so the science of theology is a product of reason, but of reason as including a power of recognizing god which is practically inseparable from a love for God.

We here use the term “reason” to signify the minds whole power of knowing. Reason in this sense includes states of the sensibility, so far as they are indispensable to knowledge. We cannot know an orange by the eye alone; to the understanding of it, taste is as necessary as sight. The mathematics of sound cannot give us an understanding of music; we need also a


musical ear. Logic alone cannot demonstrate the beauty of a sunset, or of a noble character; love for the beautiful and the right precedes knowledge of the beautiful and the right. Ullman draws attention to the derivation of sapientia, wisdom, from sapere, to taste. So we cannot know God by intellect alone; the heart must go with the intellect to make knowledge of divine things possible. “Human things,” said Pascal, “need only to be known, in order to be loved; but divine things must first be loved, in order to be known.” “This [religious] faith of the intellect,” said Kant, “is founded on the assumption of moral tempers.” If one were utterly indifferent to moral laws, the philosopher continues, even then religious truths “would be supported by strong arguments from analogy, but not by such as an obstinate, skeptical heart might overcome.”

Faith, then, is the highest knowledge, because it is the act of the integral soul, the insight, not of one eye alone, but of the two eyes of the mind, intellect and love to God.With one eye we can see an object as flat, but, if we wish to see around it and get the stereoptic effect, we must use both eyes. It is not the theologian, but the undevout astronomer, whose science is one-eyed and therefore incomplete. The errors of the rationalist are errors of defective vision. Intellect has been divorced from the heart, that is from a right disposition, right


affections, right purpose in life. Intellect says: “I cannot know God”: and intellect is right. What intellect says, the Scriptures also says: 1 Cor. 2: 14-- “the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him; and he cannot know them because they are spiritually judged”’ 1 : 21-- “in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom know not God.”

The Scripture on the other hand declares that “by faith we know” (Heb. 11: 3). By “heart” the Scripture means simply the governing disposition, or the sensibility + the will; and it intimates that the heart is an organ of knowledge: Ex. 35: 25-“the women that were wise hearted”; Ps. 34: 8-- “O taste and see that Jehovah is good” -- a right taste precedes correct sight: jer.24: 7 -- “I will give them a heart to know me”; Mat. 5: 8 -“Blessed are the pure in heart; for they shall see God”; Luke 24: 25 -- “slow of heart to believe”; John 7: 17 -- “If any man willeth to do his will, he shall know of the teaching, whether it is of God, or whether I speak from myself”; Eph. 1: 18 -- having the eyes of your heart enlightened, that ye may knoweth not God.”

“C. Faith, therefore, can furnish, and only faith can furnish, fit and sufficient material for a scientific theology. --As an operation of man’s higher rational nature, though distinct from


ocular vision or from reasoning, faith is not only a kind, but the highest kind, of knowing. It gives us understanding of realities which to the senses alone are inaccessible, namely, God’s existence, and some at least of the realities between God and his creation.

Phillipi, Glaubenslebre, 1: 50, follows Gerhard in making faith the joint act of intellect and will. Hopkins, Outline Study of Man, 77, 78, speaks not only of “the aesthetic reason” but of “the moral reason.” Murphy, Scientific Bases of Faith, 91, 109, 145, 191—“Faith is the certitude concerning matter in which verification is unattainable.” Emerson, Essays, 2: 96--”Belief consists in accepting the affirmations of the soul--unbelief in rejecting them.” Morell, Philos. of Religion, 38, 52, 53, quotes Coleridge: “Faith consists in the synthesis of the reasons and of the individual will . . . And by virtue of the former (that is, reason), faith must be a light, a form of knowing, a beholding of truth.”

Faith, then, is not to be pictured as a blind girl clinging to a cross -- faith is not blind--” Else the cross may just as well be a crucifix or an image of Gaudama.” “Blind unbelief,” not blind faith,” is sure to err. And scan his works in vain.” As in conscience we recognize an invisible authority, and know the


truth just in proportion to our willingness to “do the truth,” so in religion only holiness can understand holiness, and only love can understand love (cf. John 3: 21 -- “he that doeth the truth
cometh to the light.”.)

If a right state of heart be indispensable to faith and so to the knowledge of God, can there be any “theologia irregenitorum,” or theology of the unregenerate? Yes, we answer; just as the blind man can have a science of optics. The testimony of others gives it claims upon him; the dim light penetrating the obscuring membrane corroborates this testimony. The unregenerate man can know God as power and justice, and can fear him. But this is not a knowledge of God’s inmost character; it furnishes some material for a defective and ill-proportioned theology; but it does not furnish fit or sufficient material for a correct theology. As, in order to make his science of optics satisfactory and complete, the blind man must have the cataract removed from his eyes by some competent oculist, so, in order to any complete or satisfactory theology; the veil must be taken away from the heart by God himself (cf. 2 Cor. 3: 15,16 -- “a veil lieth upon their heart, but whosoever it *marg. ‘a man’+ shall turn to the Lord, the veil is taken away”).”
(Systematic Theology Pp. 3-5. Augustus Strong, D.D., LL D. President and Professor of Biblical Theology In The Rochester Theological Seminary. Judson Press, Valley Forge, PA. Thirty-First Printing. 1976. ISB No. 0-8170-0177-8.)


Efforts persist by Neo-gnostic, Liberal-socialist ‘Progressives,’ that is to say Socialists, Communists, or in the American body politic Democrats, to delete the word ‘Creator’ from the Constitution.



Liberal’s delusional denial of reality when it comes to the nature of Islam and their embracing of the delusion that any non-Muslim group can coexist with Islam is humorously—in so far as all humor is tragic—personified in the character of the infamous crack head, the late Rodney King, the poster child for Liberal-socialism who immortalized the Liberal-socialist’s rhetorical mantra embraced despite mountains of evidence demonstrating the insanity of the very idea, by his infamous words, “Can’t we all just get along?”



Political Correctness:
“Not to have a correct political point of view is like having no soul.”

Wow, really? No soul? Isn’t that a little extreme?


Yes, but then, those are the words of Mao Zedong, the Chinese communist leader with the extreme distinction of having caused more deaths than any person in human history— 50 to 70 million, more than Stalin and Hitler combined.

Mao was a rabid believer in “political correctness.” In fact, he wrote the book.

Mao’s 1967 book—officially titled “Mao Zedong on People’s War” (though better known as Mao’s “Little Red Book”)—became the ultimate authority for political correctness during the 1960’s. Carried around by millions of Chinese during the ‘Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution” of 1968, the small, red-plastic-bound book consisted of quotes from Mao’s various writings,….” (Whistleblower Magazine; Vol. 21, No. 5. May 2012.
‘Magic Words—The Left’s Secret Weapon for Transforming Traditional America.’ By David Kupelian. Pg. 16.)


Today, a major engine for the left’s insatiable quest for power goes under the strange name of “political correctness”—an insidious frontal attack on common sense and conscience through language manipulation.

Even the phrase “political correctness” sounds demented. Politics, like all areas of opinion and preference that emanate from our core worldview, is a matter of free choice and personal autonomy in America; nobody can tell you the “correct” opinions to have! And yet, that’s precisely what “political correctness” attempts to do.” (Whistleblower Magazine;
Vol. 21, No. 5. May 2012. ‘Magic Words—The Left’s Secret Weapon for Transforming Traditional America.’ By David Kupelian. Pg. 8.)


