Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Thesis project on
Loudspeaker and Audio Monitors
Guided by
Submitted by -
Acknowledgement
Loudspeaker
4
Types of Enclosure
Subwoofer
Woofer
Tweeter
11
History
12
14
Conclusion
18
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I wish to express my sincere gratitude to Mr. Rajinder Gandhi (senior faculty for
sound recording and radio production), for providing me with all the necessary
material and timely encouragement, required for the completion of my thesis.
I place on record, my sincere gratitude to Mr. Avneet Grewal for providing all
necessary practical knowledge regarding the thesis work.
I also place on record my sense of gratitude to one and all who directly, or
indirectly have lent their helping hand in this venture.
LOUDSPEAKER
one
or
more
drivers.
To
adequately
are
very
low
frequencies); mid-range
Subwoofer
A subwoofer is a woofer driver used only for the lowest part of the
audio spectrum: typically below 200 Hz for consumer systems,
below 100 Hz for professional live sound, and below 80 Hz in THXapproved systems. To accurately reproduce very low bass notes
without unwanted resonances, subwoofer systems must be solidly
constructed and properly braced; good speakers are typically
quite heavy. Many subwoofer systems include power amplifiers
Woofer
Tweeter
crossover between the low-frequency driver and the combined mid- and high
frequencies.
Enclosures
Most loudspeaker systems consist of drivers mounted in an enclosure, or cabinet.
The role of the enclosure is to prevent sound waves emanating from the back of a
driver from interfering destructively with those from the front. Hence, without an
enclosure they typically cause cancellations which significantly degrade the level
and quality of sound at low frequencies. A sealed enclosure prevents transmission
of the sound emitted from the rear of the loudspeaker by confining the sound in a
rigid and airtight box. Techniques used to reduce transmission of sound through the
walls of the cabinet include thicker cabinet walls, lossy wall material, internal
bracing, curved cabinet walls.
However, a rigid enclosure reflects sound internally, which can then be transmitted
back through the loudspeaker diaphragmagain resulting in degradation of sound
quality. This can be reduced by internal absorption using absorptive materials.
Such as glass wool, wool, or synthetic fiber batting, within the enclosure. The
internal shape of the enclosure can also be designed to reduce this by reflecting
sounds away from the loudspeaker diaphragm, where they may then be absorbed.
One of the most common uses of loudspeakers in the home environment is
as home theater speakers. These speakers often are synchronized so they produce
a surround sound effect and are often referred to as surround speakers. This is
especially useful when watching movies, where the audio is often meant to be
played on a surround sound system.
The quality of the loudspeaker greatly depends on the weight, and therefore the
size, of the magnet inside the speaker. The larger the magnet, the more powerful
the speaker will be. The weight of the magnet should be listed on the specifications
of any good loudspeakers. However, it should be noted that some weigh the entire
magnet system and not just the magnet itself. This could affect the power and
quality of the speaker and deceive some into buying something other than what
they thought they were purchasing.
The Yamaha NS-10, one of the most influential studio monitors of all time.
History
In the early years of the recording industry in the 1920s and 1930s, studio monitors
were used primarily to check for noise interference and obvious technical problems
rather than for making artistic evaluations of the performance and recording.
Musicians were recorded live and the producer judged the performance on this
basis, relying on simple tried-and-true microphone techniques to ensure that it had
been adequately captured; playback through monitors was used simply to check
that no obvious technical flaws had spoiled the original recording.
The first high-quality loudspeaker developed expressly as a studio monitor was
the Altec
Lansing
Duplex 604
in
1944.
The
604
was
relatively
compact coaxial design and within a few years it became the industry standard in
the United States, a position it maintained in its various incarnations over the next
25 years. It was common in US studios throughout the 1950s and 60s and remained
in continuous production until 1998. However, in 1959, at the height of its industry
dominance, Altec made the mistake of replacing the 604 with the 605A Duplex, a
design widely regarded as inferior to its predecessor. There was a backlash from
some record companies and studios and this allowed Altecs competitor, JBL (a
company originally started by 604 designer James B. Lansing), to make inroads
into the pro monitor market.
In a BBC white paper published in January 1963, the authors explored 2-channel
stereophony, and remarked that it was at a disadvantage compared with multichannel stereophony that was already available in cinemas in that "the full intended
effects is apparent only to observers located within in a restricted area in front of
the loudspeakers". The authors expressed reservations about dispersion and
directionality in 2-channel systems, noting that the "face-to-face listening
arrangement" was not able to give an acceptable presentation for a centrallylocated observer in a domestic setting. In the late 1960s JBL introduced two
monitors which helped secure them pre-eminence in the industry. The 4320 was a
direct competitor to the Altec 604 but was a more accurate and powerful speaker
and it quickly made inroads against the industry standard. However, it was the
more compact 4310 that revolutionized monitoring by introducing the idea of close
or "near-field" monitoring.
