Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SOLUTION Steeley Associates Versus Concord Falls
SOLUTION Steeley Associates Versus Concord Falls
e; $900,000
e; $1,200,000
2
1,767,000
4
1,630,000
1
1,767,000
3
970,000
solutions to EV(noDES):
#9
650,000 = (1,200,000*.50) + (100,000*.50)
#8
700,000 = (900,000*.50) + (500,000*.50)
#7
700,000 maximum between #8 & #9
#6
1,930,000 = (4,000,000 * .4) + ([-200,000] * .1) + (700,000 * .5)
#5
970,000 = (1,300,000*.7) + (200,000 *.3)
#4
1,630,000 maximum of #5, #6 & #7
note: #6 = 1,930,000 - 300,000 (for the legal cost)
#3
#2
#1
Decision:
Based on the decision tree analysis above, the best alternative will have a payoff of $1,767,000.
Given this scenario, the team suggests that Steeley requests for a permit. If the permit is granted, Steel
In case the request for permit is reject, Steeley is advised to sue the town.
If they win the case, Steeley should proceed in contructing the high-density apartment but if they lose th
$3,000,000
sell property
$700,000
###
5
$200,000
,630,000
###
$200,000
1,930,000
700,000
7
700,000 construct low-density
office building
$200,000
650,000
a payoff of $1,767,000.
t. If the permit is granted, Steeley should proceed with the construction of the high-density apartment.
ity apartment but if they lose the case, Steeley should opt to sell the property instead.
$900,000
$500,000
$1,200,000
$100,000
8
700,000
9
650,000