SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING (SBT) INTO AVIATION GROUND SCHOOLS 1

1



SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING (SBT) INTO AVIATION GROUND SCHOOLS

SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING (SBT) INTO AVIATION GROUND SCHOOLS 2

2

Table of Contents
SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING (SBT) INTO AVIATION GROUND SCHOOLS ................................. 1
INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 3
Definitions................................................................................................................................................. 4
Statement of the Problem .......................................................................................................................... 6
Purpose of the Project ............................................................................................................................... 6
Limitations to the Study ............................................................................................................................ 7
Delimitations of the Study ........................................................................................................................ 7
Summary ................................................................................................................................................... 7
REVIEW OF LITERATURE ....................................................................................................................... 7
Scenario Based Training Method ............................................................................................................ 11
Collaborative Problem Solving Method ................................................................................................. 13
Case Study Method ................................................................................................................................. 14
The Scenario Based Training (SBT) Process .......................................................................................... 14
Training Effectiveness: An Overview ..................................................................................................... 16
Definition of Training ............................................................................................................................. 16
METHOD ................................................................................................................................................... 17
A Brief overview of the Literature Review ............................................................................................ 17
Research Question & Objective .............................................................................................................. 19
Population of the Sample ........................................................................................................................ 19
Instrumentation ....................................................................................................................................... 19
Data Collection & Analysis .................................................................................................................... 20
Methodology Summary .......................................................................................................................... 20
SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................ 20
Discussion ............................................................................................................................................... 21
Contribution of the Project ...................................................................................................................... 21
Recommendations for Further Development .......................................................................................... 22
Project Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 22
REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................... 23

SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING (SBT) INTO AVIATION GROUND SCHOOLS 3

3

INTRODUCTION
It is not possible to fully recreate past situations after an incident. That is why there is
more monitoring and recording technology available in most aviation equipment. Lets not forget
that even the emergency responders have that technology. The recording equipment creates a
clear livid scenario of possible incidents that are analyzed and implemented. A decade ago this
was a slow process where computers were not as fast as they are now (Phillips, 2007). Where
information is processed in Nano seconds and this fastens the implementation of result (Merriam
& Leahy, 2005). As result much emphasis has been on training that should be real-world
scenario based. The FAA-Industry Training Standards, (FITS) focuses on developing problem
solving and case study training with definable metrics for evaluation on aeronautical decision
making, information management and risk management (Smith, 2010).

The purpose of this research is to evaluate the value of SBT in ground school with regard to
safety in the aviation sector (Wickens et. al, 2004). Major airlines conduct SBT tests using
licensed authorities and information is shared publicly and FAA monitors all the SBT
evaluations. SBT can range from the following circumstances:
- Crew Resource Management communication under duress
- Air Traffic Controller communication
- Emergency reactions for all crew and scenarios
The above scenarios are just a glimpse of outcomes that resulted in incidences or accidents in
aviation. The study will answer how SBT will be effective in any situation in aviation to avert
future incidences.
SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING (SBT) INTO AVIATION GROUND SCHOOLS 4

4

As per Schumacher, and Petros (2005), learning is upgraded when training is sensible.
Furthermore, the underlying abilities required settling on exceptional judgments and choices are
open to instruction. The training staff of the military and business aerial transports has grasped
these standards through the reconciliation of Line Oriented Flight Training (LOFT) and Crew
Resource Management (CRM) training into their capability programs (Robertson et al.). In both
LOFT and CRM lessons, genuine scenarios are used and intends to lay open pilots to reasonable
operations and basic choice making chances. The most eminent movement in these projects is
that, at present, they are scenario based. The point when the educator is a facilitator, not the
teacher, classes is more intelligent (Lynch, 2005)
Generally, flight training has been a move based procedure. That is accurate for the teacher
and in addition the understudy. We might start on a lesson with the aim of drilling moderate
flight, presenting force off stalls, and showing an arriving. We kept tabs on what to do, not why
we do it. Luckily, that is all changing on account of scenario-based training.
Definitions
Scenario based training is simply a reality based training where the students are presented
with a real life situation and they have to react to it accordingly. "Scenario-based training give
the pilot a circumstance, a true pragmatic circumstance that can really happen," says Eric Crump,
chief of the aviation program at Polk State College in Winter Haven, Florida. "Much the same as
in genuine living, the pilot needs to settle on a choice" (Lafemina, 2009). That is the way to
scenario-based training, which Crump depicts as a center fundamental of his school's flight
training system. It obliges the pilot to think, to assess the circumstances, and settle on choices
SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING (SBT) INTO AVIATION GROUND SCHOOLS 5