No Rules for Radicals:


Saul Alinsly was a “…Chicago Marxist and father of “community organizing” who had…” “…a profound effect on…” Mr. “…Obama. Indeed, while campaigning for the presidency, Obama said of his years steeped in Alinsky’s revolutionary “community organizing” methods: “It was that education that was seared into my brain. It was the best education I ever had, better than anything I got at Harvard Law School.”
(Whistleblower Magazine; Vol. 21, No. 5. May 2012. ‘The Wannabe Tyrant’s Secret’ By David Kupelian. Pg. 42.)

“The single most important operating principle behind Alinsky’s methods, the one that makes the rest of them work—namely, intimidation—is increasingly the modus operandi of today’s government.” (Whistleblower Magazine; Vol. 21, No. 5. May
2012. ‘The Wannabe Tyrant’s Secret’ By David Kupelian. Pg. 42.)

“…here’s Alinsky rule No. 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage.”


What’s the purpose behind making people “infuriated” so they’ll “react to your advantage”? According to Alinsky: “The enemy properly goaded and guided in his reaction will be your major strength.”

This statement—“his reaction will be your major strength”—capsulizes a major operating so easily take hold of a country, and why so many of us take legal and illegal drugs to feel better, and why government continues to grow out of control: When we’re intimidated and upset, when we emotionally overreact, we’re losing the battle.” Since we’re focused on how evil works, you’ll undoubtedly be interested in knowing to whom Alinsky dedicated “Rules for Radicals.” “Here’s

the guy…” Alinsky “…honors as “the first radical” on the dedication page of the first edition:
Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgement to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins—or which is which),


the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom—


.” (Whistleblower Magazine;

Vol. 21, No. 5. May 2012. ‘The Wannabe Tyrant’s Secret’ By David Kupelian. Pp. 42-43.)


“A great many of the world’s conflicting ideologies, philosophies and religions are rooted in rebellion against reality—against God and his laws. How do they manage that? By the use of clever language, concepts and supposition, all tangled together to impress others, make them doubt themselves and feel intimidated by the supposedly superior knowledge and understanding of the “authority.” Being in the grip of a deceitful ideology is to exist in an alternate reality— almost like an altered state of mind, such as drugs can induce.


Today’s most obvious and troubling case in point: Americans elevated to the presidency Barack Hussein Obama, a far-left radical who is manifestly hostile toward free-market capitalism and American exceptionalism—in fact, to just about everything American—but who campaigned using powerfully evocative words of national restoration and reconciliation. “Hope,” change,” “fairness,” “justice,” “reform,” and “transparency” would usher in a bright new era of “healing” and “unifying” America and the world through this charismatic young leader’s “post-racial,” “post-partisan” presidency.” What we got instead was a jarringly narcissistic, supremely demagogic and corrupt Chicago politician, lacking both in experience and wisdom, and displaying breathtaking contempt for America’s Constitution and its best-in-the-world system of government.” (Whistleblower Magazine; Vol. 21, No. 5. May 2012.
‘Magic Words—The Left’s Secret Weapon for Transforming Traditional America.’ By David Kupelian. Pg. 7.)

“…truth be told, the political and cultural left has hijacked virtually our entire language in the last couple of generations. It has redefined many key words, phrases and concepts. Indeed, changing not only the words we use, but the way we think, has been central to the transformation of America in our lifetime.


“…bad or ignoble qualities of human beings…” have become “…disguised and excused with euphamisms: “Illegal aliens” became “illegal immigrants,” and then “undocumented immigrants,” and presto-chango, something bad was magically transformed into something good. Homosexuals became “gay,” abortion advocates became “pro-choice” and atheists became “brights,” each euphemism converting a negative association into a positive one. Today, increasing numbers of people refer to pedophilia as “intergenerational sex” and child molesters as “minor-attracted persons” or MAPs. (In Islam, the popular euphemism for pedophilia is “child marriage,” just as adultery is called “temporary marriage.” Really.)

Of course, Islam has become a major beneficiary of political correctness, reminiscent of what George Orwell called


“Newspeak” in his novel “1984.” After 19 Muslim terrorists, acting in the name of Islam, murdered almost 3,000 Americans in a wanton act of war on Sept. 11, 2001, the government and media, to avoid offending Muslims, declared Islam to be a “religion of peace.” The Islamic jihad declared on America was mysteriously referred to by our leaders as a “war on terror” involving an unnamed enemy. But even that awkward, nearmeaningless expression was deemed to insensitive toward Islam, so under Obama the euphemizing turned surreal when “war on terror” morphed into “overseas contingency operations.” Likewise, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano came up with a friendly new phrase for massmurder terror attacks. Announcing that she was deliberately avoiding the term “terrorism” in speeches because “we want to move away from the politics of fear,” she adopted the term “man-caused disasters.”

So, employing the government’s official terminology: After experiencing “man-made disasters,” the U.S. has responded with “overseas contingency operations.”

Any Questions?” (Whistleblower Magazine; Vol. 21, No. 5. May
2012. ‘Magic Words—The Left’s Secret Weapon for Transforming Traditional America.’ By David Kupelian. Pg. 8.)



Don't Be Deceived By So-Called "Conservatives":
2008 presidential candidate Dr. Alan Keyes warns of the advance of Socialist ideology within both major American political parties when he writes, "...the term "conservative" becomes an inherently shifty concept. Its meaning entirely depends on the nature of present circumstances. At present America is in the grip of a pervasively socialist-minded elite faction. The Democrats represent its risk-taking, "Gordian knot" wing (socialism at one blow); the GOP's elitist leadership represents its more risk-averse "gradualist" wing (socialism one bite at a time.) But, on the whole, the infamous Newsweek magazine cover that announced "We are all socialists now" speaks for this elite faction. Emboldened by Obama's election, it openly declared what has, de facto, been true of America's political elite since Ronald Reagan left office.



After Obama's orchestrated "victory," one glimpsed the possibility that the elitist GOP leaders are also tempted openly to jettison the GOP's principled conservative facade. In 2009, Mitt Romney joined Jeb Bush and others "for the inaugural event of the National Council for a New America." As reported in the Washington Times, the air was filled with talk of the principles and core values of the GOP. But the newspaper's editors chose to headline what they portrayed as Jeb Bush's view that it was "Time to leave Reagan behind" (as Reagan said the Democratic Party did when it turned openly to socialism?); "to give up ... nostalgia for the heyday of the Reagan era and look forward, even if it means stealing the winning strategy deployed by Democrats in the 2008 election." Take note: The Obama faction's 2008 strategy was the typical left-wing socialist ploy (used, for instance in post-World War II Eastern European countries during the phase of free elections before the Soviet-backed Communists Party consolidated control) of campaigning on pliably empty slogans of change, progress and unity to avoid premature focus on their real goals, which they knew many voters would reject. Is it unreasonable to suppose that the GOP wing of the socialist-minded elite has been following Jeb Bush's advice? Instead of the cattle-prod slogan of change, they are employing the more powerful cattle prod of fear, anger and revulsion against Obama. They project an Obama "bogeyman" in order to pretend that the threat emanates mainly from his person, not the more pervasive elitist forces whose socialist predilections he merely represents. Why the pretense? Because Mitt Romney


also represents those socialist-minded elite forces. Until recently it was impossible to repress the facts showing that Romney's actions and record marked him as a key leader of the GOP wing of the socialist-minded elite. That was before attempts at GOP party-line repression (ironically also typical of Communist style party politics) emboldened its enforcers to start calling people "traitors" if they dared to discuss Romney's record." ('How
Socialist Will 'Conservative' Become?' By Dr. Alan Keyes. Aug. 16, 2012.