However, a backlash against the behemoth monitor was soon to take place. With
the advent of punk, new wave, indie, and lo-fi, a reaction to high-tech recording
and large corporate-style studios set in and do-it-yourself recording methods
became the vogue. Smaller, less expensive, recording studios needed smaller, less
expensive monitors and the Yamaha NS-10, a design introduced in 1978 ironically
for the home audio market, became the monitor of choice for many studios in the
1980s. While its sound-quality has often been derided, even by those who monitor
through it, the NS-10 continues in use to this day and many more successful
recordings have been produced with its aid over the past twenty five years than
with any other monitor.
Monitor v/s hi-fi speakers
No speaker, monitor or hi-fi, regardless of the design principle, has a completely
flat frequency response; all speakers color the sound to some degree. Monitor
speakers are assumed to be as free as possible from coloration. While no rigid
distinction exists between consumer speakers and studio monitors, manufacturers
more and more accent the difference in their marketing material. Generally, studio
monitors are physically robust, to cope with the high volumes and physical knocks
that may happen in the studio, and are used for listening at shorter distance than hifi speakers, though nothing precludes them from being used in a home-sized
environment. Studio monitors are increasingly self-amplified (active), although not
exclusively so, while hi-fi speakers usually require external amplification.
Whereas in the 1970s the JBL 4311s domestic equivalent, the L-100, was used in a
large number of homes, and the Yamaha NS-10 also served both domestically and
professionally during the 1980s. Despite not being a "commercial product" at the
outset, the BBC licensed production of the LS3/5A monitor, which it used
internally. It was commercially successful in its twenty-something-year life.
The archetypal studio near-field monitor, Yamaha's NS10M, is well known to have
(put politely) a characterful tonal balance. The general consensus seems to be that
it is uneven through the mid-range and too bright at the top (hence the commonly
employed trick of hanging tissue paper over the tweeters to calm it down).
In two words, we should be looking for the 'neutral average' neither too bright nor
too dull. If the aspirations we have for our work are that it should sound tonally
acceptable on the widest range of systems out there, from hi-fi systems costing
many thousands to AM radio (or its low-bit-rate MP3 equivalent), then the
perceived tonal balance of our near-field monitor, which will be used up close and
probably with its back to the wall, should be as close to the 'population average' as
possible. The same is probably true of a hi-fi speaker, because in balance terms, the
hi-fi speaker is nothing but a monitor that's used a few stages down the line (ie. by
the consumer of the music you're mixing).
A neutral tonal balance, however, is not the same thing as a flat axial frequency
response. The perceived tonal balance of a speaker is the combination of the direct
sound from the drivers and reflected sound from nearby surfaces, and, as speakers
are directional devices (especially at high frequencies), a flat axial frequency
response doesn't mean that a loudspeaker will necessarily sound that way. But we
can work backwards, and predict generally how the axial response might look for
different types of loudspeakers if they are to sound neutral. Firstly, a hi-fi speaker
that's positioned perhaps four meters away from the listener and is mounted a little
away from the wall on a floor stand should have a subtly different response shape
compared to a near-field monitor that's maybe one to two meters away and
mounted on a wall. Where the near-field should demonstrate a slightly up-shelved
response at a few hundred Hertz combined with a slow roll-off at either frequency
extreme, the hi-fi speaker, unless it has been specifically balanced for use against a
wall, should probably be closer to flat.
Secondly, if a near-field monitor is to be used in a small room, where strong
reflections from the side walls will reach the ear within a few milliseconds, the
shape of the horizontal off-axis response is vital too. Wild variations between on
world. M-Audio is a trusted brand and you wont regret purchasing a set of
Studiophile speakers.
KRK Rokit 8
The KRK Rokit 8 is latest version of the very popular Rokit series. Instantly
recognizable with its yellow woofer, the KRK Rokit is the new-age standard for
studio monitors. Perfect for electronic dance music and acoustic productions, you
cant go wrong with the Rokit series.
CONCLUSION
Studio monitors are designed to reproduce audio signals that are as flat as possible
across the audible frequency spectrum. Unlike consumer stereo speakers that may
be tweaked to produce a strong bass response and sound punchy, good studio
monitors dont emphasize particular frequencies over others. A good monitor will
give you accurate, consistent response no matter the volume level. This allows you
to listen critically to how certain elements of the mix sound at different volumes.
They also capture fleeting musical transients that add subtlety and nuance to the
sounds they reproduce.