Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Received 30 November 2020; revised 29 January 2021; accepted 9 February 2021; posted 10 February 2021 (Doc. ID 416286);
published 2 March 2021
A SiO2 /TiO2 bilayer thin-film-based fiber optic humidity sensor was fabricated via a modified dip coating proc-
ess with enhanced sensitivity. SiO2 film was coated on the surface of the fiber core, followed by deposition of the
TiO2 layer on SiO2 . The relative humidity (RH) is measured by modulation in intensity of the transmitted laser at
room temperature. The optical fiber humidity sensor based on SiO2 /TiO2 film shows two-segmented linearity in
measurement with sensitivities of 5.35 and 1.94 µW/% RH at 15%–50% RH and 50%–95% RH, respectively. The
response time and recovery time are 25 s and 50 s, respectively. To our knowledge, the superior response time and
recovery time of the sensor in our study were achieved over those fiber optic humidity sensors reported with modu-
lation in intensity. Furthermore, this fiber optic humidity sensor has a good reproducibility and long-term stabil-
ity. The sensing mechanism is attributed to effects of moisture on the refractive index and the light absorption coef-
ficient of SiO2 film and modulation in the transmission characteristic of evanescent waves in the optical fiber. ©
2021 Optical Society of America
https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.416286
Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of a sensing device for fiber optic humidity sensor based on SiO2 /TiO2 film.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 48.0◦ , 53.9◦ , and 62.7◦ for the TiO2 film in the figure are con-
A. XRD Analysis
sistent with the crystal faces of anatase TiO2 structure (101),
(004), (200), (105), and (204) (JCPDS card No. 21-1272).
The XRD diffraction pattern of the SiO2 and TiO2 films is
shown in Fig. 3. No sharp peaks were observed for the SiO2
B. SEM Analysis
film, which indicated that the SiO2 film prepared by the sol-gel
method was amorphous. The peaks observed at 25.3◦ , 37.8◦ , Figure 4 shows the surface morphology and microstructures of
the fiber core, the SiO2 film coated on the core, and the TiO2
film on the SiO2 film, respectively. The bare fiber core possesses
a smooth surface, which offers benefits for coating a smooth
film on it. The SiO2 film coated on the bare core exhibits a flat
surface with a moderate amount of nanopores, which is con-
ducive to adsorption of water molecules. After coating the TiO2
film, the loss of unique structure of the SiO2 film indicated
the TiO2 film fully covered the SiO2 film. A rough surface of
TiO2 film was achieved which resulted from the aggregation of
TiO2 particles during deposition. The thicknesses of the SiO2
layer and TiO2 layer of the sensor with SiO2 -2/TiO2 -3 are
estimated to be 375 ± 34 nm and 424 ± 48 nm , respectively.
C. Humidity Sensing
Fig. 3. XRD diffraction patterns of SiO2 film and TiO2 film. Sensitivity is generally considered to be the ratio of the change in
the output signal to the input signal. In this paper, sensitivity is
Fig. 4. Side-view SEM images of (a),(b) bare fiber core; (c),(d) SiO2 film coated fiber core; and (e),(f ) TiO2 film coated SiO2 /fiber core. (g),(h)
Cross-sectional SEM images of the sensor with SiO2 -2/TiO2 -3 films. Images in (g) and (h) were taken on the same site with different focuses.
Research Article Vol. 60, No. 8 / 10 March 2021 / Applied Optics 2161
defined as [36–38] The moisture absorption (from 15% RH to 95% RH) and
desorption processes (from 95% RH to 15% RH) of the fiber
1P
Sensitivity = w/%RH, (1) optic sensor with SiO2 -2/TiO2 -3 bilayer films were studied at
1%RH room temperature, which is shown in Fig. 7. The results show
in which 1P is the change of output power of the optical fiber, that there is a slight deviation in the optical power change curves
and 1%RH is the corresponding change in relative humidity. of humidification and drying. The average relative deviation of
Figure 5 shows the average sensitivity of fiber optic sensors the round-trip measurement is less than 0.67%, indicating that
coated with different layered SiO2 . Sample SiO2 -2 shows the optical humidity sensor possesses an excellent reversibility in
the superior sensitivity with RH varying from 15% to 95%. the processes of increasing or decreasing the relative humidity.
