Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RESEARCH ARTICLE
ABSTRACT
One of the biggest challenges for making dyesensitised solar cells (DSCs) on plastic substrates is the difculty in making
good quality nanoporous TiO2 lms with both good mechanical stability and high electrical conductivity. Cold isostatic
pressing (CIP) is a powder compaction technique that applies an isostatic pressure to a powder sample in all directions. It is
particularly suitable for making thin lms on plastic substrates, including nonat surfaces. Cold isostatically pressed
nanocrystalline TiO2 electrodes with excellent mechanical robustness were prepared on indium tin oxide (ITO)coated
polyethylene naphthalate (PEN) substrates in the absence of organic binders and without heat treatment. The morphology
and the physical properties of the TiO2 lms prepared by the CIP method were found to be very compatible with
requirements for exible DSCs on plastics. This roomtemperature processing technique has led to an important technical
breakthrough in producing high efciency exible DSCs. Devices fabricated on ITO/PEN lms by this method using
standard P25 TiO2 lms with a Rucomplex sensitiser yielded a maximum incident photontocurrent conversion
efciency of 72% at the wavelength of 530 nm and showed high conversion efciencies of 6.3% and 7.4% for incident
light intensities of 100 and 15 mW cm2, respectively, which are the highest power conversion efciencies achieved so far
for any DSC on a polymer substrate using the widely used, commercially available P25 TiO2 powder. Copyright 2011
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
KEYWORDS
flexible dyesensitised solar cells; cold isostatic pressing; plastic substrates; TiO2 lms
*Correspondence
YiBing Cheng, Department of Materials Engineering, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Vic. 3800, Australia.
Email: yibing.cheng@monash.edu
Received 11 August 2010; Revised 20 March 2011; Accepted 4 April 2011
1. INTRODUCTION
Dyesensitised solar cells (DSCs) have been recognised as
potentially a lowcost alternative to conventional silicon
based solar cells because of their remarkably high power
conversion efciency and lowcost fabrication processes
[1,2]. The highest efciency for DSC reported to date has
exceeded 11% for devices fabricated by hightemperature
sintered TiO2 electrodes prepared on Fdoped SnO2coated
conductive glass substrates (usually around 500 C) [3].
Recently, DSCs fabricated on exible, light weight, thin
conductive polymer substrates have received much attention
because of their potential for a wide range of commercial
applications. DSCs based on exible polymer substrates are
suitable for continuous and speedy manufacturing processes
such as the rolltoroll manufacturing process used in the
Copyright 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
H. C. Weerasinghe et al.
2. EXPERIMENTAL
2.1. Deposition and processing of
nanocrystalline TiO2 lms on indium
tin oxidecoated polyethylene
naphthalate substrates
Titania suspensions of ~30 wt% were prepared by
dispersing 5 g of P25 (Degussa, Hanau, Germany) TiO2
powder in 99.7% ethanol followed by ball milling [16].
TiO2 lms with different thicknesses were coated by the
doctorblade technique on ITOPEN (13 /) substrates
purchased from Peccell Technologies (Kanagawa, Japan)
322
Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 2012; 20:321332 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
DOI: 10.1002/pip
H. C. Weerasinghe et al.
Figure 1. Schematic presentation of the steps for the preparation of TiO2 electrodes by the cold isostatic pressing (CIP) technique.
Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 2012; 20:321332 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
DOI: 10.1002/pip
323
H. C. Weerasinghe et al.
Figure 2. Optical microscopic images (a, b) and the 3D prolometry (c, d) of TiO2 lms on indium tin oxidecoated polyethylene
naphthalate substrates before (a, c) and after (b, d) cold isostatic pressing compression.
Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 2012; 20:321332 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
DOI: 10.1002/pip
H. C. Weerasinghe et al.
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscopic images of the surface of TiO2 lms (a) before and (b) after compression by cold isostatic
pressing.
Figure 4. (A) Appearance of the TiO2 lms on an indium tin oxide (ITO)coated polyethylene naphthalate (PEN) substrate asprinted (a)
and after cold isostatic pressing (CIP) compression at 200 MPa (b) when the lms were laid on a wooden bench. (B) Variation of the
transmittance of the 12mthick TiO2 lms on ITOPEN substrates processed at different CIP pressures.
Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 2012; 20:321332 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
DOI: 10.1002/pip
325
H. C. Weerasinghe et al.
Figure 5. N2 adsorptiondesorption isotherms and pore size distribution (insert gure) of (a) unpressed and (b) cold isostatic pressing
processed TiO2 lms.
Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 2012; 20:321332 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
DOI: 10.1002/pip
H. C. Weerasinghe et al.
Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 2012; 20:321332 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
DOI: 10.1002/pip
327
H. C. Weerasinghe et al.
Figure 7. The variation of (a) lateral displacement, (b) normal displacement, (c) lateral force and (d) normal force of the nanoindenter on
the TiO2 lms made at different pressures. A typical measured curve is displayed for each sample. (e) Averaged maximum normal
force (at t = 8 s) and (f) averaged steady state lateral force (t = 30 s) variation against the cold isostatic pressing pressure (the average
values were calculated based on ve different scratch tests).
Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 2012; 20:321332 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
DOI: 10.1002/pip
H. C. Weerasinghe et al.
Table I. Nanoindentation and nanoscratch results of averaged maximum normal force and steady state lateral force with increasing
processing pressure (based on ve different scratches).
