Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Food Chemistry
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foodchem
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 20 March 2013
Received in revised form 10 July 2013
Accepted 18 July 2013
Available online 25 July 2013
Keywords:
Antioxidant activity,
Total phenolic compounds
Mexican pepperleaf
Piper auritum
Papalo
Porophyllum ruderale
a b s t r a c t
Extracts from fresh and dried samples of Mexican pepperleaf (Piper auritum Kunth) and papalo
(Porophyllum ruderale) were obtained using a stirring or an ultrasound extraction system with ve types
of solvents (water, 50:50% v/v ethanol:water, 70:30% v/v ethanol:water, 85:15% v/v ethanol:1.5 N HCl,
and ethanol). Total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity were evaluated with the phenol Folin
Ciocalteu reagent and the ABTS method, respectively. Total phenolic compounds (PC), trolox (T), and
ascorbic acid (AA), in the two herbs, were in the range of 6.7968.03 mg of galic acid (GA)/g dry solids
(d.s.), 4.8864.99 mg of T/g d.s., and 5.3149.84 mg AA/g d.s., respectively. Extracts from fresh papalo,
using ultrasound as the extraction system, had the highest amount of total phenolic compounds. The
fresh pepperleaf extract, obtained using ultrasound as the extraction method contained the highest
amount of antioxidant activity.
2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The demand for natural additives, including antioxidants, has
grown worldwide in recent years. This requirement is coupled with
the development of the food industry and the introduction of new
technologies to meet the worldwide peoples requirements. Therefore, it would be worthwhile to nd new local sources of natural
antioxidants, and try to introduce these new alternatives to the
food industry.
The growing interest for replacing synthetic for natural antioxidants, obtained from parts of plants, has promoted the investigation for obtaining and identifying new antioxidants to be used in
foods. Oxidation reactions are not only important to the food
industry; antioxidants are also required to avoid deterioration of
products found in the cosmetics, pharmaceutical and plastic industries (Moure et al., 2001). It is also known that many plants used
for therapeutic purposes are excellent sources of phytochemicals
such as phenolic compounds. Many of these chemical compounds,
having antioxidant activity, are used in food products and a number of medical treatments (Li, Hao, Wang, Huang, & Li, 2009). Basically, antioxidants inhibit the spread of free radicals in biological
systems. To characterize such a property in parts of plants, and
other materials, the antioxidant activity should be determined.
The ABTS method has been widely used to measure the antioxidant
Corresponding author. Tel.: +52 222 229 2126; fax: +52 222 229 2727.
E-mail address: angel.guerrero@udlap.mx (J.. Guerrero-Beltrn).
0308-8146/$ - see front matter 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.07.078
456
457
temperature of 250 C, a 10:1 split ratio mode, an initial temperature of 60 C increasing at a rate of 4 C/min until reach 240 C. The
ionization energy was 70 eV. The scanning mass range was m/z 43350. The identication of compounds was based on comparing
their mass spectra with the database of the mass spectra NIST library and literature reports.
2.8. Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using the Minitab 14 statistical program. An
analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Turkeys test for multiple comparisons were performed to determine signicant differences. Differences within results were tested at 5% (P < 0.05) to state
signicant differences. The Pearson correlation coefcients were
calculated in a bivariation correlation fashion (Montgomery,
2010). The standard deviation was calculated using the Excel
program.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Moisture content of leaves
The moisture content of dried and fresh P. auritum was
8.07 0.51 and 83.2 1.31% w/w, respectively, and for P. ruderale
was 9.52 1.16 and 87.32 1.08% w/w, respectively.
3.2. Phenolic compounds
Table 1 shows the total phenolic compounds in extracts from
dried and fresh P. auritum and P. ruderale leaves. It is important
to take into account that solvents, such as water, ethanol and mixtures of them, used for making extracts from plants, could be safe
to be used for food purposes since solvents such as acetone and
methanol may leave toxic residues. The phenolic compounds content was between 6.79 and 68.04 mg GA/g d.s. for both types of
plants. These values are higher than those reported by Khknen
et al. (1999) for other herbal extracts. They reported values of total
phenols between 9.1 and 23.1 mg GA/g per d.s. of herb. Higher
quantities of phenolic compounds were observed as the amount
of ethanol was increased in mixtures. Moure et al. (2000) reported
that the total phenolic content in methanol and ethanol extracts of
hazelnut was higher than in acetone; the phenolic content was
three times higher in ethanol than in acetone.