5

based on a regularly changing arrangement of chances and tests. (Blickensderfer, Strally &
Doherty, 2012)
Line-oriented flight training (or LOFT) is training in a test system with a complete group
utilizing agent flight sections that hold ordinary, anomalous, crisis strategies that may be normal
in line operations. A teacher screens the group's execution and audits the recreated flight or
flights with the team thereafter to call attention to mistakes or exceptional choices that were
made. (Dismukes, McDonnel & Jobe, 2000)
FITS remains for FAA-Industry Training Standards, which is an advanced training
project made by the FAA to address the necessity for change in flight training practices as of late
(Summers, 2007). In 2003, the FAA set out to modernize flight training techniques after various
innovatively propelled flying machine (TAA) hit the business ((FAA), 2012). The propelled
aeronautics frameworks in this new flying machine oblige certain tirelessness from pilots. The
present flight training standards were made in 1973, and don't address cockpit administration in a
significant manner. The flood of TAA implied that learner pilots might be flying the same (if not
more present day) frameworks than airline and corporate pilots, yet they weren't prepared
fittingly for that sort of flying. (FAA, 2007)
Crew resource management or cockpit resource management (CRM) is a situated of
training techniques for utilization in situations where human mistake can have obliterating
impacts. Utilized basically for enhancing air security, CRM concentrates on interpersonal
correspondence, initiative, and choice making in the cockpit. (OConner et. Al, 2008)
SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING (SBT) INTO AVIATION GROUND SCHOOLS 6

6

Statement of the Problem
Aviation educators need to accept another part and capacity, based on an alternate set of
principles, strategies, and methods in an aviation nature's turf. Between June 1994 and May
1995, Moats & Chermack et al., (2008) talked with teachers from five real U.S. aerial shuttles.
Of the educators questioned throughout this study, a few teachers volunteered that they didn't
feel sufficiently trained to encourage LOFT scenario based training. Help, particularly in light of
the fact that it is a radical flight from the instructional strategies generally utilized as a part of
aviation, obliges active training in which educators: (a) watch master facilitators, (b) drill
assistance, and (c) gain input.
The discoveries from the Moats & Chermack et al., (2008) study backed past
examination Moats & Chermack et al., (2008); Continental Airlines, 1992; both referred to in
(Moats & Chermack et al., 2008). Discoveries, that is, help could be a compelling device to build
the profundity of team investment and investigation toward oneself of CRM execution. In this
study, we will try to understand the impact of Scenario Based Training in Aviation Ground
Schools.
Purpose of the Project
The purpose of the project is as discussed earlier, to understand the impact of Scenario based
training in aviation schools. In order to do so, we will be giving a complete knowledge of
scenario based training to the students as well as some well known aviation instructors. This
knowledge will be imparted through a visual presentation especially created for them. Once they
have gone through the whole presentation, we will try to analyse change of their perception
about the flight training on the basis of a before and after quantitative feedback.
SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING (SBT) INTO AVIATION GROUND SCHOOLS 7

7

Limitations to the Study
A limitation of this exploration undertaking is the unlucky deficiency of practice time. To
get more successful educators, the teacher has the necessity to consolidate and practice the
instructional systems and techniques. This task displays best practices and powerful
methodologies and techniques they may as well use in their preparation programs; however it
doesn't permit time for the teachers to practice these methods.
Delimitations of the Study
To guarantee the sensibility of the feedback and assists with its collection, the populace
will mainly comprise of flight higher instruction programs that are part and the reputed guides of
the aeronautics schools. We will likewise guarantee that SBT is tried suitably where the
members will be taken through an in profundity presentation about SBT which will help them
comprehend the thought before taking their feedbacks.
Summary
A diagram of the foundation research, articulation of the issue, and the motivation behind
the task were displayed in this section. In the next part, the literature review, we survey the
present writing accessible on issue (situation) based taking in and mature person taking in
standards to backing the advancement of the successful techniques and techniques.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Generally, flight training has been a move based procedure. That is correct for the teacher
and the scholar. We might start on a lesson with the proposition of polishing moderate flight,
SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING (SBT) INTO AVIATION GROUND SCHOOLS 8

8

presenting force off stalls, and exhibiting an arriving. We concentrated on what to do, not why
we do it. Luckily, that is all changing on account of scenario-based training. (Beckett, 2013)

