Chirang (II) 2010 11 Daisamjhora Iwmp

DPR Formats
Approved by DoLR
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT OF IWMP

(2010 2014)
Declaration
Under Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) 2010-14, the Detailed Project Report (DPR) of Chirang-2
(DAISUMJHORA) cluster consisting of 26 priority villages, has been prepared. The total project area proposed to be treated under this
cluster is 3600 ha with the total project cost Rs. 432.00 Lakhs. Low Agriculture Production, Health Problems, High cost of basic
amenities Water Scarcity of techniques Practice and market knowledge
It states briefly the need for implementing the watershed project in Chirang-2 (DAISUMJHORA) cluster and suggests the appropriate
solutions to overcome for soil and water scarcity through holistic approach. It also put the emphasis on improving livelihood pattern
of the rural section.
The DPR is finally submitted to SLNA for the approval.
Authority Signatory
Acknowledgements
We would like to sincerely thank Mrs.N.A.Hazrika, Honorable Commissioner, Department of Soil conservation, Government
of Assam and Chairperson, SLNA, IWMP, Assam entrusting us the task of preparation of Detail Project Report of Chirang-2
(Diasumjhora) watershed, under IWMP project, Assam. We would also like on place on record our appreciation for Dr.Prem
Sharan, Ex-Commissioner, Department of Soil Conservation, Assam for giving us the opportunity for working in Assam.
We are grateful to Mr. F.S. Choudhary CEO, SLNA, IWMP, Assam for his continuous support and guidance. We shall also be
thankful to Special Duty Officers viz .Mr. J.M Talukdar, Mr.Chutia, Mr. B.Bhutta and Mr. P.Barkakoty for their suggestions,
coordination, support, comments and feedback from time to time.
Our special thanks to Divisional officer- Chirang, Mr.N.Sinha for his timely support in providing divisional information relevant
to the project and feedback on the draft report.
This project would have not been completed without moral and active support of Terracon staff who patiently worked on the
arduous task of data collection, interpretation and analysis over last 8 months.
We highly appreciate the sincere field work put by all field officers, survey team and data analysts.
Ashok Jain
Director & Strategist,
Terracon EcotechPvt. Ltd
Terracon Ecotech Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai
Study Team
Name
Designation
Ashok Jain
Project Advisor, Financial Analyst
Surabhi Mehrotra
Project Head, Environment Planner
Yashada Kulkarni
PRA coordinator and Data Analyst
Ashish Tadas
GIS and GPS Expert and Documentation
Swapna Patil
Data Analyst , Engineering Expert
Field Team
Vivek Sharma
Regional coordinator
Hemanta Deka
Socio Economic coordinator
Mr. Saburam & Team
Field Coordinator
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Brief about area
Daisumjhora Micro watershed is located in Borobazar Block, Chirang district of Assam state. The total project area of the watershed is
about 4120 ha out of which 3600ha has been undertaken to be treated under Integrated Watershed Management Programmes (IWMP)
starting year 2010-2011.
The watershed includes six Gram Panchayat namely Subaijhar, Kumansali Batabari, Monghian, Poslabari, Borobazar. Assamies,
Bengalies and Muslim are the primary inhabitants of the village.
The livelihood of these people is primary based on rainfed agriculture, vegetable, cultivation, Poultry farming and wage labourer. The
major source of income of the people is from agriculture. Important crops are paddy and winter vegetables. Poultry, piggery are more
preferable work in project area.
The productivity of all the crops is in average. With the help of natural & human resources, it is possible to uplift their socio-economic
status. There is immense scope to conserve and utilize soil and water properly under this watershed. The nearest town is Bijni which is
about 8 to 10 km from the project area and is well connected by tar road. Chirang-2 (Daisumjhora) project is located in Borobazar block,
Chirang district of Assam state.
The project area falls under Bodoland Territorial Autonomous council (BTAD). The project is a cluster of six micro-watersheds with
3A2A2/I(a), 3A2A2/I(b), 3A2A2/I(c), 3A2A2/I(d), 3A2A2/I(e), 3A2A2/I (f)) as their respective codes.
Micro Watershed Name & Code No.:

Microwatershed
Name
Kumarsali
Ladanguri
Daugapara
Deotari
Uttarpara
Amguri
Watershed Code
3A2A2/I(a)
3A2A2/I(b)
3A2A2/I(c)
3A2A2/I(d)
3A2A2/I(e)
3A2A2/I(f)
Institutional arrangements
The new common guideline has provided for
establishment of dedicated institutions for the
purpose of implementation of IWMP. It includes a
Central Level Nodal Agency (CLNA), below it State
Level Nodal Agencies (SLNAs) in all the states, below
it District Watershed Development Units (DWDUs)
at the district level; Project Implementing Agencies
(PIAs) at the project level and Watershed
Committees (WCs) at village level.
Salient features
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Delegation of powers to the States for sanctioning and implementation of projects.

Dedicated institutions of multi-disciplinary professionals at national, state and district levels
Project duration made flexible into 3 distinct phases- preparatory phase, works phase and consolidation phase
Focus on Livelihoods through integrated farming systems
Clustering of small watershed in the range of 1000-5000 ha. areas to optimize transaction cost.
Focus on scientific planning and capacity building
Multi tier Ridge to valley approach
Treatment area and details

Since 1996, Government of India has issued guideline for the implementation of area development programme adopting
watershed approach. Watershed approach aims at restoration of ecological balance preserving environment and stabilizing the income
of village community both farmers, asset less and landless agricultural labour. The importance of watershed development cannot be
underestimated. On one hand is the need to increase food productivity and hence productivity from soil and the other decreasing soil
erosion and depleting water availability.
ii
The scope of soil conservation is very wide and encompasses much more than physical work for erosion control. The concept of
soil conservation, now-a-days has been expanded to mean protection of the soil against physical loss by erosion or against chemical
deterioration. Thus, the effective conservation and management of land, water and vegetation resources aimed at obtaining optimum
and sustained return from these resources without degrading them can be achieved by adopting watershed as basic unit of
development. Watershed being a natural hydrological entity, it responds most effectively to various engineering, biological and cultural
treatments. Monitoring of runoff and silt at the outlet of the watershed can help assess the impact of various treatments aimed at
conserving soil and water, and protecting vegetation.
Watershed management involves protection of land against all forms of degradation, restoration of degraded land, sediment
control, pollutants control, and prevention of floods, etc. A workable size of the watershed can be decided in accordance with the aim
and objective of the particular system as well as the size of the stream for which it forms a catchment. Watershed of smaller size has
distinct advantage of involving a smaller number of families within a resource unit with a common social and economic pattern.
Demarcation of watershed and subsequently sub watersheds can be done either by using toposheet of the area available with Survey of
India or by interpretation of remotely sensed imagery of the area. Prioritization of sub watershed should be done on the basis of
sediment yield and pollutants concentration in the runoff from the sub watershed. The entire watershed can be treated gradually over a
number of years as per the availability of financial and other resources.
Numerous treatment technologies in the form of engineering measures and agronomic practices are available. But identification of
most suitable technologies as per the site condition and their application in correct way is most important to achieve the desired
results. These technologies when adopted within the boundary of watershed, facilitates favourable interaction among various
watershed factors such as Physiographic, land slope, soil characteristics, land use, hydrological behaviour etc, land and water resources
to produce food, fodder, fuel and fibre on sustainable basis. In Chirang 2 cluster, majorly Boulder pitching, well repairing, check dam
construction is suggested. This will help in soil and water conservation in the area which is the main concern in rainfed agricultural
areas.
Based on surveys and PRA activities, number of livelihood activities like wood craft, bee keeping, Tarza making etc are suggested to
boost the economy of the area. Along with livelihood activities and microenterprises suggested, capacity building of asset less and small
farmers as well as institutional arrangement are suggested for sustainable management of the watershed.
iii
Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................................................................................................i
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................. 1
Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1
Profile of the watershed project .................................................................................................................................................................. 3
Table 1.1: Project at a Glance ................................................................................................................................................................... 3
Weightage Criteria ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 4
Table 1.2: Need and Scope for Watershed Development ........................................................................................................................ 4
Table 1.3: Watershed information............................................................................................................................................................ 6
Table 1.4: Status of other development project in the area .................................................................................................................... 7
Table 1.5: Status of previous watershed programme .............................................................................................................................. 8
CHAPTER 2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AREA ................................................................................................................................... 9
Table 2.1: Location .................................................................................................................................................................................... 9
Watershed Location ................................................................................................................................................................................ 10
Table 2.2: Land Details ............................................................................................................................................................................ 12
Table 2.3: Details of the types of beneficiaries covered under the project ........................................................................................... 14
Soil and Topography: .............................................................................................................................................................................. 15
iv
Table 2.4: Details of Agro-climatic condition .......................................................................................................................................... 15

Table 2.5: Details of flood and drought in the project area ................................................................................................................... 17
Table 2.6: Details of soil erosion in the project area .............................................................................................................................. 18
Table 2.7: Details of the Soil pH .............................................................................................................................................................. 19
Table 2.8: Climatic Condition .................................................................................................................................................................. 20
Table 2.9: Physiographic Features .......................................................................................................................................................... 20
Table 2.10: Watershed characteristics ................................................................................................................................................... 20
CHAPTER 3 BASE LINE INFORMATION OF WATERSHED ................................................................................................................................ 21
Socio-economic profile ............................................................................................................................................................................... 21
Table 3.1: Demographic features............................................................................................................................................................ 21
Livestock: .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25
Table 3.2: Livestock details ..................................................................................................................................................................... 25
Table 3.3: Socio- economic status .......................................................................................................................................................... 28
Table 3.4: Migration Details .................................................................................................................................................................... 35
Table 3.5: Details of Community Based Organizations existing in the watershed village ...................................................................... 37
Table 3.6: Infrastructure Facilities ......................................................................................................................................................... 38
Table 3.7: Land use pattern (in Hectares) ............................................................................................................................................... 40
Table 3.8: Details of Common Property Resources ................................................................................................................................ 42
Table 3.9: Agriculture implements ............................................................................................................................................................. 46
Table 3.10: Crop Classification ................................................................................................................................................................... 46

