You are on page 1of 2

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

14 / Monday, January 24, 2005 / Notices 3403

Electronic Comments should ensure that the Exchange’s described in Items I and II below, which
• Use the Commission’s Internet position limits and exercise limits on Items have been prepared by the
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ SPDR options provide its members with Exchange. The proposed rule change
rules/sro.shtml); or sufficient flexibility to participate in the has been filed by the Exchange as a non-
• Send an e-mail to rule- market for such options in a manner controversial filing pursuant to Rule
comments@sec.gov. Please include File that should provide greater depth and 19b–4(f)(6) under the Act.3 The
Number SR–Amex–2005–06 on the liquidity for all market participants. Commission is publishing this notice to
subject line. The Commission finds good cause for solicit comments on the proposed rule
Paper Comments approving this proposed rule change from interested persons.
• Send paper comments in triplicate prior to the thirtieth day after
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, publication of notice thereof in the
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
Securities and Exchange Commission, Federal Register. Specifically, the
the Proposed Rule Change
450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC Commission believes that granting
20549–0609. accelerated approval to the proposed The Exchange proposes to amend its
All submissions should refer to File rule change should permit greater depth rules regarding Instant Liquidity Access.
Number SR–Amex–2005–06. This file and liquidity in the SPDR options II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
number should be included on the market that should benefit all market Statement of the Purpose of, and
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the participants, including retail investors. Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Commission process and review your Because the higher position limits and Change
comments more efficiently, please use exercise limits mirror those that the
In its filing with the Commission, the
only one method. The Commission will Commission has previously approved
Exchange included statements
post all comments on the Commission’s for like products, the Commission
concerning the purpose of and basis for
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ believes it is consistent with Sections
the proposed rule change and discussed
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the 6(b)(5) 10 and 19(b)(2) 11 of the Act to
any comments it received on the
submission, all subsequent approve the Amex’s proposed rule
proposed rule change. The text of these
amendments, all written statements change on an accelerated basis.
statements may be examined at the
with respect to the proposed rule places specified in Item IV below. The
V. Conclusion
change that are filed with the Exchange has prepared summaries, set
Commission, and all written It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,12 that the forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
communications relating to the the most significant aspects of such
proposed rule change between the proposed rule change (SR–Amex–2005–
06) is hereby approved on an statements.
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the accelerated basis. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
public in accordance with the For the Commission, by the Division of Statement of the Purpose of, and
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
available for inspection and copying in authority.13 Change
the Commission’s Public Reference Margaret H. McFarland, 1. Purpose
Section, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Deputy Secretary.
Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such The purpose of the proposed rule
[FR Doc. E5–257 Filed 1–21–05; 8:45 am]
filing also will be available for change is to amend a section of the
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
inspection and copying at the principal Rules of the Board of Governors of the
office of the Amex. All comments Boston Stock Exchange (‘‘BSE Rules’’)
received will be posted without change; SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE relating to Instant Liquidity Access
the Commission does not edit personal COMMISSION (‘‘ILA’’). In Chapter XXXIII, Section 8,
identifying information from the Exchange sets forth rules related to
[Release No. 51031; File No. SR–BSE–2004– the facilitation of orders through ILA.
submissions. You should submit only 46]
information that you wish to make The Exchange is proposing that ILA
publicly available. All submissions orders for any account in which the
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Boston same person is directly or indirectly
should refer to File Number SR–Amex– Stock Exchange; Notice of Filing and interested may be entered without any
2005–06 and should be submitted on or Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed time delay between the entry of orders
before February 14, 2005. Rule Change Relating to Its Instant in the book. Presently, there is a thirty-
IV. Commission’s Findings and Order Liquidity Access Rules second restriction between the entry of
Granting Accelerated Approval of January 12, 2005. orders for the same account.
Proposed Rule Change Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the When the ILA rules were originally
After careful review, the Commission Securities Exchange Act of 1934 drafted, the intention behind the thirty-
finds that the proposed rule change is (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 second interval was to provide a
consistent with the requirements of the notice is hereby given that on December measure of protection for Exchange
Act and the rules and regulations 20, 2004, the Boston Stock Exchange specialists by preventing orders from
thereunder, applicable to a national (‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities being entered in a rapid fire manner.
securities exchange,8 and, in particular, and Exchange Commission The Exchange has now had several
months of experience with ILA, and
the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule as
both Exchange customers and
the Act.9 Specifically, the Commission
specialists have requested that the
finds that the proposed rule change 10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
11 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). thirty-second restriction be removed, so
8 In approving this proposal, the Commission has 12 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). that ILA can be utilized for a larger
considered its impact on efficiency, competition, 13 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). percentage of orders. The concern about
and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 3 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).