Dr. Alan Keyes brilliantly illuminates the very essence of the 'inforwar' taking place in America between the diametrically opposed philosophical/ideological worldviews vying for control of the 'land of the free' once ruled by a government 'of the People, by the People and for the People,' that is to say, the Secular-humanist, Liberal-socialist, ‘Progressive,’worldview traditionally embraced by the Democrat Party now embraced by a great many so-called ‘Conservatives’ within the Republican Party vs. the biblical worldview, when he writes: "The

rule of the Creator supersedes every such human claim. It allows each and every individual to claim the right to determine their own actions, so long as those actions conform to the disposition of right in the Creator’s endowment of their way of being (their nature)." ('Why Obama Didn't
Appreciate Chick-Fil-A' Aug. 29, 2012.


Recognition by America's leaders of the 'rule of the Creator,' the risen Lord Jesus of the Bible, the Christ, is an imperative if Americans would hope that God would bless America - as 'We the People' sometimes prayerfully sing—or at least we used to. If America's leaders do not recognize as Creator the Lord Jesus of the Bible, (not to be confused with the myriad other Jesus's within innumerable pseudo-Christian cults today), and as Source of the unalienable rights with which all men are endowed—a recognition so plainly seen by the Founding Fathers of this nation that they found it to be a self-evident truth—then it is only a natural political progression for those leaders to attribute those unalienable rights to another source, even 'another Jesus'; to identify those rights as originating somewhere other than from an immutable, eternal, omniscient, Holy God, loving Creator of all that is.


"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made. In Him was life, and the life was the light of men. And the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it." (John 1: 1-5. NKJV.) 'Big government' ‘Progressive,’ Liberal-socialists will quite naturally gravitate towards an ideology which determines those unalienable rights as originating from..., you guessed it,...the state. More insidious—in so far as it is less obvious—is the natural gravitation of the so-called 'Conservative,' so-called 'Christian,' Right who today all too often assume an accommodating, unbiblical ideological position which corresponds with attributing Mankind’s God-given unalienable rights to the Liberal's substitutionary source from whence all men's rights supposedly emanate. The phony Conservatives also embrace the Liberal's imaginatively manufactured delusion of an alternative from where the unalienable rights with which all men are endowed by their Creator may falsely be asserted to have originated. In doing so, so-called 'Conservatives' reduce the unalienable quality of the unalienable rights men have been endowed with by their Creator to a level of retractability. The state may giveth and the state may taketh away.


If the 'Creative Community' concept of the Liberal socalled theologians determines the rights that men are endowed with to be one thing at one moment in time but another at a later period in time in a morally relativistic manner that they assert their ‘Master Thinkers,’ their ‘Legislative Leaders,’ their ‘Supermen,’ their ‘Community Organizers’ have an enigmatic authority from on high—from the Zeitgeist or ‘spirit of the age—have the right to do, then no man is justified, according to the religion of Liberalism’s dogma, to question the moral parameters which Liberal ‘Legislative Leader’ ‘Community Organizer, 'Superman' leaders have at any given time and place—within any given Sitz im Lebin—determine to be acceptable. To question the moral dictate as to what is right and what is wrong, what is good and what is evil, by the self-professed enigmatically gifted with an higher insight than the rest of we mere mortals—a sociologically defined verstehen—would simply be intolerant! Does the immense hypocrisy and insanity of the proponents of Liberalism’s 'reasoning' yet stand out in the light for the reader to see? Liberalism is delusional. Amazingly, for lack of any sound argument to defend said alternate source to the Creator, the risen Lord Jesus Christ, the nominal Christian ‘Conservative’ Right still turns away from the Bible to the same illegitimately constructed concepts of the Liberal Left's perversions of Political Correctness, Tolerance,


Pluralism, Inclusiveness, Multi-Culturalism, Unity, Diversity, etc,...etc..., as the morally relative foundation upon which to attempt to justify their political decisions and laws and qualify, according to whatever contemporaneous position upon the continuum of morality they should at any given time be informed by the ‘Legislative Leaders’ who assert the right to dictate said position that the rest of ‘We the People’ must accept as truth, as morally good or evil, the extension of certain anything-but-unalienable rights unto ‘We the People’ as either acceptable, that is to say morally good, or unacceptable, that is to say morally evil. Instead of returning to the simplicity of the Gospel of the risen Lord Jesus Christ who came in the flesh and died upon a Cross for my sin and yours upon which this Christian nation, exceptional in all of human history, was founded and has been blessed by God, Republicans bow to the theology of the Humanist Liberal-socialist Left.


Resorting to the morally relative, currently popular Liberal versions of the concepts of Political Correctness, Tolerance, Pluralism, Inclusiveness, Diversity, Multi-Culturalism, Unity, etc..., upon which to base one's worldview laws establishes those principles, embraced as beliefs, upon shifting sands of moral relativism and too relegates the pronouncement of just what contemporaneously popular version of said Liberal concepts shall be acceptable at any given time in the future to whomsoever within the unnatural Liberal construct of a "Community" happens to be in leadership position—the 'Superman’ du jour, ‘Community Organizer’ of the year, or ‘Legislative Leader’ of the moment so to speak—to re-define as he or she sees fit to re-define said retractable and manipulable morally relative standards of good and evil, of right and wrong, according to the lusts of their hearts.


The Liberal's ‘Superman’ ‘Community Organizer,’ ‘Legislator Leader’ have a right at any given time and place within the "Progressive," ‘Liberal-socialist,’ Humanist plan for America, according to their delusional "logic," to exercise their authority to dictate precisely what is or is not Politically Correct; to be or not to be Tolerated; is or is not sufficiently Pluralistic; is or is not adequately Inclusive; is or is not acceptably Multi-Cultural; or is or is not appropriately Unified or Diverse. Nota bene the word "dictate" in the last sentence and its similarity to the word 'dictator!'


Like Satan deceptively suggested in the Garden of Eden, Liberal-socialist neo-gnosticism, or Humanism, or Liberalism, or Materialism, or Marxism, or Collectivism, or ‘Progressivism’ which all have their doctrines and tenets laid out in the highly subjective science of Sociology, worship their God—Mankind. Their God is Humanity, so, most appropriately, their religion is often identified as "Humanism," but they don't like to permit their terms and concepts to be nailed down; so like the undefinable shape of a moving piece of jello, they continually redefine, re-label, re-brand, their concepts and their religious belief system. Self-proclaimed ‘Master Thinkers’ among


adherents to the religion of Liberalism advance an agenda which, if they can get the rest of Humanity to believe it, eventually leads to their being put in positions of political authority from where they can “properly” direct, or ‘Organize,’ the ‘Community’ for, so they assert, they are the gnostically gifted with ‘great new insight,’ the verstehen, needed by the ‘Community’ to know what is right and what is wrong—what is good and what is evil—in order for the ‘Community’ to move “Forward”—to ‘Progress’—unto the next ‘Sitz im Leben’ in the never-ending “evolutionary” development of the ‘Community’ towards the ultimate glorification of Mankind…, (and all the Liberals said, ‘Amen!’)

The One and Only "Concept" within the belief system of a person with a Christian Worldview, that is to say within true biblical Christianity, is Jesus Christ, the eternal Creator, and He allowed Himself to be nailed down firmly, both physically on the Cross and metaphorically in his unambiguous teachings and professions of truth as to just precisely who He is.

Jesus explicitly conveyed the message as to who He is in Word and deed, (evidentiary miracles), that there be no morally relativistic re-defining, re-branding, or re-labeling of precisely who He is—He is Truth, absolute Truth—He came in the flesh,


was crucified for our sin, and on the third day was raised from the dead in fulfillment of Scriptural prophecy. Jesus is the Lord God, Creator of all that is. Hallelujah!