Table 3.11: Crops & Cropping pattern .................................................................................................................................................... 47
Table 3.12: Land capability Classification .............................................................................................................................................. 61
Table 3.13: Irrigation facilities................................................................................................................................................................ 61
Table 3.14: Status of water table ............................................................................................................................................................ 67
Table 3.15: Assessment of drinking water facility .................................................................................................................................. 68
Table 3.16: Surface water resources...................................................................................................................................................... 71
Table 3.17: Ground Water Structures to be repaired............................................................................................................................. 77
Table 3.18: Details of existing livelihoods ............................................................................................................................................... 81
Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: Project area Vs District Vs State Vs country Vs world ....................................... 85
Table 3.19: Problem Typology of the Watershed ................................................................................................................................... 87
CHAPTER 4 INSTITUTIONAL BUILDING AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT .......................................................................................................... 89
Table 4.1: Details of SHGs & UGs newly formed under IWMP ............................................................................................................... 89
Watershed Committees.............................................................................................................................................................................. 90
Table 4.2: Details of Watershed Committees (WC) ............................................................................................................................... 90
Table 4.3: WDT Particulars ...................................................................................................................................................................... 93
Table 4.4: PIA particulars ....................................................................................................................................................................... 94
Table 4.5: Bank Account Details ............................................................................................................................................................. 94
Institutional Mechanisms: .......................................................................................................................................................................... 95
vi
Flow Chart of Institutional Arrangement from District to watershed level ........................................................................................... 95

Fund Flow mechanisms flow chart ...................................................................................................................................................... 95
List of Watershed Records to be maintained ......................................................................................................................................... 96
Project Implementation.............................................................................................................................................................................. 97
Table 4.6: Convergence plan with IWMP................................................................................................................................................ 97
CHAPTER 5 MANAGEMENT/ACTION PLAN .................................................................................................................................................... 98
Description on methodology of plan adopted ........................................................................................................................................... 98
Details of Natural Resource Management Activities ............................................................................................................................... 103
Table 5.1: Soil and Moisture Conservation structures ......................................................................................................................... 105
Table 5.2: Water Harvesting Structures................................................................................................................................................ 106
Table 5.3: Vegetative Covers ................................................................................................................................................................ 110
Structure or Activity Wise Details of Engineering Structure and Vegetative Measures .......................................................................... 122
Table 5.4: Engineering structures for Soil Conservation Measures (SMC) .......................................................................................... 122
Table 5.5: Details of engineering structures for Water Harvesting WHS ............................................................................................. 123
Table 5.6: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works ........................................................................ 123
CHAPTER 6 CAPACITY BUILDING PLAN......................................................................................................................................................... 125
Table 6.1: Details of Capacity Building.................................................................................................................................................. 125
CHAPTER 7 PHASING OF PROGRAMME AND BUDGETING .......................................................................................................................... 127
Table 7.1: Phasing of the action plan ................................................................................................................................................... 127
vii
Table 7.2: Estimated Benefit Cost Ratio ............................................................................................................................................... 132

CHAPTER 8 CONSOLIDATION AND COMPLETION OF VARIOUS WORKS ...................................................................................................... 134
Table 8.1: Consolidation of Action Plan ................................................................................................................................................ 134
CHAPTER 9 EXPECTED OUTCOMES ............................................................................................................................................................. 135
Ground Water: .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 135
Vegetative/Crop: ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 136
Migration: ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 136
Table 9.1: Expected outcome: Quantifiable indicators ........................................................................................................................ 137
Table 9.2: Backward and Forward Linkages ......................................................................................................................................... 138
CHAPTER 10 MAPS ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 140
APPENDIX A ENGINEERING ESTIMATES
APPENDIX B MICRO-WATERSHEDWISE ACTION PLAN - PRODUCTION
A-1
ICROENTERPRISE
APPENDIX C MICRO-WATERSHEDWISE ACTION PLAN - LI ELIHOOD ACTI ITIES
viii
B-1
C-1
List of Figures
Fig. 2.1: Landscape and vegetation of project area

Fig. 2.2: Interaction with Farmers and testing soil quality of their land using pH meter
Fig. 2.3: Landuse Pattern of project area
Fig. 2.4: Type of Beneficiaries in the project area
Fig. 3.1: SC and ST population percentage in project area
Fig. 3.2: Gender wise Literacy percentage
Fig.3.3: Livestock
Fig. 3.4: Status of Socio-
..
Fig. 3.5: I
66
Fig. 3.6: Proportion of existing livelihoods

Fig. 3.7: Comparative rice productivity
Fig. 3.8: Comparative mustard productivity
34
ix
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
Introduction
Chirang is one of the 26 districts of Assam state in north-eastern India . As of 2011 it is the second least populous district in the state,
after Dima Hasao. The district has been functioning with effect from 04 th June, 2004. It was carved out of the districts of Kokrajhar,
Bongaigaon and Barpeta. Kajalgaon is the district Headquarter. There are two Sub-Divisions in the district:
1. Kajalgaon Sadar Sub-Division
2. Bijni Civil Sub-Division
According to the 2011 census Chirang district has a population of 4,81,818, roughly equal to the nation of Suriname . This gives it a
ranking of 547th in India (out of a total of 640 ). The district has a population density of 244 inhabitants per square kilometre (630 /sq
mi), its population growth rate over the decade 2001-2011 was 11.26 %. Chirang has a sex ratio of 969 females for every 1000 males,
and a literacy rate of 64.71 %. The salient project features is as follows:
Name of the District
: Chirang
Names of the Blocks
: Borobazar
Name of the project
: Daisumjhora IWMP project
Financial Year of sanction
: 2010-11
Project duration
: From 2010 to 2014
Map of the project area showing village boundaries, contours and drainage
Profile of the watershed project

Daisumjhora watershed is located in Chirang district of Assam. It consists of 26 villages and covers 6 micro-watersheds. The climate of
the district is sub-tropical in nature with warm and humid summer followed by dry and cool winter. The average annual rainfall is about
1900 mm per annum of which 75% is received during June and September. During Monsoon the climate is normally wet and dry during
winter. Both pre and post-monsoon months have unpredictable and erratic rainfall. The maximum and minimum temperature varies
from 33o to 38o C and 9o to 10o C respectively. The average radiation is the highest during March to April while overcast sky reduces the
solar radiation to the east during July. More and more agricultural land is required to be brought under irrigation on priority basis (there
being potentiality), both for increasing production and productivity through intensification of agriculture. The average ground water
table in the district can be reached at depth of about 5 to 7 m from ground level. (Source: Chirang.gov.in)
Table 1.1: Project at a Glance
1
2
3
4
5
6
Name of the State

Name of the project
Name of the District
Names of the Blocks
Names of Gram Panchayats
Names & Census Code of Villages covered
Assam
Daisumjhora IWM project 2010-11
Chirang
Borobazar
Subaijhar, Kumansali Batabari, Monghian, Poslabari, Borobazar.
00366200 Kumarsali Pathar 00366900 Uttarpara
00383400
No.1
00366100 Kumarsali
00367100 Uttarpara
00369000
No.2
00366000 Choto Ladanguri 00369300 Deotari
00368800
No.1
00365900 Choto Ladanguri 00367300 Subaijhar
00372700
No.2
00365800 Boro Ladanguri
00367500 Saraikhusra 00379900
No.1
00365700 Boro Ladamguri- 00369100 Betnapara 00372600
2
00366800 Dimajhora
00369200 Golapara
00368400
00365600
00367200
Dagarpara No.1
Dagarpara No.2
Monakosha
Katuribari
Bashbari
Ambari-1
Bashbari
Ambari-2
Chorapat
No.1
Gelasugaon
Majhrabari
No.1
00367400 Maliapara
00267600 Silbari
3
Four major reasons for selection of

watershed
Name, Address, Phone No and Reg. No. of

the PIA(s)
Date of approval of Watershed
Development Plan by the DPC
Area of the Project (ha.)
Area proposed to be treated (ha.)
Financial Year of sanction
Project duration
Project Cost (Rs. in Lakhs)
Date of Sanction by State authority
Date of Release of 1st Installment of Central
Assistance (To be filled by DoLR)
Any other, please specify
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1. The area preponderance of degraded land.7(c),

2. The area is dominated by SC and ST population 7(f),
3. There is acute problem of drinking water 7(a),
4. The major area of agriculture is rain fed and most it is susceptible to soil erosion
due to over exploitation of ground cover.
Divisional Officer, Chirang S.C. Division. Kajalgaon.
4120
3600
F
Rs. 432.00
Vast degradation of forest area at the foothill of Bhutan lead to severe erosion and
less time of concentration in watershed area
Weightage Criteria
Watershed Development programme is prioritized on the basis of 13 parameters namely poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ST, Actual
wages, percentage of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rain fed agriculture, Drinking water
situation in the area, Percentage of the degraded land, Productivity potential of the land, Continuity of another watershed that has
already developed/ treated, Cluster approach for plain or for hilly terrain.
Table 1.2: Need and Scope for Watershed Development
Project Name
Chirang-2
Project Type
(Daisumjhora- IWMP), Moderately slope area
i
7.5
ii
10
Iii
5
iv
5
v
3
Weightage
vi vii ix x xi xii
0 10 7.5 10 15 10
xiii
10
Total
93
Sn
i
Criteria
Max
Score
10
Ranges and Scores

Above 80% (10)
80 to 50 % (7.5)
50 to 20 % (5)
10
More than 40% (10)
20 to 40 % (5)
Less than 20% (3)
Actual wages are

significantly lower than
minimum wages (5)
More than 80% (10)
Actual wages are equal

to or higher than
minimum wages (0)
50 to 80% (5)
Less than 50 (3)
Critical (10)
-33.3 to -66.6 (5) DPAP
Block
10 to 20% (10)
Sub critical (5)

0 to -33.2 (0) Non
DPAP/DDP Block
20 to 30% (5)
ii
Poverty index(%of
poor to population)
% of SC/ST population
iii
Actual wages
iv
% of small and
marginal farmers
Ground water status
Moisture index/
DPAP/DDP Block
Area under assured
irrigation
10
15
Over exploited (15)

-66.7 & below (10) DDP
Block
Less than 10% (15)
viii
Drinking water
10
No source (10)
Problematic village (7.5)
Partially covered (5)
ix
Degraded land
15
High above 20% (15)
Productivity potential
of the land
10
Low less than 10 % of TGA

(5)
Lands with high production
& where productivity can be
marginally enhanced with
reasonable efforts (0)
xi
Contiguity to another
watershed that has
already been
developed/treated
10
xii
Cluster approach in
15
Lands with low production

