Expansion Joint Replacement Constructability Study Report Combined 2-23-2015 PDF

Report on Constructability of Expansion Joint Replacement
Santa Ana River Crossing, Riverside, CA
Location of Expansion Joint. The

existing joint will be replaced
with a new joint to mitigate the
joint leaking problem
Prepared for
THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT

700 NORTH ALAMEDA STREET
LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
1 Peters Canyon Rd., Suite 130

Irvine, CA 92606
IDS Group Project Number 13.113.01

February, 2015
I NTEGRATED D ESIGN S ERVICES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................... 1
2. TEMPORARY LATERAL LOADING CRITERIA ..................................................................... 2
2.1 Wind Load .................................................................................................................. 2
2.2 Seismic Load .............................................................................................................. 2
3. CONVAYANCE OF EXPANSION JOINT ASSEMBLIES ...................................................... 3
3.1 Option 1: Cranes ........................................................................................................ 3
3.2 Option 2: Rail Rigging and Lift on Bridge Trusses ...................................................... 3
4. TEMPORARY STRUCTURE STABILITY ............................................................................... 4
4.1 Analysis Approach ...................................................................................................... 4
4.2 Recommendations ...................................................................................................... 4
5. TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT PIPE LATERAL RESTRAINT .......................................... 4
5.1 Option 1: Lattice Cage ............................................................................................... 5
5.2 Option 2: Tying Pipe to Bridge Trusses ...................................................................... 5
6. CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................ 6
APPENDIX A:
TEMPORARY SEISMIC AND WIND LOADS
APPENDIX B:
FEASIBILITY STUDY OF CRANE OPTION FOR EXPANSION JOINT REPLACEMENT
CONSTRUCTION
APPENDIX C:
TEMPORARY STRUCTURE STABILITY FOR RAIL RIGGING OPTION
APPENDIX D:
PIPE LATERTAL RESTRAINT OPTION 1: LATTICE CAGE FOR TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT
RESTRAINT
APPENDIX E:
PIPE LATERAL RESTRAINT OPTION 2: TYING PIPE TO BRIDGE TRUSSES
1 Peters Canyon Rd., Ste.130, Irvine, CA 92606
tel. 949.387.8500
fax. 949.387.0800
www.idsgi.com
MWD: Report on Constructability of Expansion Joint Replacement

Santa Ana River Crossing
Feb, 2015
Page 1
Report on Constructability of Expansion Joint Replacement

MWD Upper Feeder
Santa Ana River Crossing, Riverside, CA
The purpose of this constructability study is to demonstrate the feasibility of the construction of the expansion
joint replacement. The existing expansion joint, which is currently leaking, will be replaced with a new
bellows joint. The location and massive size of the pipe joint create constructability challenges for this
project. The construction procedures and sequences provided in this report are considered
recommendations to the contractor but do not limit the contractor from utilizing other means and methods
needed to successfully install the system specified in the construction document. All work plan details,
procedures, shop drawings and calculations of temporary construction in addition to shoring, rigging, etc.
shall be submitted to Metropolitan Water District (MWD) for review and approval before commencing with the
work.
1. INTRODUCTION
As part Task Order # 6, a design was developed to mitigate the water leakage that occurs at the existing
expansion joint of the pipe. The proposed repair of the sleeve-coupling joint is expected to substantially
improve the joint performance although requiring adjustments in the future to maintain the leak mitigation
performance. The joint repair would not require extensive temporary measures during the construction as
materials and equipment could be transported to the joint location using the existing walkway.
During the final design review, a concern was raised by MWD regarding potential liability with quagga-infested
water leaking from the pipe to the Santa Ana River. MWD concluded that the existing expansion joint should
be replaced by a different joint type that prevents water leaks and requires minimum operation maintenance.
A metal bellows expansion joint was identified by MWD for this purpose.
The installation of the bellows joint requires the removal of the existing joint, which creates a constructability
challenge since no access is allowed from the riverbed due to the environmental restrictions at the site. This
necessitates the removal of the top truss diagonal members above the expansion joint to provide access to
the construction. The removal of the diagonal top truss member above the joint, and the opening up of the
steel pipe, alters the existing structural system which results in (1) discontinuity in the top diaphragm that
resists lateral loads, and (2) discontinuity in the steel pipe in both lateral and vertical directions.
An investigation is needed to review the bridges stability and the pipes structural integrity during the joint
replacement operation. In addition, given the size of the pipe, the weight of the expansion joint assembly is
significant (the weight of the new bellows joint assembly is in the order of 5 kips), which also creates another
challenge to bring the joint in place.

Feb, 2015
Page 2
It is noted that the steel pipe is currently equipped with an expansion joint that transfers the shear forces
between the pipe segments at either side of the joint, while the bending and the torsional moments are not
transferred through the relatively small overlapping length of the joint. Therefore, the existing expansion joint
provided a "hinge" to the pipe when subjected to vertical and lateral loads. The base isolation of the bridgepipe system has been designed to accommodate this. In addition, the truss members and steel pipe strength
have been checked (and strengthened where required) based on the bridge-pipe interaction while
considering the joint hinge.
During the joint replacement construction the pipe will be sliced into two separate pieces with no moment or
shear force transfer. Due to the configuration of the new bellows joint (and to avoid over-stressing the
bellows portion) an external "sleeve" or support is needed to restrain the pipe against the relative lateral
movements (vertical and horizontal). The new configuration between the pipe segments still allows shear
transfer, free axial movement, and no bending and/or torsional moment transfer. After the top truss diagonals
are re-installed, the overall final behavior becomes similar to the current condition in terms of continuity in
the lateral and vertical directions near the expansion joint.
This report outlines the loading criteria used to investigate the integrity of temporary structure during the
proposed joint replacement. Recommended methods of moving of the expansion joint and other construction
materials are also indicated. The report also presents our view of the structural stability of the temporary
structures, and several feasible methods of temporary and permanent lateral restraint of the pipe.
2. TEMPORARY LATERAL LOADING CRITERIA

2.1 Wind Load
Wind load is calculated according to ASCE 7-10, Chapter 29. Refer to Appendix A for a detailed wind load
estimation. It is noted that according to ASCE 37-02, Section 6.2.1, reduction of the design wind speed is
allowed for a temporary structure with construction period between 6 weeks to 1 year. However, our study
does not use the reduced wind load since further analysis indicates that the seismic load, rather than the
wind load governs the lateral loading design of the bridge-pipe system. Wind load stability for crane or trolley
rail operation is not indicated in our study since it is the contractors responsibility.
2.2 Seismic Load
The maximum duration that the temporary condition exists during the construction is estimated to be two (2)
months. The probability that during this short period of time the structure becomes subjected to a large
earthquake is low, therefore current codes and standards (i.e. ASCE 41-6) allow the reduction of the seismic
loads during fast track construction projects. Accordingly, a temporary seismic load of 10% of seismic weight
is used in this study. Refer to Appendix A for detailed calculations of the temporary seismic load demand
according to the procedure of ASCE 41-06, Section 1.6.1.3.

Feb, 2015
Page 3
MWD has allowed a short-duration water shutdown during the expansion joint replacement project. Since
there will be no water in the pipe during the removal and replacement of the joint a significant amount of
weight of the system will be reduced leading to less demands of the seismic loads.
3. CONVAYANCE OF EXPANSION JOINT ASSEMBLIES

3.1 Option 1: Cranes
Appendix B includes the feasibility study of the expansion joint assembly conveyance using a crane. This
method utilizes a heavy crane, stationed at the south end of the bridge, with a jib length and a capacity
sufficient to lift the removed expansion joint, as well as the proposed new bellows expansion joint. The
crane lifts the new and existing joints one at a time at the desired location of the feeder pipe. It also lifts them
to the designated temperory stage/storage areas on the south bank of the Santa Ana River near the south
entry.
Our discussion with a crane manufacturer and operator demonstrated that this option is feasible. However,
permits for a crane assembling area at the site (beyond the easement) are to be acquired by MWD if this
option is used.
3.2 Option 2: Rail Rigging and Lift on Bridge Trusses
This option involves trolley rails (rigging system) built on top of the bridge trusses (over the entire length of
T1, bridging over the gap between T1 and T2 trusses, and extending two bays on T2). The trolly moves the
expansion joints (both existing and new, and one at a time) between the south end of the bridge to the joint
location. At the south end of the bridge, a crane will be set up to lift the rigging system, and the joints from
the ground to the trolley rails over the top of the trusses, and vice versa. At the joint location, a lifting assembly
system will be temporary installed to lift and drop the joints into position.
This option does not require heavy lifting over a long distance. Most likely, the footprint of the lighter crane
and the rigging equipment will fit within the corrently designated MWD eastments. The drawback of this
option is the relatively long construction time needed to build and remove the trolley rails and rigging system,
in addition to the complexity of construction the rails on top of the bridge trusses. It is also noted that a
moving load is applied on the bridge trusses in addition to the weight of the trolley rails and the rigging system.
The temporary structure stability and the truss member structural intigrity of this option are discussed in the
following section.

Feb, 2015
Page 4
4. TEMPORARY STRUCTURE STABILITY

4.1 Analysis Approach
The rail rigging option imposes a more critical loading condition on the temporary structure than the crane
option. Structure stability and truss integrity are studied for this option only.
In order to evaluate the truss member adequacy under gravity load a Finite Element model of the full bridge
is subjected to the estimated moving weight in the vertical direction. A single truss model (Truss T2 only)
representing the top diaphragm discontinuity and pipe discontinuity is used to evaluate the lateral stability
and the member adequacy for temporary lateral loads. Refer to Appendix C for details.
4.2 Recommendations
Based on the analysis, the following measures are recommended:
The rails will be supported directly by the bridge truss top chords. The rail members shall be
designed to span independently between the truss panel points. Under this configuration, the
existing members of the T1 trusses are found to be adequate to support approximately 9 kips moving
load transported on the rail rigging system.
The influence of the moving load on the misalignment of the opened pipe is estimated to be in the
order of 0.015 inch, which is within tolerances.
The T2 trusses are structurally stable even when temporary discontinuities of the top diaphragm and
the pipe are in effect after removing the top diagonal members and the existing expansion joint. The
truss members are found adequate to resist the estimated moving load and temporary lateral loads.
The actual construction loads, their locations, and the extent of travel shall be submitted by the
contractor to the owner for approval before commencing the work.
It is noted that the dynamic interaction between the moving load and the truss-pipe system was not
considered in this study. To avoid unanticipated vibrations, the trolley speed shall be less than 5 ft.
/sec. The rails shall be carefully leveled to avoid perceptible bumping.
5. TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT PIPE LATERAL RESTRAIN

The expansion joint is located near Pier 7 which provides simple end support to the bridge trusses T2 and
T1. The pipe, however, runs continuously over Pier 7 which is one of the supports along its long span, thus,
the curvature of the deformed profile of the pipe is not similar to that of the trusses at the pier supports.
Based on our analysis, if no restraint is provided against the relative vertical and horizontal movements
between the two segments of pipe after it is cut open (as needed to remove the existing expansion joint),

Feb, 2015
Page 5
there will be a 0.57 relative displacement in the vertical direction. This is caused by the weight of the pipe
even during water shutdown. This relative displacement could cause misalignment issues when installing the
bellows expansion joint, i.e. difficulty in fitting the new joint at both ends of the displaced pipe segments.
Moreover, if the bellows expansion joint is somehow installed with the 0.57 misalignment, once the water
flow resumes (before pipe restraints are installed between the pipe segments on each side of the new bellows
expansion joint) the bellows expansion joint will be stressed as the result of further relative displacement
(an addition 0.85) due to the additional weight of the water. This incremental force in the vertical direction
is estimated to be 120 kips. Stress in the bellows will significantly reduce its fatigue life which is not
acceptable.
Beside the pipes vertical relative movement restraint, temporary and permanent horizontal restraint shall be
provided as discussed in Section 1 of this report to restore the behavior in the pipe as originally intended to
perform.
5.1 Option 1: Lattice Cage
A lattice-type steel cage is proposed to restrain the pipe relative displacement when the pipe is cut open
before the expansion joint replacement. During this operation, the top face lattices will be kept open to
provide access to remove and lift the existing joint and drop the bellows joint assembly from above.
Once installation of the new joint is completed, new diagonal lattices will be installed on the top face of the
cage and the cage will be left permanently on the pipe. The cage will be attached to the north side pipe
through two channel-rings welded to the pipe, and by a single channel ring which will be separated from the
south side pipe O.D. using Teflon materials (friction coefficient = 0.04, Teflon on Teflon). This cage allows
free axial movement of the pipe, but restrains the pipes vertical and horizontal relative movement.
The lattice cage is designed to have sufficient stiffness and strength to resist the temporary and the
permanent gravity and seismic demands. Refer to Appendix D for detail analysis including the evaluation of
the steel pipe stress.
It is suggested that the lattice cage be assembled at the site over the existing pipe. Clearance between the
lattice cage and the pipe and the bellows joint assembly shall be sufficient for pipe cutting and welding. The
construction of the lattice cage, the modification of trusses for joint conveyance, and the removal of all
temporary elements can all be done before and after the shutdown, and thus reducing the duration of the
shutdown.
5.2 Option 2: Tying Pipe to Bridge Trusses
This option utilizes temporary ties between the steel pipe and the existing bridge trusses to restrain the
relative lateral displacements between the two segments of the opened pipe during the expansion Joint
replacement. Since the shear forces which are currently transferred by the pipe joint will now be transferred
to the bridge trusses (vs. the lattice cage in Option 1), the trusses will need to be strengthened to resist the
pipe reactions.

Feb, 2015
Page 6
A detail analysis might show that these temporary ties and truss strengthening could be part of the permanent
restraint. Using this option, the interaction between the pipe and the bridge trusses is altered from the current
condition, which was used as the base of the seismic upgrade design. A preliminary analysis shows that
the impact of such alternation on the demands on the base isolators is minimum. However, the truss member
adequacy requires to be confirmed by further analysis.
The advantage of Option 2 is providing maximum clearance at the pipe and the bellows joint assembly for
pipe cutting and welding. Time of pipe shutdown can be minimized since the construction of the ties, truss
strengthening, the modification of trusses for joint conveyance, and the removal of all temporary elements
can all be done before and after the shutdown. Please refer to Appendix E for details of Option 2.
At the writing of this report, we suggest a lattice cage similar to that used in Option 1 be installed for
permanent purpose and the ties to the bridge trusses be removed. This will simulate the hinge behavior in
the pipe, and the interaction between the pipe and bridge trusses will be the same as the current condition.
This eliminates the necessity to re-check the base isolation design, the strength of the bridge truss elements
and the strength of the pipe. We will need MWD concurrence in selecting Option 1 vs. Option 2.
6. CONCLUSION
This report documents several feasible options studied for the expansion joint replacement. During the
construction, proper lateral restraints will be installed over the pipe. Two options are introduced and found
feasible. The first option utilizes a lattice cage for both temporary and permanent restraint. The second
option utilizes ties to existing bridge trusses. Construction methods to move and lift the expansion joints are
also discussed. At this time, the option that uses a rail rigging system on top of the bridge trusses appears
to be more practical than the crane option. The rail rigging option uses smaller footprint that is more likely to
be contained within the current MWD easements.
The structural integrity during construction are also discussed. The temporary construction loads on the
bridge (pipe-truss system) depends largely on the construction means and methods to be used by the
contractor, particularly when a rail rigging option is chosen. In this preliminary study, such construction loads
are based on engineering judgment and the best information available. The study indicates that minimum
truss reinforcement should be expected for the expansion joint replacement construction. However, MWD
review of the contractor submittals of detailed work plans before commencement of construction is critical.
In summary, we found that the replacement of the existing expansion joint by the proposed bellows type
joint is feasible and constructible. The actual means and methods of accomplishing the task rests solely on
the successful general contractor. All contractors proposed work shall be reviewed and approved by MWD
prior to the commencement of the construction. This step is usually needed to insure the structural integrity
of the entire bridge, and compliance with the requirements of the project.
Appendix A
Temporary Seismic and Wind Loads

1. Temporary and Permanent Structural Conditions
The MWD selected Expansion Joint Repair - replacing existing EJ with a new bellow type EJ - requires
that during the construction,
Procedure (1): the (E) diagonal braces at the top horizontal truss directly above the EJ shall be
removed to provide access to the EJ, and
Procedure (2): the (E) EJ shall be cut and removed before the installation of the new bellow EJ.
Procedure (1) will result in discontinuity in the top diaphragm for lateral loads. Procedure (2) will
result in discontinuity in the steel pipe in both lateral and vertical directions.
Note that before Procedure (2), the steel pipe is equipped with an EJ that transfers shear forces
between the pipe segments on either side of the EJ. But moments are not transferred due to the
relatively small overlapping length. Therefore, before procedure (2), the (E) EJ behaves as a "hinge" in
the pipe when subjected to vertical and lateral loads. Procedure (2) will completely separate the pipe
into two pieces with no moment or shear force transfer.
After the EJ replacement, an external "sleeve" will be installed over the bellow to allow shear transfer
between pipe segments. And the top truss diagonals will be re-installed. The permanent behaviors will
be similar to the current condition in terms of continuity in the lateral and vertical directions near the EJ.
The system behaviors of the temporary structure is substantially different than the current condition
and the permanent condition considered in the design.
2. Rationale for Reduction of Loads on Temporary Structures

The maximum length of the time window that the temporary condition exists during the construction is
estimated to be about 2 months. The likelihood that during this short period of time (2 months) the
temporary structure subjected to a large earthquake or strong wind storm is low, therefore common
engineering practice and referenced codes and standards (i.e. ASCE 37-2, ASCE 41-6) allow reduction of
the seismic and wind loads based on the exposure period.
Also considered in this constructability study is the fact that when the (E) EJ is removed and the pipe is
opened up, there is no water in the pipe, which reduce a significant amount of the system weight and
hence significantly reduce the seismic lateral demands.
3. Calculation of Temporary Seismic Load
Per ASCE 41-06, Section 1.6.1.3, "Adjustment of Mapped Response Acceleration Parameters for other
Probability of Exceedance", the seismic load on the temporary condition described above is estimated
below.
Page A-1
Design for earthquake event with 2% probability of exceedance during this 2 months period. Noted
as a (2%|2 months) event, which is an event with probability of exceedance greater than a (10%|50 yrs)
event (regular permanent structural design earthquake).
Mapped response paramenters
Ss =
1.5g
S1 =
0.6g
10%|50 yrs:
SDS =
1g
SD1 =
0.52g
Return period of (2%|2months) event

PR = -Y/ln(1-PEy) = 8.25 yrs
Y = exposure time = 2 month = 1/6 yrs = 0.167yrs
PEy = Probability of Exceedance = 0.02
Eq 1-3, Parameters for (2%|2months) Events
Si = Si 10%|50 (PR/475)n n = 0.44 (Table 1-3)
Ss 2%|2m = Ss 10%|50 (PR/475)n = SDS (PR/475)n = 0.168g
S1 2%|2m = S1 10%|50 (PR/475)n = SD1 (PR/475)n = 0.087g
The isolated structure (pipe + Truss) has a natural period of
Tn =
1 sec
(Isolators are stiffer due to smaller displacement)
Use R = 1
I=1
(This could be 1.0 since 2% probability of exceedance is used)
V = (S1/Tn)(I/R)W = 0.087W
Use minimum
V = 0.1 W
OK for seismic load
4. Calculation of Wind Load