"Let Us Now Try Liberty
God has given to men all that is necessary for them to accomplish their destinies. He has provided a social form as well as a human form. And these social organs of persons are so constituted that they will develop themselves harmoniously in the clean air of liberty. Away, then with quacks and organizers! Away with their rings, chains, hooks, and pincers! Away with their artificial systems! Away with the whims of governmental administrators, their socialized projects, their centralization, their tariffs, their government schools, their state religions, their free credit, their bank monopolies, their regulations, their restrictions, their equalization by taxation, and their pious moralizations!


And now that the legislators and do-gooders have so futilely inflicted so many systems upon society, may they finally end where they should have begun: May they reject all

: for liberty is an acknowledgement of faith in God and His works."(The Law. Pg. 76.)
systems, and try liberty God warns us of the ‘empty deceit’ of the cult of Liberalism, Liberal-socialism, Humanism, ‘Progressivism,’


Secular-Humanism, Naturalism, Materialism, or whatever ‘Ism’ adherents of the self-idolizing demonic religious belief system wish to label their worldview/religion in His Word where It is written, “Beware

lest anyone cheat you through philosophy and empty deceit, according to the tradition of men, according to the basic principles of the world, and not according to Christ.”
(Colossians 2:8.)

“The Bible clearly teaches that the end times will be characterized by a strong spiritual delusion that blinds many from the true gospel and also leads those who have believed into apostasy.” (Another Jesus: The Ecumenical Christ and the New
Evangelization. By Roger Oakland with Jim Tetlow.Copyright 2004. Pg. 12.)

"We are living in days when Satan is pouring out his spirits as well as Jesus Christ the Holy Spirit. In the Revelation, the activities of evil spirits are foretold as part of the total conflict of the Church with the powers of darkness. In Chapter 9 there


is a terrifying vision of the shaft of the bottomless pit being opened to release "locusts" that swarm over the earth, deceiving and destroying. But most of the world does not repent, but continues to worship demons (verse 20). Later in the same book there is a vision of the dragon, the beast and the false prophet, and from each of their mouths there comes, "foul spirits like frogs, for they are demonic spirits, performing signs..." (16: 13). Yet again, we discover that the other powerful agency of evil in the Revelation, Babylon, is under the same influence. We are told that this symbol of affluence "has become a dwelling place for demons, a haunt of every foul spirit..." (18: 2).

As we draw nearer to Christ's return there is no indication of a lessening of this power. The idea that evil spirits only operate in "uncivilised" parts of the world is entirely illusory. It may be true that at some points in history the power of a Church which believed in both the existence of such evil powers and the authority it possessed in Christ's name to overcome them, had removed most of this power from its borders or driven it underground and so neutralised its effectiveness. But such a situation does not exist today, for the Church has largely abdicated its authority and blandly disbelieves in such things.


The enemy has come in like a flood, and few have resisted it. Merrill F. Unger has written: 5

Although demonic activity in human history has always been undeniably great since the sin of our first parents exposed mankind to its baneful attacks, yet the full realization and augmentation of its destructive power are reserved for the consummation of the age. Demonism bears a striking relation to the doctrine of the last thing; and all classes of mankind. Jew, Gentile and the Church of God (1 Cor. 10: 32) will be intimately and vitally affected by the last-day upsurge of evil supernaturalism." (Spiritual Warfare. By Micheal Harper. Copyright
1970. U.S.A. ISBA 0-912106-69-7. Pp. 40-41.)

“One of the most subtle roles of demons is the perverting of revealed truth. They never cease in their endeavor to turn men away from the gospel of Christ and to deny and distort the Word of God. Their activity started when Satan used a threefold strategy of opposition to God (Isaiah 14: 12-14), confirmed falsehood (Genesis 3:4), and slander of the divine goodness (Genesis 3:5; cf. John 8:44). Down through the centuries Satan and his host of demon helpers, who make his presence and power practically ubiquitous, have used the same strategy to tempt men.


When man succumbed to Satan’s blandishments, he lost his Edenic innocence and his fellowship with God (Genesis 3:8) and fell under the control of evil spiritual powers, who encourage fallen man to rebel against God’s Word and will. As God began to work in redemption (Genesis 3:9-15; 21; cf. John 5:17; 9:4; 17:4), Satan’s spiritual hosts waged a persistent and endless counter-campaign to keep man ignorant of divinely revealed truth and redemptive grace in Christ. Satanic strategy always aims to deceive men to the greatest degree possible.

If ‘the god of this world’ cannot totally blind the unbeliever’s mind and thus completely hide the gospel from him (2 Corinthians 4:4), he will seduce the believer to the best of his ability. To keep the believer from the simplicity and purity of the gospel and grace he will encourage all sorts of errors. This is Satan’s attempt to retain some degree of control over those who come to a saving knowledge of Christ. Doctrinal error obscures revelation and gives Satan and demonic forces a toehold. Evil powers can confuse man in his attempt to interpret truth, but they cannot penetrate the sure defense of God’s infallible Word. The Holy Bible, God’s revealed Word, points us to Christ’s victory over Satan at the cross. He alone can deliver us from evil and from the evil one.” (Demons in
the World Today. A Study of Occultism in the Light of God's Word. By: Merrill F. Unger. Th. D., Ph. D., copyright 1971. Ch. 8: pg.147-148.)




Tuesday, July 16, 2013

STARTLING BIBLE CODE! Satan Falls Like Lightning! (Obama's Name!)

Luke 10:17-19 17 The seventy-two returned with joy and said, "Lord, even


the demons submit to us in your name." 18 He replied, "I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven. 19 I have given you authority to trample on snakes and scorpions and to overcome all the power of the enemy; nothing will harm you. Disclaimer: This information is simply for your observation. PPSIMMONS make no claims to its application to scripture or prophecy. We do not claim that Obama is the antichrist (yet). We do not claim that the Bible Code phenomenon is a viable method in which to discern scripture messages. It simply is what it is ... see with your own eyes. The following codes were found with the CODE FINDER Bible Code Program using the KJV code text. In the center of this Biblical text found in the equa-distance letter spacing sequencing of the Bible Codes phenomena are found the following words: Obama Fall Like Lightning Satan Note: the name OBAMA is found in the center of the code chart. Click the picture to enlarge


PPSIMMONS Viral video - Did Jesus Give Us The Name Of The Antichrist? Watch the video on YouTube: GO HERE TO SEE 6 MORE STARTLING BIBLE CODES!



183 -tantaros-interviews-walid-shoebat/


Within the context of the war in which Western Judeo-Christian culture including the United States as well as the entire non-Muslim world is engaged against the world domination agenda of the barbaric totalitarian and supremacist cult of Islam, the criminal usurpation by fraud of the presidency of the United States by a demonstratively committed Muslim establishes said enemy agent of


Islam practicing taqiyya as a real and present threat to the national security of the United States and indeed to the entire non-Muslim world.

The 'Manchurian' Muslim from Mombasa, Mr. Barack 'King Hussein' Obama, Jr., a.k.a. Soebarkah (as his name is listed in one of his late mother’s U.S. Passports,) a.k.a. 'Bath House Barry' Soetoro, along with all others complicit in the criminal usurpation of the presidency and/or ongoing cover-up of said most sinister crime perpetrated against the American experiment in government of the people in America’s history—what amounts to nothing less than an ongoing conspiracy to contravene the Constitution—have defined themselves as legitimate targets of opportunity for journalistic and political attack until such time as they are brought to justice by a court of law.

The honor of the office of the presidency will be defended by American patriots to the death against those who would attempt to perpetuate the ongoing conspiracy to contravene the Constitution that is Mr. Barack Obama’s, or whatever his legal name should one day be proven to be, criminal usurpation of the office of the president of the United States of America.