& where productivity can
be significantly enhanced
with reasonable efforts
(10)
Contiguous to previously
treated watershed &
contiguity within the micro
watersheds in the project
(10)
Above 6 micro-watersheds
Medium 10 to 20 %
(10)
Land with moderate
production & where
productivity can be
enhanced with
reasonable efforts (5)
Contiguity within the
micro watersheds in the
project but non
contiguous to previously
treated watershed (5)
4 to 6 micro watersheds
v
vi
vii
15
10
Below
20% (2.5)
Safe (0)
Above
30%
(Reject)
Fully
covered
(0)
Neither contiguous to
previously treated
watershed nor contiguity
within the micro watersheds
in the project (0)
2 to 4 micro watersheds in
xiii
the plains (more than

one contiguous microwatersheds in the
project)
Cluster approach in
15
the hills (More than
one contiguous microwatersheds in the
project)
Total
150
in cluster (15)
in cluster (10)
cluster (5)
Above 5 micro-watersheds
in cluster (15)
3 to 5 micro watersheds
in cluster (10)
2 to 3 micro watersheds in
cluster (5)
150
90
41
2.5
Table 1.3: Watershed information

S.N.
1.
2.
3
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13
13.
14.
15.
Name of Project
Watershed Code
Villages to be Treated
Geographical Area(Ha)
3A2A2/I(a)
3A2A2/I(b)
3A2A2/I(c)
3A2A2/I(d)
3A2A2/I(e)
3A2A2/I(f)
Kumarsali Pathar
Kumarsali
Choto Ladanguri No.1
Boro Ladanguri No.1
Boro Ladanguri No.2
Dimajhora
Dagarpara No.1
Dagarpara No.2
Uttarpara No.1
Uttarpara No.2
Deotari
71
115
136
108
119
99
147
189
131
101
79
330
Treatable
Area(Ha)*
50.00
100.00
130.00
100.00
100.00
80.00
130.00
160.00
110.00
90.00
60.00
290.00
Subaijhar
Saraikhusra
Betnapara
280
41
328
250.00
30.00
290.00
Daisumjhora
Approval Year
2010-11
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
Golapara
Malipara 2
Silbari
Monakosha
Katribari
Bashbari Ambari-1
Bashbari Ambari-2
Chorapat No.1
Gelasugaon
Bholatal-1
Majrabari No.1
Total
228
83
245
150
192
184
149
160
197
185
73
4120
200.00
70.00
230.00
125.00
175.00
150.00
130.00
140.00
180.00
170.00
60.00
3600
Table 1.4: Status of other development project in the area

S. No.
Name of the
programme/scheme
Sponsoring
agency
Objectives of the
programme/scheme
Awas yojana (IAY)
GOI
Household
2000
24
1046
Swarnjayanti gram Swarojgar GOI,

yojana (SGSY)
NREGA
GOI, DRDA
Livelihood
2009
20
96
Employment, Road
Construction
2009
26
120
Year of
commencement
Villages
covered
Estimated
number of
beneficiaries
Table 1.5: Status of previous watershed programme

S
N
Project
name
DPAP+DD
P+IWDP
Other
Watershe
d Project
CHAPTER 2
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AREA
Table 2.1: Location
Longitude
90
Latitude
EN-
E
N
State
Assam
District
Chirang
Subdivision
Borobazar
Block
Borobazar
Panchayat
Subaijhar, Kumansali Batabari, Monghian, Poslabari, Borobazar.
Villages
Kumarshali Pathar, Kumarshali,Choto Ladamguri -1,Choto Ladamguri 2,Boro Ladamguri -1,Boro Ladamguri -2,Dimajhora,Dagarpara
1,Dagarpara 2,Uttarpara 1,Uttarpara
2,Deotari,Subaijhar,Saraikhusra,Betnapara,Golapara,Malipara 2,
Silbari,Monakosha,Katribari,Banshbari Ambari-1,Banshbari Ambari2,Charapet-1 Gelasugaon,Bholatal-1,Mojrabari-2
Approach Road
Bongaigaon>Bijni>Project Area
Watershed Location
10
Fig. 2.1: Landscape and vegetation of project area
F ig. 2.2: Interaction with Farmers and testing soil quality of their land using pH meter
measuring soil pH
11
Table 2.2: Land Details

S.
No.
Names of villages
Geographic
al Area of
the village
(ha)
Forest
Area (ha)
Land under
agricultural
use (ha)
Rain-fed Irrigated
area
Area
(ha)
Permanent
pastures
(ha)
Wasteland
Cultivable
(ha)
Noncultivable (ha)
Kumarsali Pathar
71
55
50
Kumarsali
115
91
80
11
13
12
17.
Malipara 2
83
64
58
10
13
Table 2.3: Details of the types of beneficiaries covered under the project
No. of beneficiaries covered
S. No.
Name of village
MF
SF
LF
Landless
Total
Kumarsali Pathar
102
51
45
25
223
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Kumarsali
Boro Ladanguri No.1
Boro Ladanguri No.2
Dimajhora
Dagarpara No.1
Dagarpara No.2
Uttarpara No.1
Uttarpara No.2
Deotari
Subaijhar
Saraikhusra
Betnapara
Golapara
Malipara 2
Silbari
Monakosha
Katribari
200
11
78
20
145
35
134
22
150
26
122
28
102
121
205
126
55
120
25
75
80
65
2
95
61
60
15
25
44
87
14.5
28
91
85
99
89
90
20
30
102
50
47
00
12
0
15
30
0
6
45
17
43
20
107
40
50
250
52
20
35
00
25
10
100
15
56
13
85
41
65
45
46
250
350
470
297
5
322
96
231
47
280
115
265
55.5
260
270
398
290
297
500
14
Fig. 2.4: Type of Beneficiaries in the project area

Soil and Topography:
Daisumjhora watershed project falls under Lower Brahmaputra valley zone No. 4. The general and average soil character of cultivable
land in the watershed area is mainly alluvial and composed of mixture of sand (coarse to fine) and clay in varying proportions.
Moderately deep, well drained fine sandy loam. Colour of soil is grayish and fine with a high percentage of nitrogen which is good for
rice cultivation are found in the area. The soil pH is ranging from 5.5 to 7.5. Topography of the area is flat or plain and slope range from
1 to 3.5%.
Table 2.4: Details of Agro-climatic condition
1
S.
No.
1
Name of the
Project
Name of the
Agro-climatic
zone covers
project area
Lower
Major soil types
Major crops
Area in ha
Names of the
villages
a)Type
71
Kumansali Pathar
Alfisol
b) Area in ha
a) Name
b) Area in ha
71
Mainly rice
46
15
2
3
Daisumjhor
IWM Project
Brahmaputra
valley Zone no-4
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
115
136
108
119
99
147
189
131
101
79
330
280
41
328
228
83
245
150
192
184
149
160
197
185
73
Total
4,120
Source: PPR-Soil Conservation Department
Kumarsali
Sandy
Choto Ladanguri - Loam
1
Choto Ladanguri 2
Boro Ladanguri -1
Boro Ladanguri -2
Dimajhora
Dagarpara No.1
Dagarpara -2
Uttarpara No.1
Uttarpara -2
Deotari
Subaijhar
Saraikhusra
Betnapara
Golapara
Maliapara 2
Silbari
Monakosha
Katribari
Bashbari Ambari-1
Bashbari Ambari-2
Chorapat No.1
Gelasugaon
Bholatal
Majrabari No.1
115
136
as
wet paddy
cultivation
84
98
108
81
119
99
147
189
131
101
79
330
280
41
328
228
83
245
150
192
184
149
160
197
185
73
80
59
95
143
93
66
51
264
211
27
272
174
63
208
106
154
139
106
131
156
140
44
16
Table 2.5: Details of flood and drought in the project area

1
S. No.
Particulars
Villages
Flood
No. of villages
4
Periodicity
Any other
Annual
(please specify)
Drought
No. of villages
Name(s) of villages
Not affected
Nil
Choto
Ladanguri No.1,
Kumarsali
Sabaijhar
Occasional flash flood occurs during

high rain fall in upper catchment in
Bhutan and cause heavy loss to
standing crops and silt/sand
deposition takes place on cultivable
land on river bank. Also bank cutting
and shifting of river course are
common in project area.
Nil
2
Scanty and uneven rainfall causes
drought during certain monsoon
season.
Name(s) of villages
Sabaijhar
17
Table 2.6: Details of soil erosion in the project area

1
Cause
Type of erosion
Area affected (ha)
Water erosion
a
b
c
Sheet Erosion
Rill Erosion
Gully Erosion
Sub-Total
Wind erosion
Total
1854.00 hect
865.20 hect
1400.80 hect
4120.00 hect
4
Run off
(mm/ year)
1329 mm/Yr.
1329 mm/Yr.
1329 mm/Yr.
5
Average soil loss (Tonnes/ ha/
year)
20.36 Mt/ha/yr.
12.98 Mt/ha/yr.
21.01 Mt/ha/yr.
4120.00 hect
Source- PPR- Soil Conservation Dep
The four orders of soils are found in the district

1) Entisols (recent alluvium),
2) Inceptisols (old alluvium),
3) Alfisols(Mountain valley)
4) Ultisols (Laterised red).
The soil of zone is mostly acidic nature and p H increases near the river Brahmaputra. The organic carbon and available Nitrogen
of the soil mostly varies from medium to high, low in available P2O5 and medium in K2O status (Source: Agricultural
University,Jorhat and Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Chirang, Assam).
18
Table 2.7: Details of the Soil pH

Name of the Villages
Kumansali Pathar
Kumarsali
Choto Ladanguri -1
Choto Ladanguri -2
Boro Ladanguri -1
Boro Ladanguri -2
Dimajhora
Dagarpara No.1
Dagarpara -2
Uttarpara No.1
Uttarpara -2
Deotari
Subaijhar
Saraikhusra
Betnapara
Golapara
Maliapara 2
Silbari
Monakosha
Katribari
Bashbari Ambari-1
Bashbari Ambari-2
Chorapat No.1
Gelasugaon
Bholatal
Majrabari No.1
Sample no
Soil Ph
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
6.5
5.8
6.2
5.9
6.1
5.6
6.4
7.1
6.2
5.7
5.3
6.7
6.5
6.8
6.5
7.2
6.7
6.5
6.5
7.1
5.8
5.6
5.9
6.3
6.8
5.6
Soil Type
Sandy Loam soil
Source: Analog Soil pH and moisture meter-(Model DM-15)