Pressure applied (MPa)
Unpressed
70
140
200
220
1300
1982
2383
94
276
147
214
153
961
1538
1856
54
201
139
165
Thickness
Jsc
(m) (mA cm2) Voc (V)
Nonpressed
CIP
processed
12.3
17.3
9.79
13.05
ff (%)
0.663 63 4.05
0.732 66 6.30
Maximum
IPCE (%)
43
72
4. CONCLUSIONS
Figure 9. Currentvoltage characteristics under dark conditions
for the Pt|electrolyte|N719|TiO2 cells prepared using (a) unpressed and (b) cold isostatic pressing (CIP)pressed TiO2
electrodes and under illuminated conditions (1 sun) for the cells
prepared by (c) unpressed and (d) CIPpressed TiO2 electrodes.
The insert shows the relationship between the conversion
efciency and the CIP pressure.
Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 2012; 20:321332 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
DOI: 10.1002/pip
329
H. C. Weerasinghe et al.
Figure 10. Dependence of the ll factor, opencircuit voltage, current density and energy conversion efciency on the TiO2 lm
thickness (a, b) and the incident light intensity (c, d).
Figure 11. Impedance spectra of Pt|electrolyte|N719|TiO2 cells prepared using TiO2 electrodes (with an initial thickness of 15 m)
processed at different cold isostatic pressing pressure values.
optimised thickness have yielded high conversion efciencies of 6.3% and 7.4% for an incident solar energy of 100
and 15 mW cm2, respectively.
Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 2012; 20:321332 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
DOI: 10.1002/pip
H. C. Weerasinghe et al.
R0 ()
R1 ()
R2 ()
Unpressed
35
70
140
200
23.21
27.76
27.06
28.94
29.91
80.56
30.21
15.79
11.93
11.51
102.34
94.39
39.11
23.58
22.93
R0 ()
R1 ()
R2 ()
0.4
2.7
8.4
16.2
20.46
23.08
26.43
26.7
47.22
34.99
14.37
6.37
161.5
23.08
29.65
11.73
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Financial support by the Victorian Consortium in Organic
Solar Cells (VICOSC) is greatly appreciated by the
authors. Research facilities provided by the ARC Centre
of Excellence for Electromaterials Science (ACES) and
RMIT Microscopy & Microanalysis Facility (RMMF) for
SEM analysis are also acknowledged.
REFERENCES
1. ORegan B, Gratzel M. A lowcost, highefciency
solar cell based on dyesensitized colloidal TiO2 lms.
Nature 1991; 353: 737740.
2. Gratzel M. Photoelectrochemical cells. Nature 2001;
414: 338 344.
3. Chiba Y, Islam A, Watanabe Y, Komiya R, Koide N,
Han LY. Dyesensitized solar cells with conversion
efciency of 11.1%. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics
Part 2 Letters & Express Letters 2006; 45: L638L640.
4. Nemoto J, Sakata M, Hoshi T, Ueno H, Kaneko M.
Allplastic dyesensitized solar cell using a polysaccharide lm containing excess redox electrolyte solution.
Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 2007; 599: 2330.
5. Zhang D, Yoshida T, Furuta K, Minoura H.
Hydrothermal preparation of porous nanocrystalline
TiO2 electrodes for exible solar cells. Journal of
Photochemistry and Photobiology, A: Chemistry
2004; 164: 159 166.
6. Tan WW, Chen JM, Zhou XW, Zhang JB,
Lin YA, Li XP, Xiao XR. Preparation of nanocrystalline TiO2 thin lm at low temperature and its
application in dyesensitized solar cell. Journal of
Solid State Electrochemistry 2009; 13: 651 656.
7. Murakami TN, Kijitori Y, Kawashima N, Miyasaka T.
Low temperature preparation of mesoporous TiO2 lms
for efcient dyesensitized photoelectrode by chemical
vapor deposition combined with UV light irradiation.
Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology, A:
Chemistry 2004; 164: 187191.
8. Tebby Z, Babot O, Michau D, Hirsch L, Carlos L,
Toupance T. A simple route towards lowtemperature
processing of nanoporous thin lms using UV
irradiation: application for dye solar cells. Journal of
Photochemistry and Photobiology, A: Chemistry
2009; 205: 70 76.
9. Miyasaka T, Kijitori Y. Lowtemperature fabrication of
dyesensitized plastic electrodes by electrophoretic
preparation of mesoporous TiO2 layers. Journal of the
Electrochemical Society 2004; 151: A1767A1773.
10. Grinis L, Dor S, Or A, Zaban A. Electrophoretic
deposition and compression of titania nanoparticle lms
for dyesensitized solar cells. Journal of Photochemistry
and Photobiology, A: Chemistry 2008; 198: 5259.
11. Miyasaka T, Ikegami M, Kijitori Y. Photovoltaic
performance of plastic dyesensitized electrodes prepared by lowtemperature binderfree coating of
mesoscopic titania. Journal of The Electrochemical
Society 2007; 154: A455A461.
12. Durr M, Schmid A, Obermaier M, Rosselli S,
Yasuda A, Nelles G. Lowtemperature fabrication of
dyesensitized solar cells by transfer of composite
porous layers. Nature Materials 2005 4: 607 611.
Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 2012; 20:321332 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
DOI: 10.1002/pip
331
H. C. Weerasinghe et al.
332
Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 2012; 20:321332 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
DOI: 10.1002/pip