Any who impede prosecution of all those complicit in the criminal usurpation of the presidency do by their complicity define themselves as enemies of the American people and America’s


Constitution, and as such legitimate

targets of opportunity by all those
sworn to defend the Constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic.



All those complicit in Obama’s criminal usurpation of the presidency have and do define themselves as enemies of the government of the United States, or ‘We the People’; one and the same that is to say, and as such legitimate targets of opportunity for the American government—that government of, by, and for the people, to address appropriately.


From TomO’, March 2, 2013:

“Wow…read this one! Then check out the suggested
web sites!!! Many of the emails that I have sent or forwarded that had any anti-Obama information in it were negated by Snopes. I thought that was odd. Check this out. For some time we’ve seen reports that Elaina Kagan was Obama’s attorney fighting those pesky “he isn’t a citizen” law suits. Lawsuits that Snopes says don’t exist or at least that Kagan didn’t represent Mr. Obama in those suits. Guess what … they lied! She did represent Obama. Snopes, Soros and the Supreme Court’s Kagan. Well now I guess the time has come to check out Snopes! Ya’ll don’t suppose it might not be a good time to take a second look at some of the stuff that got kicked in the ditch by Snopes, do ya?


We’ve known that it was owned by a lefty couple but hadn’t known it to be financed by Soros! Snopes is heavily financed by George Soros, a big time supporter of Obama! In our search for the truth department, we find what I have suspected on many occasions.

I went to Snopes to check something about the dockets of the new Supreme Court Justice. Elena Kagan, who Obama appointed, and Snopes said the email was false and there were no such dockets. So I Googled the Supreme Court, typed in Obama-Kagan, and guess what? Yep, you got it; Snopes

lied! Every one of those dockets are there.
So, here is what I wrote to Snopes: Referencing the article about Elana Kagan and Barak Obama dockets: The information you have posted stating that there were no such cases as claimed and the examples you gave are blatantly false. I went directly to the Supreme Courts website, typed in Obama Kagan and immediately came up with all of the dockets that the article made reference to. I have long suspected that you really slant things but this was really shocking. Thank


You. I hope you will be much more truthful in the future, but I doubt it.

That being said, I’ll bet you didn’t know this: Kagan was representing Obama in ALL the petitions to prove his citizenship. Now she may help rule on them. Folks, this is really ugly. Chicago Politics and the beat goes on and on and on. Once again the US Senate sold us out!

Now we know why Obama nominated Elana Kagan for the Supreme Court. Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama. She was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship. He owed her big time. All of the requests were denied of course. They were never heard. It just keeps getting deeper and deeper, doesn’t it? The American people mean nothing any longer.

It’s all about payback time for those who compromised themselves to elect someone who really has no true right to even be there.


Here are some websites of the Supreme Court Docket: You can look up some of these hearings and guess what?

Elana Kagan is the attorney representing Obama!
Check out these examples: etfiles/09-88…


There truly is tyranny afoot. Source: bject-snopes-no-more-the-self-proclaimed-debunker-ofurban-lege?xg_source=shorten_twitter.


The metaphorical Fifth Column of defense for the American experiment in government of the people has always been those who work reporting the news, but the deep saturation of facilitating Liberal-socialists within the mass communication industry has effectively provided insulation for Mr. Obama/Soetoro/Soebarkah during the commission of his ongoing usurpation of the presidency.





Obama’s deep connection with Islam must not be ignored. The ‘Manchurian’ Muslim from Mombasa, Barack Obama, fits the profile of an enemy agent of Islam practicing taqiyya. In the interest of national security the issue of Obama’s allegiance to Islam must be considered when considering his criminal usurpation of the presidency by fraud as well as the extensive cover-up that involves forged documents and manufactured electronic files that is nothing less than an ongoing

conspiracy to contravene the Constitution.




Mr. Obama’s higher education was partially financed by Islamist elements in Saudi Arabia:

The Owners of Fox….the same Saudi Prince who paid for 0bamas' tuition to Harvard….(He owns a percentage of FOX.)

Prince Alwaleed bin Talal of Saudi Arabia. The Prince is a private entrepreneur and an international investor. The Prince was born to Prince Talal, son of the founding King of Saudi


Arabia, Abdul Aziz Al Saud, and Princess Mona Al-Solh, Daughter of Lebanon's first Prime Minister. The Prince is the nephew of the Saudi Arabian King Abdullah.

The Carlyle Group counts Prince Alwaleed bin Talal bin Abdul Aziz Alsaud of Saudi Arabia, and Osama bin Laden's estranged family among its high-profile clientele.

Many of Obama’s actions undertaken in the commission of his criminal usurpation of the presidency have been congruent with that which one might expect of an enemy agent of Islam dedicated to advancing the world domination agenda of those who embrace an Islamo-fascist worldview.


As with experiments in varying degrees of Socialism which all fall under the Collectivist banner, Islamic tyranny under Sharia also leads to enslavement under an elite few, selfidolizing, elitists who fashion themselves Humanity’s 'Master Thinkers' as Sociologists like to describe the supremacist mindset embraced by Bastiat's Liberal-socialist 'Supermen' or self-professed ‘Legislative Leaders’; those endowed with that re-emergence of the Gnostic concept that the Sociologists define as verstehen, who claim themselves superior to the rest


of we mere mortals and assume the authority that they have a right to organize society’s “Community”—to tell everyone else what is good and what is evil, what is morally right or wrong— hence the currently popular “Progressive” description of ‘Community Organizers.’


Malignant Narcissism—the classic trait of the Collectivists
who embraces an Humanistic/ “Naturalistic,” Materialistic, Liberalsocialist, “Progressive” oft-times professedly Atheistic though in truth self-worshipping worldview which elevates Man as supreme, as the ‘measure of all things,’ hence the totalitarian/supremacist/elitist personality disorder stereo-typical of the Collectivist’s self-proclaimed


‘Community Organizers’ or as Frederic Bastiat identified them ‘Legislative Leaders’ or ‘Supermen’ of malignant narcissism.


"The Superman Idea
The claims of these organizers of humanity raise another question which I have often asked them and which, so far as I know, they have never answered: If the natural tendencies of mankind are so bad that it is not safe to permit people to be free, how is it that the tendencies of these organizers are always good? Do not legislators and their appointed agents also belong to the human race? Or do they believe that they themselves are made of a finer clay than the rest of mankind?


The organizers maintain that society, when left undirected, rushes headlong to its inevitable destruction because the instincts of the people are so perverse. The legislators claim to stop this suicidal course and to give it a saner direction. Apparently, then, the legislators and the organizers have received from Heaven an intelligence and virtue that place them beyond and above mankind; if so, let them show titles to this superiority." They would be shepherds over us, their sheep. Certainly such an arrangement presupposes that they are naturally superior to the rest of us. And certainly we are fully justified in demanding from the legislators and organizers proof of this natural superiority." (‘The Law. The Classic Blueprint for a Just
Society.’ By Frederic Bastiat. Pp. 63-64.)



Underlying the indefensible apologetic arguments for Collectivist political/philosophical ideology as well as the untenable arguments posited in the teachings of Islam which regularly motivate Muslims to commit horrendous jihadist military attacks as well as to participate in the endless dimensions of Civilization, or Cultural Jihad in order to subjugate non-Muslims to dhimmitude and establish Islamist tyranny over the entire world, is the spiritual dimension of the issue.




The enemy behind the enemy non-Muslims face is spiritual in nature. Always behind the idol is/are the demonic spirit(s).




Liberal-socialists are facilitating the advance of Islam around the world. The same spirit motivates them both: The spirit of the antichrist that is in the world today.