19
Table 2.8: Climatic Condition

Average
Annual
rainfall(in
mm)preced
ing 5 years
Average
Open pan
Annual run
Average Monthly Rain fall
evaporation Relative
off
S N Year
(in mm)
Max Min
(mm per day) Humidity(RH) (mm/year)
1
2010
4241.3
35.3
23.5
60-85 %
1329
mm/Yr.
2
2009
2797.3
36.5
24.5
1329
3
2008
3497.5
38.6
26.5
3034.36
mm/Yr.
4
2007
3302.4
37.5
25.5
1329
37.9
5
2006
1333.3
26.8
mm/Yr.
(Source: Meteorological data, IMD, Guwahati, 2010, http://www.mustseeindia.com/Guwahati-weather; kamrup.nic.in/ghy.htm,
http://www.imd.gov.in/section/climate/guwahati2.htm)
Temp(0C)
Wind
Velocit
y
Table 2.9: Physiographic Features
Elevation(MSL)
85 mtr
Slope Range (%)
0-3
Order of
Watershed
Major Stream
Dulani and
Kukulong
Toposequence
(Soil series)
Average
annual
soil
loss(Ton
/
hectare/year)
Entisols, Inceptisols, Alfisols and

Ultisols.
54.35
Table 2.10: Watershed characteristics

Shape index of
the watershed
Length of main
stream
Drainage density
Average slope
Watershed relief
Perimeter of the
watershed
Elliptical
34.607 km
2.75
2.5 %
70 m
48549.801
20
CHAPTER 3
BASE LINE INFORMATION OF WATERSHED
Socio-economic profile
Daisumjhora project covers 26 villages in Borobazar Dev. block. The project has the total population of 12005 with 6074 males and 5931
females. The sex ratio is 969 females for every 1000 males. The literacy rate is about 47 per cent with male literacy 55 per cent and 38
per cent female literacy. The major castes in the village are Boro, Bengali, and others. Most of the population is involved in the
agriculture, labor work and animal husbandry.
Table 3.1: Demographic features
Name of
village
Population
T
Kumarsal
i Pathar
Kumarsal
i
Choto
Ladangur
i No.2
Choto
Ladangur
i No.1
Boro
Ladangur
i No.2
Boro
Ladangur
i No.1
Dimajhor
SC
F
ST
Others
Literacy
Total work
force
Illiteracy
373
193 180
357
184
173
12
122
67
55
251
126 125
208
109
99
439
229 210
291
152
139
148
77
71
135
69
66
304
160 144
130
125
371
202 169
146
77
69
225
125
100
208
132
76
163
70
93
179
101
78
549
271 278
110
53
57
439
218
221
337
186
151
212
85
127
276
138
138
67
30
37
67
30
37
45
21
24
22
13
25
17
432
220 212
425
217
208
238
137
101
194
83
111
116
79
37
927
439 488
528
242
286
399
197
202
424
244
180
503
195 308
347
222
125
21
a
Dagarpar
a No.1
Dagarpar
a No.2
Uttarpar
a No.1
Uttarpar
a No.2
Deotari
646
334 312
637
331
306
392
224
168
254
110 144
355
181
174
360
171 189
360
171
189
209
120
89
151
51
100
151
75
76
331
165 166
331
165
166
173
111
62
158
54
104
191
98
93
287
141 146
287
141
146
194
102
92
93
39
54
101
63
38
1082 569 513
38
9
20
1
18
8
693
368
325
320
211
109
762
358 404
280
270
10
39
21
18
636
604
630
385
245
649
272 377
581
323
258
124
0
581
284
297
237
140
97
344
144 200
321
153
168
119
60
59
79
49
30
40
11
29
46
27
19
441
211
230
230
140
90
211
71
140
337
156
181
217
111
106
81
56
25
136
55
81
107
52
55
472
241
231
270
158
112
204
84
120
246
119
127
349
193
156
154
100
54
195
93
102
210
108
102
628
310
318
314
192
122
314
118 196
291
148
143
14
279
143
136
148
85
63
145
64
81
88
80
474
236
238
186
124
62
288
112 176
171
106
65
281
141
140
123
57
66
219
127
92
185
71
114
102
98
11
61
51
770
398
372
279
182
97
603
277 326
243
226
17
Subaijhar
Saraikhu
sra
Betnapar
1279 657 622
a
Golapara 581 284 297
Malipara
119 60
59
2
Silbari
441 211 230
Monakos
217 111 106
ha
Katribari 474 242 232
Bashbari
349 193 156
Ambari-1
Bashbari
628 310 318
Ambari-2
Chorapat
293 149 144
No.1
Gelasuga
474 236 238
on
Bholatal404 198 206
1
Majrabar 882 459 423
22
i No.1
Total
1200 607 593 56 29 26 862 432

5
4
1
0
3
7
0
9
Source: Census 2001*Total - T, Male- M, Female- F
429
1
282
5
145
2
137
3
562
4
336
2
226
2
638
1
271 366
2
9
510
2
307
4
202
8
Fig: 3.1: SC and ST population percentage in project area
23
oject
1
Sr .No.
2
Feature
3
Male
4
Female
5
Total
Children(0-14 years)
1125
Sex Ratio
1.09
Birth Rate
Death Rate
Fig. 3.2: Gender wise Literacy percentage
24
Livestock:
In the Daisumjhora project, there are 3818 cows, 181 Buffaloes, & 1696 goat. Lack of surface water has reduced the fodder and pasture
availability for their animals. But milk production is sufficient in the area. There is need of dairy cooperative in the project area.
Uttarpara
No.2
Deotari
Subaijhar
Saraikhusr
a
Betnapara
120
2
228
256
2
195
80
0
29
180
50
0
201
0
0
232
0
68
45
2
0
127
10
34
205
0
92
0
0
0
0
74
0
23
0
0
6
14
0
171
0
0
2
0
0
0
50
86
0
0
0
60
2
54
0
7
0
300
51
390
250
0
150
184
26
25
123
0
85
201
56
35
150
32
144
805
59
30
800
40
256
638
79
109
900
80
115
611
34
160
392
203
980
25
0
59
36
24
134
810
62
115
sufficient
sufficient
sufficient
sufficient
sufficient
sufficient
sufficient
sufficient
sufficient
nil
sufficient
sufficient
scarce
sufficient
sufficient
sufficient
sufficient
sufficient
sufficient
sufficient
nil
nil
sufficient
sufficient
sufficient
sufficient
sufficient
sufficient
sufficient
Green (Abundant/
Sufficient/ Scarce)
(No./ quantity)
sufficient
1 Milch Animals
Cows
Buffaloes
Goat, sheep
2 Draft Animals
Ox
He Buffalo
3 Others
Poultry
Piggery
Total Milk production
4
(Ll/day)
Fodder Availability
5
Dry (Abundant/ Sufficient/
Scarce)
Dagarpara
No.2
124
32
14
S.N Feature
Dagarpara
No.1
111
10
149
Ladanguri
No.2
Dimajhora
65
5
10
Ladanguri
No.1
Boro
55
0
135
Ladanguri
No.2
Boro
102
0
15
Choto
Ladanguri
No.1
Choto
108
0
97
Kumarsali
Pathar
Kumarsali
Name of villages
Uttarpara
No.1
Table 3.2: Livestock details
25
abundant
abundant
scarce
scarce
nil
abundant
scarce
abundant
scarce
abundant
scarce
scarce
scarce
abundant
abundant
Fuel wood Availability

6 (Abundant/Sufficient/Scar
ce)
Bashbari
Ambari-2
Chorapat
No.1
Gelasugaon
Bholatal-1
Majrabari
No.1
40
3
2
161
0
95
102
26
20
115
25
31
227
0
105
185
0
85
236
0
108
0
0
0
0
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
34
0
24
0
0
0
0
0
146
0
113
41
298
109
150
23
11
859
203
700
900
900
Bashbari
Ambari-1
204
0
0
Katribari
203
14
35
Silbari
302
0
119
Malipara 2
32
0
30
Golapara
Name of
villages
Monakosha
S.No Feature
1 Milch Animals
Cows
Buffaloes
Goat, sheep
2 Draft Animals
Ox
He Buffalo
3 Others
Poultry
Piggery
26
Table 3.3: Socio- economic status

1
S.
No
Name of
Villages
Type
Total
HHs
No.
of
BPL
HHs
Land Holding (Ha)

Rain fed
1
Kumarsali
2 Pathar
3
4
1
Kumarsali
2
3
4
1 Choto
2 Ladanguri
No.1
3
4
Marginal
Small
Farmers
Big
farmers
Landless
Total
Marginal
Small
Farmers
Big
farmers
Landless
Total
Marginal
Small
Farmers
Big
farmers
Landless
Annual Gross Income (Rs.)

