In a WDM system, the simultaneous transmission of many different data signals is achieved using light of different wavelengths to distinguish between the signals. The combined optical signals are then transmitted through the fiber together. After transmission, the combined signals are separated by a demultiplexer, and each signal is detected individually.
In a WDM system, the simultaneous transmission of many different data signals is achieved using light of different wavelengths to distinguish between the signals. The combined optical signals are then transmitted through the fiber together. After transmission, the combined signals are separated by a demultiplexer, and each signal is detected individually.
In a WDM system, the simultaneous transmission of many different data signals is achieved using light of different wavelengths to distinguish between the signals. The combined optical signals are then transmitted through the fiber together. After transmission, the combined signals are separated by a demultiplexer, and each signal is detected individually.
In this module, we study the basic concepts of WDM systems.
In WDM systems, the simultaneous transmission of many different data signals is achieved using light of different wavelengths to distinguish between the signals. The intensity modulated optical carriers of different wavelengths are combined by a multiplexer. The combined optical signals are then transmitted through the fiber together. After transmission, the combined signals are separated by a demultiplexer, and each signal is detected individually. In many aspects, a WDM system is like many single channel systems combined, with the optical signals at different wavelengths all sharing one common fiber-optic channel. Thus the capacity of one fiber can be divided amongst many wavelength channels. Ideally, the different wavelengths remain independent of each other. However, the broad band noise and side mode of each channel will pass to other channels and result in cross- talk (interference) between the different wavelength channels. Optical amplifiers are critical in long haul WDM systems, but the gain (as a function of wavelength) of optical amplifiers needs to be flat. Note: For details on the handling of VPItransmissionMaker / VPIcomponentMaker please read the Users Manual before starting this unit. 2 Copyright VPIsystems. All rights reserved. WDM Systems An example of a four channel WDM system is shown below (open setup System1_1). The output of four externally modulated transmitters are combined by an ideal multiplexer WDMMUXN1Ideal and transmitted through a fiber, FiberNLS. After transmission, the combined signals are demultiplexed by the WDM_DEMUX_1_4 module and detected by the receiver Rx_OOK. Results are displayed by the SignalAnalyzer (Scope and OSA) at different points of the system. In this example, the nonlinearity and dispersion effects of the fiber are not considered. 3 Copyright VPIsystems. All rights reserved. WDM Systems Run the simulation. The optical spectrum of the signal at the input of the MUX is shown in the figure below. The peaks at the four different wavelengths represent the four WDM channels. Each of those wavelengths is modulated by a different data source. Exercise 1: Measure the channel spacing between each channel and check that the result is the same as the value specified by the global parameter ChannelSpacing 4 Copyright VPIsystems. All rights reserved. WDM Systems The optical spectrum of the signal at the output of the MUX is shown below. Question 1: Compared with the optical spectrum of the input of MUX, what is the difference between the two spectra? Exercise 2: Measure the Channel Spacing between each channel and check that the result is the same as the value specified by the global parameter ChannelSpacing 5 Copyright VPIsystems. All rights reserved. WDM Systems The optical spectrum of the signal at the output of the Demux is shown in the figure below. Question 2: Compared with the optical spectrum of the output of MUX, what is the difference between the two spectra? Exercise 3: Measure the Channel Spacing between each channel and check that the result is the same as the value specified by the global parameter ChannelSpacing 6 Copyright VPIsystems. All rights reserved. WDM Systems The bottom-left figure shows the waveform of the signal of Channel 2 at the output of the transmitter. The waveform of the Channel 2 signal at the receiver is shown in the bottom-right figure. Note that the signal has been recovered almost perfectly. The result is similar for the other channels. 7 Copyright VPIsystems. All rights reserved. WDM Systems Exercise 4: Reduce the global parameter ChannelSpacing to 10.0e9 Hz, and run the simulation again. Check that the data in channel 2 is fully recovered at the receiver. If it is not, explain why. try the different System1_1 rates and spacing