Self-designated "elite," enigmatically gifted from on High with great new insight, (i.e. Neo-gnostic concept of verstehen), ‘Legislator Leader’ ‘Superman’ ‘Community Organizers,’ socalled by some sociologists ‘Master Thinkers’ of the so-called "Progressive” (in reality most regressive), Liberal-socialist, Democrat construct of a purportedly unified ‘Community’—a counterfeit for true Christian unity within ‘One Nation Under God,’ take it upon themselves to determine just what moral principles the rest of society is to embrace as politically and socially correct—as good or as evil.


“Ideologies aren’t all that important. What’s important is psychology.

The Democratic constituency is just like a herd of cows. All you have to do is lay out enough silage and they come running. That’s why I became an operative working with Democrats. With Democrats all you have to do is make a lot of noise, lay out the hay, and be ready to use the ole cattle prod in case a few want to bolt the herd.

Eighty percent of the people who call themselves Democrats don’t have a clue as to political reality.

What amazes me is that you could take a group of people who are hard workers and convince them that they should support social programs that were the exact opposite of their own personal convictions. Put a little fear here and there and you can get people to vote any way you want.

The voter is basically dumb and lazy. The reason I became a Democratic operative instead of a Republican was because


there were more Democrats that didn’t have a clue than there were Republicans.

Truth is relative. Truth is what you can make the voter believe is the truth. If you’re smart enough, truth is what you make the voter think it is. That’s why I’m a Democrat. I can make the Democratic voters think whatever I want them to.”~ James

Carville, Lead Democratic Strategist for Bill Clinton
Presidential Campaign, "Prominent" Democratic Political Consultant, Attorney.

‘We the People' within American society MUST respond emphatically with the wisdom conveyed in the writings of Frederic Bastiat with words encapsulating his argument to convey the following sentiments to those who would assume the authority to dictate to the rest of us what is morally right and what is morally wrong—what is socially acceptable, that is to say politically correct to define as “good,” and what is not to be ‘Tolerated’ as


“evil” and say to them, “Show us your titles to this superiority you assert you possess and by what right you presume to lead the rest of Humanity, society, or what you describe as the ‘Community’ “FORWARD” within the godless framework of your delusional worldview."




The idolatrous agenda of those ‘Progressive’ Liberalsocialist Democrat advocates who attempt to influence every aspect of society is the agenda of Socialism.

Quite naturally they need to do away with the American reverential acknowledgement of the Creator from whom all men are endowed with certain unalienable rights. The criminal usurper of the office of the president, Mr. Barack Hussein Obama, Jr., has repeatedly misquoted the Constitution and deleted the word “Creator” in his erroneous references from that document.


2012 Democrat National Convention in Tampa, Florida.

It is the contention of the Liberal-socialists, consistent with a Liberal-socialist worldview, that Mankind’s rights originate from the state and more specifically the enigmatically gifted ‘Legislative Leader’ ‘community organizers,’ or as some sociologists define them ‘Master Thinkers’ of the ‘Progressive,’ Collectivist, Liberal-socialist, Inclusive, Politically Correct, Pluralistic, Morally Relevant, and of course ‘Tolerant’ ‘Community.’


Quite naturally, born again believers in the risen Lord Jesus Christ of the Bible, the Creator from whom all men are endowed with certain unalienable Rights who came in the flesh to save men from their sin, are excluded from the Liberal’s collectivist construct of a so-called “Community”—a counterfeit replacement for the traditional American concept of ‘One Nation Under God,’ as ‘non-bright’ instigators of social unrest and politically incorrect ideology.

The pluralistic , supposedly “inclusive,” so-called “unity” proposed by Liberal-socialists is as well a demonic counterfeit for true Christian unity in Christ Jesus that has traditionally been the philosophical and politically ideological underpinnings of the American experiment in government of the people— traditionally ‘One Nation Under God.’

"Socialists look upon people as raw material to be formed into social combinations. To them—the elite—the relation between persons and the legislator appears to be the same as the relationship between the clay and the potter." (‘The Law. The Classic Blueprint for a Just Society.’ By
Frederic Bastiat. Pp. v.-vi.)


Of the utmost importance to America’s future—and indeed the future of the world—is that the American people— ‘We the People’—address Obama’s offense to the office of the president of the United States of America and the insult to America’s Constitution that Obama’s ongoing criminal usurpation of the presidency and conspiracy to contravene the Constitution represents.

Americans must address the criminal himself, Mr. Obama/Soetoro/Soebarkah, and all those complicit in the fraud’s conspiracy to contravene the Constitution, be they foreign or domestic enemies.

‘We the People’ must address the dangerous ideologies behind Obama’s inglorious achievement for the advance of Islam that have facilitated Obama’s inflicting upon the American experiment the harm that his criminal usurpation of the presidency and everything that he and his illegitimate administrations have accomplished while complicit in the criminal usurpation of the presidency and broader conspiracy to contravene the Constitution have achieved.


Collectivism—that is to say the religion of Socialism, Liberal-socialism, Communism, Atheism, ‘Progressivism,’ Marxism, Humanism or Secular-Humanism, Materialism, Naturalism, etc…, all birds of a feather, as well as the murderous totalitarian, supremacist worldview and religious cult of Islam must all be thoroughly refuted and all their attempts at infiltration into Western Judeo-Christian culture stopped in their tracks.

All Socialism is National Socialism.


Americans must address not only Mr. Barack Hussein Obama, or whatever his actual legal name may be, but the enemies responsible for visiting upon our nation such a curse as the criminal usurpation of the presidency by the Manchurian’ Muslim from Mombasa.

‘We the People’ must appropriately address even our

enemies in Congress who have refused to honor
their oath of office to defend the Constitution and have utterly failed to protect the office of the president of the United States from great malice inflicted upon by our enemy Islam in all its Civilization Jihad waging dimensions.




Obama is but a symptom of the diseases upon Mankind of Islam and of Islam’s facilitating dupe: The Collectivist, Liberalsocialist, Marxist, Atheist, Humanist or SecularHumanist, ‘Progressive,’ ‘Modern’ religious, political, and philosophical worldview, which is in reality nothing new, but simply the age old lie of the devil repackaged for a different time and place.

Here you go Barry; read this!

Mr. Obama is an open sore in America’s history as long as his illegitimate administration continues in its flagrant mockery of the Constitution; he is an ongoing successful enemy jihadist infiltration of the highest office in America by means of practicing taqiyya.


Please read ‘Never Vetted--The Unlawful President, the National Security Loopholes That Endanger America’ by Capt. (Ret.) Pamela Barnett—available on



Our nation’s Founders drew a line in the sand that—if recognized and applied to the present situation wherein America is being systematically infiltrated by agents of Islam intent on advancing their agenda within the fabric of American society in an effort to achieve their ultimate objective: The ‘Islamization’ of the world—could and should function as an instrument with which America could use in order to adopt the most advantageous posture from which to successfully defend herself against the cancerous spread of the murderous cult of Islam within her borders.

America’s Founders gave to future generations of Americans the tools with which to defeat Islam: The words within the Declaration of Independence.

The Declaration of Independence begins with a preamble under the heading ‘The Unanamous Declaration of the Thirteen States of America,’ and continues, “When in the Course of human events, It becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them

with another, and to assume among the powers of the
earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of Nature and of Nature’s God…”, the Lord Jesus Christ, “…entitle


them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.” By the author of this treatment Chris Farrell. Attached video by Pastor Phil Johnson.