Risk Category: IV
(Essential Facility)
Exposure: C
Special Wing Region: 120
mph
(ASCE 7-10 wind speed)
(Note this is corresponding approximately to wind with mean return interval of 1700
yrs.)
Directionality Factor Kd = 0.95
Page A-2
(Table 26.6-1, Chimneys, Tanks, and Similar Structures, Round)

Topographic Factor Kzt = 1
(Figure 26.8-1)
Gust-Effect Factor G = 0.85
(Rigid Structure, Unless otherwise determined in Tables)
Enclosure classication = open

Velocity Pressure:
qz = 0.00256 Kz Kzt Kd V2
Kz =
1.04
(40', Exposure C, Table 29.3-1)
qz = 36.4 psf
DESIGN WIND LOAD
F = qz G Cf Af
(ASCE 7-10 Section 29.5)
Wind load Force Coefficients, Cf

Cf = 0.55
(Figure 29.5-1)
D = 9.83ft
h = 40ft
D*(qz) =59.3
Moderately smooth
h/D = 4.1
F = qz G Cf Af
F = 17.1 Af
According to ASCE 37-02, Section 6.2.1, a reduciton factor 0.8 is allowed to be applied on the design
wind speed for construction period between 6 weeks to 1 year, which effectively reduces the design
wind load to 0.82 = 0.64 time of the calculated force above.
F = 10.9 Af
Use wind load 20 psf OK for wind load
5. Determine the governing lateral load

For empty pipe condition, seismic weight of Pipe + Truss
1.10 +1.25 = 2.35klf
Seismic Load = 0.1W = 235plf
Wind Load = 20 Af =
200plf (Af = 10x1 = 10 sqft/ft)
Therefore, Seismic Governs
Page A-3
Appendix B
FEASIBILITY STUDY OF TOWER CRANE OPTION AND CRAWLER

CRANE OPTION FOR EXPANSION JOINT REPLACEMENT
CONSTRUCTION
This is to document a preliminary study of the construction feasibility of the MWD proposed expansion
joint replacement project at MWD Upper Feeder over Santa River Crossing, Riverside, CA. The
construction option studied herein envolves a heavy crane stationed at the south end of the bridge (see
Figure below), with a jib length and lifting capacity sufficient to suspend the existing Expansion Joint (EJ)
to be removed from the feeder pipe, as well as the proposed new bellow-type EJ, and to transport them
(one at a time) between the EJ location on the feeder pipe and the designated temperory stage/storage
area on the south bank of the Santa Ana River near the south entry. Additionaly, the use of a crawler
crane was studied due to the area of work limitations per currently approved easements.
1. Crane Capacity Requirements

Google Earth Screenshot
Page B-1
Required Jib Length (Radius) = 250

Required Hook Height = 50
Required Capacity at Max Jib Length = 6 kips
2. Equipment Availability
There are several models of tower cranes meeting these criteria available for rental, for example,
Terex Peiner SK575, Terex Comedil CTT 721-40, Potain MDT 412-L10, etc.
Further study and research shows that a crawler crane may be suitable for the project given the area
limitations.
3. Findings of This Study
It is feasible from an equipment capacity point of view. A Crawler Crane instead of a tower
crane may be more suitable given the site conditions and area limitations. A crawler crane can
have a boom length of more than 300 ft, and is capable of the required lifting power. The
crawler crane can be stationed on top of an approximately 40x40 wood platform, which would
not require concrete foundation or soil work.
The crawler crane will require a big assembling area near the location of the final station. From
the assembling area to the final station, the path is preferable to be clear of any obstacles such
as light poles or power lines.
The required crane assembling area may be larger than currently available at the site, at least
per current permit. Either new permit is acquired or assembling would have to be done on an
elevated condition, which would not be cost-effective.
Because of the heavy equipment itself and significant counter weight, there is a concern about
the ground bearing capacity particularly adjacent to underground sewer lines. MWD should
evaluate the existing conditions at all underground utilities.
The station area of a crawler crane need to be approximately 70 away from the pipe line for
boom operation to avoid the pipe or trusses.
Page B-2
Appendix C
Temporary Structure Stability for Rail Rigging Option

Trolley rails, lifts and their construction procedure shall be designed by the Contractor. The
construction loads on the bridge trusses shall be provided for review, and if required the truss
members shall be enhanced before the commencement of construction. However, this study
of the structural adequacy of the as-built trusses elements is based on engineering judgment
and best information available regarding the construction loads. Purpose of this study is to
demonstrate the feasibility and identify potential elements most likely requiring strengthening.
1. Weight of (E) Expansion Joint to Remove
a. 1st Piece to remove: (2.2 kips total)
2 long x 7/8 thick 9-10 Diameter Pipe = 2 x 1.1klf = 2.2 kips
b. 2nd Piece to remove: (7.25 kips total)
3 long x 1 thick 9-10 Diameter Pipe = 3 x 1.26klf = 3.8 kips
C15x50 Channel Ring 9-10 Diameter = 50plf x 30.9 = 1.5 kips
L7x4x3/4 Angle Ring 9-10 Diameter = 26.2plf x 30.9 = 0.8 kips
Bolts and Nuts = 6lbs x 31 = 0.2 kips
9 long x 1 thick 9-10 Diameter Pipe = 0.75 x 1.26klf =0.95 kips
2. Weight of (N) Bellow Expansion Joint
a. (4 kips total estimated by bellow manufacturer)
Center-spool (12) + Butt-strap (2)x6 = 2 x 1.1klf = 2.2 kips
Bellow (2) x 16.75 = 1.7 kips
Bolts and Nuts = 12 lbs x 10 = 0.12 kips
Therefore assuming 9 kips moving weight.
3. Weight of Rails
a. Rails need to be design to control rail deflection
Assume (2) W12x26 rails on trusses
(2) W12x65 bridging the gap over Pier 7
The weight of rails is automatically considered by program in models. Total
weight of rails is estimated to be 12.5 kips.
Note that for T1 Trusses where no temporary discontinuity (top diaphragm and pipe) is
introduced,
Seismic Weight of Trusses + Pipe + Full Water = 1278 kips (See 90%CD Calc. pp 21)
Additional weight during joint replacement construction,
Moving Weight + Rails = 9 kips + 12.5 kips = 21.5 kips
The ratio of additional weight to existing weight that the Bridge Trusses designed for:
Page C-1
Additional Weight / Existing Weight = 21.5/1278 = 1.7% << 5%

Therefore T1 Trusses do not need to be checked for construction loading, except those
members locally impacted by the moving load. Since the rails will be directly supported by
truss top chord (see below sketch), and the rail itself is designed to span between truss nodes
(18 ft apart), the truss top chord members are structurally adequate by inspection.
Trolley Rails
Sketch: Concept of Trolley Rails on Bridge Truss
Page C-2
Full bridge model with moving loads (Gravity only):

Moving Load definition: 9 kips downward on one lane. See sketch below for lane definition
(South 2 bays of T2 + Gap between T2 and T1 + Entire T1); lanes are located close to the planes
of the vertical bridge trusses each side of the pipe, taking into account of possibly eccentricity
of loading. The 9 kips is conservatively loaded on one lane rather than distributed over 2 lanes.
Lanes of
Moving Load
Moving load impact on opened pipe misalignment

See below tabulated influence lines for vertical displacements of joints on either side of the
opened pipe. The maximum influence of the 9 kip moving load on the vertical misalignment of
the open pipe is estimated to be about 0.015 inch. This is very small and negligible.
Page C-3
Case Bellow Moving Load Influence forJoint 1550, U3
Case Bellow Moving Load Influence forJoint 874, U3
Lane
Lane
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
Station Sta. Dist Ordinate Ord. Dist Global X Global Y Global Z Influence
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
1
0
1
0 358.0033
-6.75
22.5 -1.29E-05
2
8.9967
1
0
367
-6.75
22.5 -1.40E-05
3 17.9934
1
0 375.9967
-6.75
22.5 -1.51E-05
4
18
1
0 376.0033
-6.75
22.5 -1.51E-05
5 26.9967
1
0
385
-6.75
22.5 -1.64E-05
6 35.9934
1
0 393.9967
-6.75
22.5 -1.77E-05
7
36
1
0 394.0033
-6.75
22.5 -1.77E-05
8 45.4967
1
0
403.5
-6.75
22.5 -7.92E-06
9 54.9934
1
0 412.9967
-6.75
22.5 1.88E-06
10
55
1
0 413.0033
-6.75
22.5 1.89E-06
11 64.4967
1
0
422.5
-6.75
22.5 1.17E-05
12 73.9934
1
0 431.9967
-6.75
22.5 2.15E-05
13
74
1
0 432.0033
-6.75
22.5 2.15E-05
14 82.9934
1
0 440.9967
-6.75
22.5 4.02E-05
15
83
1
0 441.0033
-6.75
22.5 4.02E-05
16 91.9934
1
0 449.9967
-6.75
22.5 5.88E-05
17
92
1
0 450.0033
-6.75
22.5 5.88E-05
18 100.9967
1
0
459
-6.75
22.5 6.60E-05
19 109.9934
1
0 467.9967
-6.75
22.5 7.33E-05
20
110
1
0 468.0033
-6.75
22.5 7.33E-05
21 118.9967
1
0
477
-6.75
22.5 7.60E-05
22 127.9934
1
0 485.9967
-6.75
22.5 7.88E-05
23
128
1
0 486.0033
-6.75
22.5 7.88E-05
24 136.9967
1
0
495
-6.75
22.5 7.70E-05
25 145.9934
1
0 503.9967
-6.75
22.5 7.53E-05
26
146
1
0 504.0033
-6.75
22.5 7.53E-05
27 154.9967
1
0
513
-6.75
22.5 7.11E-05
28 163.9934
1
0 521.9967
-6.75
22.5 6.69E-05
29
164
1
0 522.0033
-6.75
22.5 6.69E-05
30 172.9967
1
0
531
-6.75
22.5 5.97E-05
31 181.9934
1
0 539.9967
-6.75
22.5 5.25E-05
32
182
1
0 540.0033
-6.75
22.5 5.25E-05
33 190.9967
1
0
549
-6.75
22.5 4.34E-05
34 199.9934
1
0 557.9967
-6.75
22.5 3.43E-05
35
200
1
0 558.0033
-6.75
22.5 3.43E-05
36 208.9967
1
0
567
-6.75
22.5 2.57E-05
37 217.9934
1
0 575.9967
-6.75
22.5 1.71E-05
Influence Line for U3 of Joint #1550
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
Station
Sta. Dist
ft
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
Ordinate Ord. Dist Global X Global Y Global Z Influence

ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
0
1
0 358.0033
-6.75
22.5 -1.52E-04
8.9967
1
0
367
-6.75
22.5 -1.52E-04
17.9934
1
0 375.9967
-6.75
22.5 -1.51E-04
18
1
0 376.0033
-6.75
22.5 -1.51E-04
26.9967
1
0
385
-6.75
22.5 -1.19E-04
35.9934
1
0 393.9967
-6.75
22.5 -8.69E-05
36
1
0 394.0033
-6.75
22.5 -8.69E-05
45.4967
1
0
403.5
-6.75
22.5 -6.72E-05
54.9934
1
0 412.9967
-6.75
22.5 -4.75E-05
55
1
0 413.0033
-6.75
22.5 -4.75E-05
64.4967
1
0
422.5
-6.75
22.5 -2.78E-05
73.9934
1
0 431.9967
-6.75
22.5 -8.15E-06
74
1
0 432.0033
-6.75
22.5 -8.15E-06
82.9934
1
0 440.9967
-6.75
22.5 -7.78E-06
83
1
0 441.0033
-6.75
22.5 -7.77E-06
91.9934
1
0 449.9967
-6.75
22.5 -7.41E-06
92
1
0 450.0033
-6.75
22.5 -7.40E-06
100.9967
1
0
459
-6.75
22.5 -6.88E-06
109.9934
1
0 467.9967
-6.75
22.5 -6.36E-06
110
1
0 468.0033
-6.75
22.5 -6.36E-06
118.9967
1
0
477
-6.75
22.5 -5.89E-06
127.9934
1
0 485.9967
-6.75
22.5 -5.41E-06
128
1
0 486.0033
-6.75
22.5 -5.41E-06
136.9967
1
0
495
-6.75
22.5 -5.03E-06
145.9934
1
0 503.9967
-6.75
22.5 -4.64E-06
146
1
0 504.0033
-6.75
22.5 -4.64E-06
154.9967
1
0
513
-6.75
22.5 -4.26E-06
163.9934
1
0 521.9967
-6.75
22.5 -3.89E-06
164
1
0 522.0033
-6.75
22.5 -3.89E-06
172.9967
1
0
531
-6.75
22.5 -3.51E-06
181.9934
1
0 539.9967
-6.75
22.5 -3.13E-06
182
1
0 540.0033
-6.75
22.5 -3.13E-06
190.9967
1
0
549
-6.75
22.5 -2.73E-06
199.9934
1
0 557.9967
-6.75
22.5 -2.33E-06
200
1
0 558.0033
-6.75
22.5 -2.33E-06
208.9967
1
0
567
-6.75
22.5 -1.89E-06
217.9934
1
0 575.9967
-6.75
22.5 -1.46E-06
Influence Line for U3 of Joint #874
Differential @
9 kips
Influence
ft
in
1.39E-04 1.50E-02
1.37E-04 1.48E-02
1.36E-04 1.47E-02
1.36E-04 1.47E-02
1.03E-04 1.11E-02
6.92E-05 7.48E-03
6.92E-05 7.47E-03
5.93E-05 6.41E-03
4.94E-05 5.34E-03
4.94E-05 5.34E-03
3.95E-05 4.27E-03
2.96E-05 3.20E-03
2.96E-05 3.20E-03
4.79E-05 5.18E-03
4.79E-05 5.18E-03
6.62E-05 7.15E-03
6.62E-05 7.15E-03
7.29E-05 7.88E-03
7.96E-05 8.60E-03
7.96E-05 8.60E-03
8.19E-05 8.84E-03
8.42E-05 9.09E-03
8.42E-05 9.09E-03
8.21E-05 8.86E-03
7.99E-05 8.63E-03
7.99E-05 8.63E-03
7.54E-05 8.14E-03
7.08E-05 7.65E-03
7.08E-05 7.65E-03
6.32E-05 6.83E-03
5.56E-05 6.00E-03
5.56E-05 6.00E-03
4.61E-05 4.98E-03
3.66E-05 3.95E-03
3.66E-05 3.95E-03
2.76E-05 2.98E-03
1.85E-05 2.00E-03
Misalignment
Page C-4
Moving Load Influence on Truss Member Axial Load:

Critical Case 1: Truss T2 (and Truss T1 similar) End Diagonal Member
Side Truss Diagonal Member 2C15x40+CapPl,
Compression capacity = 805 kips (see Calc. pp. 299)
Case Bellow Moving Load Influence forFrame 394, RD = 0.5, Axial Force
@
9 kips
Lane
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
Station
Sta. Dist Ordinate Ord. Dist Global X Global Y Global Z Influence

ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
Kip
in
1
0
1
0 358.0033
-6.75
22.5 -0.6413
2
8.9967
1
0
367
-6.75
22.5 -0.6981
3 17.9934
1
0 375.9967
-6.75
22.5 -0.7549
4
18
1
0 376.0033
-6.75
22.5
-0.755
5 26.9967
1
0
385
-6.75
22.5
-0.832
6 35.9934
1
0 393.9967
-6.75
22.5 -0.9091
7
36
1
0 394.0033
-6.75
22.5 -0.9091
8 45.4967
1
0
403.5
-6.75
22.5 -0.6738
9 54.9934
1
0 412.9967
-6.75
22.5 -0.4385
10
55
1
0 413.0033
-6.75
22.5 -0.4384
11 64.4967
1
0
422.5
-6.75
22.5 -0.2031
12 73.9934
1
0 431.9967
-6.75
22.5
0.0322
13
74
1
0 432.0033
-6.75
22.5
0.0322
14 82.9934
1
0 440.9967
-6.75
22.5
0.031
15
83
1
0 441.0033
-6.75
22.5
0.031
16 91.9934
1
0 449.9967
-6.75
22.5
0.0297
17
92
1
0 450.0033
-6.75
22.5
0.0297
18 100.9967
1
0
459
-6.75
22.5
0.0281
19 109.9934
1
0 467.9967
-6.75
22.5
0.0265
20
110
1
0 468.0033
-6.75
22.5
0.0265
21 118.9967
1
0
477
-6.75
22.5
0.0252
22 127.9934
1
0 485.9967
-6.75
22.5
0.024
23
128
1
0 486.0033
-6.75
22.5
0.024
24 136.9967
1
0
495
-6.75
22.5
0.0229
25 145.9934
1
0 503.9967
-6.75
22.5
0.0218
26
146
1
0 504.0033
-6.75
22.5
0.0218
27 154.9967
1
0
513
-6.75
22.5
0.0208
28 163.9934
1
0 521.9967
-6.75
22.5
0.0197
29
164
1
0 522.0033
-6.75
22.5
0.0197
30 172.9967
1
0
531
-6.75
22.5
0.0184
31 181.9934
1
0 539.9967
-6.75
22.5
0.0171
32
182
1
0 540.0033
-6.75
22.5
0.0171
33 190.9967
1
0
549
-6.75
22.5
0.0155
34 199.9934
1
0 557.9967
-6.75
22.5
0.0139
35
200
1
0 558.0033
-6.75
22.5
0.0139
36 208.9967
1
0
567
-6.75
22.5
0.0118
37 217.9934
1
0 575.9967
-6.75
22.5 9.66E-03
-5.77
-6.28
-6.79
-6.80
-7.49
-8.18
-8.18
-6.06
-3.95
-3.95
-1.83
0.29
0.29
0.28
0.28
0.27
0.27
0.25
0.24
0.24
0.23
0.22
0.22
0.21
0.20
0.20
0.19
0.18
0.18
0.17
0.15
0.15
0.14
0.13
0.13
0.11
0.09
Max Influence = 8.2 kips = 1% Capacity OK.
Page C-5
Critical Case 2: Truss T1 Bottom Chord

Side Bottom Chord Member 2C15x33.9+4WebPl,
Tension capacity = 1344 kips (see Calc. pp. 299)
@
9 kips
Lane
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
Station

ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
Kip
in
1
0
1
0 358.0033
-6.75
22.5 3.04E-04
2
8.9967
1
0
367
-6.75
22.5 5.49E-04
3 17.9934
1
0 375.9967
-6.75
22.5 7.94E-04
4
18
1
0 376.0033
-6.75
22.5 7.94E-04
5 26.9967
1
0
385
-6.75
22.5 2.01E-03
6 35.9934
1
0 393.9967
-6.75
22.5 3.23E-03
7
36
1
0 394.0033
-6.75
22.5 3.24E-03
8 45.4967
1
0
403.5
-6.75
22.5
0.0329
9 54.9934
1
0 412.9967
-6.75
22.5
0.0625
10
55
1
0 413.0033
-6.75
22.5
0.0625
11 64.4967
1
0
422.5
-6.75
22.5
0.0922
12 73.9934
1
0 431.9967
-6.75
22.5
0.1218
13
74
1
0 432.0033
-6.75
22.5
0.1218
14 82.9934
1
0 440.9967
-6.75
22.5
0.184
15
83
1
0 441.0033
-6.75
22.5
0.184
16 91.9934
1
0 449.9967
-6.75
22.5
0.2461
17
92
1
0 450.0033
-6.75
22.5
0.2462
18 100.9967
1
0
459
-6.75
22.5
0.2998
19 109.9934
1
0 467.9967
-6.75
22.5
0.3534
20
110
1
0 468.0033
-6.75
22.5
0.3535
21 118.9967
1
0
477
-6.75
22.5
0.4291
22 127.9934
1
0 485.9967
-6.75
22.5
0.5047
23
128
1
0 486.0033
-6.75
22.5
0.5048
24 136.9967
1
0
495
-6.75
22.5
0.6266
25 145.9934
1
0 503.9967
-6.75
22.5
0.7483
26
146
1
0 504.0033
-6.75
22.5
0.7484
27 154.9967
1
0
513
-6.75
22.5
0.7299
28 163.9934
1
0 521.9967
-6.75
22.5
0.7115
29
164
1
0 522.0033
-6.75
22.5
0.7114
30 172.9967
1
0
531
-6.75
22.5
0.5565
31 181.9934
1
0 539.9967
-6.75
22.5
0.4015
32
182
1
0 540.0033
-6.75
22.5
0.4014
33 190.9967
1
0
549
-6.75
22.5
0.3279
34 199.9934
1
0 557.9967
-6.75
22.5
0.2544
35
200
1
0 558.0033
-6.75
22.5
0.2543
36 208.9967
1
0
567
-6.75
22.5
0.1777
37 217.9934
1
0 575.9967
-6.75
22.5
0.1011
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.03
0.30
0.56
0.56
0.83
1.10
1.10
1.66
1.66
2.21
2.22
2.70
3.18
3.18
3.86
4.54
4.54
5.64
6.73
6.74
6.57
6.40
6.40
5.01
3.61
3.61
2.95
2.29
2.29
1.60
0.91
Max Influence = 6.7 kips = 0.5% Capacity OK.
Page C-6
Critical Case 3: Truss T1 Top Chord

Side Top Chord Member 2C15x55+1cvr+2web,
@
9 kips
Lane
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
Station

ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
Kip
in
1
0
1
0 358.0033
-6.75
22.5 2.27E-03
2
8.9967
1
0
367
-6.75
22.5 2.41E-03
3 17.9934
1
0 375.9967
-6.75
22.5 2.55E-03
4
18
1
0 376.0033
-6.75
22.5 2.55E-03
5 26.9967
1
0
385
-6.75
22.5 3.42E-03
6 35.9934
1
0 393.9967
-6.75
22.5 4.29E-03
7
36
1
0 394.0033
-6.75
22.5 4.28E-03
8 45.4967
1
0
403.5
-6.75
22.5 -0.0303
9 54.9934
1
0 412.9967
-6.75
22.5 -0.0648
10
55
1
0 413.0033
-6.75
22.5 -0.0648
11 64.4967
1
0
422.5
-6.75
22.5 -0.0993
12 73.9934
1
0 431.9967
-6.75
22.5 -0.1339
13
74
1
0 432.0033
-6.75
22.5 -0.1339
14 82.9934
1
0 440.9967
-6.75
22.5 -0.1984
15
83
1
0 441.0033
-6.75
22.5 -0.1984
16 91.9934
1
0 449.9967
-6.75
22.5 -0.2629
17
92
1
0 450.0033
-6.75
22.5 -0.2629
18 100.9967
1
0
459
-6.75
22.5 -0.3144
19 109.9934
1
0 467.9967
-6.75
22.5 -0.3659
20
110
1
0 468.0033
-6.75
22.5
-0.366
21 118.9967
1
0
477
-6.75
22.5 -0.4364
22 127.9934
1
0 485.9967
-6.75
22.5 -0.5068
23
128
1
0 486.0033
-6.75
22.5 -0.5068
24 136.9967
1
0
495
-6.75
22.5 -0.6002
25 145.9934
1
0 503.9967
-6.75
22.5 -0.6935
26
146
1
0 504.0033
-6.75
22.5 -0.6935
27 154.9967
1
0
513
-6.75
22.5
-0.662
28 163.9934
1
0 521.9967
-6.75
22.5 -0.6305
29
164
1
0 522.0033
-6.75
22.5 -0.6304
30 172.9967
1
0
531
-6.75
22.5 -0.5554
31 181.9934
1
0 539.9967
-6.75
22.5 -0.4803
32
182
1
0 540.0033
-6.75
22.5 -0.4802
33 190.9967
1
0
549
-6.75
22.5 -0.4117
34 199.9934
1
0 557.9967
-6.75
22.5 -0.3431
35
200
1
0 558.0033
-6.75
22.5
-0.343
36 208.9967
1
0
567
-6.75
22.5 -0.2696
37 217.9934
1
0 575.9967
-6.75
22.5 -0.1962
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.04
-0.27
-0.58
-0.58
-0.89
-1.21
-1.21
-1.79
-1.79
-2.37
-2.37
-2.83
-3.29
-3.29
-3.93
-4.56
-4.56
-5.40
-6.24
-6.24
-5.96
-5.67
-5.67
-5.00
-4.32
-4.32
-3.71
-3.09
-3.09
-2.43
-1.77
Page C-7
Critical Case 4: Truss T1 Vertical

Side Vertical Member W14x82,
@
9 kips
Lane
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
TrackRail1
Station

ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
Kip
in
1
0
1
0 358.0033
-6.75
22.5 3.77E-03
2
8.9967
1
0
367
-6.75
22.5 4.14E-03
3 17.9934
1
0 375.9967
-6.75
22.5 4.52E-03
4
18
1
0 376.0033
-6.75
22.5 4.52E-03
5 26.9967
1
0
385
-6.75
22.5 4.92E-03
6 35.9934
1
0 393.9967
-6.75
22.5 5.31E-03
7
36
1
0 394.0033
-6.75
22.5 5.32E-03
8 45.4967
1
0
403.5
-6.75
22.5
0.0279
9 54.9934
1
0 412.9967
-6.75
22.5
0.0504
10
55
1
0 413.0033
-6.75
22.5
0.0504
11 64.4967
1
0
422.5
-6.75
22.5
0.073
12 73.9934
1
0 431.9967
-6.75
22.5
0.0956
13
74
1
0 432.0033
-6.75
22.5
0.0954
14 82.9934
1
0 440.9967
-6.75
22.5 -0.2799
15
83
1
0 441.0033
-6.75
22.5 -0.2801
16 91.9934
1
0 449.9967
-6.75
22.5 -0.6554
17
92
1
0 450.0033
-6.75
22.5 -0.6555
18 100.9967
1
0
459
-6.75
22.5 -0.5434
19 109.9934
1
0 467.9967
-6.75
22.5 -0.4314
20
110
1
0 468.0033
-6.75
22.5 -0.4313
21 118.9967
1
0
477
-6.75
22.5 -0.3466
22 127.9934
1
0 485.9967
-6.75
22.5 -0.2618
23
128
1
0 486.0033
-6.75
22.5 -0.2618
24 136.9967
1
0
495
-6.75
22.5 -0.2315
25 145.9934
1
0 503.9967
-6.75
22.5 -0.2012
26
146
1
0 504.0033
-6.75
22.5 -0.2012
27 154.9967
1
0
513
-6.75
22.5 -0.1782
28 163.9934
1
0 521.9967
-6.75
22.5 -0.1552
29
164
1
0 522.0033
-6.75
22.5 -0.1552
30 172.9967
1
0
531
-6.75
22.5 -0.1359
31 181.9934
1
0 539.9967
-6.75
22.5 -0.1166
32
182
1
0 540.0033
-6.75
22.5 -0.1166
33 190.9967
1
0
549
-6.75
22.5 -0.0987
34 199.9934
1
0 557.9967
-6.75
22.5 -0.0808
35
200
1
0 558.0033
-6.75
22.5 -0.0808
36 208.9967
1
0
567
-6.75
22.5 -0.0615
37 217.9934
1
0 575.9967
-6.75
22.5 -0.0423
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.25
0.45
0.45
0.66
0.86
0.86
-2.52
-2.52
-5.90
-5.90
-4.89
-3.88
-3.88
-3.12
-2.36
-2.36
-2.08
-1.81
-1.81
-1.60
-1.40
-1.40
-1.22
-1.05
-1.05
-0.89
-0.73
-0.73
-0.55
-0.38
Page C-8
Single truss model with moving loads (Lateral and Gravity):

See sketch below for a graphic representation of the models used in this analysis.
A single bridge truss (T2) is analyzed. The truss is modeled as simple supported on 4 points
(corresponding to 2 supports on each pier). Only the portion of pipe within the length of Truss
T2 is modeled. The pipe is fixed at either ends above the pier to represent the effective restrain
from a continuation of the pipe. This single truss model does not fully represent the behaviors
of the full bridge, but rather serves as an approximate of the local behavior of the truss-pipe
interaction under relatively small lateral loading. Note that the temporary seismic load is
estimated to be 10% of the seismic weight, which is much less than the lateral demands in a
MCE earthquake. The displacement of the isolators shall be much smaller than the MCE
displacement and the isolators effective stiffness is higher. Laterally fixed truss supports and
fixed pipe restrains are thus judged to be appropriate for such an approximation purpose.
Above the location of the expansion joint, the top truss diagonal members (2 total) are
removed to represent the temporary structure condition.
Single Truss Model
Page C-9
Two Single Truss Models are created for different stages of construction:
Model A: Hinged Pipe with Full Water Mass

At the expansion joint, the pipe is modeled as a hinge, where shears but no moments
are transferred to the other side of the joint. Mass of water completely fulfilling the
pipe is modeled -- 10% water weight contributing the temporary seismic demand
together with the rest of the structural weight.
Model B: Open Pipe with No Water Mass
At the expansion joint, the pipe is open, where neither shears nor moments are
transferred to the other side of the joint. No mass of water in the pipe is modeled
only the weight of the structure is taken into consideration.
Since SAP2000 program does not handle horizontal moving load, the lateral Trolley Rail loading
on the truss is explicitly modeled as point loads at a few representing locations. The
overturning effect due to the center of mass above the top truss is also considered.
Temporary seismic in transverse direction (Y-Y direction)

Lateral Shear = 9 kips x 0.1 = 0.9 kips (applied as two 0.45 kips point loads in each case)
Overturning = 9 kips x 0.1 x (H/B) = 0.5 kips (applied as up and down point loads in
each case).
Temporary seismic in longitudinal direction (X-X direction)
Lateral Shear = 9 kips x 0.1 = 0.9 kips (applied as four 0.23 kips point loads in each case)
Overturning = 9/2 kips x 0.1 x (H/B) = 0.13 kips (applied as up and down point loads in
each case).
Page C-10
Y-Y Location 1
Y-Y Location 2
Y-Y Location 3
Y-Y Location 4
Y-Y Location 5
Moving Lateral Load (Transverse Direction) Modeled as Point Loads at Critical Locations
Page C-11
X-X Location 1
X-X Location 2
Moving Lateral Load (Longitudinal Direction) Modeled as Point Loads at Critical Locations
Model A:
1. Max lateral drift at frames adjacent to expansion joint
Lateral Drift Ratio 1
Lateral Drift Ratio 2
Page C-12
Drift Ratio 1 (see sketch above for definition)

Max drift ratio 1 = 0.05% very small, negligible
TABLE: Joint Displacements
Joint
OutputCase
Text
Text
224
10%Lateral + Moving Y Loc 1
224
10%Lateral + Moving Y Loc2
224
224
224
324
324
324
324
324
CaseType
Text
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
U1
ft
-0.000592
-0.00059
-0.000588
-0.000586
-0.000583
-0.000085
-0.000081
-0.00007
-0.000074
-0.000079
U2
ft
0.004804
0.004804
0.0048
0.004796
0.004788
0.0127
0.012737
0.012784
0.012613
0.012446
U3
ft
0.001424
0.001428
0.001439
0.001411
0.001392
0.001459
0.001463
0.001475
0.001442
0.001418
R1
Radians
-0.000187
-0.000187
-0.000189
-0.000185
-0.000182
-0.000362
-0.000363
-0.000365
-0.000358
-0.000351
R2
Radians
0.000038
0.000038
0.000037
0.000037
0.000036
0.000031
0.000031
0.000032
0.000031
0.000031
R3
Radians
-0.000144
-0.000144
-0.000143
-0.000143
-0.000142
-0.000235
-0.000231
-0.00023
-0.000223
-0.000213
D(U2) Drift Ratio

ft
%
0.007896
0.05%
0.007933
0.05%
0.007984
0.05%
0.007817
0.05%
0.007658
0.05%
U3
ft
0.000527
0.000531
0.000538
0.000533
0.000534
0.000506
0.000509
0.000516
0.00051
0.00051
R1
Radians
-0.000132
-0.000133
-0.000134
-0.000136
-0.000139
0.000053
0.000052
0.000052
0.000042
0.000036
R2
Radians
0.000047
0.000047
0.000047
0.000046
0.000046
0.000044
0.000045
0.000045
0.000044
0.000043
R3
Radians
-0.000082
-0.000081
-0.000081
-0.000078
-0.000076
-0.000358
-0.000359
-0.000359
-0.000335
-0.000318
D(U2) Drift Ratio

ft
%
0.004206
0.02%
0.004248
0.02%
0.004287
0.02%
0.004488
0.02%
0.00468
0.02%
Drift Ratio 2 (see sketch above for definition)

Joint
OutputCase
Text
Text
142
142
142
142
142
264
264
264
264
264
CaseType
Text
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
U1
ft
-0.000445
-0.000444
-0.000443
-0.000442
-0.00044
0.000212
0.000214
0.000224
0.000211
0.000207
U2
ft
0.002266
0.002269
0.002269
0.002274
0.002277
0.006472
0.006517
0.006556
0.006762
0.006957
Page C-13
2. Bottom truss diagonals

Bottom Diagonals in the Bay Directly under Expansion Joint
TABLE: Element Forces - Frames
Frame
Station
OutputCase
Text
ft
Text
627
1.25 10%Lateral + (D+Water) + Y Loc1
627
627
627
627
627
627
627
627
627
628
628
628
628
628
628
628
628
628
628
641
641
641
641
641
641
641
641
641
641
642
642
642
642
642
642
642
642
642
642
CaseType
Text
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
P
Kip
-0.932
-0.932
-0.93
-0.93
-0.932
-0.932
-0.957
-0.957
-0.987
-0.987
-0.933
-0.933
-0.931
-0.931
-0.932
-0.932
-0.957
-0.957
-0.987
-0.987
-13.312
-13.312
-13.314
-13.314
-13.312
-13.312
-13.287
-13.287
-13.257
-13.257
-13.311
-13.311
-13.313
-13.313
-13.311
-13.311
-13.286
-13.286
-13.256
-13.256
V2
Kip
-0.201
-0.004515
-0.201
-0.004488
-0.201
-0.004477
-0.201
-0.00431
-0.201
-0.004147
0.001253
0.198
0.001231
0.198
0.001223
0.198
0.001133
0.198
0.001037
0.198
-0.21
-0.013
-0.21
-0.013
-0.21
-0.013
-0.21
-0.013
-0.21
-0.013
0.001979
0.199
0.002001
0.199
0.002008
0.199
0.002099
0.199
0.002194
0.199
V3
Kip
0.011
0.011
0.011
0.011
0.011
0.011
0.011
0.011
0.011
0.011
0.00837
0.00837
0.008363
0.008363
0.008341
0.008341
0.008307
0.008307
0.008286
0.008286
-0.009097
-0.009097
-0.009073
-0.009073
-0.00904
-0.00904
-0.008909
-0.008909
-0.008789
-0.008789
-0.012
-0.012
-0.012
-0.012
-0.012
-0.012
-0.012
-0.012
-0.012
-0.012
T
Kip-ft
-0.0003098
-0.0003098
-0.0003106
-0.0003106
-0.0003111
-0.0003111
-0.0003137
-0.0003137
-0.0003164
-0.0003164
-0.0001005
-0.0001005
-0.00009962
-0.00009962
-0.00009884
-0.00009884
-0.00009941
-0.00009941
-0.00009973
-0.00009973
0.0001664
0.0001664
0.0001657
0.0001657
0.0001651
0.0001651
0.0001625
0.0001625
0.0001598
0.0001598
0.0001993
0.0001993
0.0002001
0.0002001
0.0002009
0.0002009
0.0002003
0.0002003
0.0002
0.0002
M2
Kip-ft
0.0521
-0.0668
0.0523
-0.0668
0.0525
-0.067
0.0537
-0.0673
0.0547
-0.0676
0.0535
-0.0401
0.0535
-0.0401
0.0533
-0.04
0.053
-0.04
0.0526
-0.0401
-0.0409
0.0609
-0.0407
0.0608
-0.0405
0.0607
-0.0393
0.0603
-0.0383
0.06
-0.0588
0.0755
-0.0589
0.0755
-0.059
0.0756
-0.0594
0.0756
-0.0597
0.0755
M3
Kip-ft
-0.7264
0.4252
-0.7262
0.4251
-0.7262
0.425
-0.7244
0.4249
-0.7228
0.4247
0.4262
-0.6889
0.4261
-0.6888
0.426
-0.6888
0.4259
-0.6879
0.4257
-0.6871
-0.7717
0.4725
-0.7719
0.4726
-0.7719
0.4727
-0.7736
0.4728
-0.7753
0.473
0.4755
-0.6478
0.4756
-0.648
0.4757
-0.648
0.4758
-0.6488
0.476
-0.6497
Max Axial Load (compression) = 13.3 kips < Brace Capacity = 73.3 kips (Calc. pp. 302), OK.
Page C-14
Bottom Diagonals in the End Bay

