Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I-I1, 1987
0277-9536 87 $3.00+0.00
Copyright ~ 1987 Pergamon Journals Ltd
$.$M 24 I--A
THOMASJ. CSORDAS
than possession and healing being treated as subtopics under religion, possession was now a subtopic
in a discussion of psychopathology. Whereas in 1937
Field stressed the 'fundamental difference' between
the conceptions and premises of African and European medicine, in 1960 spirit possession was part of
the 'ideological background' for an analysis of psychopathology. The trend continued with the first
major collection on possession trance, edited by
Prince [9] in 1966, which includes, among several
articles concerned with psychotherapeutic aspects of
possession, only one that specifically addresses its
religious meanings, and then primarily with regard to
Asian traditions [10]. In 1967 Kennedy [11] published
an account of the zar cult as a form of psychotherapy,
including the hypothesis that the core participants of
the cult "Tend to be rather unstable, emotional, and
hysteria-prone persons" [7, p. 189].
In his 1973 account of the North African Hamadsha, Crapanzano [12] expressed a methodological
tension in his choice of a "framework familiar to
readers of Western medical and psychiatric literaure." He acknowledged this as a bias, stating that his
informants would not agree, and that indeed it would
be possible instead to emphasize religion or folk
theology. His rationale for adopting the medical
framework was that cult adherents see its role not as
mystical union but as cure, and that the question of
whether these cures are religious is meaningless for
them, since for them everything is religious. Crapanzano's own notion of a symbiotic cure in which the
patient merges with a cult calls into question any easy
distinction between mystical union and cure, however, and the fact that informants see everything as
religious does not necessarily grant that the anthropologist leave to make the distinction for them
between religious and medical dimensions of their
experience--at least not without some careful methodological critique of the distinction. Prince [13], in
his 1974 discussion of Yoruba possession cults as
psychiatric treatment, also blurs this distinction. Beginning with an interest in psychiatric disorders in the
Yoruba population, he observed that psychotic patients were at times initiated for therapeutic purposes.
He describes two cult initiations from Nigeria which
are indeed those of psychotics, but in two additional
initiations described from the Yoruba candombl~ cult
of Brazil, there is no indication that the initiates are
'patients' in any sense. Yet a psychological interpretation is offered that lumps together situations the
actors in which may have been 'possessed' of very
different motives.
Lewis' [14] influential cross-cultural study of 1971,
which also used the zar as an examplary case, introduced the polar classification of possession cults as
'central' or 'peripheral.' This work helped to crystallize the trend identified here, and thus deserves
extended comment. The central possession cult is
defined as part of the institutional apparatus upholding a society's moral order, and possession is usually
regarded as a positive experience, Peripheral possession cults are the refuge of marginal, low-status,
non-mainstream individuals and possession is usually
regarded as a form of illness. This distinction introduces an implicit notion of social pathology to that
of individual illness and therapy. The central cult is
THOMAS J. CSORDAS
the Anglo-American literature, and contrasts substantially with the better known zar cult.
CANDOMBLI~
THOMAS J. C$ORDAS
In contrast to some possession cults, each participant in candomblb has only one guardian spirit. A
person often resembles, or has certain personality
traits in c o m m o n with the guardian orixa: it is
c o m m o n to say that a person is 'for Oxala' or 'for
Oxun' in the same way that a North American might
say that a person 'takes after her grandmother.' This
suggests caution in concluding that spirit possession
in candomblk is a cultivation of the multiple personality phenomenon, wherein repressed or unrecognized motives are acted out [52]. Those who are
initiated into the possession experience undergo a
careful process of training over a period of several
months, since they will be responsible for incarnating their deity in human form. During this period.
initiates make the elaborate costume characteristic of
their patron, and learn both the complex mythology
associated with that divinity and its t?pical patterns
of behavior and speech as manifested on ritual occasions. During initiation the novice Filha-de-Santo is
secluded in darkness in a twilight state of semi-trance
characterized as one of childlike suggestability or
regression, and referred to in Y o r u b a as ~r& While
totally absorbed in the sacred presence, the novice is
sensitized to the drum rhythm sacred to her orixa,
so that on ritual occasions her possession experience
is initimately tied to a particular musical experience.