Said preamble needs now, in the current generation’s shift at the helm of the American ship of state—a ship of state


exemplified by the USS Constitution, (let not the irony of her name go unnoticed!), to be amended by the following sentiments inserted after the words ‘which have connected them with another’ by expanding the wording to address the enemy America faces today, the murderous, supremacist and totalitarian cult of Islam and its world domination agenda, to read as follows: ‘…which have connected them with another even to the degree of tolerating intolerable ideological or religious belief systems or worldviews which have and do define themselves through the actions of their adherents as the enemy of the liberty which with all men are endowed by their Creator, the Lord Jesus Christ,

and to assume….”


The U.S.S. Constitution. ‘Old Ironsides.’
(Image used with permission from Commander Kerchner.

The criminal usurpation of the presidency by an enemy agent of Islam practicing taqiyya demands a response from the American people of a most explicit nature proportional to the magnitude of the offense committed against the office of the president of the United States of America and against the


United States Constitution—a response that the pan-Islamic world will hear loud and clear.

Since the murderous cult of Islam has throughout its history and does today explicitly hold to codified doctrines of world domination and the ‘dhimmitudinization’ of non-Muslims unto the de facto slave status under Sharia law of being what Muslims refer to as a dhimmi, ‘We the People’ must acknowledge that those values espoused by the teachings of Islam are incompatible with a free society—with God-given liberty—and that the murderous cult of Islam cannot—must not—be tolerated in the United States of America or any of her territories.

‘The Muslim Brotherhood in America.’ A free
Course in 10 Parts. Presented by Frank Gaffney.

Islam is, strictly speaking, not a religion alone. It is a totalitarian and supremacist political/philosophical ideology, a legal system, and a more than metaphorical military instruction


manual which mandates and sanctions murder, and Islam is more.


Islam is a totalitarian system of tyrannical governance which represents the antithesis of the liberty that Americans— those who hold certain truths as self-evident and may therefore consider themselves rightly to be among 'We the People'— recognize as a self-evident, God-given right.

Islam is an evil religious cult, yes, but much more than just that. America’s collective failure to recognize her enemy Islam for what it is in its totality is the single greatest advantage that America's enemy Islam has facilitating its efforts at infiltrating the United States and dominating and subjugating JudeoChristian culture along with the rest of the non-Muslim world.


The usurpation of the office of the president by an enemy agent of Islam practicing taqiyya should be a wakeup call to all Americans ringing ever so loudly not unlike an alarm bell—a Liberty Bell if you please—ringing the truth about the diabolical nature of the enemy of all the non-Muslim world; an alarm bell resounding in the woken conscience of the American people— ‘We the People’—with notes exclaiming the reality of the insidiously devious characteristics of the cancerously spreading metaphorical disease upon Mankind that is the evil totalitarian and supremacist philosophical ideology and tyrannical political system called Islam—deviousness personified in the fraud


perpetrated by the ‘Manchurian’ Muslim from Mombasa, Mr. Barack, or Barry, Hussein Soetoro/Obama/Soebarkah.

There’s no such thing as “radical Islam”:

To suggest that there is such a thing as "radical Islam” one would have to present some denomination, division, group, or sect of Islam that they could honestly define as moderate or not radical in its teachings.

Every facet of Islam, Shiite or Sunni or whatever other you care to bring into the discussion, advances the world domination agenda of Islam—the subjugation of all nonMuslims to the de facto slave status of dhimmi under Sharia.

Don't let anyone try and water down Islam by attempting to assert that there is some big, bad "radical" group within Islam.

Call a spade a spade so we can start crushing the Muslims under the tracks of our tanks.


It was the contention of the signers of The Declaration of Independence in recognizing the entitlement of separate and equal station availed by the laws of Nature and Nature’s God, the Lord Jesus Christ, unto a free nation that any such nation’s citizens should rightly exercise the action of decently respecting the opinions of mankind in the Course of human events by declaring the causes which impelled them towards separation from—in the trial of their time—Great Britain.

Americans today should as well decently respect the opinions of mankind in the Course of human events and declare, as we face the trial of our time—the world-wide expansion of the murderous cult of Islam, an enemy as insurmountable in its dimensions as Great Britain seemed unto our nation’s Founders, the causes which impel us now unto the separation from and the rejection and exclusion of proponents of the insidious Islamic worldview—the Muslims—from participation


within the American experiment in government of, by, and for the people.
No free people can co-exist peacefully with advancing Islam in their midst.


America must determine to defeat Islam. Americans must determine to prosecute Barack, or Barry Hussein Obama, or whatever his legal name may truly be, to the fullest extent of the law for having committed the most sinister crime against the American experiment in government of, by, and for the people in their country’s history.


Nothing short of unconditional surrender by our enemy Islam will suffice—such is the nature of the victory that the non-Islamic world must subject the barbaric sects of Islam to for to permit Islam participation within any society Carte Blanche—with no restrictions—is an invitation for the viral spread of the murderous cult within all aspects of American society. Muslims hold to aspirations of world domination under a one-world Islamic Caliphate.

Islam is not here in America to participate or “coexist”, it is here to dominate. Obama’s criminal usurpation of the presidency of the most powerful nation in human history represents the single greatest achievement by any Muslim leader—religious, military, or other—in Islam’s history. In many Muslim’s eyes Obama is revered in an almost prophet-like fashion of idolization as an heroic figure within what they perceive as a glorious expansion of Islam’s tyrannical domination over other groups of people.





Proponents of Islam will argue that there exist "moderate" Muslims yet no division, sect, denomination, or branch of Islam exists which may be described as "moderate" when subjected to even superficial analysis.


Holding truths which are self-evident as did our nation’s Founders denies the toleration of any encroachment upon such truths by erroneous, unbiblical philosophical/political ideologies which deny the Creator, the Lord Jesus Christ, from whom all men are endowed with certain unalienable rights.

The truths that ‘…all men are Created equal, that

they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life,


Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness’ rings exceedingly
familiar in the hearts of all those who would call themselves Americans. ‘We the People’ hold such truth as self-evident.

Such is a minimum requirement for any person to consider himself or to be considered by others to be among the 'We the People' within the borders of the United States of America who may rightly be called American.



Those words are the very tintinnabulation resounding for generations within the hearts of ‘We the People’ of the United States of America—the Spirit of ’76′, the American Spirit of Liberty—revered and saluted symbolically in America’s Liberty Bell which, though cracked and silent, still resonates strongly within the breast of all those who assent to the truth that all men are, in fact, endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights.



"The preservation of the sacred fire of liberty, and the destiny of the republican model of government, are...staked on the experiment entrusted to the hands of the American people."—George Washington, First
Inaugural Address, 1789.

The Declaration of Independence continues, “That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED,— that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light or transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. BUT WHEN A LONG TRAIN OF ABUSES AND USURPATIONS, PURSUING INVARIABLY THE SAME OBJECT EVINCES A DESIGN TO REDUCE THEM UNDER ABSOLUTE DESPOTISM, IT IS THEIR RIGHT, IT IS THEIR DUTY, TO THROW



The freedom of religion determined by and for ‘We the People’ in the First Amendment to the Constitution needs not be extended—should not be extended—unto adherents to the murderous cult of Islam for the words ‘When a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object…’ are a working definition of Islam’s doctrinally professed strategy, that is to say, ‘design,’ of establishing the DHIMMITUDINIZATION of all non-Muslims worldwide under SHARIA.



Islam advances an invariable pursuit of an object: The object being a one-world Islamic Caliphate; and Islam evinces a design embodied in strategic doctrines that are literally directions for dominating non-Islamic societies codified within the books that Muslims hold as holy. Islam aims to


dominate America under the absolute despotism of Sharia and reduce all non-Muslims to the de facto slave status of being what Muslims identify as dhimmis.