This evolutionary procedure isn't new to aviation. If it was the move of flying machine
from spindly taildraggers made of wood and wire into all-metal, tricycle-rigging machines with
dependable motors, to smooth, aerodynamically prevalent airframes fabricated from composite
materialschange is a consistent in aviation. Indeed our instrument boards have advanced from
an apparently self-assertive accumulation of arbitrarily introduced simple measures into today's
clean glass board bundles. A momentously comparable movement is occurring in flight training,
with the pilot's points of view and choice making capacities going to the front line (Mcmahon,
2011).
Earlier, the hypothesis was that if pilots could perform an arrangement of particular
undertakings and finish each of them while staying inside the cutoff points made by the FAA's
reasonable test gauges, they were skilled to fly and could be honored a pilot declaration or rating
suitable to the errands they've finished. (Beckett, 2013)
After some time it became obvious that there is something else entirely to being a pilot
than the capacity to essentially rehash what a flight educator exhibits, regulated. A pilot
requirements to have the capacity to show the capability to perform an errand to the suitable
norms, and in addition display the choice making aptitudes that permit him or her to select the
assignment proper to the conditions when working in certifiable circumstances. A pilot's
activities and choices might as well have setting. Get ready pilots to meet that objective is the
crux of scenario-based training. (Beckett, 2013)

SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING (SBT) INTO AVIATION GROUND SCHOOLS 9

9

The reason for this venture was to make a presentation based on grown-up taking in
techniques, for pilot teachers to have the ability to viably encourage scenario based training.
Those people who are included in the aviation business are moving from customary learning
related taking in conclusions to a stress on expanded disguised taking in which learners survey
circumstances and respond properly (Federal Aviation Administration [FAA], 2008). Learning
segments turn into a critical component of a dynamic taking in experience. Additionally, the
advancement of propelled flight has helped a movement in the center of aviation training to
incorporate aeronautical choice making (ADM) and danger administration (FAA Regulations to
Improve Safety of Commercial Air Tours, 2007).
The FAA (2008) analysts expressed that "scenario based training (SBT) is based on the
idea of arranged comprehension, which is the ticket that information can't be known and
completely comprehended free of its connection" (p. 11) at the end of the day, people take in
better when the circumstances is more practical and they are relied upon to perform. Scenario
based training is an aggregation of essential taking in principle, mature person taking in notions,
and the best of the accepted aviation training strategies (FAA, 2008). Most importantly, it is
about taking in mind boggling undertakings in a practical environment at a pace and in a
structure the singular understudy can appreciate and process. Exceptional showing systems are
still critical, however just when they help in scholar taking in.
To turn into a viable teacher, which thus handles successful training, the educator needs
to have foundation information about essential taking in principle and grown-up taking in ideas.
The vast majority of the examination in the field of training is intended for experts with
foundations in instruction. The motivation behind this undertaking was to make a presentation
for aviation educators intended to help them comprehend grown-up taking in thoughts. This
SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING (SBT) INTO AVIATION GROUND SCHOOLS 10

10

presentation incorporates those methods that are best practices for teachers in an aviation nature's
turf (Mcmahon, 2011).
Reproduction and Aviation Since the origination of manned flight, pilot training has been
an imperative issue. Flying is a challenging, complex errand that requires impressive
consideration assets from the pilot and in addition augmented training (Wickens, Lee, Liu, &
Becker, 2004). Flight training apparatuses (i.e., test system and nature's domain) have long been
a remarkable asset to minimize both the expenses and dangers which are connected with figuring
out how to fly. The utilization of these gadgets has underpinned training projects in different
territories in aviation, for example, air movement administration. Numerous reproduction
mechanisms use the most recent personal computers and innovation (i.e., they repeat itemized
landscape, gear disappointments, movement, vibration, and visual signs in the ballpark of a
circumstance). Additionally, the utilization of recreation has been a point of convergence in
training exploration, in that, a regulated environment is furnished where investigations may be
directed to figure out the adequacy of different training strategies. Recreation could be
characterized through various perspectives; yet, as per Blickensderfer, Liu, & Hernandez, (2005),
reenactment is the representation of segments of an environment through some medium keeping
in mind the end goal to accomplish a destination. On account of flight training, the goal is to
utilize the test system to permit the learner to practice the basics of flying an airplane without
flying a real air ship. Airplane test systems range from desktop, personal computers to full size
reproductions of particular makes, models, and arrangement of plane cockpits (i.e., flight
administration programming and fittings ((FAA), 2012) is the boss power to affirm these
mechanisms for training purposes in the United States.

SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING (SBT) INTO AVIATION GROUND SCHOOLS 11

11

As per Dekker & Dahlstrom et al., (2008), flight preparing test systems are viable
instructive and instructional instruments. Two fundamental profits of their utilization are security
and expenses. (Blickensderfer et al., 2005) included that the utilization of test systems increment
security since they can prepare pilots under conditions that might be so risky it is not possible
prepare in genuine guideline. Case in point, pilots who necessity to advance the learning and
abilities important to fly throughout stormy climate no more need to sit tight for an overcast day;
they can polish in reproduced conditions in the flight preparing apparatus with no risk to
themselves or the flying machine. The test system is an astounding classroom on the grounds that
the scholar has the capacity to commit errors and gain from them as referred to in Blickensderfer
et al., (2005). Additionally, the teacher pilot is permitted to concentrate on showing and not
flying the airplane. Also, numerous test systems have the capacity to gather information
throughout the preparation scenarios that could be assessed later by both the person and teacher.

Notwithstanding rehearsing essential errands (e.g., stick and rudder) in a test system,
pilots and team can polish other flight related aptitudes too. Kanki & Helmreich et al., (2010)
contemplated the helpfulness of desktop test systems to prepare for procedural assignments. In
their studies, people figured out how to program a weapon program on a F-16 more rapidly in a
test system than in a routine preparing setting.
Scenario Based Training Method
An arrangement of aviation instruction masters have offered their definitions on the
subject of scenario based training (FAA, 2008). Scenario based training (SBT) is a training
system that uses a remarkably organized script of certifiable encounters to address aviation
training goals in a nature. Such training can incorporate: (a) beginning training, (b) move
SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING (SBT) INTO AVIATION GROUND SCHOOLS 12

12

training, (c) overhaul training, (d) repetitive training, and (e) unique training. The objective of
SBT is to test the understudy with a mixed bag of flight scenarios intended to enhance choice
making abilities. These scenarios oblige the pilot to: (a) deal with the assets accessible in the
flight deck, (b) activity sound judgment, and (c) settle on opportune choices. Despite the fact that
flight teachers have utilized the SBT approach as a showing system for a long time, the later
accentuation on SBT in aviation training reflects the discoveries from aviation specialists that
exhibit that learners take in more successfully when eagerly included in the taking in procedure.
Phillips, W. (2007) characterized SBT as unique in relation to customary classroom training, in
that, a scenario or activity serves as the educational program. The in general objective is to give
particular chances for the learner to improve discriminating capabilities (i.e., driver information,
aptitudes, and mentality) through practice and input. Phillips, W. (2007) portrayed SBT as
training that is kept tabs on decently arranged activities, with reaction gave to learners based on
their reactions to mimicked signals equivalent to those in the real nature's turf. Particularly, SBT
contrasts from accepted systems, as the scenarios embody the whole educational module from
the starting.
Salas, Priest, Wilson, and Burke (2006) offered an alternate viewpoint for the meaning of
SBT. Scenario based training is established in deductive hypotheses of taking in and logically
manufactures from the presentation of data (i.e., revelatory and procedural information) in an
universal way (e.g., classroom addresses, self-paced, machine based, and media taking in) to
shows where the learners can watch the execution focused for training, to practice based
techniques where the scenarios turn into the educational program Practice exercises turn into the
substance of training. (Madni & Madni, 2008)
SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING (SBT) INTO AVIATION GROUND SCHOOLS 13

13

The aviation educator is the way to fruitful SBT, and the generally speaking taking in target in
this technique for training conveyance is for the scholar to be more prepared to practice sound
judgment and settle on great choices (FAA, 2008). The scenario might not have one right or one
wrong reply, which reflects circumstances confronted in this present reality. It is essential for the
teacher to see ahead of time which results are sure or negative and permit the learner opportunity
to settle on both exceptional and poor choices without endangering wellbeing. This permits the
understudy to settle on choices that fit his or her encounter level and bring about positive
conclusions.
As per Mcmahon (2011), Line Oriented Flight Training (LOFT) is a sort of SBT that
alludes to aircrew training and includes the reenactment of sensible, full mission circumstances.
These circumstances, or scenarios, comprise of run of the mill every day operations for the aerial
shuttle and are regularly advanced from mishap reports to improve authenticity. Sensible issues
and crises are acquainted throughout the scenarios with train right flight deck administration
strategies.
Collaborative Problem Solving Method
Cooperation (i.e., two or more individuals cooperating) to tackle issues has been utilized
all around time (FAA, 2008). In training, the shared critical thinking system joins joint effort
with critical thinking when the educator furnishes an issue to a gathering who then illuminates it.
This system utilizes joint effort and could be altered for an intuitive one-on-one taking in
circumstance, for example, an autonomous aviation educator may experience. The teacher
furnishes the issue to the person, offers just constrained help as the understudy illuminates it, yet
takes an interest in discovering results. At the end of the day, open-finished, imagine a scenario
in which issues are utilized to furnish the people with a chance to advance HOTS.
SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING (SBT) INTO AVIATION GROUND SCHOOLS 14