For both types of plants, higher amounts of total phenolic compounds were observed in fresh plants when using the stirring or
the ultrasound system. In a general way, no signicant difference
(P > 0.05) was observed in the phenolic compounds content between the stirring and the ultrasound system for making the
extraction. Thus, the ethanolic extracts from powders or fresh
plant could be used in foods.
Table 1
Total phenolic compounds from Piper auritum and Porophyllum ruderale leaves.
Material
Dry P. auritum
Fresh P. auritum
Dry P. ruderale
Fresh P. ruderale
Extraction
Stirring
Ultras.
Stirring
Ultras.
Stirring
Ultras.
Stirring
Ultras.
Water
14.11 0.41ax
14.25 0.66ax
27.55 2.85ax
32.19 2.73ay
20.26 0.83ax
25.62 2.17ay
42.90 2.29ax
37.78 5.34ax
E:W
(70:30%)
E:HCl
(85:15%)
Ethanol
18.45 1.01cx
18.15 0.85cx
27.11 2.46ax
28.30 1.99abx
40.09 2.02bx
39.27 1.73cx
46.77 1.92ax
49.07 2.54by
18.67 1.56cx
17.76 2.04cx
27.83 3.73ax
30.39 1.88ay
42.13 2.67bx
39.66 1.90cy
46.74 9.22ax
49.96 4.86bx
22.69 0.71dx
23.38 0.74dx
39.81 5.96bx
31.32 4.52ay
51.29 3.04cx
52.04 3.88dx
67.22 7.14bx
68.04 2.55cx
8.72 1.69bx
6.79 1.41by
25.51 5.02ax
25.24 6.02bx
18.01 3.52ax
17.22 3.44bx
40.44 5.24ax
39.94 3.95ax
Different letters in a row indicates signicant differences (P < 0.05). x and y letters for the stirring and ultrasound procedures, for same type of sample, indicates signicant
differences (P < 0.05).
458
Table 2
Antioxidant activity (as trolox equivalents) from Piper auritum and Porophyllum ruderale leaves.
Material
Dry P. auritum
Fresh P. auritum
Dry P. ruderale
Fresh P. ruderale
Extraction
Stirring
Ultras.
Stirring
Ultras.
Stirring
Ultras.
Stirring
Ultras.
Water
15.25 1.62ax
15.24 1.27ax
26.24 1.96ax
28.78 2.88ax
22.50 2.73ax
34.43 1.54ay
41.79 5.56ax
39.56 5.58ax
E:W
(70:30%)
E:HCl
(85:15%)
Ethanol
20.58 1.03cx
18.89 1.61cy
28.74 1.27ax
25.04 1.63a,cy
42.95 2.99cex
45.49 1.61cx
48.39 5.03ax
50.97 1.80cx
19.64 2.44cx
18.49 2.40cx
24.74 1.20abx
29.03 1.20ay
43.59 2.80cx
47.34 1.51cy
64.99 3.97cx
51.59 5.35cy
8.39 0.76dx
7.85 0.32bx
5.59 1.37dx
3.06 0.44dy
38.52 3.15dex
26.40 4.71dy
25.67 2.90bx
22.81 5.52bx
11.86 0.74bx
8.79 2.08by
15.35 2.69bx
22.67 5.38b,cy
14.82 2.88bx
14.95 1.93bx
26.20 5.31bx
28.60 3.18bx
Different letters in a row indicates signicant differences (P < 0.05). x and y letters for the stirring and ultrasound procedures, for same type of sample, indicates signicant
differences (P < 0.05).
Table 3
Antioxidant activity (as AA equivalents) from Piper auritum and Porophyllum ruderale leaves.
Material
Dry P. auritum
Fresh P. auritum
Dry P. ruderale
Fresh P. ruderale
Extraction
Stirring
Ultras.
Stirring
Ultras.
Stirring
Ultras.
Stirring
Ultras.
Water
12.66 1.28ax
12.65 0.99ax
21.85 1.55ax
23.77 2.27ax
19.36 2.15ax
28.76 1.21ay
36.81 4.38ax
35.05 4.40ax
E:W
(70:30%)
E:HCl
(85:15%)
Ethanol
16.86 0.81cx
15.53 1.27cy
23.82 1.00ax
20.90 1.28acy
35.47 2.36c,ex
37.48 1.27cx
42.01 3.96ax
44.04 1.42cx
16.12 1.92cx
15.21 1.89cx
20.67 0.95abx
24.04 0.95ax
35.98 2.21cx
38.93 1.19cy
55.09 3.13cx
44.53 4.22cy
7.26 0.60dx
6.83 0.25bx
5.57 1.08dx
3.58 0.35dy
31.99 3.97dex
22.44 3.71dy
24.11 2.28bx
21.85 4.35bx
9.99 0.58bx
7.57 1.64by
13.27 2.13bx
19.03 4.24bcy
13.31 2.27bx
13.41 1.52bx
24.53 4.18bx
26.42 2.51bx
Different letters in a row indicates signicant differences (P < 0.05). x and y letter for the stirring and ultrasound procedures, for same type of sample, indicates signicant
differences (P < 0.05).
459
Dry P. auritum
Fresh P. auritum
Dry P. ruderale
Fresh P. ruderale
*
**
Extraction
Stirring
Ultrasound
Stirring
Ultrasound
Stirring
Ultrasound
Stirring
Ultrasound
Water
0.303
0.388
0.088
0.678
0.356
0.592
0.813**
0.016
Correlation coefcients
E:W
(50:50%)
E:W
(70:30%)
E:HCl
(85:15%)
Ethanol
0.041
0.545
0.830
0.088
0.597
0.347
0.147
0.539
0.041
0.545
0.830
0.088
0.597**
0.347
0.147
0.539
0.741
0.429
0.069
0.573
0.288
0.355
0.695
0.176
0.957
0.581
0.886
0.936
0.380
0.120
0.962
0.095
P < 0.05.
P < 0.10.
460
pointed out that safrole was the main compound found in essential
oil from P. auritum. Safrole is considered toxic and even carcinogenic. The Scientic Committee on Food of the European Commission 1979 (SCF, 1979) proposed a limit of 1 mg of safrole/kg of food
and beverages. Fig. 2, on the other hand, shows the chemical spectrum obtained for P. ruderale extract obtained by shaking dry powder during 2 h. Three main compounds are also observed. Peaks 1,
2 and 3 correspond to ethylcyclohexane, ciclogeraniolane, and triethylether glycerol, respectively. When making a comparison with
compounds reported by Loayza et al. (1999), no similarity is observed with compounds reported in this research. However, it is well
known that factors that may inuence the difference between compounds in biological materials may include cultivar type, country of
origin, and harvest time, among other environmental conditions.
4. Conclusions
The extract containing the higher amount of total phenols was
the acidied extract of fresh P. ruderale using an ultrasonic bath.
The higher amount of antioxidant activity was observed in the
70% ethanol extract of fresh P. ruderale obtained by stirring.
Although a number of antioxidants are present in P. ruderale and
P. auritum, phenolic compounds can make a signicant contribution to their antioxidant activity. The efciency of antioxidants
properties depends strongly on the conditions of oxidation; hence,
the ABTS method only gives an approximation of the possibilities
of how an extract acts as an antioxidant. P. ruderale extracts contained higher total phenolic content and antioxidant activity than
the P. auritum extracts.
Acknowledgements
This research was part of the project number 2007/62275-Z
supported by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologa (CONACyT)
in Mexico. Author Lilia A. Hernndez-Conde would like to thank to
CONACyT for the economic support provided for the completion of
her doctoral studies.