It is every American's right and duty to throw off and to throw out such a murderous cult as Islam as sure as it would be to throw off any government that might arise which so clearly and precisely met the description of any such a government which America’s Founding Fathers realized might one day arise on history’s stage and about which they chose to give us warning and advice as how appropriately to address any such government say for example like that of Mr. Barack, or Barry, Hussein Soetoro, or Obama—or even Soebarkah—as his mother listed his name in one of her US Passports.

It is as well every American's duty who would defend the Constitution to provide ‘New Guards’ for our future security and a new, legal, legitimate president who will lead us in the war in which we are engaged in against the murderous cult of Islam. Mr. Barack Hussein Obama, Jr., or Barry Soetoro, or Soebarkah, is an enemy agent of Islam practicing taqiyya who has achieved the inconceivable: The criminal usurpation of the presidency of the United States by fraud.


Our enemy, Islam, reduces all non-Muslims unto the de facto slave status of dhimmi, a status with no rights under the absolute despotism of Sharia law.

The words written to protect America from abuses and usurpations by a future hypothetical derelict American government apply equally, indeed more so, as instruction as how to proceed against any foreign enemy which meets the description in the warning from our Founding Fathers so precisely as does the murderous cult of Islam.

“The greatest danger to American Freedom is a government that ignores the Constitution.”—Thomas Jefferson.


Islam is not just a religious cult. It is a cultural mandate unto every dimension of a society to advance a totalitarian/supremacist political worldview antithetical to the foundational principles of the American experiment in ‘government of the People, by the People and for the People.’

It is the right and the duty of those who would defend the Constitution and the God-endowed unalienable right to liberty that the Constitution recognizes to exclude the murderous cult of Islam from the religious freedoms bought with the blood, toil and treasure of generations of Americans and throw out of our country adherents to such a murderous cult and totalitarian political ideology as Islam which espouses an agenda of world domination through terror and enslavement of non-Muslims in dhimmitude.


It is the right and duty of every American who would defend the Constitution to demand a congressional investigation into the blatantly forged documents that the 'Manchurian' Muslim from Mombasa, Mr. Barack Hussein Obama, or Barry Soetoro, or Seobarkah, has proffered as purported evidence of his constitutional eligibility to be president and to demand that action be undertaken in the light of the findings of such an investigation to retroactively abrogate both of his illegal elections to the office of president.


None other than the highly esteemed Professor Emeritus Dr. Charles E. Rice of the Notre Dame School of Law maintained in 2011 that “This

is potentially serious business. If it turns out that Obama knew he was ineligible when he campaigned and when he took the oath as president, it could be the biggest political fraud in the history of the world,”


“While courts should have an interest, he said, a House committee investigation could “ascertain the facts, compelling by subpoena the production of all the available records relevant to Obama’s eligibility, including the complete Hawaiian records of his birth, his passport records to ascertain whether he traveled to Pakistan in 1981 on an American or other passport; the records from Occidental College, Columbia University and Harvard Law School to determine whether Obama described himself as a foreign student; and such other records as may be relevant.” “He said Congress also could consider requiring candidates for a federal elective office to produce evidence of their eligibility, and the define the term “natural born Citizen.” He said it would be a “public service” for the House to “determine those facts and to recommend any indicated changes in the law or the Constitution.” (LAW PROF CALLS
ON HOUSE TO INVESTIGATE ELIGIBILITY 'Citizens whom the media and pundits dismiss as 'birthers' have raised legitimate questions.' 3/01/2011. By Bob Unruh.)


Americans must expel all Muslims who advance any dimension of civilization or cultural jihad within the United States in order to guard her future security, and she needs now to terminate any further immigration of adherents to Islam onto US soil.



Watch this video on the subject of natural born citizenship by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus: m/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8


If Americans do not take drastic steps against Islamic infiltration now then future generations of Americans shall suffer the same fate as citizens of non-Muslim societies into which Islam has infiltrated like a cancerous disease and conquered through stages have suffered for centuries.


If 'We the People' fail to take action as 'New Guards' of American’s God-given liberty then future generations of Americans shall have to take up the fight under far worse conditions wherein the murderous cult of Islam shall have entrenched itself more deeply within America’s borders by means of the infiltration of all areas of American society wherein Islamic agents practicing taqiyya, like Mr. Obama, advance policies that facilitate Muslim’s achieving their ultimate goal: The domination of Islam over every facet of American society and the rest of the world.


We Are Afraid, A 1400 Year

Secret,' by Dr Bill Warner.

No society that values liberty should tolerate Islam.



America must determine to defeat her enemy and demand nothing less than unconditional surrender from our pan-Islamic enemy.

History has clearly demonstrated that compromise with the murderous cult of Islam inevitably leads to subjugation under the totalitarian political ideology/financial system/military doctrine/ etc…, notably including most influential spheres of society such as academia, the mass media, political organizations, and within all areas of finance, of the murderous tyranny of Islam.


As an American fighting man, I have no choice but to fight against the advancement of any aspect of the cancerous Islamic disease upon Mankind even at risk of my own life, liberty, or treasure.


Andrew Breitbart and Loretta Fuddy may most probably be added to this list.

A prediction: As the reality that Americans will have justice for Obama’s mockery of the Constitution and attack upon the God-given Liberty appreciated within that document and the wheels of justice roll ever closer to rolling over the ‘Manchurian’ Muslim from Mombasa and bringing him and his conspiracy to contravene the Constitution to justice, the


American people can expect elaborate diversions to be staged in an attempt to minimize coverage of the issue by the press— to create a distraction so as to diffuse the intensity of the opposition to Obama proceeding further in the commission of his criminal usurpation of the presidency.


American’s constitutionally guaranteed God-given rights may have to be suspended by the state during what I believe will be Obama’s camp’s orchestrated “crisis” to save ‘We the People’ from ourselves.

“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.” ~ William Pitt,
the Younger.



Pray that God Bless America in Jesus’ name and GET UP OFF $OME OF YOUR TREA$URE for this fight!




USCode, if followed will end all of the mosques in USA and remove citizenship to all Muslims in USA. Section 313 in Chapter 2 of the Immigration and Naturalization Act expressly forbids citizenship for anyone espousing any totalitarian ideology, which Islam does. No Muslim immigration! USCode 18 sec2381"Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid &comfort within the US or elsewhere, is guilty of treason.



Fellow Patriots, This fight needs financing!
Please donate to the Cold Case Posse at so that the investigation may proceed against the criminal usurpation of the presidency. Please donate to Atty. Larry Klayman at Please donate to Capt. (Ret.) Pamela Barnett at Please donate to Dr. Terry Lee Lakin at the



By Christopher T. Farrell NOLA, USA. ANNO DOMINI MMXIV

Send Petition to:

I, the undersigned American citizen, demand the unconstitutional elections of an ineligible candidate, Mr. Barack Hussein Obama Jr., also known as Barry Soetoro, and Soebarkah, who knowingly and fraudulently represented himself as eligible to campaign for the office of the President of the United States of America in two presidential elections, and has presented ‘We the People’ with forged documents and/or fraudulently manufactured electronic files including multiple birth certificates and a Selective Service Registration Card in a conspiratorial effort to cover-up his sinister conspiracy to contravene the Constitution, and has used multiple fraudulent Social Security numbers, be retroactively abrogated forthwith along with all that his illegitimate administrations have illegally affected while complicit in the crime of the unconstitutional usurpation of the presidency including the illegal appointments of two individuals to the Supreme Court.

Printed Name: _____________________________ Signature: _________________________________ Date: ______ /___________ / 2014

Mailing Address: __________________________________________ __________________________________________ __________________________________________ ______
E-Mail: ______________________________________ Telephone: (_____) _______-____________


Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful