Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bloom
1986
144
SPSS
Bloom
Bloom
(2003
2005
Bloom
Bloom
Bloom
Bloom
Bloom
2369512
75
Bloom
Bloom
BloomEnglhartFurstHill
Krathwohl1956
Bloom
Bloom
Bloom2001
1 Bloom
Anderson et al,2001,p.268
76
2369512
1.
3Procedural Knowledge
A.
2.
B.
4 M e t a c o g n i t i v e
verb-noun relationship
3.
cumulative
hierarchy
increasing complexity hierarchy
C.
Knowledge
A.B.
C.
self knowledge
4.
Bloom
1.Knowledge Dimension
Bloom
92
retention
Bloom
transfer
1Remember
A.B.
Bloom
2Understand
1Factual Knowledge
A.B.C.
D.E.F.G.
A.B.
2Conceptual Knowledge
3Apply
A.B.
4Analyze
A.B.
C.
A.B.C.
2369512
77
Airasian2002
5Evaluatecriteria
standards
A.B.
6Create
A.B.C.
Airasian,20022003
20042005
1986
2003Anderson
2005
Krathwohl2001
Bloom
91
2004Bloom
1.
2.
2005
3.4.
Bloom
5.
Bloom
78
Bloom
2000
2369512
144
21
140
1.
2.94
Bloom
2
3.
4.
SPSS 10.0
1.
Cronbach 0.7228
2.
Bloom
3.
27
0.44
0.990.70.95
130.25
80.4
21121
SPSS
1.16.54
2.PR 27=Pp 15PR 73=Pp 19
3.
Bloom
1.
1
A.
90
B.1356.1
C.1880.5
2369512
79
34
A.
B.
806
4 8 . 8
C.
2 0
30.2
1572.1
1783.7
1.
A-2-1-1-1
C.
1A-2-1-1-1Bloom
1783.7
181921
92.4
2.
1
79.9
A.
B.
90.2
92.7
2
A.
1314
80
B.
50
2369512
2.
D-2-5-1-1
D-2-2-3-1
53.5
D-2-3-2-2
4 E - 2 - 7 - 4 - 2
5 6 . 1
1D-2-2-3-1
3 8 . 2
23
3.
E-2-1-7-2
E-2-5-9-3
E-2-3-2-3
E-2-3-2-1
4.
F-2-3-4-2
F-2-2-1-1
F-2-8-2-1
F-2-6-7-1
F-2-5-1-1
E-2-3-2-2
2F-2-2-1-1
E-2-7-4-2
3F-2-3-4-2
90
5 8 . 1
1E-2-1-7-2 E-2-5-9-3
58.1
E-2-3-2-1
2E-2-3-2-3
95.1
4F - 2 - 8 - 2 - 1 F - 2 - 5 - 1 - 1
34.9
F-2-6-7-190
50
3E-2-3-2-2
90.2
2369512
81
5F-2-2-1-118
52.8
Bloom
1.
2.
1.
2.
3.
3.
2004Bloom12298-127
200023167-71
2003
2005Bloom
2005
2003105
94-106
2002
2005641-12
82
2369512
1986
Airasian, P.W., Miranda, H. (2002). The role of assessment in the revised taxonomy. Theory into Practice,
41(4), 249-254.
Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Rath,
J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom
s taxonomy of educational objectives. NewYork:Longman.
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds). (1956). Taxonomy of
educational objectivesThe classification of educational goals. (Handbook:cognitive domain).
New York: David Mckay.
Krathwohl, D. R.(2002). A Revision of Blooms Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41 (4),
212-218.
2369512
83
84
E-2-1-7-2
2
1.1
E-2-5-9-3
1 a
1
2
3
4
D-2-5-1-1
1 b
E-2-3-2-3
1
1.1
3
4
2369512
2
47
A-2-1-1-1
2.6
1
2
3
4
D-2-2-3-1
2.6
1
E-2-1-7-2
2.4
1
2
3
4
E-2-5-9-3
2 a
2369512
85
10
11
86
E-2-3-2-1
2.4
1
2
3
4
E-2-3-2-2
2
2 b
1
2
3
4
2369512
F-2-3-4-2
2 a
12
13
14
F-2-2-1-1
2 a
E-2-7-4-2
2.6
F-2-8-2-1
2 b
2369512
87
15
16
17
88
117
2
D-2-3-2-2
3.2
A-2-1-1-1
3.1
A.
B.
C.
D.
1CABD
2BDCA
3CDAB
4BACD
D-2-2-3-1
3.1
2369512
18
19
20
21
1
2
3
4
F-2-2-1-1
3.1
F-2-3-4-2
3.1
F-2-6-7-1
4.1
1
2
3
4
F-2-5-1-1
5.1
2369512
89
2 Bloom
Knowledge
Dimension
A.
Factual
Knowledge
B.
Conceptual
Knowledge
E-2-1-7-2
E-2-5-9-3
A-2-1-1-1
D-2-2-3-1
E-2-1-7-2
E-2-3-2-1
E-2-5-9-3
D-2-5-1-1
E-2-3-2-3
E-2-3-2-2
E-2-7-4-2
F-2-2-1-1
F-2-3-4-2
F-2-8-2-1
D.
Metacognitive
Knowledge
D-2-3-2-2
A-2-1-1-1
D-2-2-3-1
F-2-2-1-1
F-2-3-4-2
F-2-4-3-1
F-2-6-10-2
F-2-6-7-1
F-2-8-2-1
C.
Procedural
Knowledge
90
F-2-6-7-1
2369512
F-2-5-1-1