You are on page 1of 3

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.

22 / Friday, February 2, 2007 / Notices 5093

(2) Statutory Basis Paper Comments SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE


COMMISSION
The proposed rule change is designed Send paper comments in triplicate to
to be consistent with Regulation NMS, Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, Securities [Release No. 34–55181; File No. SR–NASD–
as well as consistent with Section 6(b) and Exchange Commission, 100 F 2007–005]
of the Act,4 in general, and furthers the Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549–
objectives of Section 6(b)(5),5 in 1090. Self-Regulatory Organizations;
particular, in that it is designed to National Association of Securities
prevent fraudulent and manipulative All submissions should refer to File No. Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
acts and practices, to promote just and SR–Amex–2007–08. This file number Order Granting Accelerated Approval
equitable principles of trade, and, in should be included on the subject line of Proposed Rule Change to Operate
general, to protect investors and the if e-mail is used. To help the the Alternative Display Facility on a
public interest. Commission process and review your Permanent Basis
comments more efficiently, please use
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s January 26, 2007.
only one method. The Commission will
Statement on Burden on Competition Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site at http://www.sec.gov/ Securities Exchange Act of 1934
The proposed rule change does not
rules/sro.shtml. Copies of the (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
impose any burden on competition that
submission, all subsequent notice is hereby given that on January
is not necessary or appropriate in
amendments, all written statements 23, 2007, the National Association of
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Securities Dealers, Inc. (‘‘NASD’’) filed
with respect to the proposed rule
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s with the Securities and Exchange
change that are filed with the
Statement on Comments on the Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
Proposed Rule Change Received From Commission, and all written proposed rule change as described in
Members, Participants or Others communications relating to the Items I and II below, which Items have
proposed rule change between the been substantially prepared by NASD.
No written comments were solicited Commission and any person, other than The Commission is publishing this
or received with respect to the proposed those that may be withheld from the notice to solicit comments on the
rule change. public in accordance with the proposed rule change from interested
III. Date of Effectiveness of the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be persons. In addition, the Commission is
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for available for inspection and copying in granting accelerated approval of the
Commission Action the Commission’s Public Reference proposed rule change.
Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
Within 35 days of the date of I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
DC 20549. Copies of such filing also will
publication of this notice in the Federal Statement of the Terms of Substance of
be available for inspection and copying
Register or within such longer period (i) the Proposed Rule Change
at the principal office of the Exchange.
as the Commission may designate up to All comments received will be posted NASD proposes to amend NASD Rule
90 days of such date if it finds such without change; the Commission does 4100A to operate its Alternative Display
longer period to be appropriate and not edit personal identifying Facility (‘‘ADF’’) on a permanent basis.
publishes its reasons for so finding or information from submissions. You The ADF pilot program, as approved by
(ii) as to which the self-regulatory should submit only information that the Commission on July 24, 2002, and
organization consents, the Commission you wish to make available publicly. All extended on April 7, 2003, January 26,
will: 2004, October 21, 2004, July 20, 2005,
submissions should refer to File No.
(A) By order approve such proposed and April 26, 2006, will expire on
SR–Amex–2007–08 and should be
rule change, or January 26, 2007. NASD has requested
submitted on or before February 23,
accelerated approval of the proposed
(B) institute proceedings to determine 2007.
rule change and proposes an operative
whether the proposed rule change For the Commission, by the Division of date of January 27, 2007. The text of the
should be disapproved. Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated proposed rule change is available at
IV. Solicitation of Comments authority.6 NASD, the Commission’s Public
Florence E. Harmon, Reference Room, and http://
Interested persons are invited to www.nasd.com.
Deputy Secretary.
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, [FR Doc. E7–1689 Filed 2–1–07; 8:45 am] II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
including whether the proposed rule BILLING CODE 8011–01–P Statement of the Purpose of, and
change is consistent with the 1934 Act. Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Comments may be submitted by any of Change
the following methods: In its filing with the Commission,
Electronic Comments NASD included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
Use the Commission’s Internet proposed rule change and discussed any
comment form at http://www.sec.gov/ comments it had received on the
rules/sro.shtml or send an e-mail to proposed rule change. The text of these
rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include statements may be examined at the
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

File No. SR–Amex–2007–08 on the places specified in Item III below. NASD
subject line. has prepared summaries, set forth in

4 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).