Less coating was probably unable to offer a sufficient length for This hysteresis is probably ascribed to the fact that the response
penetration of evanescent waves. However, excessive coating of the fiber optic humidity sensor in this work was faster than
resulted in a decrease of the efficiency of moisture transport that of the hygrometer for calibration in both vapor adsorption
from the surface to the interior. The output power change of and desorption processes [39].
the optical sensors based on SiO2 -2 film and TiO2 film pre- As the ambient RH increases, the output power of optical
pared by different coating times with increasing RH and the fiber decreases. In the range of low RH (15%–50% RH), the
corresponding average sensitivity are shown in Figs. 6(a) and output power drops sharply, while in the range of high RH
6(b). The sensor with TiO2 -3 film achieved the optimal average (50%–95% RH), the decreasing slope of output power reduces.
sensitivity of 3.41 µW/% RH, which is probably attributed Figure 8 shows the two-segment linearity of the optical fiber
to its suitable thickness for performance both in absorbing humidity sensor with sensitivities of 5.35 and 1.94 µW/% RH
ambient water molecules and in further transferring to the SiO2 at high relative humidity and low relative humidity, respec-
layer. Moreover, the sensitivity of the sensors was significantly tively. It shows that the optical fiber humidity sensor has a good
enhanced after coating TiO2 film, which is attributed to the linearity in both low and high RH ranges.
hydrophilic nature of TiO2 film, i.e., the efficient collection of Figure 9 shows the transient output power profile of the
moisture. Hence, the sensor with SiO2 -2 and TiO2 -3 films was fiber optic sensor with SiO2 -2/TiO2 -3 bilayer films with RH
selected for further study hereafter in this work. variation from 15% to 95%. The response time and recovery
time are 25 s and 50 s, respectively. To illustrate that the sensor
is superior to other humidity sensors in terms of response and
recovery time, Table 1 summarizes the comparison between the
humidity sensors studied in this work and those reported. The
fiber optic humidity sensor based on SiO2 -2/TiO2 -3 bilayer
films exhibits a fast response and recovery over those reported.
Gupta et al. [21] reported a highly sensitive fiber optic humidity
sensor based on phenol red doped polymethylmethacrylate film
with a response time of ∼5 s and humidity range of 20%–80%
RH. However, the humidity-control technique for sensing
test was different from that in this work, which might result in
different measurement of response time.
Fig. 5. Average sensitivity of fiber optic sensors with SiO2 films
In order to study the reproducibility of the fiber optic humid-
prepared by different coating times with RH varying from 15% to ity sensor, the sensing performance in the range of 15%–95%
95%. RH has been successively examined for three times, as shown
in Fig. 10. The variation characteristic of optical power nearly
Fig. 6. (a) Variation of output power with increasing RH from 15% to 95% and (b) average sensitivity of fiber optic humidity sensors coated with
SiO2 -2 film and TiO2 -1 , TiO2 -2 , TiO2 -3 , and TiO2 -4 films.
2162 Vol. 60, No. 8 / 10 March 2021 / Applied Optics Research Article
Fig. 8. Linearity of optical fiber humidity sensor based on SiO2 /TiO2 film with RH of (a) 15%–50% and (b) 50%–95%.
Table 1. Comparison of Response and Recovery Time of Fiber Optic Humidity Sensors
Sensing Materials Mechanism Response Time Recovery Time Humidity Range References
SiO2 /TiO2 film Intensity 25 s 50 s 15%–95% This work
Polymethyl methacrylate Intensity 27 s 168 s 35%–85% [40]
Silica sol-gel film Intensity 30 s 180 s 0.025%–16.2% [33]
Porous silica xerogel film Intensity 120 s 120 s 44%–100% [34]
Research Article Vol. 60, No. 8 / 10 March 2021 / Applied Optics 2163
Fig. 10. Repeatability of fiber optic humidity sensor. Fig. 12. Relationship between transmission characteristic
Pt (z)/Pt (0) and the absorption coefficient n 3i . In the simula-
tion, the light wavelength, fiber radius, fiber length, and core refractive
. Based on the physical properties of optical fiber and coat- index are 650 nm, 500 µm, 25 cm, and 1.52, respectively.
