Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tower Data
Surface Reflectance: MODIS
Validation &
Optimization
LSWI
EVI
Respiration = x Ta +
Figure 1: Schematic diagram of the Vegetation Photosynthesis Respiration Model (VPRM). EVI denotes
Enhanced Vegetation Index, LSWI-Land Surface Water Index; FPARPAV-the fraction of incident light
absorbed by the photosynthetically active vegetation in the canopy; Tscale, Pscale and Wscale-scalars for
temperature, leaf phenology and canopy water content, respectively. GEE (Gross Ecosystem Exchange) is
the light-dependent part of Net Ecosystem Exchange, R (Respiration) is the light-independent part. MODIS
refers to the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer onboard the NASA Terra and Aqua satellites;
PAR0, , and are the four model parameters, one set per vegetation type.
Harvard Forest
20
Harvard Forest
10
(moles/m2/s )
0
10
OBS
VPRM
GEE
RESP
15
30
20
(moles/m2/s )
10
NEE Obs
NEE VPRM
GEE
RESP
182
184
186
188
2000
190
2001
2002
2003
2004
Date
Day of 2000
BOREAS
BOREAS
4
0
2
(moles/m2/s )
10
(moles/m2/s )
NEE Obs
NEE VPRM
GEE
RESP
174
175
176
177
Day of 2000
178
179
180
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Date
Figure 2a: (left panels) Examples of hourly output from the VPRM for Harvard Forest (upper) and
NOBS (lower). Observations (points) show u*-filtered hourly data only. (right panels) Comparison
between the observed (solid-square) and VPRM (blue line) monthly mean NEE (mole m-2 s-1) over the
four-year period at these two calibration sites. The VPRM provides a consistent separation of the lightdependent part of NEE ("GEE") from the light-independent part (Respiration) across all sites.
Figure 2b: A comparison between the observed (solid-square) and VPRM (open-circle) mean diurnal
diurnal variation of NEE (mole m-2 s-1) during the peak growing season at Calibration sites.
10
12
10
12
10
12
0.30
0.25
12
0.12
0.9
10
0.10
0.08
0.06
0.2
12
Month
0.08
0.8
Index
0.4
0.4
0.04
Index
0.6
0.06
0.8
0.3
0.2
0.6
0.3
6
Month
0.00
0.2
0.5 0.0
0.0
0.2
0.02
0.2
0.0
0.0
6
Month
10
12
0.0
1.0
0.5
NEE (moles/m2/s )
1
3
4
3
4
0
NEE (moles/m2/s )
0
1
2
NEE (moles/m2/s )
5
10
NEE (moles/m2/s )
0.05
0.1
VPRM prefactor
0.6
0.4
Index
0.8
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
VPRM prefactor
0.0
0.5
1.0
0.5
1.0
0.8
0.6
Index
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.5
1.5
12
2.0
0.25
10
0.20
0.15
6
Month
0.10
1.0
1.0
NEE (moles/m2/s )
0.0
NEE (moles/m2/s )
0.5
1.0
0.6
12
VPRM prefactor
10
0.5
Index
0.04
0.02
0.2
0.5
0
1
2
NEE (moles/m2/s )
3
4
8
10
0.4
0.08
0.06
VPRM prefactor
0.6
Index
0.4
0.05
0.00
0.2
0.0
0.0
6
Month
12
0.7
0.8
0.20
0.15
0.10
VPRM prefactor
0.6
Index
0.4
0.1
0.2
2 0.0
6
10
0.8
0.10
0.25
1.0
0.8
0.3
0.2
VPRM prefactor
0.8
0.6
Index
0.4
1.0
Month
VPRM prefactor
1.0
1.5
2.0
NEE (moles/m2/s )
0
2
0.20
0.5
Month
NEE (moles/m2/s )
0.35
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.4
0.02
2.5
Month
NEEobs
NEEVPRM
Pscale
Wscale
Tscale
EVI
PreFac
0.7
Index
0.6
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.5
0.10
0.12
0.8
0.2
0
1
NEE (moles/m2/s )
2
3
6
Month
10
12
VPRM prefactor
Month
6
Month
10
12
10
12
Month
Figure 3: (upper sections) Seasonal dynamics of the pre-factors Tscale, Pscale, and Wscale in the VPRM equation
(Eq. 12), driven by satellite and meteorological data. All factors are significant, at various times and places.
(lower sections) Comparison of the seasonal dynamics between observed (black) and VPRM (red) monthly
mean NEE (mole m-2 s-1) at calibration sites, monthly means , averaged over all years. Values in the title
bar give the fraction of the total variance of the mean seasonal cycle of NEE captured by the model, [1
var( NEEobs NEEVPRM)/var( NEEobs)] (in parenthesis, the same quantity for the time series of individual
monthly means). Note that net uptake of CO2 corresponds to negative values of NEE.