5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 6 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:13 Feb 01, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00096 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM 02FEN1
5094 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 22 / Friday, February 2, 2007 / Notices

Sections A, B, and C below, of the most accordingly, would now operate on a stocks.14 Accordingly, NASD believes it
significant aspects of such statements. permanent basis as well.12 is appropriate to approve the operation
NASD believes that the ADF has been of ADF on a permanent basis.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s operating successfully during the pilot NASD proposes that the proposed
Statement of the Purpose of, and period. The Commission acknowledged rule change be operative on January 27,
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule this fact when it approved the launch of
Change 2007.
SuperMontage, stating that the ADF met
1. Purpose the conditions set forth in its 2. Statutory Basis
On July 24, 2002, the Commission SuperMontage Approval Order to NASD believes that the proposed rule
approved SR–NASD–2002–97,3 which provide an alternative quotation change is consistent with the provisions
authorized NASD to operate the ADF on collection, trade comparison, and trade of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,15 which
a pilot basis for nine months. NASD reporting facility. NASD believes that requires, among other things, that NASD
subsequently filed for immediate the ADF has since continued to honor rules must be designed to prevent
effectiveness proposed rule changes SR– those conditions. Moreover, on fraudulent and manipulative acts and
NASD–2003–067 to extend the pilot September 28, 2006, the Commission practices, to promote just and equitable
until January 26, 2004; 4 SR–NASD– approved SR NASD–2006–91,13 which, principles of trade, and, in general, to
2004–012 to extend the pilot until among other things, amended the ADF protect investors and the public interest.
October 26, 2004; 5 SR–NASD–2004–160 rules governing quoting, trade reporting, NASD believes that approval of the
to extend the pilot until July 26, 2005; 6 and clearing applicable to the ADF and operation of ADF rules on a permanent
SR–NASD–2005–092 to extend the pilot extended this functionality to all NMS basis provides an effective mechanism
until April 26, 2006; 7 and SR–NASD– for quoting and trading activities
jurisdiction to a three-member subcommittee of otherwise than on an exchange.
2006–050 to extend the pilot until NASD’s Market Regulation Committee to review
January 26, 2007.8 As described in system outage determinations under NASD Rule B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
detail in SR–NASD–2005–087, which 4300A(f) and excused withdrawal denials under Statement on Burden on Competition
replaced withdrawn rule filing SR– NASD Rule 4619A. The rule change proposal
became effective contemporaneous with the NASD does not believe that the
NASD–2001–090, the ADF is a Commission’s approval. See Securities Exchange
quotation collection, trade comparison, Act Release No. 49029 (January 6, 2004), 69 FR
proposed rule change will result in any
and trade reporting facility developed 2167 (January 14, 2004). On December 4, 2003, burden on competition that is not
by NASD in accordance with the NASD filed for immediate effectiveness SR–NASD– necessary or appropriate in furtherance
2003–181 to amend Rule 4613A(c) to clarify that of the purposes of the Act.
Commission’s SuperMontage Approval NASD may suspend quotations in the ADF
Order 9 and in conjunction with displayed by any market participant, including an C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Nasdaq’s then anticipated registration as electronic communications network (‘‘ECN’’), that Statement on Comments on the
a national securities exchange.10 In are no longer reasonably related to the prevailing
market. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. Proposed Rule Change Received From
addition, since the Commission gave its 49075 (January 14, 2004), 69 FR 3414 (January 23, Members, Participants, or Others
initial approval to the ADF pilot, NASD 2004). On March 12, 2004, the Commission
has filed several other ADF-related rule approved SR–NASD–2003–175, a proposal to repeal Written comments were neither
change proposals that have been Rule 4613A(e)(1), which required a member that solicited nor received.
displays priced quotations for a Nasdaq security in
incorporated into the operation and two or more market centers to display the same III. Solicitation of Comments
administration of the pilot,11 and priced quotations for that security in each market
center. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
Interested persons are invited to
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 46249 49413 (March 12, 2004), 69 FR 12882 (March 18, submit written data, views, and
(July 24, 2002), 67 FR 49822 (July 31, 2002). 2004). On August 18, 2004, the Commission arguments concerning the foregoing,
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 47663 approved SR–NASD–2004–002, a proposed rule including whether the proposed rule
change to amend NASD Rule 4300A to require an
(April 10, 2003), 68 FR 19043 (April 17, 2003).
ADF Market Participant to provide advance written
change is consistent with the Act.
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 49131
notice to NASD’s ADF Market Operations before Comments may be submitted by any of
(January 27, 2004), 69 FR 5229 (February 3, 2004).
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50601
denying electronic access to its ADF quote to any the following methods:
NASD member in the limited circumstances where
(October 28, 2004), 69 FR 64611 (November 5, a broker-dealer fails to pay contractually obligated Electronic Comments
2004). costs for access to the Market Participant’s
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52122
quotations. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. • Use the Commission’s Internet
(July 25, 2005), 70 FR 44133 (August 1, 2005). 50218 (August 18, 2004), 69 FR 52055 (August 24, comment form (http://www.sec.gov/
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53699
2004). On March 10, 2005, the Commission rules/sro.shtml); or
(April 21, 2006), 71 FR 25271 (April 28, 2006).
9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 43863
approved SR–NASD–2004–159, a proposed rule • Send an e-mail to rule-
change to establish Rule 4400A, which gives NASD
(January 19, 2001), 66 FR 8020 (January 26, 2001) authority to receive and review complaints against comments@sec.gov. Please include File
(SR–NASD–99–53). ADF Market Participants that allege denial of direct
10 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 44396 or indirect access pursuant to NASD Rule 4300A. 14 In addition, on January 5, 2007, NASD filed