Irrigated
SC
ST
Other
s
SC
ST
Other
s
SC
ST
Others
Total
30
2.66
5.32
0.665
1.33
1.596
50000
80000
10000
140000
26
1.33
7.98
0.665
0.665
2.394
60000
70000
75000
205000
2.66
6.65
3.99
6.65
80000
90000
20000
190000
1
60
1
1
0
13.3
0
39.9
0
2.66
0
11.97
0
21.28
0
0
0
190000
0
240000
0
105000
0
535000
50
2.66
11.97
7.98
11.97
80000
150000
230000
22
4.522
6.384
12.64
500000
200000
700000
5.32
4.788
9.044
1.33
30000
20000
50000
28
1 Choto
2 Ladanguri
No.2
3
4
1 Boro
2 Ladanguri
No.1
3
4
1
2
Dimajhora
3
4
1
2
3
4
Dagarpara- 1
Total
Marginal
Small
Farmers
Big
farmers
78
28
0
6
12.502
2.66
23.142
3.99
0
0
17.024
1.995
25.94
3.99
0
0
610000
50000
370000
80000
0
0
980000
130000
42
3.99
6.65
2.128
4.655
90000
10000
190000
15
5.32
10.64
6.384
11.97
80000
120000
200000
Landless
Total
Marginal
Small
Farmers
Big
farmers
85
68
10
0
11.97
5.03
21.28
5.05
0
0
10.507
2.66
20.615
6.65
0
0
220000
50000
210000
150000
0
0
430000
200000
33
3.45
3.32
9.31
11.43
130000
170000
300000
32
11.9
15.29
9.31
11.57
150000
200000
350000
Landless
Total
140
20.38
23.66
21.28
29.65
330000
520000
Marginal
Small
Farmers
Big
farmers
Landless
103
10.6
17.3
3.99
9.97
500000
300000
850000
800000
45
7.98
11.9
2.66
6.9
400000
200000
600000
8
0
0
0
5.32
0
15.9
0
0
0
2.66
0
10.64
0
200000
200000
Total
156
23.9
45.1
9.31
27.51
900000
700000
135
49
46.5
1.33
26.6
3.325
650000
500000
0
160000
0
115000
0
98
43
50.54
2.66
23.94
0.665
670000
300000
970000
50
25.27
1.33
7.448
3.99
200000
30000
230000
0
Marginal
Small
Farmers
Big
farmers
Landless
29
1
2
3 Dagarpara- 2
4
1 Uttarpara -1
2
3
4
1
2 Uttarpara- 2
3
4
1
2 Deotari
3
4
Total
286
95
122.31
5.32
57.988
7.98
152000
0
830000
Marginal
Small
Farmers
Big
farmers
100
23
3.99
7.98
7.98
3.325
9.31
10.64
200000
250000
250000
235000
0
700000
80
15
3.99
10.64
10.64
4.788
7.315
7.98
200000
250000
200000
650000
15
5.32
7.98
7.98
2.926
10.64
3.724
500000
450000
620000
Landless
Total
200
43
13.3
26.6
26.6
11.039
27.265
900000
950000
Marginal
Small
Farmers
Big
farmers
Landless
Total
Marginal
60
32
22.34
4
0
107000
0
0
55
21
25
2
142
2
55
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
18
2.66
7.98
3.99
6.65
100000
150000
250000
42
12
1.596
16.23
4.665
1.33
100000
200000
300000
1.33
4.788
9.31
6.118
100000
250000
350000
Small
Farmers
Big
farmers
Landless
Total
Marginal
Small
Farmers
Big
farmers
Landless
157000
0
292000
0
700000
0
30
1
2
Subaijhar
3
4
1 Saraikhusra
2
3
4
1
2 Betnapara
3
4
1
2 Golapara
3
4
1 Malipara
2
Total
Marginal
Small
Farmers
Big
farmers
Landless
Total
Marginal
Small
Farmers
Big
farmers
Landless
Total
Marginal
Small
Farmers
Big
farmers
Landless
Total
Marginal
Small
Farmers
Big
farmers
Landless
Total
Marginal
Small
100
30
5.586
28.998
17.965
14.098
205
53
33.25
27.93
16.625
45
15
13.97
5.985
10.906
40
7.98
7.315
5.985
10
10
300
78
55.2
41.23
33.516
300000
600000
900000
300000
320000
620000
200000
150000
350000
7.98
150000
80000
230000
31.12
2
650000
550000
0
120000
0
12.63
5
10.50
7
25
18
31
3
4
1
2 Silbari
3
4
1 Monakosha
Farmers
Big
farmers
Landless
Total
Marginal
Small
Farmers
Big
farmers
Landless
Total
Marginal
Small
Farmers
Big
farmers
Landless
Total
1
2
3
4
Katuribari
Marginal
Small
Farmers
Big
farmers
Landless
Total
7
0
50
105
99
41
5
250
118
19.95
10.64
80
32
27.27
9.31
32
15.3
8.645
232
34
62.52
28.595
109
80
19.95
8.645
115
67
31.92
24.74
25
18.62
12.24
252
150
70.49
45.625
340000
0
101000
0
10.64
9.975
7.315
500000
400000
250000
0
9.975
11.7
5.985
300000
400000
310000
5.054
5.985
4.655
200000
150000
200000
25.669
27.66
17.95
5
100000
0
950000
301000
0
496000
0
340000
0
200000
60000
180000
440000
250000
90000
292000
632000
4.788
180000
320000
120000
620000
0
37.90
5
630000
470000
592000
0
169200
0
31.92
11.43
8
12.63
5
0
55.99
3
13.69
9
19.41
8
550000
Marginal
32
2 Banshbari
Ambari-1
3
4
1
2
Chorapet-1
3
4
1
Total
Marginal
Small
Farmers
Big
farmers
Landless
Total
Gelasugaon
Marginal
Small
Farmers
Big
farmers
Landless
2
3
4
1
2
3
Small
Farmers
Big
farmers
Landless
Bholatal-1
1 Majrabari-1
2
Total
Marginal
Small
Farmers
Big
farmers
Landless
13.57
11.97
300000
100000
150000
550000
5.32
5.187
6.916
175000
150000
125000
450000
2.66
10.64
2.66
250000
40000
600000
890000
0
26.99
9
39.9
21.417
725000
290000
875000
7.98
15000
125000
0
189000
0
140000
10.64
15000
210000
225000
4.256
8.645
40000
90000
130000
70000
425000
0.266
0.532
0
0
0
0
100000
240000
0
0
300000
400000
495000
400000
640000
52
16.63
8.246
40
42
23.94
15.96
24
7.98
3.99
124
94
48.55
28.196
102
42
1.33
106
35
1.33
35
12.63
5
11.70
4
23.94
60
Total
246
80
6.916
27.26
5
54.53
Marginal
Small
8
11
2
1
1.197
5.32
0
0
3.325
5.32
12.23
6
0
31.12
2
33
3
4
Farmers
Big
farmers
Landless
62
4.655
320000
320000
18
Total
99
11
6.517
13.3
0.798
340000
0
102000
0
0
136000
0
Fig. 3.4: Status of Socio-economic
34
Table 3.4: Migration Details

1
S
No.
Name of village
Distance of
Income from
No. of days
Major reason(s)
destination of
Occupation
such
No. of persons migrating per year of
for migrating migration from the during migration occupation
migration
village (km)
(Rs.)
M
F
Total
1 Kumarsali Pathar
Nearby village/city
12000
2 Kumarsali
Nearby village/city
16000
3 Choto Ladanguri No.1
Nearby village/city
7000
5 Boro Ladanguri No.1
6 Boro Ladanguri No.2
7 Dimajhora
36
18
54
22
8 Dagarpara No.1
9 Dagarpara No.2
10 Uttarpara No.1
11 Uttarpara No.2
12 Deotari
180
13 Subaijhar
14 Saraikhusra
15 Betnapara
16 Golapara
12
17 Malipara 2
To get regular
wages etc.
during lean
period of the
year and after
completing of
cultivation
practice and get
subsidiary
income for
upliftment of
the family
member.
Nearby village/city
Nearby village/city
7000
Nearby village/city
4.5km
Nearby village/city
Nearby village/city
Labour
/Servant/Securit
y
65000
7000
7000
Nearby village/city
7000
Nearby village/city
8000
Nearby village/city
Nearby village/city
4000
Nearby village/city
5000
Nearby village/city
7000
17
180
Nearby village/city
12
To get regular
Nearby village/city
Labour
1200
35
18 Silbari
19 Monakosha
20 Katribari
10
21 Bashbari Ambari-1
14
10
22 Bashbari Ambari-2
23 Chorapat No.1
24 Gelasugaon
25 Bholatal-1
26 Majrabari No.1
121
84
205
Total
wages etc.
during lean
period of the
year and after
completing of
cultivation
practice and get
subsidiary
income for
upliftment of
the family
member.
Nearby village/city
Nearby village/city
/Servant/Securit
y
1450
8000
Nearby village/city
5000
Nearby village/city
15000
Nearby village/city
Nearby village/city
1200
Nearby village/city
19000
Nearby village/city
5000
600-700 KM
3000-5000
Source: Baseline Survey 2011
36
Table 3.5: Details of Community Based Organizations existing in the watershed village
3
4
SHG
164
152
Total
164
152
UGs
No. of members
Total
With both
Total no. of CBOs
With only
Men
With only
Women
S.
No.
Type of Group
No. of
Bank linkage
No. of SC
No. of ST in
Others in No. of BPL in
in each
each category
each
each category
category
category
No.
Bank
of
Loan
M
F
T M F T M F T M
F
T
SHGs Amount
(Rs.)
(i) LL
(ii)
MF
169 485 (iii)
SF
(iv)
LF
169 485
(i) LL
(ii)
MF
(iii)
SF
(iv)
LF
Total
VSS
FG/ FC
37
5
6
7
WUA
F-SHG-C
F-SHG-B
PG
PC
Other
related
10
Groups
(Specify)
Source: Baseline Survey 2011, VSS: Van Suraksha Samiti, FG: Farmers Group/ Farmers Club, WUA: Water User Association, F
at Block), PG: Producers Group, PC: Producers Cooperative.
Table 3.6: Infrastructure Facilities
1
S.No
2
Infrastructure type
1 Educational Institutions
Anganwadi
Primary School
Secondary school
3
No./Quantity
4
Distance (km)
0 km
20
3-8 km
10 km
Govt. College
Vocational Institutions
5
Status (description)
All villages having Anganwadi
facility in the village itself.
Most of village having secondary
school in village itself.
None of village have college so
they have to go Borobazar and
Bijni.
38
2 Service Institutions
Bank
Post office
Primary Health Care Center
Veterinary Center
Markets/ Village Haat
1
1
0 km
0 km
10
0 km
3 No. of bore wells/pump sets

(Functional)
4 No. of Milk collection centers (
Union/ Society/ Pvt. Agency/Others)
Total Quantity of surplus milk
5 Road Connectivity (to main road by
an all-weather road) (Yes/No)
6 Bus facility (Yes/No)
Within homestead area
Yes
Yes
No
No
-
8 No. of HHs with access to drinking

water
10 Any other facilities (specify-------------)
Some of village have primary

health center in village rest of
villagers have to go to nearby
village or Borobazar.
Most of the villagers have their

own borewells for drinking water
purpose.
7 No. of HHs provided electricity
9 Access to Agro Industries (Yes/No)
3-5 kmBorobazar
-
Yes
As most of the cows are of local

breed milk production is very less.
All villages have not good road
connectivity
Almost all villages have electricity.

