Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MOBILE ETHICS
committee. The ethics codes aims to regulate the users behavior on using mobile phones
with the increasing and intense problems and irresponsible behavior of some users of mobile
technologies.
Check the number before dialing it in order not to annoy any person.
Don't annoy others with your loud conversations in case you have a mobile phone's
loud speaker. Moreover, this offends the person you are talking to (on the mobile) as
he does not know that others are hearing his conversation.
Don't use mobile phones with high technologies such as the photographic or video
cameras to violate others privacy. Know for sure that making materials that concern
any person available on the Internet or mobile phones without his knowledge or
consent is considered an immoral act punished by law and condemned and rejected by
religion and moral ethics.
Avoid sending SMSs that include inappropriate words or indecent photos as you will
be charged and accused legally for this.
Don't speak loudly on your mobile phones in public places such as hospitals, clinics
or conference halls, etc.
Switch off your mobile phone in places of worship, lecture and examination rooms,
cinemas, theatres, etc.
Switch off your mobile phone in hospitals especially in ICUs lest any potential wave
interference occurs.
MOBILE ETHICS
Choose a non-annoying ringtone for your mobile phone. Always remember that
ringtones aim mainly to make the mobile user know that he has got a call.
Don't use your mobile phone while driving as this will expose you to huge dangers
and it is illegal.
Beware of dealing with the companies that defraud people concerning certain
ringtones or applications for their mobile phones. You should deal only with
trustworthy companies.
Don't respond to text messages or calls you receive from unknown numbers or
sources because most probably they aim to swindle on you.
Ensure that no one is getting disturbed, hurt, offended or insulted by use of mobile
phone because sensitivity to the other peoples needs and comforts is best sign of
mobile etiquette.
Either put off your mobile phones or put them on silent/vibration mode while
attending meetings, seminars, conferences, symposiums, libraries, religious places,
theatre, airplane, museums, meditation halls, public rest rooms or any other public
MOBILE ETHICS
Think about the convenience and suitability of timings of receiver before calling
him/her.
Dont send any text messages, image, clip, music, graphics, ring tone or any other
form of data that may hurt, insult, disturb or offend the receiver.
Dont listen to music and watch videos in high volume in public places.
Never capture photographs of individuals with mobile cameras without their consent
and knowledge. Respect privacy of people and places for example, gym, swimming
due permission.
Dont talk on mobile phones while driving. Texting while driving is more dangerous
MOBILE ETHICS
Ethics is derived from Greek word Etos which means the way of living. Ethics is the
branch of philosophy that is considered with human conduct. More especially the
behavior of an individual in society ethics examines the rational justification for our
moral judgment.
Ethical Standards
Many local, state, and national bar associations have issued opinions regarding attorneys use
of technology. While their approach and specific conclusions vary, they generally refer to two
overarching ethical responsibilities: the duty of competence and the duty of confidentiality.
The duty of competence, as reflected in the American Bar Associations Model Rule of
Professional Conduct 1.1, provides that an attorney must have the legal knowledge, skill,
thoroughness and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation. Bar associations
have interpreted this rule to require not only knowledge regarding the particular area of law at
issue in the case, but also knowledge of the security issues involved in attorneys use of
technology.
The duty of confidentiality, as set forth in Model Rule 1.6, provides that an attorney
generally may not reveal information relating to the representation of a client. The
commentary to Rule 1.6 provides additional detail, stating that a lawyer must act
competently to avoid inadvertent or unauthorized disclosures, either by the lawyer or
by others participating in the representation, and that, when transmitting information,
a lawyer must take reasonable precautions to prevent the information from coming
into the hands of unintended recipients.
Bar association opinions apply these general concepts to many different technologies,
including email, cloud computing, document metadata, and wireless Internet
connections. While it is beyond the scope of this article to discuss the specifics of
MOBILE ETHICS
each opinion, they collectively impart several important themes that are useful to keep
in mind.
MOBILE ETHICS
The decisions made in response to a ringing mobile phone or flashing text message
emerge from consequential versus deontological ethical frames (Flew 1979; Olson 1967;
Waller 2005) used to determine what to do versus what we ought to do. This is
particularly true in western and North American cultural contexts from which our data are
collected.