References
A.O.A.C. Ofcial Methods of Analysis, 2000. Association of Ofcial Analytical
Chemists. 16th ed. Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Baos-Guevara, P. E., Zavaleta-Meja, E., Colinas-Len, M. A., Luna-Romero, I., &
Gutirrez-Alonso, J. G. (2004). Control biolgico de Colletotrichum
gloeosporioides en papaya maradol roja (Carica papaya L.) y siologa
postcosecha de frutos infectados. Revista Mexicana de Fitopatologa, 2, 198
205.
Bohlmann, F., Jakupovic, J., Robinson, H., & King, R. M. (1980). A dithienylacetylene
from Porophyllum ruderale. Phytochemistry, 19, 27592760.
Capelo, J. L., Maduro, C., & Vilhena, C. (2005). Discussion of parameters associated
with the ultrasonic solidliquid extraction for elemental analysis (total content)
by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry. An overview. Ultrasonic
Sonochemistry, 12, 225232.
Chemat, S., Lagha, A., Aitamar, H., Bartels, P. V., & Chemat, F. (2004). Comparison of
conventional and ultrasound-assisted extraction of carvone and limonene from
caraway seeds. Flavour and Fragrance Journal, 19, 188195.
Cheung, L. M., Cheung, P. C. K., & Ooi, V. E. C. (2003). Antioxidant activity and total
phenolics of edible mushroom extracts. Food Chemistry, 81, 249255.
Chizzola, R., Michitsch, H., & Franz, C. (2008). Antioxidative properties of Thymus
vulgaris leaves: Comparison of different extracts and essential oil chemotypes.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 56, 68976904.
Corra, M. P. (1984). Dicionario das plantas teis do Brasil e das exticas cultivadas
(vol. II. Brasil: IBDF-Ministerio da Agricultura (pp. 67). Brasil: IBDF-Ministerio
da Agricultura.
Djeridane, A., Yous, M., Nadjemi, B., Boutassouna, D., Stocker, P., & Vidal, N. (2006).
Antioxidant activity of some Algerian medicinal plants extracts containing
phenolic compounds. Food Chemistry, 97, 654660.
Domnguez, M., Nieto, A., Marin, J. C., Keck, A., Jeffery, E., & Cspedes, C. L. (2005).
Antioxidant activities of extracts from Barkleyanthus salicifolius (Asteraceae)
and Penstemon gentianoides (Scrophulariaceae). Journal of Agricultural and Food
Chemistry, 53, 58895895.
Durling, N. E., Catchpole, O. J., Grey, J. B., Webby, R. F., Mitchell, K. A., Foo, L. Y., et al.
(2007). Extraction of phenolics and essential oils from dried sage (Salvia
ofcinalis) using ethanolwater mixtures. Food Chemistry, 101, 14171424.
Gao, X., Ohlander, M., Jeppsson, N., Bjrk, L., & Trajkovski, V. (2000). Changes in
antioxidant effects and their relationship to phytonutrients in fruits of sea
buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,
48, 14851490.
Guerrero-Beltran, J.A., Vergara-Balderas, F., & Hernandez-Reyes, C. (2010).
Antioxidant properties of epazote leaf powders. 2010 IFT Annual Meeting
and Food Expo. July 1720. Chicago, IL, USA.
Guillet, G., Blanger, A., & Arnason, J. T. (1998). Volatile monoterpenes in Porophyllum
gracile and P. ruderale (asteraceae): Identication, localization and insecticidal
synergism with a-terthienyl. Phytochemistry, 49, 423429.
Gupta, M. P., & Arias, T. D. (1985). Safrole, the main component of the essential oil
from Piper auritum of Panama. Journal of Naturals Products, 48, 330.
Halliwell, B., & Gutteridge, J. M. C. (1990). Role of free radicals and catalytic metal
ions in human disease: An overview. Methods in Enzymology, 186, 185.
Jaramillo, M. A., & Manos, P. S. (2001). Phylogeny and patterns of oral diversity in
the genus Piper (Piperaceae). American Journal of Botany, 88, 706716.
Khknen, M. P., Hopia, A. I., Vuorela, H. J., Rauha, J., Pihlaja, K., Kujala, T. S., et al.
(1999). Antioxidant activity of plant extracts containing phenolic compounds.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 47, 39543962.