14

Case Study Method
A research endeavor is a composed or oral record of a genuine circumstance that holds a
message that teaches the learner (FAA, 2008). An inexorably mainstream manifestation of
showing, the research endeavor holds a story with respect to the learners that drives them to
manage circumstances experienced in genuine living. The educator introduces the case to the
learners who: (a) then investigate it, (b) arrive at conclusions, and (c) offer conceivable results.
Powerful careful investigations require the learner to utilize discriminating intuition abilities.

The Scenario Based Training (SBT) Process
There is a planned precise SBT model, based on fundamental standards of taking in, as
indicated in Figure 1. This methodology aides training architects or teachers to: (a) distinguish
the task/mission and the learning, aptitudes, and capabilities included; (b) outline scenarios to
incorporate occasions which permit the learner to improve and practice the particular
information, abilities, and capacities recognized; (c) plan execution measures to empower the
trainer to evaluate execution; and (d) guarantee that particular criticism is provided for the
learner.
Scenario Based Training Diagram
SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING (SBT) INTO AVIATION GROUND SCHOOLS 15

15


There are four stages inside this model. The main stage is to distinguish taking in or training
destinations (i.e., the learning and aptitudes important to perform a particular undertaking).
Generally, training goals are based on a necessity for development or the presentation of new
supplies. The second stage is to arrange scenario occasions, which will give the learner the
chance to practice the sought aptitudes. The scenarios are based on the training destinations. In
the event that arranged painstakingly, and effectively, the occasions guarantee that the learner
polishes the greater part of the focused on aptitudes until all training targets are met (Dekker &
Dahlstrom et al., 2008). The third stage is execution appraisal. Execution measures are produced
which connect nearly to scenario occasions and permit the educator to assess if the learner has
showed the right learning and aptitudes (Dekker & Dahlstrom et al., 2008). When the learning
objectives, scenario occasions, and execution measures are created, the time it now, time for the
learner to encounter the scenario. Throughout this time, the teacher screens the learner execution
and utilization the execution criteria to judge learner execution.
The last stage is feedback/debrief; the educator gives particular, point by point criticism
to the learner. The educator connects the reaction to particular occasions and taking in goals.
This helps the learner to translate the reaction and, thusly, to join the input into his/her
consequent execution.
The motivation behind this model is to help training engineers and teachers compose
their methodology to outline and actualize SBT. Likewise, it can help to guide the methodology
which characterizes a set of characteristics or qualities that must be available in request to
guarantee that the training is viable (Moats & Chermack et al., 2008).
SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING (SBT) INTO AVIATION GROUND SCHOOLS 16

16

Training Effectiveness: An Overview
There is solid accord that securing of learning, abilities, practices, and state of mind
through training is of little esteem if the new aspects are not summed up to the employment
setting and are not kept up over the long haul as referred to in Phillips, (2007). As it were,
training is pointless in the event that it can't be made as execution. Consistent with Banburry et.
al, (2007), for human assets advancement (HRD) to turn into a center business process,
execution is the key.
Definition of Training
Pendelton, (2005)characterized training as the procurement that is pointed at making
deliberate taking in procedures that help enhancing the execution of specialists in their present
employment. The definition does not contrast outstandingly from meanings of training in the
HRD connection. For example, in a nature's turf, training is frequently characterized as an
arranged taking in experience intended to realize changeless change in a singular's information,
disposition, or aptitudes (Banburry et. al, 2007). As referred in Alawneh, (2008) a furnished
definition that related training to singular execution, which is apparently a more adept descriptor
of HRD destinations (D Pendelton, 2005). He characterized training as the deliberate securing of
disposition, thoughts, learning, parts, or aptitudes that bring about enhanced execution at work.
By and large, it has been found that most working environment training definitions in the global
expositive expression stress the present place of employment as the centering. Case in point,
Banburry et. al, (2007) prominent that the central motivation behind training is to help
individuals advance abilities and capabilities which, when connected at work, will upgrade their
normal occupation execution in their present place of employment. The definition joins the
SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING (SBT) INTO AVIATION GROUND SCHOOLS 17