Frame
Station
OutputCase
Text
ft
Text
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
626
626
626
626
626
626
626
626
626
626
639
639
639
639
639
639
639
639
639
639
640
640
640
640
640
640
640
640
640
640
CaseType
Text
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
P
Kip
0.266
0.266
0.279
0.279
0.285
0.285
0.31
0.31
0.329
0.329
0.227
0.227
0.24
0.24
0.247
0.247
0.27
0.27
0.288
0.288
-14.787
-14.787
-14.8
-14.8
-14.807
-14.807
-14.832
-14.832
-14.851
-14.851
-14.763
-14.763
-14.776
-14.776
-14.782
-14.782
-14.806
-14.806
-14.824
-14.824
V2
Kip
-0.202
-0.004884
-0.202
-0.004878
-0.202
-0.004874
-0.202
-0.00486
-0.202
-0.004855
0.00919
0.206
0.00923
0.206
0.009256
0.206
0.00936
0.206
0.009469
0.206
-0.204
-0.006784
-0.204
-0.00679
-0.204
-0.006795
-0.204
-0.006808
-0.204
-0.006813
-0.000325
0.197
-0.000365
0.197
-0.00039
0.196
-0.000495
0.196
-0.000604
0.196
V3
Kip
0.004869
0.004869
0.004749
0.004749
0.00464
0.00464
0.003995
0.003995
0.003395
0.003395
0.026
0.026
0.026
0.026
0.026
0.026
0.027
0.027
0.027
0.027
-0.043
-0.043
-0.043
-0.043
-0.043
-0.043
-0.044
-0.044
-0.044
-0.044
-0.0079
-0.0079
-0.007836
-0.007836
-0.007776
-0.007776
-0.007411
-0.007411
-0.007071
-0.007071
T
M2
Kip-ft
Kip-ft
-0.0001853
0.0066
-0.0001853 -0.0479
-0.0001856
0.0056
-0.0001856 -0.0475
-0.0001859
0.0047
-0.0001859 -0.0472
-0.0001877 -0.00053
-0.0001877 -0.0452
-0.0001894 -0.0054
-0.0001894 -0.0434
-0.0001418
0.1574
-0.0001418 -0.1336
-0.0001412
0.1578
-0.0001412
-0.134
-0.0001408
0.1581
-0.0001408 -0.1343
-0.0001377
0.1602
-0.0001377 -0.1364
-0.0001346
0.1621
-0.0001346 -0.1383
0.0001058 -0.3054
0.0001058
0.1717
0.0001055 -0.3064
0.0001055
0.172
0.0001052 -0.3073
0.0001052
0.1724
0.0001034 -0.3125
0.0001034
0.1743
0.0001017 -0.3174
0.0001017
0.1762
0.0002847 -0.0278
0.0002847
0.0605
0.0002853 -0.0275
0.0002853
0.0602
0.0002857 -0.0271
0.0002857
0.0598
0.0002888 -0.0251
0.0002888
0.0578
0.0002919 -0.0232
0.0002919
0.0559
M3
Kip-ft
-0.7272
0.4286
-0.7271
0.4286
-0.7271
0.4285
-0.7267
0.4288
-0.7264
0.429
0.4275
-0.7764
0.4275
-0.7769
0.4274
-0.7773
0.4277
-0.7782
0.4279
-0.7792
-0.7475
0.4295
-0.7476
0.4295
-0.7476
0.4296
-0.748
0.4293
-0.7483
0.4291
0.4315
-0.666
0.4315
-0.6655
0.4316
-0.6652
0.4314
-0.6643
0.4312
-0.6632
Page C-15
Bottom Diagonals in the Interior Bay Adjacent to Expansion Joint

Frame
Station
OutputCase
Text
ft
Text
629
629
629
629
629
629
629
629
629
629
630
630
630
630
630
630
630
630
630
630
643
643
643
643
643
643
643
643
643
643
644
644
644
644
644
644
644
644
644
644
CaseType
Text
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
P
Kip
9.488
9.488
9.491
9.491
9.5
9.5
9.463
9.463
9.43
9.43
9.487
9.487
9.491
9.491
9.499
9.499
9.463
9.463
9.43
9.43
-7.453
-7.453
-7.456
-7.456
-7.464
-7.464
-7.428
-7.428
-7.395
-7.395
-7.455
-7.455
-7.459
-7.459
-7.467
-7.467
-7.431
-7.431
-7.397
-7.397
V2
Kip
-0.205
-0.007669
-0.205
-0.007654
-0.205
-0.007637
-0.204
-0.007572
-0.204
-0.007497
0.013
0.21
0.013
0.21
0.013
0.21
0.013
0.21
0.013
0.21
-0.2
-0.002884
-0.2
-0.0029
-0.2
-0.002917
-0.2
-0.002981
-0.2
-0.003057
-0.003369
0.194
-0.003368
0.194
-0.003352
0.194
-0.003118
0.194
-0.002856
0.194
V3
Kip
-0.001547
-0.001547
-0.001539
-0.001539
-0.001542
-0.001542
-0.001534
-0.001534
-0.001509
-0.001509
-0.007879
-0.007879
-0.007882
-0.007882
-0.007878
-0.007878
-0.007881
-0.007881
-0.0079
-0.0079
0.002948
0.002948
0.002956
0.002956
0.002954
0.002954
0.002961
0.002961
0.002986
0.002986
-0.000164
-0.000164
-0.000168
-0.000168
-0.000163
-0.000163
-0.000166
-0.000166
-0.000185
-0.000185
T
Kip-ft
-0.0003116
-0.0003116
-0.0003122
-0.0003122
-0.0003128
-0.0003128
-0.0003109
-0.0003109
-0.0003091
-0.0003091
0.0001603
0.0001603
0.0001598
0.0001598
0.0001594
0.0001594
0.000155
0.000155
0.0001502
0.0001502
0.0001841
0.0001841
0.0001836
0.0001836
0.000183
0.000183
0.0001849
0.0001849
0.0001867
0.0001867
0.0001493
0.0001493
0.0001488
0.0001488
0.0001485
0.0001485
0.0001441
0.0001441
0.0001392
0.0001392
M2
Kip-ft
-0.0196
-0.0023
-0.0195
-0.0023
-0.0195
-0.0023
-0.0195
-0.0023
-0.0192
-0.0023
-0.033
0.0552
-0.033
0.0552
-0.033
0.0551
-0.033
0.0552
-0.033
0.0553
0.011
-0.022
0.0111
-0.022
0.011
-0.022
0.0111
-0.022
0.0114
-0.022
0.0106
0.0125
0.0106
0.0125
0.0106
0.0124
0.0106
0.0125
0.0106
0.0126
M3
Kip-ft
-0.7201
0.4668
-0.7197
0.4671
-0.7194
0.4672
-0.7191
0.4667
-0.7188
0.4662
0.4652
-0.7853
0.4654
-0.7851
0.4655
-0.7848
0.4651
-0.7826
0.4646
-0.7802
-0.6973
0.4362
-0.6977
0.4359
-0.698
0.4358
-0.6982
0.4363
-0.6985
0.4368
0.4375
-0.626
0.4373
-0.6262
0.4371
-0.6265
0.4376
-0.6287
0.4381
-0.6311
Page C-16
3. Bottom truss chords

Bottom Chord in the Bay Directly under Expansion Joint
Frame
Station
OutputCase
Text
ft
Text
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
379
379
379
379
379
379
379
379
379
379
CaseType
Text
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
P
Kip
-61.478
-61.478
-61.512
-61.512
-61.556
-61.556
-61.585
-61.585
-61.625
-61.625
-70.873
-70.873
-70.839
-70.839
-70.795
-70.795
-70.765
-70.765
-70.726
-70.726
V2
Kip
-0.768
0.344
-0.767
0.345
-0.766
0.346
-0.768
0.344
-0.769
0.342
-0.843
0.268
-0.844
0.267
-0.845
0.267
-0.843
0.269
-0.841
0.27
V3
Kip
0.077
0.077
0.079
0.079
0.079
0.079
0.086
0.086
0.093
0.093
0.283
0.283
0.285
0.285
0.285
0.285
0.292
0.292
0.299
0.299
T
Kip-ft
0.0009852
0.0009852
0.000984
0.000984
0.0009873
0.0009873
0.0009419
0.0009419
0.0009006
0.0009006
-0.0001667
-0.0001667
-0.0001679
-0.0001679
-0.0001646
-0.0001646
-0.0002101
-0.0002101
-0.0002514
-0.0002514
M2
Kip-ft
1.0094
-0.2508
1.0224
-0.2614
1.0327
-0.2654
1.1048
-0.3054
1.1726
-0.348
3.0506
-1.5743
3.0636
-1.5849
3.074
-1.5889
3.146
-1.629
3.2138
-1.6715
M3
Kip-ft
-4.4066
-0.9479
-4.4056
-0.963
-4.4055
-0.9752
-4.4206
-0.9585
-4.4353
-0.9478
-4.9024
-0.2085
-4.9034
-0.1934
-4.9035
-0.1812
-4.8884
-0.1979
-4.8737
-0.2086
Max Axial Load (compression) = 70.9 kips < Member (2C15x33.9_SD) Capacity = 501 kips (Calc.
pp. 299), OK.
Page C-17
Bottom Chord in End Bay

Frame
Station
OutputCase
Text
ft
Text
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
378
378
378
378
378
378
378
378
378
378
CaseType
Text
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
P
Kip
-51.921
-51.921
-51.945
-51.945
-51.987
-51.987
-52.019
-52.019
-52.068
-52.068
-80.315
-80.315
-80.292
-80.292
-80.25
-80.25
-80.218
-80.218
-80.169
-80.169
V2
Kip
-0.453
0.658
-0.453
0.658
-0.453
0.658
-0.452
0.659
-0.452
0.66
-0.461
0.651
-0.461
0.651
-0.461
0.651
-0.462
0.65
-0.463
0.649
V3
Kip
-0.118
-0.118
-0.122
-0.122
-0.125
-0.125
-0.147
-0.147
-0.168
-0.168
-0.841
-0.841
-0.846
-0.846
-0.849
-0.849
-0.871
-0.871
-0.891
-0.891
T
Kip-ft
0.0013
0.0013
0.0013
0.0013
0.0013
0.0013
0.0013
0.0013
0.0013
0.0013
0.0001988
0.0001988
0.0002046
0.0002046
0.0002123
0.0002123
0.0002186
0.0002186
0.0002304
0.0002304
M2
Kip-ft
-1.0322
0.8895
-1.0863
0.9016
-1.137
0.911
-1.4248
0.9787
-1.6958
1.0425
-11.0793
2.665
-11.1335
2.6771
-11.1842
2.6865
-11.4719
2.7542
-11.7429
2.818
M3
Kip-ft
-2.3322
-4.0053
-2.3297
-4.0041
-2.3285
-4.0038
-2.3286
-4.0183
-2.3296
-4.0324
-2.9232
-4.4773
-2.9256
-4.4786
-2.9268
-4.4789
-2.9267
-4.4644
-2.9257
-4.4503
pp. 299), OK.
Page C-18
4. Frame columns
Critical Frame Column 1
Critical Frame Column 2
Critical Frame Column 1 (See sketch above for definition)

Frame
Station
OutputCase
Text
ft
Text
432
432
432
432
432
432
432
432
432
432
434
434
434
434
434
434
434
434
434
434
CaseType
Text
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
P
Kip
-97.325
-96.015
-97.29
-95.98
-97.269
-95.959
-97.47
-96.16
-97.682
-96.373
-100.242
-98.932
-100.276
-98.967
-100.297
-98.988
-100.096
-98.787
-99.884
-98.574
V2
Kip
-0.92
-0.92
-0.929
-0.929
-0.938
-0.938
-0.905
-0.905
-0.869
-0.869
-2.181
-2.181
-2.19
-2.19
-2.199
-2.199
-2.166
-2.166
-2.129
-2.129
V3
Kip
0.528
0.528
0.528
0.528
0.529
0.529
0.529
0.529
0.529
0.529
0.539
0.539
0.538
0.538
0.538
0.538
0.537
0.537
0.537
0.537
T
Kip-ft
-0.0017
-0.0017
-0.0016
-0.0016
-0.0016
-0.0016
-0.0015
-0.0015
-0.0013
-0.0013
-0.0026
-0.0026
-0.0025
-0.0025
-0.0025
-0.0025
-0.0023
-0.0023
-0.0021
-0.0021
M2
Kip-ft
5.3084
-3.0665
5.3143
-3.0699
5.3208
-3.0737
5.3245
-3.0753
5.3272
-3.0763
5.4236
-3.1323
5.4176
-3.1289
5.4112
-3.1251
5.4075
-3.1235
5.4048
-3.1225
M3
Kip-ft
-6.1106
8.4932
-6.1836
8.5612
-6.2589
8.6313
-5.9645
8.403
-5.6371
8.1528
-21.8638
12.7542
-21.9369
12.8221
-22.0121
12.8922
-21.7178
12.664
-21.3903
12.4137
Pu = 100.3 kips, Mu = 22 k-ft.

Member W14x82, Capacity Pn = 386 kips (Calc pp. 299), Mn = 297 k-ft, D/C = 0.33 < 1, OK.
Page C-19
Critical Frame Column 2 (See sketch above for definition)

Frame
Station
OutputCase
Text
ft
Text
394
0 10%Lateral + (D+Water) + Y Loc1
394
394
394
394
394
394
394
394
394
395
395
395
395
395
395
395
395
395
395
CaseType
Text
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
P
Kip
-152.803
-151.602
-152.728
-151.527
-152.7
-151.499
-152.433
-151.232
-152.211
-151.01
-179.993
-178.792
-180.068
-178.867
-180.096
-178.896
-180.364
-179.163
-180.585
-179.384
V2
Kip
-0.373
0.587
-0.374
0.587
-0.374
0.587
-0.373
0.588
-0.372
0.589
-0.299
0.662
-0.298
0.662
-0.298
0.663
-0.299
0.662
-0.3
0.661
V3
Kip
0.637
0.637
0.658
0.658
0.677
0.677
0.783
0.783
0.883
0.883
5.144
5.144
5.165
5.165
5.184
5.184
5.29
5.29
5.39
5.39
T
Kip-ft
-0.0056
-0.0056
-0.0056
-0.0056
-0.0056
-0.0056
-0.005
-0.005
-0.0048
-0.0048
0.0058
0.0058
0.0058
0.0058
0.0058
0.0058
0.0064
0.0064
0.0066
0.0066
M2
Kip-ft
9.4393
1.275
9.5898
1.1587
9.7282
1.0525
10.516
0.4794
11.2545
-0.0626
30.5461
-35.3929
30.6966
-35.5092
30.8351
-35.6153
31.6228
-36.1885
32.3613
-36.7304
M3
Kip-ft
3.4877
2.1172
3.4853
2.1197
3.4842
2.1212
3.4849
2.11
3.4866
2.0986
3.9974
1.6691
3.9998
1.6666
4.0009
1.6652
4.0002
1.6764
3.9985
1.6878
Pu = 180.1 kips, Mu = 36.2 k-ft (weak axis)

Member 2C15x40+CapPl, Capacity Pn = 805 kips (Calc pp. 299), Mn = 398 k-ft, D/C = 0.30 < 1,
OK.
Page C-20
Model B:
1. Max lateral drift at frames adjacent to expansion joint
Drift Ratio 1 (definition similar to Model A)
Joint
OutputCase
Text
Text
224 10%Lateral + Moving Y Loc1
CaseType
Text
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
U1
ft
-0.000249
-0.000247
-0.000245
-0.000242
-0.000239
0.000135
0.000139
0.00015
0.000145
0.000139
U2
ft
0.004749
0.004751
0.004751
0.004706
0.004661
0.010616
0.010655
0.010705
0.010499
0.0103
U3
ft
0.001381
0.001385
0.001396
0.001362
0.001339
0.001411
0.001416
0.001428
0.00139
0.001361
R1
Radians
-0.000174
-0.000175
-0.000176
-0.000172
-0.000169
-0.000279
-0.000281
-0.000283
-0.000275
-0.000268
R2
Radians
0.00003
0.000029
0.000029
0.000028
0.000027
0.000024
0.000024
0.000025
0.000024
0.000024
R3
Radians
-0.000064
-0.000063
-0.000063
-0.000062
-0.000061
-0.000159
-0.000155
-0.000154
-0.000147
-0.000137
D(U2) Drift Ratio

ft
%
0.005867
0.04%
0.005904
0.04%
0.005954
0.04%
0.005793
0.04%
0.005639
0.03%
U3
ft
0.000631
0.000635
0.000642
0.000634
0.000633
0.000611
0.000614
0.000622
0.000613
0.000611
R1
Radians
-0.000122
-0.000124
-0.000125
-0.000127
-0.000129
0.000042
0.000042
0.000042
0.000032
0.000024
R2
Radians
0.000044
0.000044
0.000045
0.000044
0.000043
0.00004
0.000041
0.000041
0.00004
0.000038
R3
Radians
-0.000104
-0.000104
-0.000104
-0.0001
-0.000096
-0.000288
-0.00029
-0.00029
-0.000265
-0.000247
D(U2) Drift Ratio

ft
%
0.003423
0.02%
0.003464
0.02%
0.003503
0.02%
0.00371
0.02%
0.003906
0.02%
Drift Ratio 2 (definition similar to Model A)

Joint
OutputCase
Text
Text
CaseType
Text
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
U1
ft
-0.00031
-0.000309
-0.000308
-0.000305
-0.000302
0.000384
0.000386
0.000396
0.000381
0.000375
U2
ft
0.002433
0.002437
0.002439
0.002423
0.002407
0.005856
0.005901
0.005942
0.006133
0.006313
Page C-21
2. Bottom truss diagonals

Bottom Diagonals in the Bay Directly under Expansion Joint
Frame
Station
OutputCase
Text
ft
Text
627
1.25 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc1
627 12.4363 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc1
627
627 12.4363 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc2
627
627 12.4363 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc3
627
627 12.4363 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc4
627
1.25 10%Lateral + D+ Y Loc5
627 12.4363 10%Lateral + D+ Y Loc5
628
628 11.4779 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc1
628
628 11.4779 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc2
628
628 11.4779 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc3
628
628 11.4779 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc4
628
628 11.4779 10%Lateral + D+ Y Loc5
641
641 12.4363 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc1
641
641 12.4363 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc2
641
641 12.4363 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc3
641
641 12.4363 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc4
641
641 12.4363 10%Lateral + D+ Y Loc5
642
642 11.4779 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc1
642
642 11.4779 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc2
642
642 11.4779 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc3
642
642 11.4779 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc4
642
642 11.4779 10%Lateral + D+ Y Loc5
CaseType
Text
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
P
Kip
4.712
4.712
4.718
4.718
4.724
4.724
4.626
4.626
4.531
4.531
4.709
4.709
4.715
4.715
4.721
4.721
4.624
4.624
4.529
4.529
-8.847
-8.847
-8.853
-8.853
-8.859
-8.859
-8.761
-8.761
-8.666
-8.666
-8.839
-8.839
-8.845
-8.845
-8.851
-8.851
-8.754
-8.754
-8.659
-8.659
V2
Kip
-0.208
-0.011
-0.207
-0.011
-0.207
-0.011
-0.207
-0.01
-0.207
-0.01
-0.003009
0.194
-0.003032
0.194
-0.003041
0.194
-0.003118
0.194
-0.003202
0.194
-0.213
-0.016
-0.213
-0.016
-0.213
-0.016
-0.213
-0.016
-0.213
-0.016
-0.002913
0.194
-0.002891
0.194
-0.002882
0.194
-0.002805
0.194
-0.002721
0.194
V3
Kip
0.001816
0.001816
0.001838
0.001838
0.001867
0.001867
0.002037
0.002037
0.002192
0.002192
0.006481
0.006481
0.006476
0.006476
0.006457
0.006457
0.006397
0.006397
0.006354
0.006354
-0.00404
-0.00404
-0.004018
-0.004018
-0.003989
-0.003989
-0.003819
-0.003819
-0.003665
-0.003665
-0.004596
-0.004596
-0.004601
-0.004601
-0.00462
-0.00462
-0.00468
-0.00468
-0.004724
-0.004724
T
Kip-ft
-0.0002566
-0.0002566
-0.0002573
-0.0002573
-0.0002578
-0.0002578
-0.0002606
-0.0002606
-0.0002633
-0.0002633
-0.0001249
-0.0001249
-0.0001241
-0.0001241
-0.0001233
-0.0001233
-0.0001238
-0.0001238
-0.000124
-0.000124
0.000147
0.000147
0.0001463
0.0001463
0.0001458
0.0001458
0.0001431
0.0001431
0.0001403
0.0001403
0.000204
0.000204
0.0002048
0.0002048
0.0002056
0.0002056
0.0002052
0.0002052
0.0002049
0.0002049
M2
Kip-ft
0.0041
-0.0162
0.0043
-0.0163
0.0045
-0.0164
0.006
-0.0168
0.0073
-0.0172
0.0297
-0.0428
0.0296
-0.0428
0.0295
-0.0428
0.029
-0.0426
0.0286
-0.0425
-0.0233
0.0219
-0.0232
0.0218
-0.023
0.0217
-0.0215
0.0212
-0.0201
0.0209
-0.0239
0.0275
-0.024
0.0275
-0.0241
0.0276
-0.0246
0.0278
-0.025
0.0279
M3
Kip-ft
-0.758
0.4623
-0.7578
0.4622
-0.7578
0.4621
-0.7559
0.462
-0.7542
0.4619
0.4663
-0.6012
0.4662
-0.601
0.4661
-0.601
0.466
-0.6002
0.4659
-0.5995
-0.7823
0.4957
-0.7825
0.4958
-0.7825
0.4959
-0.7844
0.496
-0.7861
0.4961
0.5011
-0.5675
0.5012
-0.5677
0.5013
-0.5677
0.5013
-0.5685
0.5015
-0.5692
Page C-22
Bottom Diagonals in the End Bay