(June 7, 2001), 66 FR 31952 (June 13, 2001) (File See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51356 SR–NASD–2007–001 for immediate effectiveness.
No. 10–131). The Commission conditionally (March 10, 2005), 70 FR 12924 (March 16, 2005). This rule filing amended certain ADF rules to: (1)
approved the Nasdaq Exchange application on 12 On August 8, 2006, NASD filed SR–NASD– Expand the prohibition on locking and crossing
January 13, 2006. See Securities Exchange Act 2006–096 as an immediately effective rule change. quotations in NMS stocks to include pre-opening
Release No. 53128 (January 13, 2006), 71 FR 3550 This rule change amended Rule 4613A and adopted and post-closing quotations; (2) extend the
(January 23, 2006). IM–4613A–1 to enable ECN members that post obligation to comply with ADF rules to pre-opening
11 On January 30, 2003, NASD filed proposed rule quotations through the ADF to request and receive quotes; and (3) replace the specific modifiers
change SR–NASD–2003–009 to revise the multiple market participant identifiers. See identified in Rule 4632(A)(a)(4) with a more general
transaction and quotation-related fees applicable to Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54307 (August reference to modifiers as specified by NASD. See
ADF activity during the pilot program. The rule 11, 2006), 71 FR 47551 (August 17, 2006). It should Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55088 (January
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

change proposal became effective upon filing, with be noted that NASD is not requesting that SR– 11, 2007), 72 FR 2573 (January 19, 2007). While
an implementation date of February 17, 2003. See NASD–2006–096 operate on a permanent basis. NASD is requesting that the amendments made to
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 47331 Rather, NASD is requesting that this remain a pilot ADF rules in both SR–NASD 2006–091 and SR–
(February 10, 2003), 68 FR 7635 (February 14, and will address this in a separate rule filing. NASD–2007–001 also become permanent, it should
2003). On January 6, 2004, the Commission granted 13 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54537 be noted that they will not be implemented until
accelerated approval to SR–NASD–2003–145, a (September 28, 2006), 71 FR 59173 (October 6, the Regulation NMS Trading Phase Date.
proposal to amend the ADF pilot rules to give 2006). 15 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(6).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:13 Feb 01, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00097 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM 02FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 22 / Friday, February 2, 2007 / Notices 5095