ings, the transmission characteristics of light in the fiber optic
fiber are shown in Fig. 12. After adsorption of water vapor, the
4. CONCLUSIONS
refractive index of SiO2 cladding decreases, which results in
the decrease of the transmission characteristic Pt (z)/Pt (0) if A fiber optic evanescent wave humidity sensor based on
the absorption coefficient n 3i is constant. In addition, light SiO2 /TiO2 bilayer films has been fabricated by modulating
absorption of the cladding is enhanced with the exposure to the intensity of laser transmitted. SiO2 film and TiO2 film
humid air. With a constant refractive index n 3 of the cladding, are employed as the optical fiber cladding and the humidity
the transmission characteristic of optical power exhibits a linear sensitive material, respectively. Anatase TiO2 thin film was
coated by a modified dip coating method after deposition of an
decrease with the logarithmic increase of absorption coefficient
amorphous SiO2 layer on the fiber core. The output power of
n 3i if n 3i < 5 × 10−6 . By overall effects on the refractive index
the transmitted beam decreased with increasing RH. Sensors
and absorption coefficient of the cladding with the exposure
based on SiO2 /TiO2 bilayer films were superior on sensitivity
to humid air, the output power of the fiber decreases with over those based on pure SiO2 films. The fiber optic humidity
increasing RH, which is consistent with the test results. When sensor based on SiO2 /TiO2 film shows linearity in two seg-
n 3i > 5 × 10−6 , the transmission characteristic Pt (z)/Pt (0) ments in the whole measurement range of RH. The sensitivity
does not change with the variation of the absorption coefficient, is determined to be 5.35 µW/% RH ( R 2 = 0.995 ) in the RH
i.e., the optical power remains constant, which is ascribed to the range of 15%–50%, and 1.94 µW/% RH ( R 2 = 0.993 ) in
exp(−αz) in Eq. (3) approaching zero. A high RH may lead the RH range of 50%–95%. The response and recovery times
to a high absorption coefficient of the SiO2 layer, which has were determined to be 25 s and 50 s, respectively. In addition,
a negligible effect on the decrease of output power. Therefore, this fiber optic humidity sensor possessed a good repeatability
the sensitivity is lowered compared to that in the low RH range, and long-term stability after aging. The sensing mechanism is
which probably generate two-segment linearity of sensing. based on the absorption of moisture on the TiO2 film and also
2164 Vol. 60, No. 8 / 10 March 2021 / Applied Optics Research Article
diffusion of water molecules promoted by the TiO2 film, which 17. S. Akita, H. Sasaki, K. Watanabe, and A. Seki, “A humidity sen-
leads to the change of the refractive index and light absorption sor based on a hetero-core optical fiber,” Sens. Actuators B 147,
385–391 (2010).
coefficient of the SiO2 film. The transmission characteristics
18. M. Consales, A. Buosciolo, A. Cutolo, G. Breglio, A. Lrace, S.
of evanescent waves in the optical fiber are modulated corre- Buontempo, P. Petagna, M. Giordano, and A. Cusano, “Fiber optic
spondingly. The fiber optic humidity sensor may be applicable humidity sensors for high-energy physics applications at CERN,”
in many sites such as remote online observation stations. Sens. Actuators B 159, 66–74 (2011).
19. T. L. Yeo, T. Sun, and K. T. V. Grattan, “Fibre-optic sensor technolo-
Funding. National Natural Science Foundation of China (41975172, gies for humidity and moisture measurement,” Sens. Actuators A
51472123, 51502143). 144, 280–295 (2008).
20. M. M. Li, T. Dubaniewicz, H. Dougherty, and J. Addis, “Evaluation of
Acknowledgment. The authors thank J. Zhao for the discussion on fiber optic methane sensor using a smoke chamber,” Int. J. Min. Sci.
humidity test setup. Technol. 28, 969–974 (2018).
21. B. D. Gupta and Ratnanjali, “A novel probe for a fiber optic humidity
Disclosures. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. sensor,” Sens. Actuators B 80, 132–135 (2001).
22. W. Q. Cao and Y. X. Duan, “Optical fiber-based evanescent ammonia
sensor,” Sens. Actuators B 110, 252–259 (2005).