Thus, there is no uniform susceptibility to sonic
driving [35] as a mechanism of trance induction, but
rather a selective suggestibility based on cultivated
sensitivity to the interweaving of musical themes in
the ceremonies [cf. 5].
The effects of this training are seen not only in the
carefully stylized behavior of the deities during ritual
possessions, but in interactions among orixas that
reflect their relations in myth. For example, Bastide
[36] recounts that one of Xango's wives, once tricked
in myth by her co-wife, often flies into a rage during
ceremonies, and must be restrained by assistants from
beating her malefactress in revenge. Thus, instead of
therapeutic acting out, spirit possession in candomblb
can be seen as a pure form of ritual drama, where the
parts of deities are not played by humans, but where
the deities in effect play themselves. Also according to
Bastide, the relation of the individual to her possessing orixa is essentially one o f mystical communion. On an interpretive level, the mystical relation in
this instance takes precedence over features of social
pathology or marginality that are often invoked in
o f p o s s e s s i o n cults. In Bastide's
" . . . (T)he social can only inscibe, in the domain of interpersonal relations, the laws of the mystical life. The devees
of participation in the group can only follow those of the
identification of a person with the orixa. The variations of
social solidarity are finally only the reflection, and the
consequence, of the variations of solidarity established
between the person and the world of the gods ... It is not
social morphology that commands religion or explains it,
but on the contrary the mystical that commands the social"
[36, pp. 27 and 28; my translation].
CASE VIGNETTES
If illness is n o t the p r i m a r y c o n c e r n o f candombl~
p a r t i c i p a n t s , a n d the cult's existence is n o t a d e q u a t e l y
e x p l a i n e d as a r e s p o n s e to social m a r g i n a l i t y , it is still
necessary in a b a l a n c e d e t h n o p s y c h i a t r i c a p p r o a c h to
view it as a resource for the h e a l t h a n d well-being o f
a c o m m u n i t y t h r o u g h the m e a s u r e s o f ritual p r o p h y laxis p r e s c r i b e d by the M ~ e - d e - S a n t o in c o n s u l t a t i o n .
A l t h o u g h o n o c c a s i o n p e o p l e with v a r i o u s m e d i c a l
illnesses c o n s u l t the M d e - d e - S a n t o , m o s t c o n s u l t e e s
are p e o p l e with p s y c h o s o c i a l issues such as m a r i t a l
p r o b l e m s , financial difficulties o r p r o b l e m s with
d r u g s a n d alcohol. T h e following is an e x a m p l e o f
such a situation, as r e c o u n t e d by D r R u b i m : .
THOMAS J. CSORDAS
10
THOMAS J. CSORDAS
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
REFERENCES
I, Bourguignon E. The effectiveness of religious healing
movements: a review of recent literature. Trans.
Psychiar Res. Rev. 13, 5-21, 1976.
2. Cox R.. (Ed.) Religious Systems and Psychotherapy.
Thomas, Springfield, 1973.
3. LaBarre W. The Ghost Dance: The Origins of Religion.
Delta, New York, 1972.
4. Bourguignon E. (Ed.) Religion, Altered States of Cot.sciousness, and Social Change. Ohio State University
Press, Columbus, 1973.
5. R.ouget G. La Musique et la Transe. Gallimard, Paris,
1980.
6. Messing S. Group therapy and social status in the zar
cult of Ethiopia. In Culture and Mental Health: CrossCultural Studies (Edited by Opler M.). Macmillan, New
York, 1959.
7. Field M. Search for Security: An ethnopsychiatric Study
of Rural Ghana. Northeastern University Press,
Evanston, 1960.
8. Field M. Religion and Medicine of the Ga People.
Oxford University Press, London, 1937.
9. Prince R.. (Ed.) Trance and Possession States. R. M.
Bucke Memorial Society, Montreal, 1966.
I0. Wayman A. the religious meaning of possession states
(with Indo-Tibetan emphasis). In Trance and Possession
States (Edited by Prince R.). R..M. Bucke Memorial
Society, Montreal, 1966.
11. Kennedy J. Nubian zar ceremonies as psychotherapy.
Hum. Org. 26, 185-194, 1967.
12. Crapanzano V. The Hamadsha: A Study in Moroccan
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
ll