Number SR–NASD–2007–005 on the In addition, the Commission believes SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
subject line. that the proposal is consistent with COMMISSION
Section 15A(b)(11) of the Act 18 in that
Paper Comments
it is designed to produce fair and [Release No. 34–55180; File No. SR–NASD–
• Send paper comments in triplicate informative quotations, to prevent 2007–004]
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, fictitious or misleading quotations, and
Securities and Exchange Commission, to promote orderly procedures for Self-Regulatory Organizations;
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC collecting, distributing, and publishing National Association of Securities
20549–1090. quotations. Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a
All submissions should refer to File In approving SR–NASD–2006–091, Proposed Rule Change to Amend
Number SR–NASD–2007–005. This file which, among other things, amended NASD Rule 7010(k) Relating to
number should be included on the the ADF rules to align them with Transaction Reporting and Compliance
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Regulation NMS, the Commission Engine Transaction Data
Commission process and review your considered and addressed the regulatory
comments more efficiently, please use issues regarding NASD’s operation of January 26, 2007.
only one method. The Commission will the ADF. The Commission believes the Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
post all comments on the Commission’s instant proposal to make the ADF Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ permanent does not raise any new (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,2
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the regulatory issues. For the same reasons notice is hereby given that on January
submission, all subsequent stated in its order approving SR–NASD– 16, 2007, the National Association of
amendments, all written statements 2006–091, the Commission believes that Securities Dealers, Inc. (‘‘NASD’’) filed
with respect to the proposed rule this proposal is consistent with the with the Securities and Exchange
change that are filed with the requirements of the Act and the rules Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
Commission, and all written and regulations thereunder applicable to proposed rule change as described in
communications relating to the a national securities association. Items I, II, and III below, which Items
proposed rule change between the NASD has requested that the have been substantially prepared by
Commission and any person, other than Commission find good cause for NASD. The Commission is publishing
those that may be withheld from the approving the proposed rule change this notice to solicit comments on the
public in accordance with the prior to the thirtieth day after proposed rule change from interested
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be publication of notice thereof in the persons.
available for inspection and copying in Federal Register. The Commission I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
the Commission’s Public Reference believes that granting accelerated Statement of the Terms of Substance of
Room. Copies of such filing also will be approval of the proposed rule change is
the Proposed Rule Change
available for inspection and copying at appropriate because the proposed rule
the principal office of NASD. All change does not raise any new NASD is proposing to amend NASD
comments received will be posted regulatory issues. In addition, SR– Rule 7010(k) relating to Transaction
without change; the Commission does NASD–2006–091 went through a full Reporting and Compliance Engine
not edit personal identifying notice-and-comment period, and no (‘‘TRACE’’) transaction data to offer the
information from submissions. You comments were received. Accelerated ability to receive, for a reduced fee, a
should submit only information that approval of this proposal will allow the ‘‘snapshot’’ of real-time TRACE
you wish to make publicly available. All benefits of the ADF to continue without transaction data (‘‘TRACE data’’) once
submissions should refer to File a lapse in the pilot due to expire on each day rather than continuously
Number SR–NASD–2007–005 and January 26, 2007. Accordingly, the throughout the day.
should be submitted on or before Commission finds good cause, pursuant The text of the proposed rule change
February 23, 2007. to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,19 for is available on NASD’s Web site at
IV. Commission’s Findings and Order approving the proposed rule change http://www.nasd.com/RulesRegulation/
Granting Accelerated Approval of prior to the thirtieth day after the date RuleFilings/2007RuleFilings/index.htm,
Proposed Rule Change of publication of notice thereof in the at NASD’s principal office, and at the
Federal Register. Commission’s Public Reference Room.
The Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with V. Conclusion II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
the requirements of the Act and the It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Statement of the Purpose of, and
rules and regulations thereunder Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,20 that the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
applicable to a national securities proposed rule change (SR–NASD–2007– Change
association.16 Specifically, the 005) be, and hereby is, approved on an In its filing with the Commission,
Commission believes that the proposed accelerated basis. NASD included statements concerning
rule change is consistent with Section the purpose of, and basis for, the
For the Commission, by the Division of
15A(b)(6) of the Act,17 which requires Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated proposed rule change and discussed any
that the rules of the self-regulatory authority.21 comments it received on the proposal.
organization are designed to prevent Florence E. Harmon, The text of these statements may be
fraudulent and manipulative acts and examined at the places specified in Item
Deputy Secretary.
practices, to promote just and equitable IV below. NASD has prepared
[FR Doc. E7–1688 Filed 2–1–07; 8:45 am]
principles of trade, and, in general, to summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

protect investors and the public interest. BILLING CODE 8010–01–P and C below, of the most significant
16 In approving this proposal, the Commission has 18 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(11). aspects of such statements.
19 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
considered its impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 20 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
17 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(6). 21 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:13 Feb 01, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00098 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM 02FEN1

You might also like