Our everyday decisions and actions are also a confirmation of the social order, as our
interpretation of what is correct or incorrect behavior is relative to established social
norms, conventions, and rules (Barbour 1992; Furrow 2005). By examining our
ruminations on these rules, and our consequential actions based on individual value
judgments, we gain insight into the sense of that which is social as opposed to that which
is merely individual. The tensions that arise in decision-making processes expose the
influence of ethics on the exercise of morals within social contexts. This is non-trivial and
complex in daily, face-to-face interaction. Our ability to empathize with others who are
near at hand can lead to better choices for the benefit of the collective and more altruistic
outcomes. On the other hand, when we are more attentive to our individual desires and
consciously or not become poorly attuned to those around us, our decisions can also lead
to misunderstandings and abused feelings, and our actions may be interpreted as
insensitive.
The Concept of Mobile Ethics
Ethics is a set of rules supposed to be followed by people in a particular field. Though
unlike law breaking ethical rules does not amount any direct punishment but ethics has
social pressure bounding upon individual. Since childhood the process of learning ethical
aspects of human behavior continues lifelong. According to Merriam Websters online
dictionary, etiquette is defined as the conduct or procedure required by good breeding or
prescribed by authority to be observed in social atmosphere. Mobile phone etiquettes can
MOBILE ETHICS
be defined as good manners of proper mobile usage without hurting, disturbing and
annoying others. This may include a certain level of sensibility on the part of user
regarding when to take calls, when to ignore calls, when to silent the ringer,
appropriately sending and receiving text messages and appropriate use of mobile phone in
different situations.
Present Trend and Mobile Ethics
Mediated interaction via the mobile phone in particular adds new dimensions to ethical
considerations. We often need to decide whether it is better to respect the sensibilities of
co-present others over our desire to communicate with remote interlocutors when, for
example, our phone rings in a restaurant. In this case the affordance of the mobile phone
to dissolve geographical distance and provide virtual proximity presents the receiver with
a choice in the moment.
MOBILE ETHICS
While these are ethics that can be worked out by ponderous thought, we also need to
process these issues in the moment. In mobile-mediated interactions, decision-making
processes are further compounded by what may be described as incompatibilities in
values (Berlin 1980). An incoming call in a restaurant places the value that an individual
holds in being accessible at all times in conflict with a value that he or she has in being
solely attentive to a dinner companion: this example illustrates basic tensions of
pervasiveness versus limitedness, and being individual versus social. These decisions are
also affected by the relative newness of mobile technologies and a perception that social
rules and principles are still being worked out regarding the use of these technologies in
various contexts. By understanding the principles governing our application of everyday
ethics in these situations (both co-present and mediated) we have the opportunity to see
the workings of society: society constituted as both the primary source of our ethical
norms and behaviors, and society as reflected in the social contexts in which these norms
and behaviors emerge reflexively through praxis.
Modern society is quite often focused on the individual and is, indeed, becoming more
individualized. We see this in the sense that we need to construct and take responsibility
for our own lives (Beck and Beck-Gernsheim 2002; Lash 2002). At a more mundane
level, the drift of technology development is in the direction of more individualized
devices. Where there was public transportation, there is now personal transportation;
where there were shared landline telephones, we now each have our own mobile phone.
The mobile phone is clearly a part of this drift towards individualism. The mobile phone
gives users freedom of movement. It is our own personal communication channel. It is a
device where we can collect personal photos, our contact list, messages from friends and
family, etc.
MOBILE ETHICS
Aim
The aim of this research is to find out the awareness level of mobile ethics among the
users. It will elaborate all the dimensions of the usage.
Objectives
The objectives of this research is to
Methodology
MOBILE ETHICS
Design
The design used for this research will be observation and survey. Observation will be non
participative in nature. People using mobile phones will be visualized. Their etiquettes and
manners of talking will be seen and noted down. This study is an effort to look at completely
new areas of communication ethics. Along with observation method secondary data will be
collected through survey.
Variables
The elements to be studied will be
Universe
The universe for this research will be Ranchi city.
Sample
A sample of 100 mobile users will be taken from Ranchi. Equal sample of male and women
will be taken. Sample will be selected from home of some colonies of Ranchi city.