Villages have borewell in their
homestead area as a source of
drinking water.
Most of the villagers have safe
access to rice mills in the area.
-

39
Table 3.7: Land use pattern (in Hectares)
Cultivated area
13*
Net Area sown

more than once
Gross Cropped
Area
Uncultivated
Private land
12
Net Sown Area
11
Cultivated
Irrigated
10
Cultivated
Rainfed
Permanen
t Fallow
Temporary
fallow
Land Under
miscellaneous
use
Permanent
Pastures
Kumarsali
Land under
Agriculture Use
Kumarsali Pathar
Community Land
Village
Forest Area
S. N
Geographical
Area#
71
55
50
55
115
91
13
80
11
91
136
109
15
12
95
14
109
108
84
13
76
84
119
91
14
10
83
91
99
79
12
69
10
79
147
113
17
12
103
10
113
Choto Ladanguri
No.1
Choto Ladanguri
No.2
Boro
Ladamguri -1
Boro
Ladamguri -2
Dimajhora
Dagarpara No.1
189
146
20
17
132
14
146
Dagarpara No.2
131
111
14
92
19
111
10 Uttarpara No.1
101
83
10
71
12
83
11 Uttarpara No.2
79
65
55
10
65
3
4
5
6
40
12 Deotari
330
270
10
30
20
231
39
270
13 Subaijhar
280
224
31
25
196
28
224
14 Saraikhusra
41
32
29
32
15 Betnapara
328
268
10
32
18
230
38
268
16 Golapara
228
193
20
15
160
33
193
17 Malipara 2
83
64
10
58
64
18 Silbari
245
200
20
17
171
29
200
19 Monakosha
150
115
22
105
10
115
20 Katribari
192
159
18
15
134
25
159
184
147
20
17
129
18
147
149
114
23
104
10
114
160
123
18
14
112
11
123
24 Gelasugaon
197
167
19
11
138
29
167
25 Bholatal-1
185
142
20
17
130
12
142
26 Majrabari No.1
73
56
10
51
56
TOTAL
4,120
3301
84
441
294
2884
417
3301
Bashbari Ambari1
Bashbari Ambari22
2
23 Chorapat No.1
21
Source: PPR- Soil Conservation Department, Chirang.
41
Table 3.8: Details of Common Property Resources

1
S.No
2
Name of
village
Kumarsali
Pathar
CPR
Particulars
Choto
Ladanguri
No.2
Wasteland/
degraded land
Pastures
Village Ponds/
Tanks
Others (Pl.
specify)
Total
Wasteland/
degraded land
Pastures
Orchards
Village Forest
Total
Wasteland/
degraded land
Village Ponds/
Tanks
Total
Wasteland/
degraded land
Pastures
Boro
Ladanguri
Total
Wasteland/
degraded land
Kumarsali
Choto
Ladanguri
No.1
Total Area (ha)

Area owned/ In possession of
Govt.
Any other
Pvt.
(specify
PRI
(Pl.
persons
dept.)
Specify)
5
9
Area available for treatment (ha)

Pvt.
persons
3
2.0
0.45
10.0
12.0
1.0
3.6
8.4
4.0
1.2
0.98
0.56
17.0
5.4
15.0
14
10.9
0.89
2.8
3.0
10
Any other
(Pl.
Specify)
0.45
0.89
6.0
PRI
0.85
2.5
8.0
Govt.
(Specify
dept.)
6.5
12.4
3.0
6.7
10.3
42
No.1
Dimajhora
Dagarpara
No.1
Dagarpara
No.2
Uttarpara
No.1
Uttarpara
No.2
Deotari
Pastures
Village Ponds/
Tanks
Total
Wasteland/
degraded land
Pastures
Village Ponds/
Tanks
Total
Wasteland/
degraded land
Pastures
Village Ponds/
Tanks
Others (Pls.
Specify)
Total
Wasteland/
degraded land
Village Ponds/
Tanks
Total
Wasteland/
degraded land
Pastures
Village Ponds/
Tanks
Total
Wasteland/
degraded land
Pastures
Total
Wasteland/
4.0
0.0968
10
19
1.8
0.0968
6.4
5.0
0.065
12.0
25.0
3.2
0.065
8.7
6.0
0.284
16.3
8.0
10.2
12.0
3.7
11.0
8.0
2.1
35.0
7.4
1.8
0.098
1.5
2.0
15.0
9.4
0.065
3.0
0.098
4.0
16.5
2.7
0.284
0.065
4.0
13.4
4.5
2.0
8.4
17.8
43
Subaijhar
Saraikhusra
Betnapara
Golapara
Malipara 2
degraded land
Pastures
Orchards
Village Forest
Forest
Village Ponds/
Tanks
Total
Wasteland/
degraded land
Village Ponds/
Tanks
Temples/
Places of
worship
Others (Pl.
specify)
Total
Wasteland/
degraded land
Pastures
Total
Wasteland/
degraded land
Pastures
Village Ponds/
Tanks
Total
Wasteland/
degraded land
Village Ponds/
Tanks
Total
Wasteland/
10.0
10.0
6.5
0.50
0.50
46.0
4.6
0.86
25.4
0.86
10.3
41.3
2.5
17
5.5
18
1.5
1.0
15.0
35.0
7.4
20.5
6.4
1.3
15.0
0.50
6.0
11
0.67
10.0
1.3
10.0
13
3.1
10.0
0.50
2.5
6.7
44
Silbari
Monakosha
Katribari
Bashbari
Ambari-1
Bashbari
Ambari-2
Chorapat
degraded land
Pastures
Orchards
Village Forest
Forest
Village Ponds/
Tanks
Total
Wasteland/
degraded land
Pastures
Village Ponds/
Tanks
Total
Wasteland/
degraded land
Pastures
Village Ponds/
Tanks
Total
Wasteland/
degraded land
Village Ponds/
Tanks
Total
Wasteland/
degraded land
Total
Wasteland/
degraded land
Pastures
Total
Wasteland/
15.0
3.0
1.8
2.4
1.4
0.80
0.80
22.0
10.2
8.0
0.80
10.0
20.0
5.4
0.65
5.4
5.0
1.5
13.0
20.0
12.4
12.9
3.2
1.0
8.4
0.50
14.6
0.50
10.0
17.0
6.4
10.9
10.0
20.0
6.5
14.5
5.0
10.0
22.0
3.2
7.3
12.0
45
No.1
degraded land
Pastures
Total
Wasteland/
degraded land
Village Ponds/
Tanks
Total
Wasteland/
degraded land
Pastures
Total
Gelasugaon
Majrabari
No.1
5.0
12.0
18.0
3.4
7.0
0.50
5.0
10.0
2.0
12.0
0.50
2.4
6.8
1.0
Table 3.9: Agriculture implements

1
S. No
Implements
Nos.
Tractor
Sprayers-manual/ power
52
Cultivators/Harrows
35
Seed drill
Table 3.10: Crop Classification

1
S. No
Crop classification
Single crop
Double crop
Multiple crop
Area (Ac)
46
Table 3.11: Crops & Cropping pattern
Potato
5.
2
8
0
0
0
3000
3500
4800
4100
3800
3500
5
4
7
3
4.5
3
4
8
2.5
3.5
3
4
3.5
5
4
3
6
10
4400
4500
4600
4200
4300
450
4200
4400
4000
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
9000
3000
2500
3000
3500
4800
4100
3800
3500
6
Total
3.8
12.3
17100
5000
9.0
16.4
32100
10000
3.6
2100
2200
6.6
1850
3640
13
10.2
3950
5840
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
5000
Production
(Ton/yr)
15000
Area (ha)
4.1
Productivity
(Kgs/ha)
5
Irrigated
Productivity
(Kgs/ha)
Production
(Ton/yr)
Area (ha)
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
Productivity
(Kgs/ha)
Production
(Ton/yr)
Area (ha)
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
Productivity
(Kgs/ha)
4
Rain fed
0
0
0
4200
4300
4500
4200
4400
4000
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
Jute
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3.5
4.5
5
3
4
4
3
8
6
2.5
10
Village : Kumarsali
Productivity
(Kgs/ha)
1 Kharif
9000
3000
2500
0
0
0
0
0
0
Production
(Ton/yr)
3
Crop
sown
Area (ha)
1
2
S Season
N
4400
4500
4600
0
0
0
0
0
0
Area (ha)
3 Summer
3.5
3
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
2 Rabi
5
4
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
Productivity
(Kgs/ha)
Jute
Maize
Pulse
Diese
Maize
Mustard
Rice
Jute
Maize
Rain fed
Production
(Ton/yr)
1 Kharif
Production
(Ton/yr)
3
Crop
sown
Area (ha)
1
2
S Season
N
Block: Borobazar
Village : Kumarsali Pathar
5
Irrigated
47
2 Rabi
3 Summer
Maize
Pulsee
Mustard
Oil
Basmuti
Aiyang
Parimal
7
3
4.3
2.6
1600
400
1600
1650
3
1
6.8
4.5
2170
1650
1967
2016
10
4
11.1
7.1
3770
2050
3567
3666
5.1
1370
3017
5.1
1370
3017
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.6
2.51
1.99
2
9
1.5
2400
2900
154
1450
4300
1500
4.6
2.51
1.99
2
9
1.5
2400
2900
154
1450
4300
1500
Total
1000
9000
1500
750
4.2
2.4
5
10
6
7.4
5.1
4.2
51.50
1140
25.70
520
1003.5
6029
925.7
920.15
7.4
4.4
9
18
9.9
9.3
13.3
9.0
261.5
2140
1525.7
920.15
2003.5
15029.6
1520.6
1670.15
2.1
19.50
1900
2.1
19.50
1900
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12.6
3.99
4.2
2.5
12
5
9.11
14.11
76.5
1923.3
1755
182
3006.5
2516.56
6250
2506
12.6
3.99
4.2
2.5
12
5
9.11
14.11
76.5
1923.3
1755
182
3006.5
2516.56
6250
2506
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
Productivity
(Kgs/ha)
210
1000
600
400
Production
(Ton/yr)
3.9
1.9
8.3
4.8
Area (ha)
3.2
2.0
4
8
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
Productivity
(Kgs/ha)
3 Summer
Production
(Ton/yr)
2 Rabi
Area (ha)
Jute
Maize
Potato
Pulse
Mustard
Oil
Ranjit
Paromil
Aiyang
Basumati
6
Total
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
1 Kharif
Village : Choto Ladanguri-1

5
Irrigated
4
Rain fed
Production
(Ton/yr)
Productivity
(Kgs/ha)
3
Crop
sown
Area (ha)
1
2
S Season
N
o
Total
1
2
S Season
3
Crop
4
Rain fed
Village : Choto Ladanguri-2

5
Irrigated
6
Total
48
3 Summer
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7.5
6
8
4
24.5
3.6
4.8
2.9
5200
6820
7200
9200
3500
1600
1700
1200
1550
2900
1550
2900
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.12
2.66
1.89
1.5
5
5
2.9
4
2840
2780
2000
1800
150.8
450
18.29
158
4.12
2.66
1.89
1.5
5
5
2.9
4
2840
2780
2000
1800
150.8
450
18.29
158
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
Productivity
(Kgs/ha)
3500
1600
1700
1200
Production
(Ton/yr)
5200
6820
7200
9200
Area (ha)
24.5
3.6
4.8
2.9
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
Productivity
(Kgs/ha)
7.5
6
8
4
Production
(Ton/yr)
Area (ha)
2 Rabi
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
Jute
Maize
Potato
Pulses
Mustard
Oil
Jwsa
Parimol
Aiyang
Basumati
Productivity
(Kgs/ha)
1 Kharif
Production
(Ton/yr)
sown
Area (ha)
N
o
Total
2 Rabi
4000
7.5
43.9
2215.6
5700
1.6
2.6
3.7
10050
2500
7000
1800
9000
15000
5
4
6
7.6
6.2
5.2
7000
9000
7600
7000
4500
1900
9
8
10.5
9.2
8.8
8.9
17050
11500
14600
8800
13500
16900
1000
23000
9.10
1550
1800
15
13.1
2550
24800
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
Productivity
(Kgs/ha)
1215.6
Production
(Ton/yr)
4.5
Area (ha)
4.5
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
1700
Productivity
(Kgs/ha)
1000
Production
(Ton/yr)
3.4
Area (ha)
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
3.0
5
4
4
4.5
6
Total
Productivity
(Kgs/ha)
Jute
Production
(Ton/yr)
1 Kharif
Maize
Alu
Pulse
Mustard
Oil
Village : Boro Ladanguri-1