17

securing of information and abilities picked up through training to a requisition in the working
environment. This connection speaks to the notion of training exchange.
METHOD
A Brief overview of the Literature Review

In the literature review, we discussed in detail what scenario based training actually
means and how it can be applied in aviation training. We also looked into various other methods
of training such as Line Oriented Flight Training, etc. Then we looked into the various theories
by different scholars related to training in aviation schools. The scenario strategy does not exist
in that capacity; rather, "scenario procedure" is noticeably a complete term which in genuine
practice blankets the most shifted conceivable collection of methodologies, methods, and
exploration and workshop plans. The expression "scenario systems" speaks to a methodological
notion enveloping a group of methodologies with diverse degrees of multifaceted nature. For
purposes of systematization, it is just coherent to do an investigation of distinctive
methodological levels (. Simultaneously, scenario methodologies could be viewed as a mind
boggling set of strategies which constantly comprises of various distinctive methodological steps
or stages (Robertson, Schumacher & Petros, 2005).

Diverse methods may be connected inside the skeleton of a commonsense scenario
process. The grouping of steps or stages containing the cement, remarkable qualities of a
scenario strategy is controlled by the determination of a particular scenario method. An
equivalent word ordinarily utilized when talking about scenario strategies is "scenario
SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING (SBT) INTO AVIATION GROUND SCHOOLS 18

18

dissection". An alternate notion now and then utilized synonymously is "scenario
administration", which accentuates the part of the vital requisition of scenarios from leaders. The
thoughts of "different scenario dissection" (MSA) and "scenario composing" are additionally
pervasive. In the meantime, scenario technique methods with all their methodology and
instruments don't remain solitary in a "method less" space, but instead have response to strategies
and instruments which are additionally connected in different sorts of methodological outline
(e.g. pattern investigation, performing artist dissection, cross-sway examination and so forth.).
Actually, they are regularly coupled in examination plans with other autonomous routines.
Accordingly, one for instance discovers system mixtures including displaying routines,
Delphi-strategies, or way mapping methods. Planning and system are behind every extraordinary
venture. This creator depicts the technique used to improve a PowerPoint presentation for
avionics educators. The presentation incorporates methods and strategies for avionics teachers to
use in an operational nature. Such preparing can incorporate: (a) starting preparing, (b) move
preparing, (c) overhaul preparing, and (d) repetitive preparing. The reason for outlining this
presentation is to help pilot educators who have never taught a reenactment (situation) based
instructional class advance their preparation abilities. Additionally, encountered aeronautics
teachers may discover these methodologies and systems functional to extend their showing
ability set.
As the scenario unfolds, the members were displayed with inputs that either obliges
adjustment of the existing way and arrangement of activity. While a few inputs obliged
practically zero movement, others obliged more quick activity. Every scenario obliged the pilot
to change the flight arrangement and either redirect or perform a crisis arriving. The workshops
were intended for presentation by a proficient facilitator, and were displayed to gatherings of up
SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING (SBT) INTO AVIATION GROUND SCHOOLS 19

19

to twenty members. Every scenario comprised of a set of Powerpoint slides, supplemented by a
script for the facilitator. Members were furnished with obliged flight arranging reports
throughout the presentations and were inquired as to whether they were in the real flying
machine. At every choice focus, the facilitator exhibited the new data then requested
examination from the aggregation. The facilitator to expand the authenticity of the scenario
included extra scripted, and at times as improved, inputs.
Research Question & Objective

The main objective of this study is to understand the impact of scenario based training in aviation
training schools. The main research questions involved in this study is what is the impact of
scenario based training in aviation schools? In order to do that a detailed presentation about
SBT will be given to the entire population.
Population of the Sample
The population in the research study will consist of noted trainers from aviation schools and some
randomly selected students who are a studying aviation. The reason for doing so is to understand the
impact in both the cases of students and teachers at large.
Instrumentation
The research will be done with the help of a before and after analysis along with a detailed
presentation of Scenario Based Training which will be shown to the selected population of the
students and the teachers. Before giving the presentation, the population will have to fill up a
questionnaire with a fixed set of scenarios. Once done with that they will be taken through the
presentation. After completing the presentation they will be given the same set of questionnaires
and will be asked to refill it in order to understand the impact and change of learning SBT.
SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING (SBT) INTO AVIATION GROUND SCHOOLS 20

