Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Clayton - Sam.
Sam - I'm tired, all right? I just want to go home.
Sam You got me hiding my engagement ring, Clay.
Clayton What is wrong with you?
Sam - Will you come under the umbrella?
Clayton - No.
Sam I've been engaged for six months.
No one even knows I'm dating anyone.
Do you have any idea how that makes me feel?
Clayton I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry, okay?
Sam For Christ's sake, Clay, what are you doing?You can't be in the rain.Will you come
inside so we can get warm? Unless you'd rather stand in the rain.
Clayton I should have done this a long time ago.
Sam Here we go.
Clayton Look what we've got here.
Sam All right, sweetie.
Clayton All right. Open up, honey.
Sam You okay?
Gump rubs elbows with many famous personalities over the last half of the century
including Elvis Presley and Nixon, thanks to computer technology (General Dan
doesn't really lose his legs either---they are just erased and the background is then
touched up by using computer graphics programs). The account of how Gump is
responsible for the gyrations that is so characteristic of Presley is very telling of the
motives of this movie. Gump is contrasted to the famous males, who are idols (in
some cases) in today's society, and it appears as though he is better off in comparison:
Gump's choices in life seem to determine his niceness (he goes to Vietnam, keeps his
promises ("a promise is a promise"), harbours no ill-feelings or grudges, and is not
greedy with fame or money) and successes. Contrast this to the choices his lifetime
girl friend Jenny makes: she wants to be famous and rich, but ends up being a druggie.
The people she is surrounded by are all of a dubious nature: a sexually-abusive father,
a show audience more interested in her naked body than her folk-music playing, and
an abusive hippie-boyfriend.
The traditional male heroes that we have had are all dysfunctional in some respect or
another and we are lost without heroes, as Bloom points out. Gump is a new kind of a
role-model; he's A Nice Boy and everyone knows they're hard to find. As one reviewer
said: "Today the last American hero is a Tom Hanks character with a small IQ".
Forrest Gump is the runaway hit movie of this summer. Many people claim it gets
them in touch with their "inner child". Some reviewers attack it for the view that low
IQ is a necessity for maintaining the child-like attitude Gump has. Gump never grows
up or matures in the movie. He never becomes a man and remains a boy throughout. It
is implied, at least, that his "stupidity" is what allows him to do this. This may or may
not be true, but it is just a movie in the end. Most people in his position would not be
so fortunate as he. And what about the converse: if you are intelligent, does this mean
you cannot be child-like forever? That's not true, and I think Zemeckis did a good job
in showing that anyone can retain their inner child as long they never grow up or
become mature.