Sampling
Convenient sampling technique will be employed for taking the sample for the research.
Instruments
Questionnaire will be used as a tool of data collection. The questions to be enquired will be1. Do you use mobile phone frequently?
2. Are you aware of the ethical codes of mobile usage?
3. Giving a situation, how you handle cell phones at that time?
Literature Review
MOBILE ETHICS
MOBILE ETHICS
This article analyzed what happens to that connection when not only the image but also the
physical body is mediated and challenged in post-human relations, and examined the ensuing
ethical implications. The author took photojournalism and, in particular, mobile phone
footage as a starting point for an exploration of the (post-human) body as evidence and sign
of authenticity in the modern age of digital communications and journalism.
Mobile Witnessing: Ethics and the Camera Phone in the War on Terror(2005)
Some of the first images were rapidly circulated globally in news media of the London
Bombings on 7 July 2005 that were taken by non-journalists using mobile camera phones.
This paper explored some of the ethical issues raised by mobile phone witnessing in the war
on terror.
The article uses a performative approach of witnessing in which mobile testimony is seen in
terms of performances and speech acts between different parties, including
mute witness
the survivor witness and
witness to the survivor
The approach enabled to see the significance of global mobilities and mobilizations in
relation to ethics and mobile witnessing, rather than focusing only the ethics associated with
the discrete mobile witness image itself. The article examined some of the global virtual
traces and data trajectories on the World Wide Web associated with a mobile camera phone
image taken by a witness survivor, Adam Stacey in the 7 July 2005 London Bombings.
This suggested that mobile witnessing involves a fluid and travelling involvement in data
capture, data sharing, and receipt, through global networks mobilized through multiple
mobilities. Mobile witnessing has trajectories across and moments of emplacement between
the self and the other, the individual and the group, the private and the public, the citizen and
the professional journalist, the living body and the machine. In traversing the ordinary and the
MOBILE ETHICS
extraordinary, speech and speechlessness, mobile witnessing can involve engagement beyond
mere spectatorship, establishing new ways of recording events in the war on terror.
Given that cell phones are potentially hazardous to our health, why do we constantly
push for more availability and advancement of cell phone technology?
MOBILE ETHICS
Finally, how do we deal with more subtle ethics such as teaching our children safe
and responsible cell phone use?
MOBILE ETHICS
MOBILE ETHICS
Many rudiments of mobile etiquettes are outcome of common sense already prevalent in
society; therefore respondents are familiar of it. But despite knowing it people do not bother
to apply it in their day-to-day life. Of course there is huge gap between what we talk in public
and follow in personal life; this is reflected in case of use of mobile phones also. Following
are some conclusions derived out of the data analysis:
Half of the people talk on phone even if they are eating and there is a call to attend.
Total 37.5 percent of the respondents do not bother to take the call while attending
Silent Ethics in the Mobile Phone Sector? The Case of the por que no te callas?
Ringtone
This study concluded on the fact that the mobile phone industry has been one paradigmatic
example of the rapid innovation pace which characterizes the telecommunications sector.
Apart from the obvious core product, the mobile itself, the industry has strongly relied on the
popularity (and, consequently, profitability) of satellite businesses such as the ringtones one.
MOBILE ETHICS
Specifically concerning the latter, the mobile phone companies had to take into consideration
legal guidelines flowing out from other branches of law, namely copyright. As the
development of technology (and of commercial awareness) encourages an intertwinement of
the mobile industry and practice with a growing number of other fields, ethical principles are
a primary tool in what concerns basic regulatory needs. Notably, the use of someones voice
or catchy phrase in a ringtone can call upon the intervention of the right of publicity.
However, just like in any other subjective right, the limits to ones right of publicity must be
drawn, for it is not an absolute right. In fact, if on the one hand fairness and selfdetermination are powerful ethical arguments when regulating the use of personality features
by themobile phone industry, on the other hand the right to evoke has to be carefully curbed.
Ethics should not be a motor for the creation of unjustified monopolies, insofar as it lacks
argumentative strength to go further. When ethical concerns start becoming blurred,
economic principles should step in. Definitely, ethics are not silent in the mobile phone
industry, but they sure ought to listen to what economics has to say.