Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Acosta
2007-16445
I.
Objectives:
1. To provide a plot of perfect fineness (percent passing) versus grain size
graph
2. To compute the fineness modulus using the accumulated data
II.
Experimental Procedure
A. Materials and Equipment
-
balances/ scales
sieves of numbers 1 in, 3/8 in, in, in, 4, 7, 8 ,16, 30, 40, 50,
100 and 200
B. Methodology
1. Samples of fine and coarse aggregates were taken from the stock
outside the NHRC laboratory.
2. The samples were dried to a temperature of 110 5 C.
3. Sieves were then nested in decreasing size of their openings
starting with the largest openings at the top and the smallest at the
bottom.
4. The samples were then placed at the top of the nested sieves.
Sieving was done by segregating the samples into the different
sieves. This segregation was done by shaking/agitating the sieves.
Overload of material was prevented by splitting the samples into
two or more portions, sieving each portion individually. Then
combining the masses of the several portions retained on a specific
sieve before calculating the percentage of the sample of the sieve.
5. Sieving was done until not more than 1% by mass of the material
that was retained on any individual sieve will pass that sieve.
III.
Results
Item
Basin
Basin + Aggregate
Aggregate
Initial Measurements
Coarse
0.34 kg
5.48 kg
5.14 kg
Fine
339.3 g
1207.3 g
868 g
Aperture (mm)
25
19
12.5
9.5
4.76
2.38
1.18
Total
Pan w/ Aggregates
0.55
1.9
3.28
1.18
0.81
0.46
0.43
8.61
Aperture (mm)
4.76
2.38
1.18
0.6
0.3
0.15
0.075
Total
pan (g)
Pan + Aggregates
500.6
476.6
435.3
405.9
370.1
348.3
305.7
455.7
3298.2
500.6
514.1
555.3
624.4
673.5
502.7
335.9
459.3
4165.8
IV.
Sieve
1 in
3/4 in
1/2 in
3/8 in
No. 4
No. 8
Total
Discussion
Individual Mass
retained (kg)
0
1.42
2.75
0.64
0.31
0.01
5.13
Percent of
Material Retained
(%)
0
27.68031189
53.60623782
12.47563353
6.04288499
0.194931774
100
Cumulative Percent
Retained (%)
0
27.68031189
81.28654971
93.76218324
99.80506823
Percent of Materia
Passing (%)
100
72.31968811
18.71345029
6.237816764
0.194931774
0
302.5341131
As we can see from the graph above, we have a steep slope between
sieve numbers in and in. This shows us that sample taken out of the
stock is not evenly distributed in terms of grain size.
Sieve
No. 4
No. 7
No. 16
No. 30
No. 50
No. 100
No. 200
Pan
Total
Individual Mass
retained
0
37.5
120
218.5
303.4
154.4
30.2
3.6
867.6
Percent of
Material Retained
0
4.322268326
13.83125864
25.18441678
34.97003227
17.79621946
3.480866759
Cumulative Percent
Retained
0
4.322268326
18.15352697
43.33794375
78.30797603
96.10419548
99.58506224
Percent of Material P
100
95.67773167
81.84647303
56.66205625
21.69202397
3.895804518
0.414937759
339.8109728
Conclusions
Therefore, it is concluded based on the experiment and
computations, a fineness modulus of 3.0253 for the coarse aggregate
sample and 3.398 for the fine aggregate sample.
VI.
References