VPRM prefactor
0.6
Index
0.4
0.10
VPRM prefactor
0.05
0.00
0.5
0.0
0.5
NEE (moles/m2/s )
1.0
1.5
0.14
0.15
0.8
0.6
Index
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.00
0.0
0.5
NEE (moles/m2/s )
1.0
1.0
VPRM prefactor
1.0
0.10
0.06
0.02
0.04
VPRM prefactor
0.08
0.8
0.6
Index
0.4
0.2
0.5 0.0
1.0
1.0
Figure 4: Comparison between the observed (solid-square) and predicted (open-circle) diurnal mean
NEE (mole m-2 s-1) over the peak photosynthetically active period, as in Fig. 2b, but at validation sites
without adjustment of parameters.
0
4
2
4
Month
6
8
10
12
0
2
4
Month
6
8
10
12
0
2
4
Month
6
8
10
12
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
NEE (moles/m2/s )
NEE (moles/m2/s )
0
0.2
0.2
0.6
Index
0.3
0.6
0.2
Index
0.6
Index
VPRM prefactor
0.4
VPRM prefactor
0.4
0.1
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.15
0.6
VPRM prefactor
0.10
Index
0.4
0.8
0.3
0.8
0.8
0.20
0.8
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.25
1.0
Month
Month
Month
4
Month
Month
6
Figure 5: A comparison of the seasonal dynamics of model and observed NEE, as in Fig. 3, but at
validation sites (no adjustment of VPRM parameters).
8
10
Month
Month
Month
Month
10
10
12
VPRM prefactor
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.05
0.00
0.4
2.0
1.5
0.5
0.0
NEE (moles/m2/s )
0.5
NEE (moles/m2/s )
1.0
0.0
0.0
NEE (moles/m2/s )
0.5
NEE (moles/m2/s )
1.0
1.0
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.00
0.0
0.00
0.0
0.00
0.0
0.1
0.4
0.02
0.2
0.02
0.2
0.02
0.2
Index
0.06
0.6
0.6
0.06
Index
0.08
0.6
0.2
0.3
VPRM prefactor
0.6
Index
VPRM prefactor
0.04
0.4
VPRM prefactor
0.06
Index
0.04
0.4
VPRM prefactor
0.04
0.4
0.8
0.10
0.8
0.08
0.8
0.08
0.8
0.4
1.0
0.12
1.0
0.10
1.0
0.10
1.0
VPRM prefactor
12
0.10
1.0
0.2
1 0.0
12
0.05
0.8
10
0.6
10
Index
0.4
0.00
0.2
1 0.0
0.15
0.10
VPRM prefactor
12
0.05
0.8
NEE (moles/m2/s )
12
0.00
0.6
10
Index
NEE (moles/m2/s )
3
NEEobs
NEEVPRM
Pscale
Wscale
Tscale
EVI
PreFac
0.4
10
0.2
0.5
1.0
NEE (moles/m2/s )
0.4
0.8
0.3
0.6
2
4
Index
0
2
VPRM prefactor
0.2
0.4
0.4
1.0
0.3
0.8
12
0.1
0.2
VPRM prefactor
0.6
10
12
0.0
Index
0.4
8
10
0.2
0.1
0.2
6
8
0.0
0.0
0.0
4
6
NEE (moles/m2/s )
2
4
NEE (moles/m2/s )
0
2
10
NEE (moles/m2/s )
4
12
12
(0,1)
VPRM
VPRM
(moles/m /s )
10
(0,1)
(0.49, 1.08)
15
(0.03,1.1)
15
10
5
Obs
Obs
Figure 6: (left panel) Observed and predicted monthly mean NEE (mole m-2 s-1) for calibration sites (solid
symbols) and validation sites (open symbols) excluding WLEF. The regression line for all sites (dotted line)
is very similar to the regression for validation sites only (dashed line). (right panel) Mean NEE by site
(except WLEF) for the growing season.. The line labeled (0,1) has zero intercept and slope =1 ("1:1 line").
Regression lines are labeled similarly
a)
b)
Figure 7a-b: A comparison between GEE (mole m-2 s-2) obtained by fitting VPRM, MODEL-2,
MODEL-1 and MODEL-0 to tower data from 2000 to 2003 at Harvard Forest. (upper, 7a) and
NOBS/BOREAS (upper, 7a). The VPRM incorporates EVI, Pscaleand Wscale (driven by satellite data), plus
Tscale driven by meteorological data. MODEL-2 drops LSWI factors (Pscaleand Wscale) , MODEL-1 drops
all satellite indices (EVI, Pscaleand Wscale) and MODEL-0 drops all of these plus Tscale.