5
Irrigated
4
Rain fed
Area (ha)
Crop sown
Season
1
S
N
o
49
3 Summer
Maize
Potato
Pulses
Mustard
Oil
Jwsa
Parimol
Aiyang
Basumati
5.98
14.8
3400
3774
9.70
19.3
7600
6874
3.6
4.8
2.9
6820
7200
9200
1600
1700
1200
6
7
2
15.9
17.8
16.4
7000
8000
1700
2650
2266
5600
12
17
6
19.5
12.6
19.3
13820
15200
10900
4250
3966
6800
4.2
1670
1600
4.2
1670
1600
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6.65
6.11
4.6
2.12
9
7
5
3
4580
2941
2500
2600
1684
1980
3142
1400
6.65
6.11
4.6
2.12
9
7
5
3
4580
2941
2500
2600
1684
1980
3142
1400
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
Productivity
(Kgs/ha)
Productivity
(Kgs/ha)
3100
Production
(Ton/yr)
Production(
Ton/yr)
4200
3.7
2
6
2.5
4
Area (ha)
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
2 Rabi
Jute
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
Productivity
(Kgs/ha)
1 Kharif
Area (ha)
Production
(Ton/yr)
4.5
Area (ha)
N
o
Total
1282
3656
7.17
19.9
2282
3.2
3.1
3.1
0
30.0
11.00
11.00
0
1600
1700
1100
0
6
5
4
4
3.8
3.4
6.2
4.2
31.5
21.5
17.7
1670
3565
2165
1956
1600
12
8
7
4
7.0
6.5
9.3
4.2
61.5
32.5
28.7
1670
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
14.6
Productivity
(Kgs/ha)
5.18
Production
(Ton/yr)
3100
Area (ha)
Productivity
(Kgs/ha)
1000
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
Production
(Ton/yr)
6
3
3
0
5.3
Area (ha)
2 Rabi
Jute
Pulse
Potato
Mustard
1.99
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
Maize
6
Total
Productivity
(Kgs/ha)
1 Kharif
4
Rain fed
Production
(Ton/yr)
3
Crop sown
Area (ha)
1
2
S Season
N
o
Village : Dagarpara-2
5
Irrigated
6756
5165
3865
3056
1600
51
3 Summer
Oil
Ronfit
Asu
Promingal
Aiyang
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.12
5.85
4.52
2.26
9
4
6
8
36.5
14.63
21.44
24.00
3650
2450
3260
1340
4.12
5.85
4.52
2.26
9
4
6
8
36.5
14.63
21.44
24.00
3650
2450
3260
1340
Total
1000
2500
1100
1850
2.66
5
2
4
11.2
7.5
8.2
5.5
2340
2540
2170
18.50
2785
2640
2476
2027
6.76
14
9
8
16.8
12.2
12.4
9.1
3340
4740
3170
1218.5
3785
5140
3576
3877
3.10
14.70
2018
3.10
14.70
2018
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6.65
5.82
3.32
2.87
8
9
6
5
1400
2700
1480
1264
2760
8662
9482
7864
6.65
5.82
3.32
2.87
8
9
6
5
1400
2700
1480
1264
2760
8662
9482
7864
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
Productivity
(Kgs/ha)
1000
2200
1100
1200
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
Productivity
(Kgs/ha)
5.6
4.7
4.2
3.6
Production
(Ton/yr)
4.1
9
7
4
Area (ha)
Production
(Ton/yr)
3 Summer
Area (ha)
2 Rabi
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
Potato
Jute
Maize
Pulse
Mustard
Oil
Ranjit
Aiyang
Basmuti
Parimal
6
Total
Productivity
(Kgs/ha)
1 Kharif
4
Rain fed
Production
(Ton/yr)
3
Crop sown
Area (ha)
1
2
S Season
N
o
Village : Uttarpara-1
5
Irrigated
Total
Village : Uttarpara-2
1
2
S Season
3
Crop sown
4
Rain fed
5
Irrigated
6
Total
52
5.98
14.8
3400
3774
9.70
19.3
7600
6874
3.6
4.8
2.9
6820
7200
9200
1600
1700
1200
6
7
2
15.9
17.8
16.4
7000
8000
1700
2650
2266
5600
12
17
6
19.5
22.6
19.3
13820
15200
10900
4250
3966
6800
4.2
1670
1600
4.2
1670
1600
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6.65
6.11
4.65
2.21
9
7
5
3
4580
2941
2500
2600
1684
1980
3142
1400
6.65
6.11
4.65
2.21
9
7
5
3
4580
2941
2500
2600
1684
1980
3142
1400
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
Production
(Ton/yr)
3 Summer
Maize
Potato
Pulses
Mustard
Oil
Jwsa
Parimol
Aiyang
Basumati
Productivity
(Kgs/ha)
Area (ha)
3100
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
4200
3.7
2
6
10
4
Productivity
(Kgs/ha)
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
2 Rabi
Jute
Production
(Ton/yr)
Productivity
(Kgs/ha)
1 Kharif
Area (ha)
Production
(Ton/yr)
4.5
Area (ha)
N
o
Total
Village : Deotari
3.59
1.72
2.52
3.19
13.5
17.6
10.77
19.9
2100
2400
1900
1200
1900
2500
2300
1700
6.25
3.98
5.44
5.85
18.8
23.3
14.67
25.9
4800
4600
3800
3500
3700
3800
3300
3200
19
5.9
2100
1900
19
5.9
2100
1900
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
1800
1300
1000
1500
Productivit
y (Kgs/ha)
2700
2200
1900
2300
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
5.3
5.7
3.9
6.0
Productivit
y (Kgs/ha)
2.66
2.26
2.92
2.66
Area (ha)
Production
(Ton/yr)
Production
(Ton/yr)
6
Total
Area (ha)
2 Rabi
5
Irrigated
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
Jute
Maize
Potato
Pulse
Mustard
Oil
Productivit
y (Kgs/ha)
1 Kharif
4
Rain fed
Production
(Ton/yr)
3
Crop
sown
Area (ha)
1
2
S Season
N
o
53
3 Summer
Ranjit
Asu
Aiyanng
Jwsa
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
49
38
50
47
39
35
40
49
4391
3410
4240
4550
1832.1
31.7
31.52
40.45
49
38
50
47
39
35
40
49
4391
3410
4240
4550
1832.1
31.7
31.52
40.45
Total
Village : Subaijhar
1800
1600
7000
1400
4.65
4
3
5
14.5
7.5
8.6
5.8
5100
6000
8000
9050
3776
2746
8924
5924
7.98
13
8
13
19.9
10.1
11.8
10.6
7200
7000
11000
17050
5576
4346
15924
7324
9.2
4200
4000
9.2
4200
4000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5.32
5
4.655
2.66
9
10
2
3
3560
2500
2800
3050
2530
2450
9000
1300
5.32
5
4.655
2.66
9
10
2
3
3560
2500
2800
3050
2530
2450
9000
1300
Area (ha)
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
2100
1000
3000
8000
Productivit
y (Kgs/ha)
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
5.4
2.6
3.2
4.8
Production
(Ton/yr)
Productivit
y (Kgs/ha)
3 Summer
Production
(Ton/yr)
2 Rabi
6
Total
3.32
9
5
8
Area (ha)
Jute
Maize
Potato
Pulse
Mustard
Oil
Aysu
Aiyang
Basumati
Ranjit
5
Irrigated
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
1 Kharif
4
Rain fed
Production
(Ton/yr)
Productivit
y (Kgs/ha)
3
Crop
sown
Area (ha)
1
2
S Season
N
Total
Cost of
cultivati
on (Rs.
/ha)
ivity
(Kgs/ha)
Total
Product
ion
(Ton/yr)
Product
Irrigated
(ha)
Rain fed
Product
ivity
(Kgs/ha)
Cost of
cultivati
on (Rs.
/ha)
Area
Crop
sown
Product
ion
(Ton/yr)
Area
(ha)
S Season
N
(ha)
Product
ion
(Ton/yr)
Product
ivity
(Kgs/ha)
Cost of
cultivati
on (Rs.
/ha)
Area
Village : Saraikhusra
5
54
1 Kharif
2 Rabi
Jute
Maize
Potato
Pulse
Mustard
Oil
3.724
2.394
1.596
3.059
6.5
4.3
3.5
5.3
2900
2100
18000
2600
1900
1200
800
1400
3.99
7
5
9
16.5
12.5
15.5
20.5
4100
4200
3000
2900
4275
3862
5310
6670
7.714
9.394
6.596
12.059
23
16.8
19
25.8
7000
6300
21000
5500
6175
5062
6110
8070
9.5
3000
8990
9.5
3000
8990
Total
Village :Betnapara
1500
2200
1700
1200
1400
2100
1700
1650
3.192
6
4
2
12.4
7.5
6.7
5.50
1850
2850
2270
1750
1399
2650
2567
1926
7.18
15
11
6
18
12.2
10.9
9.1
3350
5050
3970
2950
2799
4750
4267
3576
3.10
1470
2017
3.10
1470
2017
5.32
3450
2675
5.32
3450
2675
5.45
2750
2150
5.45
2750
2150
Parimal
1.99
2150
1350
1.99
2150
1350
cultivat
ion (Rs.
/ha)
5.6
4.7
4.2
3.6
Produc
tion
(Ton/y
Produc
r)
tivity
(Kgs/h
a) of
Cost
6
Total
tivity
(Kgs/h
Cost
a) of
cultivat
ion (Rs.
/ha)
Area
(ha)
3.99
9
7
4
Produc
tion
(Ton/y
r)
Produc
Potato
Jute
Maize
Pulse
Mustard
Oil
Ranjit
Aiyang
3 Summer
5
Irrigated
(ha)
1 Kharif
2 Rabi
4
Rain fed
Produc
tion
(Ton/y
Produc
r)
tivity
(Kgs/h
Cost of
a)
cultivat
ion (Rs.
/ha)
Area
3
Crop
sown
Area
(ha)
1
2
S Season
N
o
Total
S
Season
Crop
Rain fed
Village: Golapara
Irrigated
Total
55
S Season
N
o
Crop
sown
1 Kharif
Jute
Maize
Potato
Pulse
Mustard
Oil
Alo
Basmuti
Aiyang
2 Rabi
3 Summer
2.6
3.5
4.1
3.6
5.2
4.6
6.2
3.7
6856
8605
7206
7507
4706
8407
624
8505
6.6
7.5
10.1
6.6
10.2
10.6
10.2
7.7
12356
13605
12706
14007
10306
12407
1124
14505
9.5
3000
8990
9.5
3000
8990
6.65
4740
1684
6.65
4740
1684
Rain fed
Area (ha)
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
5600
4000
500
6000
Village : Malipara 2
Irrigated
Productivity
(Kgs/ha)
5500
5000
5500
6500
Production
(Ton/yr)
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
5
6
4
4
Area (ha)
Productivity
(Kgs/ha)
3 Summer
Total
Production
(Ton/yr)
2 Rabi
4
4
6
3
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
Parimal
Ranjit
Aiyang
Basumati
Mustard
Oil
Jwsa
Productivity
(Kgs/ha)
1 Kharif
Production
(Ton/yr)
sown
Area (ha)
N
o
Total
3.72
2.39
1.59
3.05
6.5
4.3
3.5
5.3
2900
2100
1800
2600
1900
1200
8000
1400
4.3
7
5
9
16.5
12.5
15.5
20.5
4100
4200
3000
2900
4275
3862
5310
6670
8.09
9.36
6.59
12.05
23
16.8
19
25.8
7000
6300
4800
5500
6175
5062
13310
8070
9.5
3000
8990
9.5
3000
8990
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
3
5.3
12
10
18
13.2
5850
14007
4312
3112
6200
6
3
5.3
12
10
18
13.2
5850
14007
4312
3112
6200
Total
Village : Monakosha
56
S Season
N
Crop
sown
1 Kharif
Jute
Maize
Alu
Pulse
Mustard
Oil
Jwsa
Ranjit
Basmuti
Parimal
2 Rabi
3 Summer
S Season
N
o
Crop
sown
1 Kharif
Jute
Maize
Potato
Pulse
Mustard
Oil
2 Rabi
Rain fed
Irrigated
Total
3.2
10
4
7
3.4
1.6
2.6
3.7
1100
10050
2500
7000
1700
1800
9000
15000
5.2
5
4
6
40.50
7.6
6.2
5.2
1115.6
7000
9000
7600
4000
7000
4500
1900
7.4
15
8
13
43.9
9.2
8.8
8.9
2215.6
17050
11500
14600
5700
8800
13500
16900
9.10
1000
8500
9.10
1000
8500
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5.0
7
3.6
1.9
5
3
1.6
4
1400
2700
1480
1264
4320
9876
11308
9788
5.0
7
3.6
1.9
5
3
1.6
4
1400
2700
1480
1264
4320
9876
11308
9788
Village: Katribari
Irrigated
Rain fed
Total
4.2
8
2.5
6
4.6
2.8
1.9
3.7
840
720
600
900
4000
18000
16000
15000
6.5
8
4.2
5
16.2
18.3
19.4
17.8
860
900
600
760
14561
28561
23681
15000
10.7
16
6.7
11
20.8
21.1
21.3
21.5
1700
1620
1200
1660
18561
46561
39681
30000
28.9
1608
4600
28.9
1608
4600
57
3 Summer
Parimol
Aiyang
Jwsa
S Season
N
o
Crop
sown
Kharif
Rabi
Summer
Jute
Potato
Maize
Pulse
Mustard
Oil
Ranjit
Aiyang
Parimole
Basmuti
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Rain fed
6.2
8
1810.9
4.0
5
2118.8
7
3
3520.7
Village : Gelasugaon
Irrigated
8380
9226
4020
6.2
4.0
7
8
5
3
1810.9
2118.8
3520.7
8380
9226
4020
Total
4.5
8
6
2
3.1
2.6
3.2
2.4
120
2000
750
650
1200
2000
1650
1900
2.9
6
9
3
12.2
6.2
5.5
4.2
3500
2022
1200
876
2825
3425
1950
2000
6.4
14
15
5.0
15.3
8.8
8.7
6.6
3620
4022
1950
1526
4025
5425
3600
3900
6.15
2500
5000
6.15
2500
5000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.0
6.0
3.1
4.1
2
9
2
2
3450
2100
2500
1900
3575
21000
9501
15000
3.0
6.0
3.1
4.1
2
9
2
2
3450
2100
2500
1900
3575
21000
9501
15000
Total
S Season
N
o
Crop
sown
1 Kharif
Jute
Maize
Potato
Village: Silbari
Irrigated
Rain fed
5.58
7
2
4.5
3.7
4.2
2100
2000
1800
2100
1800
1600
4.78
5
3.5
13.5
6.5
8.7
3150
2450
2170
Total
2665
2550
2156
10.3
12
5.5
18
10.2
12.9
5250
4450
3970
4765
4350
3756
58
2 Rabi
3 Summer
Pulse
Mustard
Oil
Ranjit
Basmuti
Aiyang
Parimol
3.6
12.00
1100
5.60
16.50
1931
10
9.2
28.5
3031
1450
2800
4.1
1470
2500
11
6.1
2920
5300
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5.586
5.985
4.788
2.128
7
3
5
2
36.50
28.41
2100
2400
2578
2450
3100
1450
5.586
5.985
4.788
2.128
7
3
5
2
36.50
28.41
2100
2400
2578
2450
3100
1450
Total
Kharif
1900
Rabi
Summer
Maize
Jute
Mustard
Oil
Ranjit
Basmuti
Parimola
2.4
2.1
1500
1600
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
3000
Productivit
y (Kgs/ha)
3.3
Production
(Ton/yr)
2500
6
Total
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
Area (ha)
2900
Productivit
y (Kgs/ha)
4.6
Production
(Ton/yr)
3.8
2.26
1
1.4
2.6
Area (ha)
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
Potato
Pulse
Productivit
y (Kgs/ha)
4
Rain fed
Production
(Ton/yr)
3
Crop
sown
Area (ha)
1
2
S
Season
No
Village : Bashbari Ambari-1