Frame
Station
OutputCase
Text
ft
Text
625
625 12.4363 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc1
625
625 12.4363 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc2
625
625 12.4363 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc3
625
625 12.4363 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc4
625
625 12.4363 10%Lateral + D+ Y Loc5
626
626 11.4779 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc1
626
626 11.4779 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc2
626
626 11.4779 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc3
626
626 11.4779 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc4
626
626 11.4779 10%Lateral + D+ Y Loc5
639
639 12.4363 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc1
639
639 12.4363 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc2
639
639 12.4363 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc3
639
639 12.4363 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc4
639
639 12.4363 10%Lateral + D+ Y Loc5
640
640 11.4779 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc1
640
640 11.4779 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc2
640
640 11.4779 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc3
640
640 11.4779 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc4
640
640 11.4779 10%Lateral + D+ Y Loc5
CaseType
Text
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
P
Kip
6.114
6.114
6.131
6.131
6.145
6.145
6.092
6.092
6.04
6.04
6.085
6.085
6.101
6.101
6.116
6.116
6.061
6.061
6.009
6.009
-10.35
-10.35
-10.367
-10.367
-10.382
-10.382
-10.328
-10.328
-10.277
-10.277
-10.33
-10.33
-10.347
-10.347
-10.362
-10.362
-10.307
-10.307
-10.255
-10.255
V2
Kip
-0.202
-0.005391
-0.202
-0.005385
-0.202
-0.00538
-0.202
-0.005372
-0.202
-0.005372
0.007098
0.204
0.007138
0.204
0.007163
0.204
0.007271
0.204
0.007384
0.204
-0.204
-0.007184
-0.204
-0.00719
-0.204
-0.007196
-0.204
-0.007203
-0.204
-0.007203
0.0008599
0.198
0.00082
0.198
0.0007953
0.198
0.0006869
0.198
0.0005737
0.197
V3
Kip
-0.005564
-0.005564
-0.005686
-0.005686
-0.005797
-0.005797
-0.006411
-0.006411
-0.006983
-0.006983
0.011
0.011
0.011
0.011
0.011
0.011
0.011
0.011
0.012
0.012
-0.025
-0.025
-0.025
-0.025
-0.025
-0.025
-0.026
-0.026
-0.026
-0.026
0.0006926
0.0006926
0.0007552
0.0007552
0.0008137
0.0008137
0.001194
0.001194
0.001546
0.001546
T
Kip-ft
-0.00004602
-0.00004602
-0.00004633
-0.00004633
-0.00004661
-0.00004661
-0.00004837
-0.00004837
-0.00005008
-0.00005008
-0.0000725
-0.0000725
-0.00007188
-0.00007188
-0.00007145
-0.00007145
-0.00006826
-0.00006826
-0.0000651
-0.0000651
-0.00001972
-0.00001972
-0.00002003
-0.00002003
-0.00002031
-0.00002031
-0.00002207
-0.00002207
-0.00002377
-0.00002377
0.0001819
0.0001819
0.0001825
0.0001825
0.0001829
0.0001829
0.0001861
0.0001861
0.0001893
0.0001893
M2
Kip-ft
-0.0601
0.0021
-0.0611
0.0025
-0.0621
0.0028
-0.067
0.0047
-0.0716
0.0065
0.0761
-0.0464
0.0764
-0.0467
0.0768
-0.047
0.0788
-0.0493
0.0806
-0.0514
-0.1911
0.0886
-0.1921
0.0889
-0.193
0.0892
-0.198
0.0912
-0.2026
0.0929
0.0202
0.0124
0.0205
0.0121
0.0209
0.0118
0.0228
0.0095
0.0247
0.0074
M3
Kip-ft
-0.7269
0.4345
-0.7269
0.4345
-0.7269
0.4344
-0.7265
0.4348
-0.7262
0.4351
0.4342
-0.7463
0.4342
-0.7468
0.4341
-0.7472
0.4345
-0.7481
0.4347
-0.7491
-0.736
0.4455
-0.7361
0.4455
-0.736
0.4456
-0.7365
0.4453
-0.7367
0.445
0.4474
-0.6634
0.4474
-0.6629
0.4475
-0.6626
0.4472
-0.6617
0.4469
-0.6606
Page C-23
Bottom Diagonals in the Interior Bay Adjacent to Expansion Joint

Frame
Station
OutputCase
Text
ft
Text
629
629 12.4363 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc1
629
629 12.4363 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc2
629
629 12.4363 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc3
629
629 12.4363 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc4
629
629 12.4363 10%Lateral + D+ Y Loc5
630
630 11.4779 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc1
630
630 11.4779 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc2
630
630 11.4779 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc3
630
630 11.4779 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc4
630
630 11.4779 10%Lateral + D+ Y Loc5
643
643 12.4363 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc1
643
643 12.4363 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc2
643
643 12.4363 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc3
643
643 12.4363 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc4
643
643 12.4363 10%Lateral + D+ Y Loc5
644
644 11.4779 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc1
644
644 11.4779 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc2
644
644 11.4779 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc3
644
644 11.4779 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc4
644
644 11.4779 10%Lateral + D+ Y Loc5
CaseType
Text
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
P
Kip
2.714
2.714
2.717
2.717
2.723
2.723
2.703
2.703
2.685
2.685
2.71
2.71
2.713
2.713
2.719
2.719
2.699
2.699
2.681
2.681
0.389
0.389
0.387
0.387
0.38
0.38
0.4
0.4
0.419
0.419
0.394
0.394
0.391
0.391
0.385
0.385
0.405
0.405
0.424
0.424
V2
Kip
-0.198
-0.0009
-0.198
-0.000885
-0.198
-0.000868
-0.198
-0.0008
-0.198
-0.000722
0.018
0.215
0.018
0.215
0.018
0.215
0.018
0.215
0.018
0.215
-0.194
0.002962
-0.194
0.002947
-0.194
0.00293
-0.194
0.002862
-0.194
0.002784
0.004151
0.201
0.004154
0.201
0.004173
0.201
0.00438
0.201
0.004618
0.201
V3
T
Kip
Kip-ft
-0.005349 -0.0002752
-0.005349 -0.0002752
-0.005342 -0.0002758
-0.005342 -0.0002758
-0.005346 -0.0002764
-0.005346 -0.0002764
-0.005322 -0.0002747
-0.005322 -0.0002747
-0.005281 -0.0002731
-0.005281 -0.0002731
-0.003893 0.0001068
-0.003893 0.0001068
-0.003896 0.0001063
-0.003896 0.0001063
-0.00389 0.0001059
-0.00389 0.0001059
-0.003908
0.000102
-0.003908
0.000102
-0.00394 0.00009763
-0.00394 0.00009763
0.003607 0.0001678
0.003607 0.0001678
0.003615 0.0001672
0.003615 0.0001672
0.00361 0.0001666
0.00361 0.0001666
0.003635 0.0001683
0.003635 0.0001683
0.003675 0.0001699
0.003675 0.0001699
0.004203 0.0001581
0.004203 0.0001581
0.0042 0.0001576
0.0042 0.0001576
0.004206 0.0001572
0.004206 0.0001572
0.004188 0.0001533
0.004188 0.0001533
0.004156 0.0001489
0.004156 0.0001489
M2
Kip-ft
-0.0399
0.0199
-0.0399
0.0199
-0.0399
0.0199
-0.0397
0.0198
-0.0393
0.0198
-0.023
0.0205
-0.0231
0.0205
-0.0231
0.0205
-0.0231
0.0206
-0.0232
0.0209
0.0191
-0.0213
0.0191
-0.0213
0.0191
-0.0213
0.0193
-0.0213
0.0197
-0.0214
0.022
-0.025
0.022
-0.025
0.022
-0.025
0.022
-0.0248
0.0219
-0.0246
M3
Kip-ft
-0.6145
0.4968
-0.614
0.497
-0.6137
0.4972
-0.6134
0.4967
-0.6131
0.4962
0.4916
-0.8158
0.4919
-0.8156
0.492
-0.8152
0.4916
-0.8133
0.4911
-0.8111
-0.599
0.469
-0.5994
0.4688
-0.5997
0.4686
-0.6
0.4691
-0.6004
0.4696
0.4666
-0.681
0.4663
-0.6813
0.4662
-0.6817
0.4666
-0.6835
0.4671
-0.6857
Max Axial Load (Tension) = 2.7 kips < Brace Capacity OK.
Page C-24
3. Bottom truss chords

Bottom Chord in the Bay Directly under Expansion Joint
Frame
Station
OutputCase
Text
ft
Text
151
151 17.1667 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc1
151
151 17.1667 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc2
151
151 17.1667 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc3
151
151 17.1667 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc4
151
151 17.1667 10%Lateral + D+ Y Loc5
379
379 17.1667 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc1
379
379 17.1667 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc2
379
379 17.1667 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc3
379
379 17.1667 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc4
379
379 17.1667 10%Lateral + D+ Y Loc5
CaseType
Text
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
P
Kip
-22.004
-22.004
-22.041
-22.041
-22.091
-22.091
-22.071
-22.071
-22.067
-22.067
-17.07
-17.07
-17.034
-17.034
-16.984
-16.984
-17.006
-17.006
-17.012
-17.012
V2
Kip
-0.821
0.29
-0.82
0.291
-0.82
0.292
-0.822
0.29
-0.824
0.288
-0.862
0.25
-0.863
0.249
-0.863
0.248
-0.861
0.25
-0.86
0.252
V3
Kip
0.151
0.151
0.152
0.152
0.153
0.153
0.158
0.158
0.163
0.163
0.405
0.405
0.406
0.406
0.407
0.407
0.412
0.412
0.417
0.417
T
Kip-ft
0.0025
0.0025
0.0025
0.0025
0.0025
0.0025
0.0025
0.0025
0.0024
0.0024
-0.0018
-0.0018
-0.0018
-0.0018
-0.0018
-0.0018
-0.0018
-0.0018
-0.0019
-0.0019
M2
Kip-ft
1.0722
-1.3876
1.0855
-1.3997
1.0966
-1.4065
1.1619
-1.42
1.2236
-1.4388
2.7259
-3.8853
2.7392
-3.8974
2.7503
-3.9042
2.8156
-3.9177
2.8773
-3.9364
M3
Kip-ft
-3.3109
1.0271
-3.3099
1.0118
-3.3098
0.9994
-3.3255
1.0188
-3.3409
1.0319
-3.4295
1.5662
-3.4305
1.5815
-3.4306
1.594
-3.415
1.5746
-3.3997
1.5614
Max Axial Load (compression) = 22 kips < Member (2C15x33.9_SD) Capacity = 501 kips (Calc.
pp. 299), OK.
Page C-25
Bottom Chord in End Bay

Frame
Station
OutputCase
Text
ft
Text
150
150 17.1667 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc1
150
150 17.1667 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc2
150
150 17.1667 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc3
150
150 17.1667 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc4
150
150 17.1667 10%Lateral + D+ Y Loc5
378
378 17.1667 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc1
378
378 17.1667 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc2
378
378 17.1667 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc3
378
378 17.1667 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc4
378
378 17.1667 10%Lateral + D+ Y Loc5
CaseType
Text
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
P
Kip
-10.942
-10.942
-10.963
-10.963
-10.998
-10.998
-11.097
-11.097
-11.205
-11.205
-28.078
-28.078
-28.058
-28.058
-28.023
-28.023
-27.927
-27.927
-27.821
-27.821
V2
Kip
-0.377
0.734
-0.377
0.734
-0.377
0.734
-0.376
0.735
-0.376
0.736
-0.4
0.712
-0.4
0.712
-0.4
0.712
-0.401
0.711
-0.402
0.71
V3
Kip
-0.212
-0.212
-0.216
-0.216
-0.22
-0.22
-0.241
-0.241
-0.261
-0.261
-0.626
-0.626
-0.631
-0.631
-0.634
-0.634
-0.656
-0.656
-0.676
-0.676
T
Kip-ft
0.0016
0.0016
0.0016
0.0016
0.0016
0.0016
0.0016
0.0016
0.0016
0.0016
-0.0002049
-0.0002049
-0.0001991
-0.0001991
-0.0001913
-0.0001913
-0.0001861
-0.0001861
-0.0001752
-0.0001752
M2
Kip-ft
-2.5673
0.8932
-2.6215
0.9056
-2.6723
0.9156
-2.9589
0.9778
-3.2289
1.0368
-7.7685
2.4643
-7.8226
2.4767
-7.8734
2.4867
-8.1601
2.5489
-8.4301
2.6079
M3
Kip-ft
-0.2367
-3.1514
-0.2342
-3.1501
-0.233
-3.1497
-0.2336
-3.1651
-0.235
-3.1799
-0.702
-3.2485
-0.7045
-3.2498
-0.7057
-3.2502
-0.7052
-3.2349
-0.7038
-3.2201
pp. 299), OK.
Page C-26
4. Frame columns
Critical Frame Column 1 (definition similar to Model A)
Frame
Station
OutputCase
Text
ft
Text
432
432
432
432
432
432
432
432
432
432
434
434
434
434
434
434
434
434
434
434
CaseType
Text
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
P
Kip
-31.303
-29.994
-31.269
-29.96
-31.25
-29.941
-31.435
-30.126
-31.633
-30.324
-33.933
-32.624
-33.967
-32.658
-33.987
-32.677
-33.803
-32.493
-33.606
-32.296
V2
Kip
0.271
0.271
0.263
0.263
0.254
0.254
0.283
0.283
0.315
0.315
-2.191
-2.191
-2.2
-2.2
-2.208
-2.208
-2.18
-2.18
-2.147
-2.147
V3
Kip
0.208
0.208
0.208
0.208
0.209
0.209
0.209
0.209
0.21
0.21
0.218
0.218
0.217
0.217
0.217
0.217
0.217
0.217
0.216
0.216
T
Kip-ft
-0.0015
-0.0015
-0.0014
-0.0014
-0.0014
-0.0014
-0.0012
-0.0012
-0.001
-0.001
-0.003
-0.003
-0.0029
-0.0029
-0.0029
-0.0029
-0.0027
-0.0027
-0.0025
-0.0025
M2
M3
Kip-ft
Kip-ft
2.0703
6.5391
-1.2297
2.2337
2.0762
6.4682
-1.2332
2.3
2.0828
6.3971
-1.237
2.3668
2.086
6.6531
-1.2384
2.1682
2.0882
6.9463
-1.2392
1.9445
2.1707 -23.7279
-1.2905 11.0527
2.1647 -23.7988
-1.287
11.119
2.1582
-23.87
-1.2832 11.1859
2.1551 -23.614
-1.2819 10.9873
2.1528 -23.3209
-1.2811 10.7636
Pu = 33.9 kips, Mu = 23.7 k-ft.

