Heteorevaluation

Students name: __________________________________ Level: ___________ Date: ________________________

Check list to evaluate watching video clip
Observations: _____________________________

Check list to evaluate a section and answer
Heteorevaluation
Students name: __________________________________ Level: ___________ Date: ________________________


Criteria YES NO
S/he participates actively during the brainstorming activity.

S/he presents ideas related to the lesson with coherence.

S/he respects other partners opinions.

S/he listens carefully to all the significant contributions from
her/his partners.

S/he increases knowledge about the numbers lesson.


Observations:

content (video)Criteria yes no
S/he answers questions correctly
S/he gives opinions
S/he takes note that help him/her to answer questions
S/he demonstrates interest to other opinions
S/he demonstrates good behavior during the activity
S/he expresses ideas clearly and fluently
S/he gets the message across
S/he shows interest when watching the video
Heteroevaluation
Rating Scale to evaluate a concept definition map
Students name: __________________________________ Level: ___________ Date: ________________________
Criteria to
evaluate a
concept
definition map
Always
5
Almost always
4
Almost never
3
Never
2
S/he Contributes
coherent ideas to
the assessment

S/he clarifies
doubts with regard
to the work

S/he demonstrates
interest during the
concept definition
map project

S/he Presents good
arguments focused
on the concept
definition map
project

S/he actively
participate in the
elaboration of the
concept definition
map

S/he demonstrates
good behavior during
the elaboration of
the concept
definition map








Heteroevaluation
Rating Scale to evaluate an investigation
Students name: __________________________________ Level: ___________ Date: ________________________
Criteria to
evaluate a
concept
definition map
Always
5
Almost always
4
Almost never
3
Never
2
S/he Contributes
coherent ideas to
the assessment

S/he clarifies
doubts with regard
to the work

S/he demonstrates
interest during the
investigation

S/he Presents good
arguments focused
on the investigation

S/he actively
participate in the
elaboration of the
investigation

S/he demonstrates
good behavior
during the
elaboration of the
investigation








Heteroevaluation
Students name: __________________________________ Level: ___________ Date: ______________


Evaluating Student Presentations
1 2 3 4 Total
Organization Audience
cannot
understand
presentation
because there
is no sequence
of information.
Audience has
difficulty following
presentation
because student
jumps around.
Student
presents
information in
logical
sequence which
audience can
follow.
Student presents
information in
logical,
interesting
sequence which
audience can
follow.

Subject
Knowledge
Student does
not have grasp
of information;
student cannot
answer
questions about
subject.
Student is
uncomfortable
with information
and is able to
answer only
rudimentary
questions.
Student is at
ease with
expected
answers to all
questions, but
fails to
elaborate.
Student
demonstrates full
knowledge (more
than required) by
answering all
class questions
with explanations
and elaboration.

Graphics Student uses
superfluous
graphics or no
graphics
Student
occasionally uses
graphics that
rarely support
text and
presentation.
Student's
graphics relate
to text and
presentation.
Student's
graphics explain
and reinforce
screen text and
presentation.

Mechanics Student's
presentation
has four or
more spelling
errors and/or
grammatical
errors.
Presentation has
three
misspellings
and/or
grammatical
errors.
Presentation
has no more
than two
misspellings
and/or
grammatical
errors.
Presentation has
no misspellings
or grammatical
errors.

Eye Contact Student reads
all of report with
no eye contact.
Student
occasionally uses
eye contact, but
still reads most of
report.
Student
maintains eye
contact most of
the time but
frequently
returns to notes.
Student
maintains eye
contact with
audience,
seldom returning
to notes.

Elocution Student
mumbles,
incorrectly
pronounces
terms, and
speaks too
quietly for
students in the
back of class to
hear.
Student's voice is
low. Student
incorrectly
pronounces
terms. Audience
members have
difficulty hearing
presentation.
Student's voice
is clear. Student
pronounces
most words
correctly. Most
audience
members can
hear
presentation.
Student uses a
clear voice and
correct, precise
pronunciation of
terms so that all
audience
members can
hear
presentation.

Total Points:
Rubric to evaluate a PowerPoint Presentation
Group Name: ____________________________________________________________
Title of Presentation: _____________________________________________________

CATEGORY Excellent-4 Good-3 Satisfactory-2 Needs
Improvement-1
Content -
Accuracy
All content
throughout the
presentation is
accurate. There
are no factual
errors.
Most of the content
is accurate but
there is one piece
of information that
seems inaccurate.
The content is
generally accurate,
but one piece of
information is
clearly inaccurate.
Content confusing
or contains more
than one factual
error.
Sequencing
of
Information
Information is
organized in a
clear, logical way.
It is easy to
anticipate the next
slide.
Most information is
organized in a
clear, logical way.
One slide or piece
of information
seems out of
place.
Some information
is logically
sequenced. An
occasional slide or
piece of
information seems
out of place.
There is no clear
plan for the
organization of
information.
Effectiveness Project includes all
material needed to
give a good
understanding of
the topic. The
project is
consistent with the
driving question.
Project is lacking
one or two key
elements. Project
is consistent with
driving question
most of the time.
Project is missing
more than two key
elements. It is
rarely consistent
with the driving
question.
Project is lacking
several key
elements and has
inaccuracies.
.Project is
completely
inconsistent with
driving question.
Use of
Graphics
All graphics are
attractive (size and
colors) and support
the topic of the
presentation.
A few graphics are
not attractive but
all support the
topic of the
presentation.
All graphics are
attractive but a few
do not support the
topic of the
presentation.
Several graphics
are unattractive
AND detract from
the content of the
presentation.
Text - Font
Choice &
Formatting
Font formats
(color, bold, italic)
have been
carefully planned
to enhance
readability and
content.
Font formats have
been carefully
planned to
enhance
readability.
Font formatting has
been carefully
planned to
complement the
content. It may be
a little hard to read.
Font formatting
makes it very
difficult to read the
material.
Spelling and
Grammar
Presentation has
no misspellings or
grammatical errors.
Presentation has
1-2 misspellings,
but no grammatical
errors.
Presentation has
1-2 grammatical
errors but no
misspellings.
Presentation has
more than 2
grammatical and/or
spelling errors.
Cooperation Group shares
tasks and all
performed
responsibly all of
the time.
Group shares
tasks and
performed
responsibly most of
the time.
Group shares
tasks and performs
responsibly some
of the time.
Group often is not
effective in sharing
tasks and/or
sharing
responsibility.

Delivery Members spoke
at a good rate,
volume and with
good
grammar. They
Members spoke
a little faster or
slower than
necessary, or too
quietly or
Members spoke
at a good rate
and volume, but
used poor
grammar. They
Members
demonstrated
having paid little
attention to rate,
volume or
maintained eye-
contact while
using, but not
reading their
notes.
loudly. They
used acceptable
grammar. They
maintained eye-
contact, but
relied too much
on their notes.
relied heavily on
their notes.
grammar. They
read nearly word
for word from
notes.