Voluntary Separation Scheme
Voluntary Separation Scheme
The privatization process of PTCL sparked controversy primarily due to allegations of an unfair and non-transparent deal, the sudden transition in employment statuses, and substantial workforce reductions post-privatization . Employees voiced their dissatisfaction through strikes and protests, and faced a new management approach that prioritized downsizing through schemes like the VSS . These actions, coupled with the perceived vested interests of the foreign management, adversely affected employee morale, as numerous employees felt their job security and financial stability were compromised . Additionally, frustration over stagnant pay scales and inadequate adjustment to new pay scale structures contributed to low morale and increased reluctance to remain with the company .
Incentives for PTCL employees considering the VSS included attractive financial packages and the opportunity to secure a better future path, as claimed by the management, in a context where technological changes demanded more adaptable skill sets . Additionally, workshops on safe investment opportunities were offered to guide employees post-separation . Disincentives included concerns about the adequacy of these packages, especially amidst high inflation, and job insecurity for those who opted out of the VSS, fearing eventual transition to less secure contractual employment . Employees were wary due to the negative outcomes faced by previous VSS participants, which contributed to the scheme's controversial reception .
Post-privatization, PTCL's strategic orientation shifted towards becoming a more customer-centric and competitive IT service provider. The company focused on reducing its human resource cost to align with international standards and enhancing operational efficiency . PTCL launched various initiatives to expand its market presence, such as introducing new mobile and data services under the subsidiaries Ufone and PakNet, despite initial struggles . The company emphasized telecommunication innovations and introduced DSL services to cater to modern telecommunications demands . These strategic shifts were designed to help PTCL maintain relevance in a rapidly evolving tech environment and improve its competitive stance in the telecom sector .
Criticisms of PTCL's downsizing and privatization initiatives from employees' perspectives included concerns about job insecurity, the fairness of the privatization process, and the adequacy of the financial packages offered under the VSS. Employees expressed that the downsizing was not in their best interest, as those who accepted the VSS often faced financial difficulties later due to market conditions and personal skill mismatches . Additionally, there were allegations of the privatization process being unfair and lacking transparency, with accusations that it was primarily geared towards benefiting foreign management interests . Furthermore, employees expressed frustration over stagnant pay scales and inadequate pension benefits post-privatization .
Technological advancements have greatly influenced PTCL's strategic decisions, including the implementation of the VSS, by necessitating a shift towards more advanced telecommunications services and infrastructure. As communication technology evolved, PTCL recognized the need to align its workforce with new demands, particularly as the company transitioned to an IT service provider . This required reducing positions associated with outdated skills and increasing cost efficiency through workforce optimization strategies, such as the VSS, which targeted redundant roles . Additionally, new technological services, including the launch of DSL and other mobile data services, required PTCL to focus strategically on adapting its operations and workforce to remain competitive in a saturated telecom market .
The anticipated economic benefits from PTCL's privatization included increased investment in the telecom sector and enhanced operational efficiency. The sale of 26% shares was expected to generate significant revenue, amounting to Rs. 2.6 billion, which was intended to encourage further investments and sectorial growth . However, subsequent reports indicated that although there were some increases in consolidated revenue and profits, PTCL eventually faced substantial losses due to the high costs associated with implementing the VSS, which strained financial resources . The anticipated benefits were not fully realized, as financial and operational challenges persisted, impacting employee job security and satisfaction .
Government interventions played a significant role in PTCL's privatization and subsequent organizational changes. The Pakistani government decided to privatize PTCL by selling 26% of its shares to Etisalat, a UAE-based telecom firm, despite facing protests and opposition from employees . The resistance from employees included strikes and disruption of services, which led to military management of exchanges and eventual salary increases to quell dissatisfaction . Post-privatization, the government's role included facilitating a smooth transition while managing employee concerns through policies like the VSS, designed to improve operational efficiency and provide employees with voluntary severance options . These interventions attempted to balance the privatization's economic goals with socio-political stability.
The privatization of PTCL and the introduction of VSS significantly affected both the company's workforce and financial status. After privatization, the company faced workforce reductions with thousands of employees opting for VSS, leading to a reduction of 16,000 employees or 53% of its workforce . Financially, PTCL faced challenges as the VSS expenses amounted to Rs11 billion, contributing to quarterly losses despite a jump in profits from core operations . The scheme intended to streamline costs and align workforce skills with evolving technological demands, but it also resulted in employees facing job insecurity and dissatisfaction .
The primary objectives of PTCL's Voluntary Separation Scheme (VSS) were to scale down the company's human resource cost and bring it in line with international standards. Senior Executive Vice President HR, Syed Mazhar Hussain, highlighted that PTCL aimed to reduce its human resource cost to 10% of revenue from the current 22% . VSS was meant to offer attractive financial packages to employees, allowing them to choose a better future while simultaneously improving PTCL's operational efficiency . This initiative aimed to address challenges stemming from the company's changing needs and technological advancements that rendered some skill sets redundant .
PTCL's VSS aligned with broader telecommunications industry trends of optimizing workforce management through cost reduction and modernization efforts. The scheme aimed to reduce human resource expenses from 22% to an industry-aligned 10% of revenue, a goal reflecting similar strategies employed by telecom companies worldwide aiming to enhance competitiveness . The trend involves restructuring workforces to better suit rapidly advancing technological landscapes and removing inefficiencies within personnel ranks . VSS offered a strategic approach to navigate such transformations by reducing redundant positions and aligning employee skills with current and future operational needs, consistent with international benchmarks .