Member W14x82, Capacity Pn = 386 kips (Calc pp. 299), Mn = 297 k-ft, D/C = 0.12 < 1, OK.
Page C-27
Critical Frame Column 2 (definition similar to Model A)

Frame
Station
OutputCase
Text
ft
Text
394
0 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc1
394 12.8176 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc1
394
394 12.8176 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc2
394
394 12.8176 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc3
394
394 12.8176 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc4
394
0 10%Lateral + D+ Y Loc5
394 12.8176 10%Lateral + D+ Y Loc5
395
395 12.8176 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc1
395
395 12.8176 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc2
395
395 12.8176 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc3
395
395 12.8176 10%Lateral + D + Y Loc4
395
395 12.8176 10%Lateral + D+ Y Loc5
CaseType
Text
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
P
Kip
-87.809
-86.609
-87.733
-86.532
-87.702
-86.501
-87.467
-86.266
-87.274
-86.074
-111.492
-110.291
-111.569
-110.368
-111.6
-110.4
-111.837
-110.636
-112.031
-110.83
V2
Kip
-0.667
0.294
-0.667
0.294
-0.667
0.293
-0.666
0.294
-0.665
0.296
-0.619
0.342
-0.619
0.342
-0.618
0.342
-0.619
0.341
-0.62
0.34
V3
Kip
1.26
1.26
1.281
1.281
1.301
1.301
1.401
1.401
1.496
1.496
3.816
3.816
3.837
3.837
3.857
3.857
3.957
3.957
4.052
4.052
T
Kip-ft
-0.002
-0.002
-0.002
-0.002
-0.002
-0.002
-0.0014
-0.0014
-0.0012
-0.0012
0.0036
0.0036
0.0036
0.0036
0.0036
0.0036
0.0042
0.0042
0.0044
0.0044
M2
Kip-ft
12.1084
-4.0443
12.2607
-4.1627
12.4027
-4.2731
13.1556
-4.8048
13.8628
-5.3095
22.8533
-26.0624
23.0056
-26.1809
23.1476
-26.2913
23.9006
-26.8231
24.6079
-27.3281
M3
Kip-ft
1.3105
3.6979
1.308
3.7004
1.307
3.7019
1.3081
3.6903
1.3102
3.6786
1.7372
3.5151
1.7396
3.5127
1.7407
3.5111
1.7396
3.5226
1.7375
3.5343
Pu = 111.8 kips, Mu = 27.3 k-ft (weak axis)

Member 2C15x40+CapPl, Capacity Pn = 805 kips (Calc pp. 299), Mn = 398 k-ft, D/C = 0.14 < 1,
OK.
Page C-28
5. Tension Ties
Tension Ties
Page C-29

Frame
Station
OutputCase
Text
ft
Text
578
578
578
578
578
578
578
578
578
578
578
578
578
578
578
581
581
581
581
581
581
581
581
581
581
581
581
581
581
581
CaseType
Text
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
P
Kip
6.205
6.208
6.211
6.188
6.191
6.194
6.169
6.172
6.174
6.136
6.139
6.142
6.102
6.105
6.108
-0.002935
-0.00002101
0.002893
-0.002935
-0.00002098
0.002893
-0.002935
-0.00002095
0.002893
-0.002935
-0.00002089
0.002893
-0.002935
-0.00002082
0.002893
V2
Kip
-0.023
3.469E-18
0.023
-0.023
3.469E-18
0.023
-0.023
3.469E-18
0.023
-0.023
3.469E-18
0.023
-0.023
3.469E-18
0.023
-0.023
3.469E-18
0.023
-0.023
3.469E-18
0.023
-0.023
3.469E-18
0.023
-0.023
3.469E-18
0.023
-0.023
3.469E-18
0.023
V3
Kip
T
Kip-ft
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
M2
Kip-ft
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
M3
Kip-ft
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.021
-1.388E-17
0
0.021
-1.388E-17
0
0.021
-1.388E-17
0
0.021
-1.388E-17
0
0.021
-1.388E-17
0
0.021
-1.388E-17
0
0.021
-1.388E-17
0
0.021
-1.388E-17
0
0.021
-1.388E-17
0
0.021
-1.388E-17
Pu = 6.2 kips
Capacity Pn = 80 kips (Calc pp. 312), D/C = 0.08 < 1, OK.
Based on these analysis, the temporary structure is stable and truss members are adequate
for the temporary loading estimated as in this study.
Page C-30
Appendix D
Pipe Temporary Restraint Option 1

Lattice Cage for Temporary and Permanent Restraint
This option utilizes a lattice cage to serve as both the temporary and the permanent lateral restraint at
the expansion joint. The lattice cage is installed before water shutdown over the (E) pipe and the (E)
Expansion Joint. And its top face is kept open during the expansion joint replacement operation to
provide access for both removal and installation of the expansion joint. After the joint replacement, the
top face of the lattice cage is closed up with diagonal members and the lattice cage serves as the
permanent lateral restraint. The conceptual sequence is shown in the following sketches.
1. Conceptual Sequence
Step 1: Install (N) Lattice Cage over the O.D. of the (E) pipe and (E) Expansion Joint. See
Sketch 1.
Step 2: Remove top truss diagonals.
Step 3: Cut (E) Pipe and remove (E) Expansion Joint. Total 3 cuts and removal of (E)
Expansion Joint in minimum two pieces to avoid the overhead beam. See Sketch 2.
Step 4: Drop in the 6 lapping ring and slide it onto the O.D. of the pipe away from the
joint.
Step 5: Drop in (N) Bellow Expansion Joint with butt straps assembly in precompressed block length. See Sketch 3.
Step 6: Extent (N) Bellow Expansion Joint to neutral length and furnish welding of the
butt straps each side to the steel pipe. Slide the lapping ring to cover butt joint and the
weld. See Sketch 4.
Step 7: Resume water service.
Step 8: Install top diagonal members on the lattice cage and close up the top face.
Step 9: Re-install bridge truss top diagonals.
2. Detail Analysis and Design Calculation

See Lattice Cage (External Sleeve) Design.
Page D-1
8-0 (VIF)
(E) Top Chord beyond

to remain
(E) Inclined member

beyond to remain
0-5 min
4-1.5
2-0 ()
9-8 (ID) Pipe
(E) Top overhead

member to remain
(E) Top Truss Diagonals to

be temporary removed and
reinstalled after EJ
replacement
0-3 min
0-9 min
(N) Channel Ring,

welded to ID of (N)
External Sleeve, but
with Gap and Teflon
surface to OD of
Pipe
Second Cut in (E) Pipe
Third Cut in (E) Pipe
Typical (N) Channel Rings,

welded to OD of Pipe and ID
of (N) External Sleeve
(N) External Sleeve

(Lattice-type built
up using tube steel)
SKETCH 1: Installation of (N) External Sleeve (Conceptual)
Page D-2
8-0 (VIF)

to remain
(E) Top overhead

member to remain

replacement
(E) Inclined member

beyond to remain
4-1.5
1-6
0-10.5 (, VIF)
First Cut in (E) Pipe
2nd Piece to be removed
1st Piece to be removed
9-8 (ID) Pipe
SKETCH 2: Removal of (E) Expansion Joint (Conceptual Sequence)
Page D-3
8-0 (VIF)

to remain
(E) Top overhead

member to remain

replacement
(E) Inclined member

beyond to remain
4-1.5
1-1
1-1 0-9 ()
(N)Expansion Joint in
Block Length (-12 inch)
9-8 (ID) Pipe
(N) Butt Straps Shop-Welded to

(N) bellow Expansion Joint
SKETCH 3: Dropping-in (N) Expansion Joint (Conceptual)
Page D-4
8-0 (VIF)

to remain
(E) Top overhead

member to remain

replacement
1-1
4-1.5
2-2.5
(cut sheet)
(E) Inclined member

beyond to remain
1-1
0-3 min
Butt Weld to Pipe

this line
(N) Sleeve Splicing

Fillet weld both ends
(N)Expansion Joint Extend to

Neutral Length (0 inch)
9-8 (ID) Pipe
(N) Butt Straps Shop-Welded to

(N) bellow Expansion Joint
Fillet Weld to Pipe

this line
SKETCH 4: Installation of (N) Expansion Joint (Conceptual)
Page D-5
Summary of External Sleeve (Lattice Cage) Design

1. Based on analysis, if no restraint is provided for relative (vertical and horizontal) movements
between the two segments of pipe, when the pipe is cut open for removal of (E) Expansion Joint,
there will be a 0.57 relative displacement in the vertical direction due to the weight of an
empty pipe. See attached analysis output Figure 1. This could cause a misalignment issue when
installing the (N) Bellow Expansion Joint difficulty to fit the (N) joint both ends to the displaced
pipe.
2. Assuming that the (N) Bellow Expansion Joint can be somehow installed tolerating the 0.57
misalignment, if pressured water is allowed to refill the pipe before lateral (vertical and
horizontal) restraint is installed between the pipe segments on each side of the (N) Bellow
Expansion Joint, the (N) Bellow Expansion Joint will be stressed due to the tendency of further
relative displacement due to additional weight from water. This force in the vertical direction is
estimated to be 120 kips (Figure 2). This is not acceptable.
3. A lattice type cage is provided to restrain the pipe relative displacement before the pipe is cut
open for the Expansion Joint replacement. During the Expansion Joint replacement, the top face
lattice will be kept open to provide accessibility for the (E) Expansion Joint removal and (N)
Bellow Expansion Joint assembly dropped from above. See sketch below. The cage structure is
checked for the temporary loading demands as described in the Design Basis.
a. Vertical Shear 260 kips + Horizontal Shear 10 kips; and
b. Vertical Shear 230 kips + Horizontal Shear 35 kips.
Pipe segment this side is

not shown for clarity.
Page D-6
4. After the installation of the (N) Bellow Expansion Joint, diagonal members will be installed on
the top face of the cage and the cage will be left permanent on the pipe to be the External
Sleeve over the Bellow Expansion Joint. The cage will be attached to the North side pipe
through two channel-rings; on the South side, the cage channel ring will be separated from the
pipe O.D. using Teflon material (friction coefficient = 0.04, Teflon on Teflon). This cage will
allow free axial movement of the pipe, but restrain the relative lateral (vertical and horizontal)
movement of the pipe as described in the Design Basis. The permanent cage is as depicted in
the sketch below. The cage structure is checked for the permanent loads and stiffness criteria
as described in the Design Basis.
a. Vertical Shear 350 kips + Horizontal Shear 30 kips;
b. Vertical Shear 250 kips + Horizontal Shear 100 kips; and
c. Lateral Stiffness (either vertical or horizontal) > 400 kip/in
Pipe segment this side is

not shown for clarity.
5. Steel pipe strength verification. Steel pipe stress is checked for combined effects of
a. Internal pressure 200 psi
b. Cage reactions (max vertical and horizontal shear and induced moments)
c. Axial thrust reaction of Bellow Expansion Joint, 6.9 kips/in x 9 in = 62.1 kips.
Page D-7
Deformation when Expansion Joint Opens Up (Under Self-weight of Empty Pipe):

Left Segment = 0.39 inch down
Right Segment = 0.18 inch up
TABLE:
Joint
Text
1554
1554
1555
1555
Joint Displacements
OutputCase
CaseType
Text
Text
DEAD
NonStatic
DEAD
NonStatic
DEAD
NonStatic
DEAD
NonStatic
StepType
Text
Max
Min
Max
Min
U1
in
0.000012
0.000012
-0.000023
-0.000023
U2
in
7.67E-09
7.67E-09
3.543E-08
3.543E-08
U3
in
-0.393061
-0.393061
0.176148
0.176148
R1
Radians
-5.667E-12
-5.667E-12
-1.891E-11
-1.891E-11
R2
Radians
-0.000457
-0.000457
0.000667
0.000667
R3
Radians
2.302E-10
2.302E-10
-8.287E-11
-8.287E-11
Fig. 1. Estimation of Selfweight Induced Misalignment When Pipe Is Cut Open
Page D-8
Vertical Shear at Expansion Joint due to Water

Weight Only = 197.1 78.5 = 118.6 kips
TABLE: Section Cut Forces - Design

SectionCut OutputCase CaseType
Text
Text
Text
PipeCutEJ DEAD
NonStatic
PipeCutEJ DEAD
NonStatic
PipeCutEJ D+Water
NonStatic
PipeCutEJ D+Water
NonStatic
StepType
Text
Max
Min
Max
Min
P
Kip
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
V2
Kip
78.53
78.53
197.09
197.09
V3
Kip
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
T
Kip-ft
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
M2
Kip-ft
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
M3
GlobalX GlobalY GlobalZ
Kip-ft
ft
ft
ft
0.00 380.50
0.00
8.13
0.00 380.50
0.00
8.13
0.00 380.50
0.00
8.13
0.00 380.50
0.00
8.13
Fig. 2. Estimation of Load on EJ Due to Water Weight
Page D-9
Lattice Cage (External Sleeve) Design

1. Temporary Structure
1.1 Member Sizes:
Top View
Bottom View
A Typ.
Side View
Cross Section
Section A-A
Page D-10
1.2 Loading:
a. Vertical Shear 260 kips + Horizontal Shear 10 kips; and
b. Vertical Shear 230 kips + Horizontal Shear 35 kips.
c. The following sketches show how loads are input in the SAP2000 model. Member
selfweight is considered by program.
d. Load Combinations for Lattice Member Strength Checks
I.
Combination 1: (1.1)Selfweight + (-2.6)Vertical + (0.1)Horizontal
II.
Combination 2: (1.1)Selfweight + (-2.3)Vertical + (0.35)Horizontal
This end of pipe is modelled fixed

for Lattice Cage analysis and design.
Dist. Load on South Ring

Elements: 0.25 k/in. Total
load = 126x3.14x0.25 =
100 kips
Load Case: Vertical Shear Load
Page D-11
This end of pipe is modelled fixed

for Lattice Cage analysis and design.
Dist. Load on South Ring

Elements: 0.25 k/in. Total
load = 126x3.14x0.25 =
100 kips
Load Case: Horizontal Shear Load
Page D-12
Internal Pressure is applied

as Surface Load on Pipe
Shell Elements, 0.2 ksi
Load Case: Internal Pressure

(Not used for temporary structure check, but included in permanent structure check)
Page D-13
Axial Thrust is applied as point

loads on Pipe Shell Elements,
0.86 kips x 72 = 62.1 kips
Load Case: Max Axial Thrust

(Not used for temporary structure check, but included in permanent structure check)
Page D-14
1.3 Member Strength Check Results:

See below SAP2000 Element Design Results (P-M-M Demand/Capacity Ratios for each
member). Detailed calculations for typical members are attached.
Lattice Member Max D/C =

0.72 < 1.0. All OK.
Lattice Members Checked for Envelope of Load Combinations
Page D-15
2
6
4
3
Index of Detail Member Checks
1.4 Estimated vertical differential displacement:

Joint
OutputCase
Text
Text
18
Unit Live 100k Down
31
Unit Live 100k Down
CaseType
Text
LinStatic
LinStatic
U1
in
0.00844
0.011205
U2
in
0.051716
-2.139E-14
U3
in
-0.051735
-0.246529
= 0.8 x (0.247-0.052) = 0.156 in < 0.75 in OK

(Pipe Selfweight Induced Shear = 78.5 kips, 80% of the 100 kip deformation).
Page D-16
SAP2000 Steel Design
Project
Job Number
Engineer
AISC360-05/IBC2006 STEEL SECTION CHECK

Units : Kip, in, F
Member #1,
Long Diagonal
(Summary for Combo and Station)
Frame : 34
Length: 60.114
Loc
: 60.114
X Mid: 49.250
Y Mid: 58.780
Z Mid: -15.750
Combo: 1.1D+2.6Up+0.1LatDesign Type: Brace

Shape: HSS3X3X5/16
Frame Type: Ordinary Concentrica
Class: Compact
Princpl Rot: 0.000 degrees
Provision: LRFD
D/C Limit=0.950
AlphaPr/Py=0.555
Analysis: Direct Analysis

2nd Order: General 2nd Order
AlphaPr/Pe=0.275 Tau_b=0.988
PhiB=1.000
PhiS=1.000
PhiC=1.000
PhiS-RI=1.000
PhiTY=1.000
PhiST=1.000
PhiTF=1.000
A=2.940
J=5.940
E=29000.000
RLLF=1.000
I33=3.450
I22=3.450
fy=46.000
Fu=58.000
r33=1.083
r22=1.083
Ry=1.100
S33=2.300
S22=2.300
z33=2.900
z22=2.900
HSS Welding: ERW
Reduce HSS Thickness? No
Reduction: Tau-b Fixed

EA factor=0.800
EI factor=0.800
STRESS CHECK FORCES & MOMENTS (Combo 1.1D+2.6Up+0.1Lateral)

Location
Pu
Mu33
Mu22
Vu2
60.114
-75.064
-1.921
-4.133
0.055
Av3=1.746
Av2=1.746
Vu3
0.069
Tu
-0.261
B2
1.000
1.000
Cm
1.000
0.600
PMM DEMAND/CAPACITY RATIO

(H1-1a)
D/C Ratio:
0.723 = 0.683 + 0.013 + 0.028
= (Pr/Pc) + (8/9)(Mr33/Mc33) + (8/9)(Mr22/Mc22)
AXIAL FORCE & BIAXIAL MOMENT DESIGN
(H1-1a)
Factor
L
K1
Major Bending
1.000
1.000
Minor Bending
1.000
1.000
K2
1.000
1.000
Lltb
1.000
Kltb
1.000
Cb
2.012
Pu
Force
-75.064
phi*Pnc
Capacity
109.936
phi*Pnt
Capacity
135.240
Major Moment
Minor Moment
Mu
Moment
-1.921
-4.133
phi*Mn
Capacity
133.400
133.400
phi*Mn
No LTB
133.400
Torsion
Tu
Moment
-0.261
Tn
Capacity
115.255
phi*Tn
Capacity
115.255
Vu
Force
0.055
0.069
phi*Vn
Capacity
34.166
34.166
Stress
Ratio
0.002
0.002
LTB
Axial
B1
1.000
1.000
SHEAR CHECK
Major Shear
Minor Shear
Status
Check
OK
OK
BRACE MAXIMUM AXIAL LOADS

Axial
P
Comp
N/C
P
Tens
-75.064
Page D-17
SAP2000 v14.2.4 - File:C:\Users\yangbo.chen\Documents\Sap2000 Run\CD Phase\Bellow EJ Investigation\Open Top

February
for Assembly
9, 2015
Dropdown
11:39 Try Latice
Project
Job Number
Engineer

Units : Kip, in, F
Member #2,
Side Diagonal
Frame : 53
Length: 55.958
Loc
: 55.958
X Mid: 47.125
Y Mid: 63.000
Z Mid: 47.250

Shape: HSS3X3X5/16
Class: Compact
Provision: LRFD
D/C Limit=0.950
AlphaPr/Py=0.373

PhiB=1.000
PhiS=1.000
PhiC=1.000
PhiS-RI=1.000
PhiTY=1.000
PhiST=1.000
PhiTF=1.000
A=2.940
J=5.940
E=29000.000
RLLF=1.000
I33=3.450
I22=3.450
fy=46.000
Fu=58.000
r33=1.083
r22=1.083
Ry=1.100
S33=2.300
S22=2.300
z33=2.900
z22=2.900
HSS Welding: ERW

EA factor=0.800
EI factor=0.800

Location
Pu
Mu33
Mu22
Vu2
55.958
-50.406
1.820
2.925
-0.011
Av3=1.746
Av2=1.746
Vu3
-0.052
Tu
-0.841

(H1-1a)
D/C Ratio:
0.478 = 0.446 + 0.012 + 0.019
= (Pr/Pc) + (8/9)(Mr33/Mc33) + (8/9)(Mr22/Mc22)
(H1-1a)
Factor
L
K1
Major Bending
1.000
1.000
Minor Bending
1.000
1.000
K2
1.000
1.000
Lltb
1.000
Kltb
1.000
Cb
1.447
Pu
Force
-50.406
phi*Pnc
Capacity
113.019
phi*Pnt
Capacity
135.240
Major Moment
Minor Moment
Mu
Moment
1.820
2.925
phi*Mn
Capacity
133.400
133.400
phi*Mn
No LTB
133.400
Torsion
Tu
Moment
-0.841
Tn
Capacity
115.255
phi*Tn
Capacity
115.255
Vu
Force
0.011
0.052
phi*Vn
Capacity
34.166
34.166
Stress
Ratio
0.000
0.002
LTB
Axial
B1
1.000
1.000
B2
1.000
1.000
Cm
1.000
0.600
SHEAR CHECK
Major Shear
Minor Shear
Status
Check
OK
OK

Axial
P
Comp
N/C
P
Tens
-50.406
Page D-18

February
for Assembly
9, 2015
Dropdown
11:42 Try Latice
Project
Job Number
Engineer

Units : Kip, in, F
Frame : 44
Length: 92.500
Loc
: 92.500
X Mid: 70.250
Y Mid: 63.000
Z Mid: 63.000
Provision: LRFD
D/C Limit=0.950
AlphaPr/Py=0.068

PhiB=1.000
PhiS=1.000
PhiC=1.000
PhiS-RI=1.000
PhiTY=1.000
PhiST=1.000
PhiTF=1.000
A=9.740
J=81.100
E=29000.000
RLLF=1.000
I33=48.300
I22=48.300
fy=46.000
Fu=58.000
r33=2.227
r22=2.227
Ry=1.100
S33=16.100
S22=16.100
z33=19.800
z22=19.800
HSS Welding: ERW
Member #3, Top