REFERENCES 23. S. K. Khijwania, K. L. Srinivasan, and J. P. Singh, “An evanescent-
1. Y. Chen, Y.-J. Wen, Y. Chen, J. T. Cothren, X. Zhang, Y.-H. Wang, wave optical fiber relative humidity sensor with enhanced sensitivity,”
W. A. Payne, and D.-H. Chen, “Effects of extreme air temperature and Sens. Actuators B104, 217–222 (2005).
humidity on the insecticidal expression level of Bt cotton,” J. Integr. 24. B. D. Gupta, H. Dodeja, and A. K. Tomar, “Fibre-optic evanescent
Agric.11, 1836–1844 (2012). field absorption sensor based on a U-shaped probe,” Opt. Quantum
2. A. EI-Turki, R. J. Ball, and G. C. Allen, “The influence of relative Electron. 28, 1629–1639 (1996).
humidity on structural and chemical changes during carbonation of 25. B. D. Gupta and N. K. Sharma, “Fabrication and characterization
hydraulic lime,” Cem. Concr. Res.37, 1233–1240 (2007). of U-shaped fiber-optic pH probes,” Sens. Actuators B 82, 89–93
3. Y. Xiong, Q.-S. Meng, J. Gao, X.-F. Tang, and H.-H. Zhang, “Effects (2002).
of relative humidity on animal health and welfare,” J. Integr. Agric. 16, 26. S. Tao, S. Gong, J. C. Fanguy, and X. Hu, “The application of a light
1653–1658 (2017). guiding flexible tubular waveguide in evanescent wave absorption
4. Z. W. Yao and M. J. Yang, “A fast response resistance-type humidity optical sensing,” Sens. Actuators B120, 724–731 (2007).
sensor based on organic silicon containing cross-linked copolymer,” 27. M. Tateda and M. Ikeda, “Mode conversion in bent step index multi-
Sens. Actuators B 117, 93–98 (2006). mode fibers,” Appl. Opt.15, 2308–2310 (1976).
5. Y. Li, C. Deng, and M. J. Yang, “A novel surface acoustic wave- 28. C. D. Singh and K. Singh, “Effect of launching condition in response
impedance humidity sensor based on the composite of polyaniline time analysis for few selected tapered porous clad optical fiber gas
and poly(vinyl alcohol) with a capability of detecting low humidity,” sensors,” Opt. Quantum Electron. 33, 189–199 (2001).
Sens. Actuators B165, 7–12 (2012). 29. M. Parthibavarman, V. Hariharan, and C. Sekar, “High-sensitivity
6. A. R. K. Ralston, C. F. Klein, P. E. Thoma, and D. D. Denton, “A model humidity sensor based on SnO2 nanoparticles synthesized by
for the relative environmental stability of a series of polyimide capaci- microwave irradiation method,” Mater. Sci. Eng. C 31, 840–844
tance humidity sensors,” Sens. Actuators B34, 343–348 (1996). (2011).
7. S. Mallick, Z. Ahmad, K. W. Qadir, A. Rehman, R. A. Shakoor, F. 30. A. Erol, S. Okur, N. Yağmurcukardeş, and M. Ç. Arıkan, “Humidity-
Touati, and S. A. Al-Muhtaseb, “Effect of BaTiO3 on the sensing sensing properties of a ZnO nanowire film as measured with a QCM,”
properties of PVDF composite-based capacitive humidity sensors,” Sens. Actuators B 152, 115–120 (2011).
Ceram. Int.46, 2949–2953 (2020). 31. Y. K. Mishra, G. Modi, V. Cretu, V. Postica, O. Lupan, T. Reimer, I.
8. J.-M. Tulliani and P. Bonville, “Influence of the dopants on the elec- Paulowicz, V. Hrkac, W. Benecke, L. Kienle, and R. Adelung, “Direct
trical resistance of hematite-based humidity sensors,” Ceram. Int.31, growth of freestanding ZnO tetrapod networks for multifunctional
507–514 (2005). applications in photocatalysis, UV photodetection, and gas sensing,”
9. B. C. Yadav, S. Singh, and A. Yadav, “Nanonails structured ferric ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 14303–14316 (2015).
oxide thick film as room temperature liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) 32. K. P. Biju and M. K. Jain, “Sol–gel derived TiO2 :ZrO2 multilayer thin
sensor,” Appl. Surf. Sci.257, 1960–1966 (2011). films for humidity sensing application,” Sens. Actuators B 128,
10. B. C. Yadav, A. K. Yadav, and A. Kumar, “Effect of nanostructured 407–413 (2007).
zinc oxide additives on the humidity and temperature sensing prop- 33. Z. J. Zhao and Y. X. Duan, “A low cost fiber-optic humidity sensor
erties of cuprous oxide,” Int. J. Green Nanotechnol. 4, 345–353 based on silica sol–gel film,” Sens. Actuators B 160, 1340–1345
(2012). (2011).