VerDate jul<14>2003 18:04 Jan 21, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM 24JAN1
3404 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 14 / Monday, January 24, 2005 / Notices

rapid fire orders has been addressed of the Act 6 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 7 subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
through systemic enhancements which, thereunder. Commission process and review your
according to ILA rules, automatically A proposed rule change filed under comments more efficiently, please use
cancel an ILA order if it can not be Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 8 normally does not only one method. The Commission will
immediately executed. Accordingly, become operative prior to thirty days post all comments on the Commission’s
since the concerns behind the thirty- after the date of filing. However, Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
second restriction never materialized, pursuant to Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii),9 the rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
and because systemic enhancements Commission may designate a shorter submission, all subsequent
have obviated the need for such a time if such action is consistent with the amendments, all written statements
restriction, the Exchange is seeking to protection of investors and the public with respect to the proposed rule
abolish the limitation. Moreover, the interest. The Exchange seeks to have the change that are filed with the
Exchange believes that removing the proposed rule change become operative Commission, and all written
thirty-second restriction will encourage immediately so that it can eliminate a communications relating to the
more customers to utilize ILA, and restriction in its rules that is no longer proposed rule change between the
thereby have their orders immediately necessary. Commission and any person, other than
executed, without the intervention of a The Commission, consistent with the those that may be withheld from the
specialist. protection of investors and the public public in accordance with the
interest, has determined to make the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
2. Statutory Basis proposed rule change effective as of the available for inspection and copying in
The Exchange believes that the date of this order.10 The Commission the Commission’s Public Reference
proposal is consistent with the believes that the proposal could Room. Copies of such filing also will be
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act,4 enhance the use of automatic executions available for inspection and copying at
in general, and Section 6(b)(5) 5 in on the Exchange and may result in more the principal office of the BSE. All
particular, in that it is designed to timely and orderly executions of orders. comments received will be posted
promote just and equitable principles of At any time within 60 days of the without change; the Commission does
trade, to remove impediments to and filing of such proposed rule change, the not edit personal identifying
perfect the mechanism of a free and Commission may summarily abrogate information from submissions. You
open market and a national market such rule change if it appears to the should submit only information that
system, and is not designed to permit Commission that such action is you wish to make available publicly. All
unfair discrimination between necessary or appropriate in the public submissions should refer to File
customers, brokers, or dealers, or to interest, for the protection of investors, Number SR–BSE–2004–46 and should
regulate by virtue of any authority or otherwise in furtherance of the be submitted on or before February 14,
matters not related to the administration purposes of the Act. 2005.
of the Exchange. For the Commission, by the Division of
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Interested persons are invited to authority.11
Statement on Burden on Competition submit written data, views, and J. Lynn Taylor,
The Exchange does not believe that arguments concerning the foregoing, Assistant Secretary.
the proposed rule change will impose including whether the proposed rule [FR Doc. E5–212 Filed 1–21–05; 8:45 am]
any burden on competition not change is consistent with the Act. BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
necessary or appropriate in furtherance Comments may be submitted by any of
of the purposes of the Act. the following methods:
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Electronic Comments SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
Statement on Comments on the COMMISSION
• Use the Commission’s Internet
Proposed Rule Change Received From comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ [Release No. 34–51030; File No. SR–CBOE–
Members, Participants, or Others rules/sro.shtml); or 2004–91]
The Exchange has neither solicited • Send E-mail to rule-
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice
nor received comments on the proposed comments@sec.gov. Please include File
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness
rule change. Number SR–BSE–2004–46 on the
of Proposed Rule Change and
subject line.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Amendment No. 1 Thereto by the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Paper Comments Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Commission Action • Send paper comments in triplicate Incorporated To Extend a Pilot
The Exchange has designated the to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Program and Eliminate the Rule
Securities and Exchange Commission, Prohibiting Electronically Generated
proposed rule change as one that: (1)
450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC and Communicated Orders
Does not significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public 20549–0609. January 12, 2005.
interest; (2) does not impose any All submissions should refer to File Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
significant burden on competition; and Number SR–BSE–2004–46. This file Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(3) does not become operative for 30 number should be included on the (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 2 thereunder,
days from the date of filing, or such notice is hereby given that on December
6 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
shorter time as the Commission may 29, 2004, the Chicago Board Options
7 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
designate if consistent with the Exchange, Incorporated (‘‘CBOE’’ or
8 Id.
protection of investors and the public 9 17
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
interest pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) 10 For
purposes of only accelerating the operative
11 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
date of this proposal, the Commission has
4 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
considered the rule’s impact on efficiency,
5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). competition and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.

VerDate jul<14>2003 18:04 Jan 21, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM 24JAN1

You might also like