Longitudinal HSS6x6
Combo: 1.1D+2.3Up+0.35LaDesign Type: Beam

Shape: HSS6X6X1/2
Class: Compact
EA factor=0.800
EI factor=0.800

Location
Pu
Mu33
Mu22
Vu2
92.500
-30.452
-8.733
154.632
0.421
Av3=5.580
Av2=5.580
Vu3
-3.029
Tu
-36.546
B2
1.000
1.000
Cm
1.000
0.275

(H1-1b)
D/C Ratio:
0.218 = 0.038 + 0.010 + 0.170
= (1/2)(Pr/Pc) + (Mr33/Mc33) + (Mr22/Mc22)
(H1-1b)
Factor
L
K1
Major Bending
1.000
1.000
Minor Bending
1.000
1.000
K2
1.000
1.000
Lltb
1.000
Kltb
1.000
Cb
1.904
Axial
Pu
Force
-30.452
phi*Pnc
Capacity
398.942
phi*Pnt
Capacity
448.040
Major Moment
Minor Moment
Mu
Moment
-8.733
154.632
phi*Mn
Capacity
910.800
910.800
phi*Mn
No LTB
910.800
Torsion
Tu
Moment
-36.546
Tn
Capacity
775.651
phi*Tn
Capacity
775.651
Vu
Force
0.421
3.029
phi*Vn
Capacity
118.201
118.201
Stress
Ratio
0.004
0.026
LTB
B1
1.000
1.000
SHEAR CHECK
Major Shear
Minor Shear
Status
Check
OK
OK
CONNECTION SHEAR FORCES FOR BEAMS

VMajor
VMajor
Left
Right
Major (V2)
0.402
0.683
Page D-19

February
for Assembly
9, 2015
Dropdown
11:43 Try Latice
Project
Job Number
Engineer

Units : Kip, in, F
Frame : 23
Length: 63.000
Loc
: 0.000
X Mid: 116.500
Y Mid: -31.500
Z Mid: 63.000
Provision: LRFD
D/C Limit=0.950
AlphaPr/Py=0.034

PhiB=1.000
PhiS=1.000
PhiC=1.000
PhiS-RI=1.000
PhiTY=1.000
PhiST=1.000
PhiTF=1.000
A=9.740
J=81.100
E=29000.000
RLLF=1.000
I33=48.300
I22=48.300
fy=46.000
Fu=58.000
r33=2.227
r22=2.227
Ry=1.100
S33=16.100
S22=16.100
z33=19.800
z22=19.800
HSS Welding: ERW
Member #4, Top

Transverse HSS 6x6
Combo: 1.1D+2.3Up+0.35LaDesign Type: Beam

Shape: HSS6X6X1/2
Class: Compact
EA factor=0.800
EI factor=0.800

Location
Pu
Mu33
Mu22
Vu2
0.000
15.151
6.794
176.016
0.252
Av3=5.580
Av2=5.580
Vu3
2.906
Tu
12.594
B2
1.000
1.000
Cm
1.000
1.000

(H1.2,H1-1b)
D/C Ratio:
0.218 = 0.017 + 0.007 + 0.193
= (1/2)(Pr/Pc) + (Mr33/Mc33) + (Mr22/Mc22)
(H1.2,H1-1b)
Factor
L
K1
K2
Major Bending
2.000
1.000
1.000
Minor Bending
2.000
1.000
1.000
LTB
Axial
Major Moment
Minor Moment
Torsion
Lltb
2.000
Kltb
1.000
Cb
2.326
Pu
Force
15.151
phi*Pnc
Capacity
361.234
phi*Pnt
Capacity
448.040
Mu
Moment
6.794
176.016
phi*Mn
Capacity
910.800
910.800
phi*Mn
No LTB
910.800
Tu
Moment
12.594
Tn
Capacity
775.651
phi*Tn
Capacity
775.651
Vu
Force
0.252
2.906
phi*Vn
Capacity
118.201
118.201
Stress
Ratio
0.002
0.025
B1
1.000
1.000
SHEAR CHECK
Major Shear
Minor Shear
Status
Check
OK
OK

VMajor
VMajor
Left
Right
Major (V2)
0.468
0.659
Page D-20

February
for Assembly
9, 2015
Dropdown
11:44 Try Latice
Project
Job Number
Engineer

Units : Kip, in, F
Member #5,
Inclind Vertical
Frame : 15
Length: 26.095
Loc
: 26.095
X Mid: 0.000
Y Mid: -53.774
Z Mid: 53.774
Combo: 1.1D+2.3Up+0.35LaDesign Type: Brace

Shape: HSS3X3X5/16
Class: Compact
Provision: LRFD
D/C Limit=0.950
AlphaPr/Py=0.279

PhiB=1.000
PhiS=1.000
PhiC=1.000
PhiS-RI=1.000
PhiTY=1.000
PhiST=1.000
PhiTF=1.000
A=2.940
J=5.940
E=29000.000
RLLF=1.000
I33=3.450
I22=3.450
fy=46.000
Fu=58.000
r33=1.083
r22=1.083
Ry=1.100
S33=2.300
S22=2.300
z33=2.900
z22=2.900
HSS Welding: ERW

EA factor=0.800
EI factor=0.800

Location
Pu
Mu33
Mu22
Vu2
26.095
-37.765
-17.811
-46.919
1.360
Av3=1.746
Av2=1.746
Vu3
3.446
Tu
2.615
B2
1.000
1.000
Cm
0.208
0.233

(H1-1a)
D/C Ratio:
0.722 = 0.290 + 0.119 + 0.313
= (Pr/Pc) + (8/9)(Mr33/Mc33) + (8/9)(Mr22/Mc22)
(H1-1a)
Factor
L
K1
Major Bending
1.000
1.000
Minor Bending
1.000
1.000
K2
1.000
1.000
Lltb
1.000
Kltb
1.000
Cb
2.274
Axial
Pu
Force
-37.765
phi*Pnc
Capacity
130.062
phi*Pnt
Capacity
135.240
Major Moment
Minor Moment
Mu
Moment
-17.811
-46.919
phi*Mn
Capacity
133.400
133.400
phi*Mn
No LTB
133.400
Tu
Moment
2.615
Tn
Capacity
115.255
phi*Tn
Capacity
115.255
Vu
Force
1.360
3.446
phi*Vn
Capacity
34.166
34.166
Stress
Ratio
0.040
0.101
LTB
Torsion
B1
1.000
1.000
SHEAR CHECK
Major Shear
Minor Shear
Status
Check
OK
OK

Axial
P
Comp
N/C
P
Tens
-37.765
Page D-21

February
for Assembly
9, 2015
Dropdown
11:47 Try Latice
Project
Job Number
Engineer

Units : Kip, in, F
Member #6,
Inclind Diagonal
Frame : 72
Length: 35.454
Loc
: 17.727
X Mid: 12.000
Y Mid: 53.774
Z Mid: 53.774

Shape: HSS3X3X5/16
Class: Compact
Provision: LRFD
D/C Limit=0.950
AlphaPr/Py=0.587

PhiB=1.000
PhiS=1.000
PhiC=1.000
PhiS-RI=1.000
PhiTY=1.000
PhiST=1.000
PhiTF=1.000
A=2.940
J=5.940
E=29000.000
RLLF=1.000
I33=3.450
I22=3.450
fy=46.000
Fu=58.000
r33=1.083
r22=1.083
Ry=1.100
S33=2.300
S22=2.300
z33=2.900
z22=2.900
HSS Welding: ERW

EA factor=0.800
EI factor=0.800

Location
Pu
Mu33
Mu22
Vu2
17.727
79.321
0.123
0.000
0.000
Av3=1.746
Av2=1.746
Vu3
0.000
Tu
-0.001
B2
1.000
1.000
Cm
1.000
1.000

(H1.2,H1-1a)
D/C Ratio:
0.587 = 0.587 + 0.000 + 0.000
= (Pr/Pc) + (8/9)(Mr33/Mc33) + (8/9)(Mr22/Mc22)
(H1.2,H1-1a)
Factor
L
K1
K2
Major Bending
1.000
1.000
1.000
Minor Bending
1.000
1.000
1.000
Lltb
1.000
Kltb
1.000
Cb
1.381
Axial
Pu
Force
79.321
phi*Pnc
Capacity
125.838
phi*Pnt
Capacity
135.240
Major Moment
Minor Moment
Mu
Moment
0.123
0.000
phi*Mn
Capacity
133.400
133.400
phi*Mn
No LTB
133.400
Torsion
Tu
Moment
-0.001
Tn
Capacity
115.255
phi*Tn
Capacity
115.255
Vu
Force
0.000
0.000
phi*Vn
Capacity
34.166
34.166
Stress
Ratio
0.000
0.000
LTB
B1
1.000
1.000
SHEAR CHECK
Major Shear
Minor Shear
Status
Check
OK
OK
Page D-22

February
for Assembly
9, 2015
Dropdown
11:48 Try Latice
Project
Job Number
Engineer

Units : Kip, in, F
Frame : 17
Length: 63.000
Loc
: 63.000
X Mid: 24.000
Y Mid: -31.500
Z Mid: 63.000
Provision: LRFD
D/C Limit=0.950
AlphaPr/Py=0.248

PhiB=1.000
PhiS=1.000
PhiC=1.000
PhiS-RI=1.000
PhiTY=1.000
PhiST=1.000
PhiTF=1.000
A=4.780
J=17.500
E=29000.000
RLLF=1.000
I33=10.300
I22=10.300
fy=46.000
Fu=58.000
r33=1.468
r22=1.468
Ry=1.100
S33=5.150
S22=5.150
z33=6.390
z22=6.390
HSS Welding: ERW
Member #7, Top

Transverse HSS 4x4
Combo: 1.1D+2.6Up+0.1LatDesign Type: Beam

Shape: HSS4X4X3/8
Class: Compact
EA factor=0.800
EI factor=0.800

Location
Pu
Mu33
Mu22
Vu2
63.000
54.516
61.214
-68.987
-1.567
Av3=2.792
Av2=2.792
Vu3
2.048
Tu
13.191
B2
1.000
1.000
Cm
1.000
1.000

(H1.2,H1-1a)
D/C Ratio:
0.642 = 0.248 + 0.185 + 0.209
= (Pr/Pc) + (8/9)(Mr33/Mc33) + (8/9)(Mr22/Mc22)
(H1.2,H1-1a)
Factor
L
K1
K2
Major Bending
1.000
1.000
1.000
Minor Bending
1.000
1.000
1.000
LTB
Axial
Major Moment
Minor Moment
Torsion
Lltb
1.000
Kltb
1.000
Cb
2.267
Pu
Force
54.516
phi*Pnc
Capacity
194.257
phi*Pnt
Capacity
219.880
Mu
Moment
61.214
-68.987
phi*Mn
Capacity
293.940
293.940
phi*Mn
No LTB
293.940
Tu
Moment
13.191
Tn
Capacity
252.264
phi*Tn
Capacity
252.264
Vu
Force
1.567
2.048
phi*Vn
Capacity
56.889
56.889
Stress
Ratio
0.028
0.036
B1
1.000
1.000
SHEAR CHECK
Major Shear
Minor Shear
Status
Check
OK
OK

VMajor
VMajor
Left
Right
Major (V2)
1.660
1.567
Page D-23

February
for Assembly
9, 2015
Dropdown
11:45 Try Latice
2. Permanent Structure
2.1 Member Sizes: Same as temporary structure, except that top diagonals are added.
Top View
2.2 Loading:
a. Vertical Shear 350 kips + Horizontal Shear 30 kips;
b. Vertical Shear 250 kips + Horizontal Shear 100 kips;
c. See Section 1.2 sketches for how loads are input in the SAP2000 model. Member
selfweight is considered by program.
d. Load Combinations for Lattice Member Strength Checks
I.
Combination 1: (1.1)Selfweight + (-3.5)Vertical + (0.3)Horizontal + Internal
Pressure + Axial Thrust
II.
Combination 2: (1.1)Selfweight + (-2.5)Vertical + (1.0)Horizontal +Internal
Pressure + Axial Thrust
2.3 Member Strength Check Results:
See below SAP2000 Element Design Results (P-M-M Demand/Capacity Ratios for
each member). Detailed calculations for typical members are attached.
Page D-24
Lattice Member Max D/C =

0.94 < 1.0. All OK.
Lattice Members Checked for Envelope of Load Combinations
2.4 Estimated vertical differential displacement:

Joint
OutputCase
Text
Text
18
Unit Live 100k Down
31
Unit Live 100k Down
CaseType
U1
Text
in
LinStatic 0.008389
LinStatic 0.011079
U2
in
0.051643
-9.771E-17
U3
in
-0.051696
-0.24627
= 2.0 x (0.247-0.052) = 0.39 in < 0.75 in OK

(Pipe Selfweight + Full Water Induced Shear = 200 kips, 2 times of the 100 kip deformation).
= 3.5 x (0.247-0.052) = 0.68 in < 0.75 in OK
(Pipe Selfweight + Full Water + MCE Seismic Induced Shear = 350 kips, 3.5 times of the 100 kip
deformation).
Page D-25
2.5 Estimated horizontal differential displacement:

Joint
OutputCase
Text
Text
18
Unit Live 100k Lateral
31
Unit Live 100k Lateral
CaseType
U1
U2
Text
in
in
LinStatic 0.028266 0.045083
LinStatic 0.044524 0.213104
U3
in
-0.002792
0.010657
= 1.0 x (0.213-0.045) = 0.168 in < 0.75 in OK

(MCE Seismic Induced Horizontal Shear = 100 kips).
2.6 Steel Pipe Stress Check:
Von Mises Stress in Pipe Elements under Load Combination I
Page D-26
Von Mises Stress in Pipe Elements under Load Combination II
Steel pipe stress is generally acceptable. To address the stress concentration at the vicinity of
the connection points, Channel shaped rings are used rather than the curved plate rings
modelled. Channels shaped rings will significantly enlarge the area in contact between the tube
steel and the pipe and reduce the effects of stress concentration.
Page D-27
Project
Job Number
Engineer

Units : Kip, in, F
Frame : 34
Length: 60.114
Loc
: 60.114
X Mid: 49.250
Y Mid: 58.780
Z Mid: -15.750
Provision: LRFD
D/C Limit=0.950
AlphaPr/Py=0.701

PhiB=1.000
PhiS=1.000
PhiC=1.000
PhiS-RI=1.000
PhiTY=1.000
PhiST=1.000
PhiTF=1.000
A=2.940
J=5.940
E=29000.000
RLLF=1.000
I33=3.450
I22=3.450
fy=50.600
Fu=63.800
r33=1.083
r22=1.083
Ry=1.000
S33=2.300
S22=2.300
z33=2.900
z22=2.900
HSS Welding: ERW
Member #1, Permanent

Diagonal
Combo: 1.1D+Press+3.5Up+Design Type: Brace

Shape: HSS3X3X5/16
Class: Compact
EA factor=0.800
EI factor=0.800
Av3=1.746
Av2=1.746
STRESS CHECK FORCES & MOMENTS (Combo 1.1D+Press+3.5Up+0.3Lateral+Thrust)

Location
Pu
Mu33
Mu22
Vu2
Vu3
60.114
-104.321
-3.120
-6.975
0.075
0.116
Tu
0.269

(H1-1a)
D/C Ratio:
0.942 = 0.881 + 0.019 + 0.042
= (Pr/Pc) + (8/9)(Mr33/Mc33) + (8/9)(Mr22/Mc22)
(H1-1a)
Factor
L
K1
Major Bending
1.000
1.000
Minor Bending
1.000
1.000
K2
1.000
1.000
Lltb
1.000
Kltb
1.000
Cb
1.863
Pu
Force
-104.321
phi*Pnc
Capacity
118.450
phi*Pnt
Capacity
148.764
Major Moment
Minor Moment
Mu
Moment
-3.120
-6.975
phi*Mn
Capacity
146.740
146.740
phi*Mn
No LTB
146.740
Torsion
Tu
Moment
0.269
Tn
Capacity
126.781
phi*Tn
Capacity
126.781
Vu
Force
0.075
0.116
phi*Vn
Capacity
37.583
37.583
Stress
Ratio
0.002
0.003
LTB
Axial
B1
1.000
1.000
B2
1.000
1.000
Cm
1.000
0.600
SHEAR CHECK
Major Shear
Minor Shear
Status
Check
OK
OK

Axial
P
Comp
N/C
P
Tens
-104.321
Page D-28

February
for Assembly
9, 2015
Dropdown
15:10 Permane
Project
Job Number
Engineer

Units : Kip, in, F
Frame : 53
Length: 55.958
Loc
: 55.958
X Mid: 47.125
Y Mid: 63.000
Z Mid: 47.250
Provision: LRFD
D/C Limit=0.950
AlphaPr/Py=0.458

PhiB=1.000
PhiS=1.000
PhiC=1.000
PhiS-RI=1.000
PhiTY=1.000
PhiST=1.000
PhiTF=1.000
A=2.940
J=5.940
E=29000.000
RLLF=1.000
I33=3.450
I22=3.450
fy=50.600
Fu=63.800
r33=1.083
r22=1.083
Ry=1.000
S33=2.300
S22=2.300
z33=2.900
z22=2.900
HSS Welding: ERW

Side Diagonal

Shape: HSS3X3X5/16
Class: Compact
EA factor=0.800
EI factor=0.800
Av3=1.746
Av2=1.746

Location
Pu
Mu33
Mu22
Vu2
Vu3
55.958
-68.170
2.976
3.096
-0.032
-0.055
Tu
-0.195

(H1-1a)
D/C Ratio:
0.595 = 0.558 + 0.018 + 0.019
= (Pr/Pc) + (8/9)(Mr33/Mc33) + (8/9)(Mr22/Mc22)
(H1-1a)
Factor
L
K1
Major Bending
1.000
1.000
Minor Bending
1.000
1.000
K2
1.000
1.000
Lltb
1.000
Kltb
1.000
Cb
1.525
Pu
Force
-68.170
phi*Pnc
Capacity
122.109
phi*Pnt
Capacity
148.764
Major Moment
Minor Moment
Mu
Moment
2.976
3.096
phi*Mn
Capacity
146.740
146.740
phi*Mn
No LTB
146.740
Torsion
Tu
Moment
-0.195
Tn
Capacity
126.781
phi*Tn
Capacity
126.781
Vu
Force
0.032
0.055
phi*Vn
Capacity
37.583
37.583
Stress
Ratio
0.001
0.001
LTB
Axial
B1
1.000
1.000
B2
1.000
1.000
Cm
1.000
0.600
SHEAR CHECK
Major Shear
Minor Shear
Status
Check
OK
OK

Axial
P
Comp
N/C
P
Tens
-68.170
Page D-29

February
for Assembly
9, 2015
Dropdown
15:10 Permane
Project
Job Number
Engineer

Units : Kip, in, F
Frame : 42
Length: 92.500
Loc
: 0.000
X Mid: 70.250
Y Mid: -63.000
Z Mid: 63.000
Provision: LRFD
D/C Limit=0.950
AlphaPr/Py=0.125

PhiB=1.000
PhiS=1.000
PhiC=1.000
PhiS-RI=1.000
PhiTY=1.000
PhiST=1.000
PhiTF=1.000
A=9.740
J=81.100
E=29000.000
RLLF=1.000
I33=48.300
I22=48.300
fy=50.600
Fu=63.800
r33=2.227
r22=2.227
Ry=1.000
S33=16.100
S22=16.100
z33=19.800
z22=19.800
HSS Welding: ERW