Kuskoski, E. M., Asuero, A. G., Troncoso, A. M., Mancini-Filho, J., & Fett, R. (2005).
Aplicacin de diversos mtodos qumicos para determinar actividad antioxidante en
pulpa de frutos. Campinas, Brazil: Ciencia y Tecnologa Alimentaria, pp. 25, 726
732.
Li, H., Hao, Z., Wang, X., Huang, L., & Li, J. (2009). Antioxidant activities of extracts
and fractions from Lysimachia foenum-graecum Hance. Bioresource Technology,
100, 970974.
Li, H., Pordesimo, L., & Weiss, J. (2004). High intensity ultrasound-assisted
extraction of oil from soybeans. Food Research International, 37, 731738.
Loayza, I., Groot, W., Lorenzo, D., Dellacassa, E., Mondello, L., & Dugo, G. (1999).
Composition of the essential oil of Porophyllum ruderale (Jacq.) Cass. from
Bolivia. Flavour and Fragrance Journal, 14, 393398.
Luthria, S. L., & Mukhopadhanyay, S. (2006). Inuence of sample preparation an
assay of phenolic acids from eggplant. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,
54, 4147.
Martnez, M. (1979). Catlogo de nombres vulgares y cientcos de plantas mexicanas.
Mxico D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Econmica (pp. 56). Mxico D.F.: Fondo de
Cultura Econmica.
McClements, D. J. (1995). Advances in the application of ultrasound in food analysis
and processing. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 6, 293299.
Montgomery, D. C. (2010). Diseo y anlisis de experimentos. Mxico, D.F.: Limusa
Wiley.
Moure, A., Cruz, J. M., Franco, D., Domnguez, J. M., Sineiro, J., Domnguez, H., et al.
(2001). Natural antioxidants from residual sources. Food Chemistry, 72,
145171.
Moure, A., Franco, D., Sineiro, J., Domnguez, H., Nuez, M. J., & Lema, J. M. (2000).
Evaluation of extracts from Gevuina avellana hulls as antioxidants. Journal of
Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 48, 38903897.
Re, R., Pellegrini, N., Proteggente, A., Pannola, A., Yang, M., & Rice-Evans, C. (1999).
Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization
assay. Free Radical Biology Medicine, 26, 12311237.
Rzedowski, G. C., & Rzedowski, J. (2004). Manual de malezas de la regin de
Salvatierra, Guanajuato. Flora del Bajo y de regiones adyacentes. Mexico, D.F.:
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologa (CONACyT) y Comisin Nacional para
el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (pp. 7278). Mexico, D.F.: Consejo
Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologa (CONACyT) y Comisin Nacional para el
Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad.
Saito, S. T., Gosmann, G., Saf, J., Presser, M., Richter, M. F., & Bergold, A. M. (2007).
Characterization of the constituents and antioxidant activity of Brazilian green
tea (Camellia sinensis var. Assamica IAC-259 Cultivar) extracts. Journal of
Agricultural and Food Chemistr, 55, 94099414.
Scientic Committee for Food, European Commission. 1979. Report of the Scientic
Committee for Food on Flavourings. Reports of the Scientic Committee for Food
(9th Series). Ofce for Ofcial Publications of the European Communities.
Luxemburg.
Sala, F. J., Burgos, J., Condn, S., Lopez, P., & Raso, J. (1995). Effect of heat and
ultrasound on microorganisms and enzymes. In G. W. Gould (Ed.), New methods
of food preservation (pp. 176204). Great Britain: Aspen Publishers.
Sellappan, S., Akoh, C. C., & Krewer, G. (2002). Phenolic compounds and antioxidant
activity of Georgia-Grown blueberries and blackberries. Journal of Agricultural
and Food Chemistry, 50, 24322438.
Usaqun-Castro, X., Martnez-Rubio, M., Aya-Baquero, H., & Gonzlez-Martnez, G.
(2006). Ultrasound assisted extraction of polyphenols from red-grape (Vitis
vinifera) residues. The International Union of Food Science and Technology
(IUFOST) World Congress. pp. 13151324.