20

Data Collection
The data collected will be quantitative in nature. It will be collected with the help of the
questionnaires containing a set of scenarios in aviation training. The questionnaires will be filled
up twice by the population. Once, before the presentation, and later on, after going through it.
Data Analysis
The questionnaires filled up by the population will be collected and then sent for analysis. The
answers given will help us analyse the impact of scenario based training with the help of the
before and after analysis.
Methodology Summary
In this part, we distinguished the intended to do the research on the basis of quantitative
data. The researchers will be doing a before and after analysis to understand the impact of
scenario based training in aviation schools. This will be done with the help of a presentation of
SBT and a set of questionnaires containing a set of scenarios in aviation training. The
questionnaires will be distributed twice, once before the presentation and the second time after it.
The analysis will be done by studying the change in the answers given by the participants after
going through the presentation.
SUMMARY
The powerful techniques and systems generated throughout this exploration undertaking
are intended to be a beginning stage for teachers to support them in transitioning from the
universal (move based) training environment to a recreated (scenario based) the earth. The
agenda of powerful methods and strategies is intended to serve as a supplemental asset device to
SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING (SBT) INTO AVIATION GROUND SCHOOLS 21

21

support aviation (pilot) educators inside pilot training projects. Notwithstanding print direction
materials, there are some different routes for educators new to scenario based taking in,
instructive brain science, showing routines, testing, and other aviation related subjects to addition
information and backing, for example, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) courses, industry
gatherings, proficient associations, and online classes. Organizing with and watching different
teachers to take in new systems are likewise supportive (FAA, 2008). In Chapters 5, this creator
examines the finished venture.
Discussion
The primary issue tended to by this examination venture is the way that scenario
(reenactment) based taking in introduces another showing environment and new teacher
obligations. The motivation behind this venture was to improve a presentation of powerful
procedures and methods for showing scenario based courses for those new to the recreated
nature. These compelling methodologies might be most advantageous to those with restricted
opportunity to accumulate and orchestrate the examination information for SBT.
Contribution of the Project
The target of this project was fulfilled in that the creator prepared an instrument that
might be used or altered to most pilot training projects. The most gainful component identified
with this set of methods and systems is its adaptability; the set of techniques and strategies
transformed in this undertaking furnishes a system whereby instructors/designers can change the
procedures to match with their particular situational necessities. This additionally implies that
scenario substance could be reused with diverse advances or media.
SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING (SBT) INTO AVIATION GROUND SCHOOLS 22

22

Recommendations for Further Development
One suggestion for further improvement might be to watch and assess teachers educating
in a recreated environment in the wake of accepting this presentation. Throughout this
assessment, the accompanying inquiries ought to be tended to: Did the educators apply the
techniques and methods displayed to them? Which techniques and methods did the
instructor/designer join? When the information from this appraisal has been assessed, extra help
could be furnished to the teacher if required. Moreover, one-on-one tutoring could be planned to
help educators improve their abilities further. Additionally, the writer could change over the set
of viable methods and strategies into a handbook that could be utilized as a supplement to the
proficient teacher course (PTC).
Project Summary
Progresses in aviation engineering and improvements in taking in innovation give aviation
educators the chance to utilize new techniques and educate to new benchmarks, which requires
distinctive aptitudes and skills. The motivation behind this venture was to help address this issue
by improving successful systems and methods for guideline utilizing scenario based training that
teachers can adequately use when educating in a scenario based nature. The objective of this
exploration undertaking was successfully met by making a presentation of powerful methods and
systems to help aviation teachers new to the operational nature's turf.

SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING (SBT) INTO AVIATION GROUND SCHOOLS 23

23

REFERENCES
Airbus. (No Date). Flight Operations Briefing Notes. Human Performance. Human
Factors Aspects in Incidents / Accident. Retrieved from
http://www.airbus.com/fileadmin/media_gallery/files/safety_library_items/Airbus
SafetyLib_-FLT_OPS-HUM_PER-SEQ01.pdf
Alawneh, M. K. (2008). Factors affecting training transfer: Participants motivation
training. Retrieved from 10, 2010. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.
ED501629)
Beckett, J (2013). Just Like the Real Thing. Retrieved from:
http://flighttraining.aopa.org/magazine/2013/July/feature-training.html
Blickensderfer, B., Liu, D., & Hernandez, A. (2005). Simulation for aviation training: A
review. Retrieved from: http://www.erau.edu/research/l-research.html
Blickensderfer, E. L., Strally, S., & Doherty, S. (2012). The Effects of Scenario-Based
Training on Pilots' Use of an Emergency Whole-Plane Parachute. International
Journal Of Aviation Psychology, 22(2), 184-202.
doi:10.1080/10508414.2012.663253
Mcmahon, A. (2011). Lesson plans to train like you fly. Newcastle, Wash.: Aviation
Supplies & Academics.
Dismukes, R., McDonnell, L., & Jobe, K. (2000). Facilitating LOFT debriefings:
instructor techniques and crew participation. International Journal of Aviation
Psychology, 10(1), 35-57. Retrieved December 26, 2009, from Academic Search
Premier Database.
SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING (SBT) INTO AVIATION GROUND SCHOOLS 24