Exercise 5: Open System1_1_a. Plot the Bit Error Rate (BER) of the received data in channel 2 versus the channel spacing for 40 Gbit/s: 100, 50 and 10 GHz
8 Copyright VPIsystems. All rights reserved. Channel Spacing & Bit Rate Per Channel The BER of the received data in channel 2 versus channel spacing for 40 Gbit/s, 10 Gbit/s and 2.5 Gbit/s signal is shown below Question 3: If the BER is required to be below 1e-9, the maximum channel spacing of WDM system for transmission 40 Gbit/s, 10 Gbit/s and 2.5 Gbit/s per wavelength is 55 GHz, 13.8 GHz and 3.4 GHz respectively (from the figure below). What determines the minimum channel spacing of this WDM system? 9 Copyright VPIsystems. All rights reserved. Multiplexer Open setup System1_2. The schematic is shown below This example shows the response of a non ideal multiplexer, WDM_MUX_2_1. The output of a WDM comb with 100 channels, WDM_Comb, is set to one of the multiplexer inputs which has limited bandwidth and Bessel transfer function. The optical spectrum at the input and output of the multiplexer are displayed by the SignalAnalyzer (OSA). 10 Copyright VPIsystems. All rights reserved. Multiplexer Set WDM_MUX_2_1 ActiveFilterBandwidth to 1e12 Hz and then run the simulation. The spectrum of the MUX input and output are shown below on the left and the right respectively. The figure on the left shows the channels of the MUX input as the channel spacing of the WDM_Comb is set to 10e9 Hz and the number of channels to 100. The spectrum at the MUX output show the response of MUX. It resembles a band-pass filter. 11 Copyright VPIsystems. All rights reserved. Multiplexer Set WDM_MUX21 ActiveFilterBandwidth = 0.5e12 Hz and run the simulation. The spectrum at the output of the MUX is shown below. We can see the bandwidth of the MUX response is reduced, which is correlated with the drop of the ActiveFilterBandwidth value. 12 Copyright VPIsystems. All rights reserved. Filtering effect of MUXs and DEMUXs 13 Copyright VPIsystems. All rights reserved. Now, we investigate the filtering effect of MUXs and DEMUXs in WDM systems. Open setup System1_3. The schematic is shown below. In this example, we isolate and focus only on one channel of a WDM system. A non-ideal transmitter (with a significant side mode) is used in this simulation. The optical spectrum of the transmitter output, multiplexer and de-multiplexer outputs are visualized by SignalAnalyzer (OSA) modules and the receiver output by a SignalAnalyzer (RFSA). Run the simulation. Filtering effect of MUXs and DEMUXs The optical spectrum of the transmitter output is shown in the top right figure. In addition to the lasing mode at 193.05 THz, there is a side mode at 193.15 THz. The side mode suppression ratio (SMSR) is 20 dB. The optical spectrum of the signal after transmitter multiplexer is shown in the button right figure. The side mode suppression ratio has increased to 39 dB because of the bandpass filtering effect of the multiplexer. 20 dB 39 dB Lasing mode Side mode 14 Copyright VPIsystems. All rights reserved. Filtering effect of MUXs and DEMUXs The optical spectrum of the signal after passing through the DEMUX is shown below. The side mode suppression ratio has further increased to 57.6 dB. Question 4: The filtering effect of a MUX and DEMUX will reduce the cross talk in a WDM system. Explain why. 57.6 dB 15 Copyright VPIsystems. All rights reserved. Filtering effect of MUXs and DEMUXs Exercise 6: Change the bandwidth of both MUX and DEMUX and run the simulation again. Measure the side mode suppression ratio of the transmitter output (SMSR T ), the side mode suppression ratio of the MUX output (SMSR M ) and the side mode suppression ratio of the DEMUX output (SMSR D ). Fill in the following table. Bandwidth (GHz) SMSR T (dB) SMSR M (dB) SMSR D (dB) SMSR M -SMSR T
(dB) SMSR D - SMSR T (dB) 40 60 80 100 120 16 Copyright VPIsystems. All rights reserved. Filtering effect of a MUX In this example, we will show the importance of the filtering effect of the multiplexer.