Top Longitudinal HSS 6x6
Combo: 1.1D+Press+3.5Up+Design Type: Beam

Shape: HSS6X6X1/2
Class: Compact
EA factor=0.800
EI factor=0.800
Av3=5.580
Av2=5.580

Location
Pu
Mu33
Mu22
Vu2
Vu3
0.000
-61.767
52.125
-108.030
0.783
-1.429
Tu
35.476

(H1-1b)
D/C Ratio:
0.231 = 0.071 + 0.052 + 0.108
= (1/2)(Pr/Pc) + (Mr33/Mc33) + (Mr22/Mc22)
(H1-1b)
Factor
L
K1
Major Bending
1.000
1.000
Minor Bending
1.000
1.000
LTB
Axial
Major Moment
Minor Moment
Torsion
K2
1.000
1.000
Lltb
1.000
Kltb
1.000
Cb
2.108
Pu
Force
-61.767
phi*Pnc
Capacity
433.773
phi*Pnt
Capacity
492.844
Mu
Moment
52.125
-108.030
phi*Mn
Capacity
1001.880
1001.880
phi*Mn
No LTB
1001.880
Tu
Moment
35.476
Tn
Capacity
853.216
phi*Tn
Capacity
853.216
Vu
Force
0.783
1.429
phi*Vn
Capacity
130.021
130.021
Stress
Ratio
0.006
0.011
B1
1.000
1.000
B2
1.000
1.000
Cm
1.000
0.511
SHEAR CHECK
Major Shear
Minor Shear
Status
Check
OK
OK

VMajor
VMajor
Left
Right
Major (V2)
0.783
1.064
Page D-30

February
for Assembly
9, 2015
Dropdown
15:11 Permane
Project
Job Number
Engineer

Units : Kip, in, F
Frame : 23
Length: 63.000
Loc
: 0.000
X Mid: 116.500
Y Mid: -31.500
Z Mid: 63.000
Provision: LRFD
D/C Limit=0.950
AlphaPr/Py=0.056

PhiB=1.000
PhiS=1.000
PhiC=1.000
PhiS-RI=1.000
PhiTY=1.000
PhiST=1.000
PhiTF=1.000
A=9.740
J=81.100
E=29000.000
RLLF=1.000
I33=48.300
I22=48.300
fy=50.600
Fu=63.800
r33=2.227
r22=2.227
Ry=1.000
S33=16.100
S22=16.100
z33=19.800
z22=19.800
HSS Welding: ERW

Top Transverse HSS6x6
Combo: 1.1D+Pressure+2.5Design Type: Beam

Shape: HSS6X6X1/2
Class: Compact
EA factor=0.800
EI factor=0.800
Av3=5.580
Av2=5.580
STRESS CHECK FORCES & MOMENTS (Combo 1.1D+Pressure+2.5Up+1Lateral+Thrust)

Location
Pu
Mu33
Mu22
Vu2
Vu3
0.000
27.449
15.833
43.512
0.500
0.456
Tu
0.974

(H1.2,H1-1b)
D/C Ratio:
0.087 = 0.028 + 0.016 + 0.043
= (1/2)(Pr/Pc) + (Mr33/Mc33) + (Mr22/Mc22)
(H1.2,H1-1b)
Factor
L
K1
K2
Major Bending
2.000
1.000
1.000
Minor Bending
2.000
1.000
1.000
Lltb
2.000
Kltb
1.000
Cb
2.356
Axial
Pu
Force
27.449
phi*Pnc
Capacity
388.891
phi*Pnt
Capacity
492.844
Major Moment
Minor Moment
Mu
Moment
15.833
43.512
phi*Mn
Capacity
1001.880
1001.880
phi*Mn
No LTB
1001.880
Torsion
Tu
Moment
0.974
Tn
Capacity
853.216
phi*Tn
Capacity
853.216
Vu
Force
0.500
0.456
phi*Vn
Capacity
130.021
130.021
Stress
Ratio
0.004
0.004
LTB
B1
1.000
1.000
B2
1.000
1.000
Cm
1.000
1.000
SHEAR CHECK
Major Shear
Minor Shear
Status
Check
OK
OK

VMajor
VMajor
Left
Right
Major (V2)
0.720
0.911
Page D-31

February
for Assembly
9, 2015
Dropdown
15:12 Permane
Project
Job Number
Engineer

Units : Kip, in, F
Frame : 16
Length: 26.095
Loc
: 0.000
X Mid: 0.000
Y Mid: 53.774
Z Mid: 53.774
Provision: LRFD
D/C Limit=0.950
AlphaPr/Py=0.381

PhiB=1.000
PhiS=1.000
PhiC=1.000
PhiS-RI=1.000
PhiTY=1.000
PhiST=1.000
PhiTF=1.000
A=2.940
J=5.940
E=29000.000
RLLF=1.000
I33=3.450
I22=3.450
fy=50.600
Fu=63.800
r33=1.083
r22=1.083
Ry=1.000
S33=2.300
S22=2.300
z33=2.900
z22=2.900
HSS Welding: ERW

Inclined Vertical

Shape: HSS3X3X5/16
Class: Compact
EA factor=0.800
EI factor=0.800
Av3=1.746
Av2=1.746

Location
Pu
Mu33
Mu22
Vu2
Vu3
0.000
-56.633
-20.782
-65.603
-1.462
-4.927
Tu
-3.696

(H1-1a)
D/C Ratio:
0.921 = 0.397 + 0.126 + 0.397
= (Pr/Pc) + (8/9)(Mr33/Mc33) + (8/9)(Mr22/Mc22)
(H1-1a)
Factor
L
K1
Major Bending
1.000
1.000
Minor Bending
1.000
1.000
K2
1.000
1.000
Lltb
1.000
Kltb
1.000
Cb
2.241
Axial
Pu
Force
-56.633
phi*Pnc
Capacity
142.511
phi*Pnt
Capacity
148.764
Major Moment
Minor Moment
Mu
Moment
-20.782
-65.603
phi*Mn
Capacity
146.740
146.740
phi*Mn
No LTB
146.740
Tu
Moment
-3.696
Tn
Capacity
126.781
phi*Tn
Capacity
126.781
Vu
Force
1.462
4.927
phi*Vn
Capacity
37.583
37.583
Stress
Ratio
0.039
0.131
LTB
Torsion
B1
1.000
1.000
B2
1.000
1.000
Cm
0.270
0.216
SHEAR CHECK
Major Shear
Minor Shear
Status
Check
OK
OK

Axial
P
Comp
-56.633
P
Tens
N/C
Page D-32

February
for Assembly
9, 2015
Dropdown
15:26 Permane
Project
Job Number
Engineer

Units : Kip, in, F
Frame : 72
Length: 35.454
Loc
: 17.727
X Mid: 12.000
Y Mid: 53.774
Z Mid: 53.774
Provision: LRFD
D/C Limit=0.950
AlphaPr/Py=0.784

PhiB=1.000
PhiS=1.000
PhiC=1.000
PhiS-RI=1.000
PhiTY=1.000
PhiST=1.000
PhiTF=1.000
A=2.940
J=5.940
E=29000.000
RLLF=1.000
I33=3.450
I22=3.450
fy=50.600
Fu=63.800
r33=1.083
r22=1.083
Ry=1.000
S33=2.300
S22=2.300
z33=2.900
z22=2.900
HSS Welding: ERW

Inclined Diagonal

Shape: HSS3X3X5/16
Class: Compact
EA factor=0.800
EI factor=0.800
Av3=1.746
Av2=1.746

Location
Pu
Mu33
Mu22
Vu2
Vu3
17.727
116.560
0.123
0.000
0.000
0.000
Tu
0.083

(H1.2,H1-1a)
D/C Ratio:
0.784 = 0.784 + 0.000 + 0.000
= (Pr/Pc) + (8/9)(Mr33/Mc33) + (8/9)(Mr22/Mc22)
(H1.2,H1-1a)
Factor
L
K1
K2
Major Bending
1.000
1.000
1.000
Minor Bending
1.000
1.000
1.000
Lltb
1.000
Kltb
1.000
Cb
1.410
Pu
Force
116.560
phi*Pnc
Capacity
137.428
phi*Pnt
Capacity
148.764
Major Moment
Minor Moment
Mu
Moment
0.123
0.000
phi*Mn
Capacity
146.740
146.740
phi*Mn
No LTB
146.740
Torsion
Tu
Moment
0.083
Tn
Capacity
126.781
phi*Tn
Capacity
126.781
Vu
Force
0.000
0.000
phi*Vn
Capacity
37.583
37.583
Stress
Ratio
0.000
0.000
LTB
Axial
B1
1.000
1.000
B2
1.000
1.000
Cm
1.000
1.000
SHEAR CHECK
Major Shear
Minor Shear
Status
Check
OK
OK
Page D-33

February
for Assembly
9, 2015
Dropdown
15:27 Permane
Project
Job Number
Engineer

Units : Kip, in, F
Frame : 18
Length: 63.000
Loc
: 0.000
X Mid: 24.000
Y Mid: 31.500
Z Mid: 63.000
Provision: LRFD
D/C Limit=0.950
AlphaPr/Py=0.323

PhiB=1.000
PhiS=1.000
PhiC=1.000
PhiS-RI=1.000
PhiTY=1.000
PhiST=1.000
PhiTF=1.000
A=4.780
J=17.500
E=29000.000
RLLF=1.000
I33=10.300
I22=10.300
fy=50.600
Fu=63.800
r33=1.468
r22=1.468
Ry=1.000
S33=5.150
S22=5.150
z33=6.390
z22=6.390
HSS Welding: ERW

Top Transverse HSS4x4
Combo: 1.1D+Press+3.5Up+Design Type: Beam

Shape: HSS4X4X3/8
Class: Compact
EA factor=0.800
EI factor=0.800
Av3=2.792
Av2=2.792

Location
Pu
Mu33
Mu22
Vu2
Vu3
0.000
78.047
75.230
-88.832
1.925
-2.536
Tu
-17.868

(H1.2,H1-1a)
D/C Ratio:
0.774 = 0.323 + 0.207 + 0.244
= (Pr/Pc) + (8/9)(Mr33/Mc33) + (8/9)(Mr22/Mc22)
(H1.2,H1-1a)
Factor
L
K1
K2
Major Bending
1.000
1.000
1.000
Minor Bending
1.000
1.000
1.000
Lltb
1.000
Kltb
1.000
Cb
2.302
Pu
Force
78.047
phi*Pnc
Capacity
211.051
phi*Pnt
Capacity
241.868
Major Moment
Minor Moment
Mu
Moment
75.230
-88.832
phi*Mn
Capacity
323.334
323.334
phi*Mn
No LTB
323.334
Torsion
Tu
Moment
-17.868
Tn
Capacity
277.490
phi*Tn
Capacity
277.490
Vu
Force
1.925
2.536
phi*Vn
Capacity
62.578
62.578
Stress
Ratio
0.031
0.041
LTB
Axial
B1
1.000
1.000
B2
1.000
1.000
Cm
1.000
1.000
SHEAR CHECK
Major Shear
Minor Shear
Status
Check
OK
OK

VMajor
VMajor
Left
Right
Major (V2)
1.925
2.019
Page D-34

February
for Assembly
9, 2015
Dropdown
15:25 Permane
Appendix E
Pipe Temporary Restraint Option 2

This option utilizes temporary ties between the steel pipe and the (E) bridge trusses to restrain the
relative lateral displacements between the two segments of the opened pipe during the Expansion Joint
replacement. The conceptual sequence is shown in the following sketches and the pros and cons as
compared to Option 1 (Lattice Cage for both temporary and permanent lateral restraining purposes) are
also discussed.
1. Conceptual Sequence
Step 1: Install (N) Channel Ring over the O.D. of (E) Steel Pipe on the south side of the (E)
Expansion Joint, centered at the (E) bridge truss vertical column adjacent to the joint.
Step 2: Install (N) HSS6x6x1/2 ties with (N) Gusset Plates to the (E) truss columns.
Step 3: Install (N) W14x82 diagonal braces with (N) Gusset Plates to both (E) vertical
trusses, one bay at the expansion joint only. This is to strengthen trusses to resist pipe
reactions.
Expansion
Joint Location
(N) Channel Ring
(N) HSS6x6x1/2
ties, (4) pcs total
(N) W14x82 Braces,
(4) pcs total
Sketch 1: Steps 1 to 3
Step 4: Remove top truss diagonals.
Page E-1
Step 5: Cut (E) Pipe and remove (E) Expansion Joint. Same as Option 1, total 3 cuts and
removal of (E) Expansion Joint in minimum two pieces to avoid the overhead beam.
Sketch 2: Step 5
Page E-2
Step 6: Drop (N) Bellow Expansion Joint with butt straps assembly in pre-compressed
block length. Same as Option 1.
Sketch 3: Step 6
Page E-3
Step 7: Extent (N) Bellow Expansion Joint to neutral length and furnish welding of the
butt straps each side to the steel pipe. Same as Option 1.
Sketch 4: Step 7
Step 8: Resume water service.

Step 9: Re-install top diagonals.
Page E-4
Step 10: Install the permanent lateral restrain, the lattice cage similar to Option 1. Note
that the lattice members need to be carefully arranged to avoid conflicts with the
HSS6x6x temporary ties and Channel Rings.
Gap between this

Channel Ring and
External Cage
Sketch 5: Step 10
Step 11: Remove the temporary ties HSS6x6x and the temporary W14x82 braces.
Page E-5
2. Estimated Relative Pipe Displacements During Expansion Joint Replacement
Empty Pipe Deformation when

Remove (E) Expansion Joint

Joint OutputCase CaseType
Text
Text
Text
874 DEAD
NonStatic
874 DEAD
NonStatic
1550 DEAD
NonStatic
1550 DEAD
NonStatic
StepType
Text
Max
Min
Max
Min
U1
in
0.000029
0.000029
0.001237
0.001237
U2
in
-7.448E-08
-7.448E-08
1.553E-07
1.553E-07
U3
in
-0.262111
-0.262111
-0.147022
-0.147022
Relative pipe displacement at expansion joint = 0.262-0.147 = 0.115 in < 0.75 in, OK.
Page E-6
Pipe with Full Water Deformation when

(E) Expansion Joint is removed but
before (N) External Sleeve is installed.

Joint OutputCase CaseType
Text
Text
Text
874 D+Water
NonStatic
874 D+Water
NonStatic
1550 D+Water
NonStatic
1550 D+Water
NonStatic
StepType
Text
Max
Min
Max
Min
U1
in
0.000116
0.000116
0.003379
0.003379
U2
in
-0.000001749
-0.000001749
9.149E-07
9.149E-07
U3
in
-0.675631
-0.675631
-0.380818
-0.380818
Relative pipe displacement at expansion joint = 0.676-0.381 = 0.295 in < 0.75 in, OK.
All (E) truss members, temporary members are checked and found adequate for temporary loading
conditions.
Page E-7
3. Comparisons to Option 1 Design

a. Pros
Option 2 does not required lattice cage during removal of (E) Expansion Joint or
installation of the (N) Bellow Expansion Joint, therefore provides a clear working space
with no obstacles for pipe cutting, (N) joint installation and welding.
b. Cons
Option 2 requires more materials (channel ring, HSS ties, truss braces and gusset plates)
and extra work to install these temporary elements and remove them after the joint
replacement.
To maintain the load path and structural behaviors of the original Expansion Joint (which
has been the basis of the base isolation analysis and design), the permanent lattice cage
is still required.
The permanent lattice cage need to be carefully designed to avoid conflicts with the
temporary members (Channel Ring and HSS ties).
Page E-8

Expansion Joint Replacement Constructability Study Report Combined 2-23-2015 PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Expansion Joint Replacement Constructability Study Report Combined 2-23-2015 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Report on Constructability of Expansion Joint Replacement

Santa Ana River Crossing, Riverside, CA

Location of Expansion Joint. The

THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT

1 Peters Canyon Rd., Suite 130

IDS Group Project Number 13.113.01

I NTEGRATED D ESIGN S ERVICES

1 Peters Canyon Rd., Ste.130, Irvine, CA 92606

MWD: Report on Constructability of Expansion Joint Replacement

Report on Constructability of Expansion Joint Replacement

MWD: Report on Constructability of Expansion Joint Replacement

2. TEMPORARY LATERAL LOADING CRITERIA

MWD: Report on Constructability of Expansion Joint Replacement

3. CONVAYANCE OF EXPANSION JOINT ASSEMBLIES

MWD: Report on Constructability of Expansion Joint Replacement

4. TEMPORARY STRUCTURE STABILITY

5. TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT PIPE LATERAL RESTRAIN

MWD: Report on Constructability of Expansion Joint Replacement

MWD: Report on Constructability of Expansion Joint Replacement

Temporary Seismic and Wind Loads

2. Rationale for Reduction of Loads on Temporary Structures

Return period of (2%|2months) event

(This could be 1.0 since 2% probability of exceedance is used)

OK for seismic load

4. Calculation of Wind Load

(ASCE 7-10 wind speed)

(Table 26.6-1, Chimneys, Tanks, and Similar Structures, Round)

Gust-Effect Factor G = 0.85

(Rigid Structure, Unless otherwise determined in Tables)

Enclosure classication = open

(40', Exposure C, Table 29.3-1)

(ASCE 7-10 Section 29.5)

Wind load Force Coefficients, Cf

5. Determine the governing lateral load

200plf (Af = 10x1 = 10 sqft/ft)

Therefore, Seismic Governs

FEASIBILITY STUDY OF TOWER CRANE OPTION AND CRAWLER

1. Crane Capacity Requirements

Required Jib Length (Radius) = 250

Temporary Structure Stability for Rail Rigging Option

Additional Weight / Existing Weight = 21.5/1278 = 1.7% << 5%

Sketch: Concept of Trolley Rails on Bridge Truss

Full bridge model with moving loads (Gravity only):

Moving load impact on opened pipe misalignment

Case Bellow Moving Load Influence forJoint 1550, U3

Case Bellow Moving Load Influence forJoint 874, U3

Influence Line for U3 of Joint #1550

Ordinate Ord. Dist Global X Global Y Global Z Influence

Influence Line for U3 of Joint #874

Moving Load Influence on Truss Member Axial Load:

Sta. Dist Ordinate Ord. Dist Global X Global Y Global Z Influence

Max Influence = 8.2 kips = 1% Capacity OK.

Critical Case 2: Truss T1 Bottom Chord

Sta. Dist Ordinate Ord. Dist Global X Global Y Global Z Influence

Max Influence = 6.7 kips = 0.5% Capacity OK.

Critical Case 3: Truss T1 Top Chord

Sta. Dist Ordinate Ord. Dist Global X Global Y Global Z Influence

Max Influence = 6.2 kips = 0.5% Capacity OK.

Critical Case 4: Truss T1 Vertical

Sta. Dist Ordinate Ord. Dist Global X Global Y Global Z Influence

Max Influence = 5.9 kips = 1.5% Capacity OK.

Single truss model with moving loads (Lateral and Gravity):