24

FAA Regulations to Improve Safety of Commercial Air Tours. (2007). Professional
Safety, 52(4), 17.
FAA. (2003). Industry Training Standards (FITS). Program Plan. Retrieved from
http://www.faa.gov/training_testing/training/fits/
Federal Aviation Administration. (2008). Aviation instructors handbook. Washington,
DC: U.S Government Printing Office.
Merriam, S. B., & Leahy, B. (2005). Learning transfer: A review of the research in adult
education and training. Journal of Lifelong Learning, 14, 1-24.
O'Connor, P., Campbell, J., Newon, J., Melton, J., Salas, E., & Wilson, K. A. (2008).
Crew Resource Management Training Effectiveness: A Meta-Analysis and Some
Critical Needs. International Journal Of Aviation Psychology,18(4), 353-368.
doi:10.1080/10508410802347044
Robertson, C., Schumacher, P., & Petros, T. (2005). A guide for inspectors, designated
examiners, and flight instructors on the implementation and philosophy of FITS.
Retrieved from: http://www.faa.gov/training_testing/training
/fits/research/media/inspector.pdf
Salas, E., Priest, H., Wilson, K., & Burke, C. S. (2006). How to turn a team of experts
into an expert medical team: Guidance from the aviation and military
communities. Retrieved from
http://scmsociety.typepad.com/patient_safety/files/burke_salas_wilsondonnelly_
priest_qshc_expert_teams_2004.pdf
SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING (SBT) INTO AVIATION GROUND SCHOOLS 25

25

Wickens, C. D., Lee, J. D., Liu, Y., & Becker, S. E. G. (2004). Introduction to human
factors engineering. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Lafemina, F. P. (2009). Experience-Based Scenarios Enhance Survival Training. Fire
Engineering, 162(4), 143-150.
Lynch, M. D. (2005). Developing a Scenario-Based Training Program. FBI Law
Enforcement Bulletin, 74(10), 1-8.
(FAA), F. A. A. (2012). Far. Newcastle: Aviation Supplies & Academics, Inc.
D Pendelton, L. (2005). From the cfi #7: scenario-based training - avweb features
article. Retrieved from: http://www.avweb.com/news/fromcfi/189784-
1.html?redirected=1
Dekker, S., Dahlstrom, N., Winsen, R. V. & Others (2008). Crew resilience and
simulator training in aviation. Retrieved from: http://www. ashgate.com.
Kanki, B. G., Helmreich, R. L. & Anca, J. M. (2010). Crew resource management.
Amsterdam: Academic Press/Elsevier.
M Summers, M. (2007). Scenario-based training in technically advanced aircraft as a
method to improve risk management. Retrieved from:
https://www.faa.gov/training_testing/training/fits/research/media/SBT_for_RM.p
df
Moats, J. B., Chermack, T. J. & Dooley, L. M. (2008). Using scenarios to develop crisis
managers: applications of scenario planning and scenario-based
training. Advances In Developing Human Resources, 10 (3), pp. 397--424.
SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING (SBT) INTO AVIATION GROUND SCHOOLS 26

26

Smith, D. (2010). Aviation today: scenario-based training: as real as it gets. Retrieved
from: http://www.aviationtoday.com/regions/usa/Scenario-based-Training-As-
Real-as-it-Gets_68235.html#.Uv2xFWKSz84.
Banbury, S., Dudfield, H., Hoermann, H., & Soll, H. (2007). FASA: Development and
Validation of a Novel Measure to Assess the Effectiveness of Commercial Airline
Pilot Situation Awareness Training. International Journal Of Aviation
Psychology, 17(2), 131-152. doi:10.1080/10508410701328557
Madni, A. M., & Madni, C. C. (2008). Intelligent Agents As Synthetic Role Players In
Scenario-Based Training. Journal Of Integrated Design & Process Science, 12(1),
39-54.
Phillips, W. (2007). Bridging the gap shortcuts to the flight deck - flight training.
Retrieved from:
http://flighttraining.aopa.org/magazine/2007/June/200706_Features_Bridging_the
_Gap.html