Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3-2011
Abstract
Optical properties of spray deposited CdO, Sb doped cadmium
chloride thin films from CdCl2 precursor, all the films were
deposited on microscope glass slide at the optimized substrate
temperature 400oC.
The transmittance of the film was observed to decrease for 5%
Sb doping, the paper investigates the variation of absorption
coefficient and optical energy gap of the as deposited films with Sb
doping.
CdCl2
.400oC
. 5%
.
152
____________________________________________
____
Introduction
Cadmium oxide (CdO) thin film, was the first film prepared as
a transparent conducting Oxide (TCO) in 1907, by thermal
Oxidation of sputtered cadmium, these TCOs have attracted
increasing attention over the last decades as critical components of
flat panel displays, Solar cells, and low emissivity windows [1, 2].
Recently CdO-based TCOs have been of interest due to their
simple crystal structure, high carrier mobilites, and sometimes
nearly metallic conductivities [3,4]. Epitaxial growth of Sn doped
CdO thin film on MgO prepared by pulsed laser deposition have
been the most conductive TCO thin films discovered
Thin film of Cd2SnO4, CdIn2O4 and CdO-ZnO thin films have
been fabricated with good conductivities and optical transparencies
for photovoltaic application [2]. Although the band gap of bulk CdO
is only 2.3eV [5] leading to a poor optical transparency in the short
wavelength range. A metal doping offers the possibility of tuning
the electronic structure and the optical band gap through a carrier
density dependent Burstien- Moss shift [6] for all these reasons, CdO
with a simple cubic rock-salt crystal structure and small conduction
electron effective mass represents an ideal model material in which
one can study the effect of doping on TCO band structure crystal
chemistry, and charge transport.
Many deposition technique have been adopted successfully in
preparing CdO such as reactive evaporation [7], Solution growth [8],
spray pyrolysis [9]. Sputtering and MOCVD. The aim of this work is
to fabricate thin films using an easy and cheap technique (spray
pyrolysis) and to study the effect antimony doping upon the inter
band transitions
Experimental
Thin films of CdO and CdO:Sb were deposited using an in-built
spray pyrolysis coating unit, the quality of these films when
prepared by spray, depends on various process parameters such as
spray rate, substrate temperature and the ratio of the various
constituents in the solutions, since the deviation from stoichiometry
153
____________________________________________
____
____________________________________________
____
hv = A(hv - Eg)r
where r=1/2 and 2 for direct and indirect allowed optical transition
respectively, whereas r=3/2 and 3 for direct and forbidden transition
respectively, A is the characteristic parameter, independent on
photon energy.
In an order to know there is one type of optical transition or
more that can exist in CdO and CdO:Sb, a graphical representation
of (hv)1/r=f(hv) for the as deposited thin film, figures (4), (5), (6)
and (7) represents (hv)2=f(hv) and (hv)1/2=f(hv) for the deposited
films, it is obvious that the first and second relation yields to a
straight line indicating the existence of direct and indirect allowed
transition.
The value of the energy band gap have been determine by
extrapolation the liner portion of the respective curves to (hv)2=0
and (hv)1/2=0 for direct allowed transition the value of the optical
energy gap of CdO and CdO:Sb were 2.4eV and 2.25eV
respectively where as for indirect allowed transition these values
were 1.15eV and 1.15eV , 0.725eV respectively.
The optical band gap decreases with antimony doping. This
may be due to the presence of localized state in the forbidden gap.
According to Mott and Devis[15]. The width of the mobility edge
depends on the degree of disorder and defects present in the
structure. Such defect produce localized states in responsible for the
decrease of optical band gap.
Conclusions
155
____________________________________________
____
References
1-
156
____________________________________________
____
157
____________________________________________
____
158
Figure (2):
The Absorptance versus photon energy
____________________________________________
____
____________________________________________
____
25
160
161
____________________________________________
____