11. K. K. Dey, D. Bhatnagar, A. K. Srivastava, M. Wan, S. Singh, R. R. 34. J. Estella, P. D. Vicente, J. C. Echeverría, and J. J. Garrido, “A fibre-
Yadav, B. C. Yadav, and M. Deepa, “VO2 nanorods for efficient per- optic humidity sensor based on a porous silica xerogel film as the
formance in thermal fluids and sensors,” Nanoscale 7, 6159–6172 sensing element,” Comput. Mater. Sci.111, 289–293 (2016).
(2015). 35. Y. B. Xiong, M. Lai, J. Li, H. B. Yong, H. Z. Qian, C. Q. Xu, K. Zhong,
12. R. K. Sonker, S. R. Sabhajeet, S. Singh, and B. C. Yadav, “Synthesis and S. R. Xiao, “Facile synthesis of ultra-smooth and transparent
of ZnO nanopetals and its application as NO2 gas sensor,” Mater. TiO2 thin films with superhydrophilicity,” Surf. Coat. Technol. 265,
Lett. 152, 189–191 (2015). 78–82 (2015).
13. B. C. Yadav and R. K. Shukla, “An opto-electronic sensor to monitor- 36. H. Kang, S. Lim, N. Park, K.-Y. Chun, and S. Baik, “High sensitivity
ing glucose concentration in water,” J. Opt. 32, 13–17 (2003). and fast response graphene oxide capacitive humidity sensor with
14. T. E. Brook, M. N. Taib, and R. Narayanaswamy, “Extending the computer-aided design,” Sens. Actuators B147, 316–321 (2010).
range of fiber–optic relative-humidity sensor,” Sens. Actuators B 39, 37. R. Aneesh and S. K. Khijwania, “Titanium dioxide nanoparticle based
272–276 (1997). optical fiber humidity sensor with linear response and enhanced sen-
15. W. J. Xie, M. H. Yang, Y. Cheng, D. W. Li, Y. Zhang, and Z. Zhuang, sitivity,” Appl. Opt.51, 2164–2171 (2012).
“Optical fiber relative-humidity sensor with evaporated dielectric 38. J. S. Kim, M. J. Lee, M.-S. Kang, K.-P. Yoo, K.-H. Kwon, V. R. Singh,
coatings on fiber end-face,” Opt. Fiber Technol.20, 314–319 (2014). and N. K. Min, “Fabrication of high-speed polyimide-based humidity
16. J. M. Corres, F. J. Arregui, and I. R. Matías, “Sensitivity optimization sensor using anisotropic and isotropic etching with ICP,” Thin Solid
of tapered optical fiber humidity sensors by means of tuning the Films517, 3879–3882 (2009).
thickness of nanostructured sensitive coatings,” Sens. Actuators B 39. X. Q. Wang, M. Lai, R. J. Gao, X. X. Huang, Z. M. Zhao, Y. Yang,
122, 442–449 (2007). G. G. Zheng, and Y. Ma, “Ultra-smooth TiO2 thin film based optical
Research Article Vol. 60, No. 8 / 10 March 2021 / Applied Optics 2165
humidity sensor with a fast response and recovery,” Appl. Opt.58, 43. G. O’Keeffe, B. D. MacCraith, A. K. McEvoy, C. M. McDonagh,
9740–9745 (2019). and J. F. McGilp, “Development of a LED-based phase fluorimet-
40. T. T. Yuan, X. X. Qi, Z. H. Liu, J. Yang, C. Y. Guan, Q. L. Long, J. M. ric oxygen sensor using evanescent wave excitation of a sol-gel
Cao, M. Luo, X. H. Yang, and L. Yuan, “Humidity sensor based immobilized dye,” Sens. Actuators B 29, 226–230 (1995).
on micro optical fiber array fabricated by electrospinning,” Opt. 44. M. Jiang, W. G. Zhang, Q. Zhang, Y. P. Liu, and B. Liu, “Investigation
Commun.427, 517–521 (2018). on an evanescent wave fiber-optic absorption sensor based on fiber
41. G. Stewart, F. A. Muhammad, and B. Culshaw, “Sensitivity improve- loop cavity ring-down spectroscopy,” Opt. Commun. 283, 249–253
ment for evanescent-wave gas sensors,” Sens. Actuators B 11, 521– (2010).
524 (1993).
42. B. D. MacCraith, “Enhanced evanescent wave sensors based on
sol-gel-derived porous glass coatings,” Sens. Actuators B11, 29–34
(1993).