Open setup System1_4. The schematic is shown on the right. Two configurations of WDM system are used to provide a comparison. They are basically the same, except that one uses a multiplexer WDM_MUX_2_1, while the other uses a coupler CombinerPowN1, to combine two channels together for transmission in a single fiber. The transmitter of channel 1 in both systems has a side mode with a SMSR of 25 dB. Note that this side mode will cause cross talk in channel 2. The recovered signals are visualized by SignalAnalyzer (Scope) and SignalAnalyzer (OSA). WDM System 1 (using MUX) WDM System 2 (using Coupler) 17 Copyright VPIsystems. All rights reserved. Filtering effect of a MUX Switch channel 2 off in both systems (by setting TxExtModLaser Active = Off) and run the simulation. The optical spectrum of the DEMUX channel 2 output in system 1 and system 2 are shown in the figures on the right, top and bottom, respectively. The cross talk from channel 1 to channel 2 in system 1 (using a MUX) is only 111 dBm, while that in system 2 (using a coupler) is 40 dBm. In system 2, the coupler combines 2 channels together without any filtering. The side mode from channel 1s transmitter is not suppressed by the coupler. Conversely, the side mode is suppressed by the MUX in system 1 (through its filtering effect) in each channel. Therefore, the cross talk (from channel 1 to channel 2) in system 2, is larger than that in system 1. -111 dBm -40 dBm 18 Copyright VPIsystems. All rights reserved. Filtering effect of a MUX Now switch channel 2 on by setting the two TxExtModLaser Active = On. Switch on the disabled SignalAnalyzer for channel 2 in both systems and run the simulation again. The eye diagram of the received signal corresponding to channel 2 in system 1, and system 2, are shown on the right, top and bottom, respectively. The eye of received channel 2 signal in system 1 is better than that of system 2. This corresponds to the fact that the cross talk in system 1 is less than that in system 2. Exercise 7: Increase the side mode power by setting the global parameter SideModePower to 1.0e-4. Measure the SMSR of the transmitter, cross talk from channel 1 to channel 2 and the BER of the received channel 2 signal, for both systems. 19 Copyright VPIsystems. All rights reserved. Optical Fiber Amplifiers in WDM Optical amplifiers can be used in WDM system to boost the power of all channels of the transmitted signal. This can be performed by a single amplifier. The profile of the gain spectrum of an optical amplifier (EDFA) has several peaks and valleys and will not amplify all channels with the same gain. Signals near the peak of the gain will grow at the expense of the other signals. This can be a limitation if the receiver does not have a dynamic range sufficient to cover the spread of signal powers at the end of the system.
One way to combat this effect is to keep all wavelength channels in a very limited bandwidth region where the gain is more or less flat. This is restrictive, however, in terms of the available bandwidth and overall channel capacity, given a minimum channel spacing.
Without the help of additional gain-shaping and gain-flattening elements, gain flatness is a difficult goal to achieve in a system where several erbium-doped fiber amplifiers are cascaded. The simulation of the behavior of amplifiers in a WDM system can provide a guide for optimizing the transmission characteristics of the system, both in terms of the choice of the amplifier and possible gain flattening as well as shaping filters. 20 Copyright VPIsystems. All rights reserved. Optical Fiber Amplifiers in WDM Open the setup System1_5. The schematic is shown below. In this example, we will investigate the limitations imposed on the WDM system due to the profile of the EDFA gain spectrum. 21 Copyright VPIsystems. All rights reserved. Optical Fiber Amplifiers in WDM Verify that the parameter Loops is set to 1, and run the simulation. The SignalAnalyzer (OSA) directly after the amplifier shows clearly the wavelength dependence of the gain and the ASE noise (see figure below). 22 Copyright VPIsystems. All rights reserved. Optical Fiber Amplifiers in WDM The SignalAnalyzer (Scope) trace of channel 1 (bottom left figure) shows the signal detected at the receiver. The corresponding eye diagram (bottom right figure) is clearly open. In order to see it press the eye-button in the toolbar of the VPIphotonicsAnalyzer. 23 Copyright VPIsystems. All rights reserved. Optical Fiber Amplifiers in WDM Set Loops to 7 for simulate a cascade of 7 amplified spans. The optical spectrum below is that of the WDM signal after transmission through 7 amplifiers. Question 5: What is the difference between this spectrum and the one for Loops = 1? 24 Copyright VPIsystems. All rights reserved. Optical Fiber Amplifiers in WDM The scope trace of channel 1 (bottom left figure) shows the signal detected at the receiver. This time, the detected signal is of poor quality, as confirmed by the corresponding closed eye diagram (bottom right figure). Question 6: What is the cause of signal degradation in channel 1? Hint: Compare the spectrum of the WDM signal when Loops = 1 to the one when Loops = 7. 25 Copyright VPIsystems. All rights reserved. Summary In this module, the performance of simple WDM systems is demonstrated. Key components of a WDM system, i.e. multiplexer, de-multiplexer, and optical amplifier, are introduced and their effect on system performance are investigated. How the channel spacing is limited by the bit rate of each channel is presented. The difference between using a WDM multiplexer and a optical coupler to combine channels is demonstrated. Why the gain profile of optical amplifier need to be flattened is discussed. 26 Copyright VPIsystems. All rights reserved.