You are on page 1of 3

Grammarly

Report generated on Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:42


Grammarly

Page 1 of 3

DOCUMENT

SCORE

CHAPTER FIVE khalaf

63 of 100
ISSUES FOUND IN THIS TEXT

23
PLAGIARISM

19%
Contextual spelling

Confused Words

Misspelled Words

Grammar

Articles Use (a/an/the)

Punctuation

Comma Misuse within Clause

Punctuation in Compound/Complex Sentences

Sentence Structure
Incomplete Sentence

Style

3
3

Passive Voice Misuse

Wordy Sentence

Vocabulary enhancement

Checking disabled

Grammarly

Report generated on Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:42


Grammarly

Page 2 of 3

CHAPTER FIVE khalaf


CHAPTER FIVE
Conclusions and Suggestion for Future Work
5.1 Conclusions
In this dissertation, different methods (single and two)
sources DOA estimation have been investigated using
simulation and practical experiments. The super
resolution 1 methods such as PHD 2, MUSIC, EV and

Possibly confused word: s uper resolution

classical method such as FFT method have been

[PHD Ph.D.] Incorrect punctuation


with a title

Passive voice

Although the FFT method is simple and easy to

Passive voice

compute, it requires long data, high differences

Wordiness

Possibly confused word: s uper resolution

Possibly confused word: s uper resolution

[overcomed overcome] Misspelled


word: overcomed

[PHD Ph.D.] Incorrect punctuation


with a title

10

[a small or the small] Missing article

11

[arrival, ] Incorrect use of comma

12

[PHD Ph.D.] Incorrect punctuation


with a title

13

[PHD Ph.D.] Incorrect punctuation


with a title

used 3 . The performance and results obtained by these


methods are compared 4.

between angles of sources, and high SNR to resolve


between two adjacent sources and locate the source in
right direction because it is low resolution method. 5 In
addition, FFT suffers from high sidelobes due to the
windowing of the data. The sidelobes may mask weak
signals. On other hand, the super resolution 6
algorithms provide good results with high resolution
and low sidelobes for short data sample.
The disadvantage of super resolution 7 algorithms is
that they are mathematically more complicated and
consume more time in DOA estimation. This problem
may be overcomed 8 because all modern computers
are high-speed in computation.
The PHD 9 resolves between two sources with small 10
difference between angles of arrival, 11 and good
estimation for source. The PHD 12 method has better
performance than FFT method in recognizing between
sources when the data is small and has smaller
sidelobe than FFT method. The PHD 13 method is
somewhat limited in its usefulness because it assumes
price knowledge of the number of complex

Grammarly

Report generated on Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:42


Grammarly

Page 3 of 3

exponentials in the signal.


The MUSIC method has a very small (negligible)
sidelobe as well as its ability to resolve small difference
between angles of arrivals. The MUSIC method is
better than both FFT and Pisarenko methods, where it
resolves minimum difference between the angles

14

[Also,] Missing comma after


introductory phrase

15

Unoriginal text: 9 words


article.sapub.org/10.5923.j.ajsp.20140402.02.html

16

Passive voice

17

Unoriginal text: 58 words


article.sapub.org/10.5923.j.ajsp.20140402.02.html

18

[method,] Missing comma in compound


sentence

19

Wordiness

20

Unoriginal text: 21 words


article.sapub.org/10.5923.j.ajsp.20140402.02.html

21

Sentence fragment

22

Sentence fragment

23

Sentence fragment

among all methods. The EV method gives accurate


DOA estimation and negligible sidelobe. Also 14 the
sidelobes are more flatness, less spurious peaks, than
that of MUSIC method.
From the practical results that are presented 16 in
this 15 dissertation, one can conclude that the FFT
method failed to locate the DOA for single source in
the accurate direction. The high-resolution techniques
estimated the DOA with small error compared to FFT
method 18 and this is one of the advantages of these
techniques over FFT method. In two sources DOA
estimation, the FFT method failed to resolve between
two sources 17 when the difference is small and has a
high sidelobe level, while the high-resolution
techniques recognize between two sources with small
error in resolution and low sidelobe level. 19, 20
5.2 Suggestion for Future Work
The use of microwave frequency. 21
Using different wavelength (frequencies). 22
Using better environment to cancel the effect of echos.
The use of small sized ultrasonic transducers that
allow to use ULA without using scanning receiver. 23

You might also like