5
Irrigated
2.1
3450
5000
6.51
6.7
6350
7500
1.5
2950
2500
4.256
4.8
5950
4400
1500
2400
2.66
1.99
5
1.19
1.99
1.5
2.9
1960
2000
3000
4300
2.66
4.655
3.9
5
3460
3600
4500
6700
2.5
3.5
2100
5000
2.5
3.5
2100
5000
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.79
2.57
1.72
8
4
6
2950
1500
2100
9000
6500
7900
2.79
2.57
1.72
8
4
6
2950
1500
2100
9000
6500
7900
Total
Village : Majrabari No.1
59
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
Area (ha)
Production
(Ton/yr)
Production
(Ton/yr)
Productivit
y (Kgs/ha)
6
Total
Kharif
4.8
3.4
2.1
3.6
5.4
6.1
3.4
5.4
1450
897
1384
1460
8500
7800
7045
6400
5.2
4.8
2.9
3.8
6.1
5.4
4.2
6.1
1530
1240
1460
1780
9400
8200
6700
7000
10.0
8.2
5
7.4
11.5
11.5
7.6
11.5
2980
2137
2844
3240
17900
16000
13745
13400
Rabi
8.4
12.4
2350
5800
8.4
12.4
2350
5800
Summer
Potato
Pulse
Maize
Jute
Mustard
Oil
Ranjit
Basmuti
7.8
3800
8700
3.2
7.8
3800
8700
6.4
1500
6500
2.575
6.4
1500
6500
Parimola
3.2
2.57
5
4.6
7.4
2100
7900
4.6
7.4
2100
7900
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
Productivit
y (Kgs/ha)
5
Irrigated
Cost of
cultivation
(Rs. /ha)
Area (ha)
Production
(Ton/yr)
4
Rain fed
Productivit
y (Kgs/ha)
3
Crop
sown
Area (ha)
1
2
S. Season
No
Total
60
Table 3.12: Land capability Classification
Flat
4120
Sandy
6
Erosion
(mention area in ha)
Strong
slope (615)
Steep
(>15)
Moderate
slope (2-6)
Nearly
Level (0-2)
Soil
Texture*
5
Based on Slope (%) (mention area
in ha)
Very. Deep
(>90)
4
Based on Depth (cms)(mention area in ha)
Moderate
deep
(22.545.00)
Deep
(45.0-90.0)
3
Total
Area
(ha)
Shallow
(7.5-22.5)
2
Land
type
V. Shallow
(0.75)
1
S.No
Water
Land
class
Wind
Sheet
Rill
Gully
1854.00
865.20
1400.80
Loamy
Table 3.13: Irrigation facilities

S. No.
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
Name of Village
Kumarsali Pathar
Kumarsali
Type of the Source

Ponds
Open wells
Bore wells
Canal irrigation
Natural spring head
Nos.
2
12
23
0
0
Command area (in ha)

-
Ponds
Open wells
Bore wells
Canal irrigation
Natural spring head
4
18
15
0
0
Ponds
Open wells
Bore wells
0
10
15
61
4
5
Canal irrigation
Natural spring head
1
0
1
2
3
4
5
Ponds
Open wells
Bore wells
Canal irrigation
Natural spring head
2
8
12
1
0
Ponds
Open wells
Bore wells
Canal irrigation
Natural spring head
5
10
12
0
0
Ponds
Open wells
Bore wells
Canal irrigation
Natural spring head
2
19
35
0
0
Ponds
Open wells
Bore wells
Canal irrigation
Natural spring head
31
11
0
1
Ponds
Open wells
Bore wells
Canal irrigation
Natural spring head
3
5
7
4
9
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Boro Ladanguri No.1
Boro Ladanguri No.2
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Dimajhora
Dagarpara No.1
62
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
Dagarpara No.2
Uttarpara No.1
Ponds
Open wells
Bore wells
Canal irrigation
Natural spring head
5
8
15
0
0
Ponds
Open wells
Bore wells
3
12
8
63
Natural spring head
1
2
3
4
5
Betnapara
Ponds
Open wells
Bore wells
Canal irrigation
Natural spring head
0
25
35
1
0
Golapara
Ponds
Open wells
Bore wells
Canal irrigation
Natural spring head
0
18
27
1
0
Malipara
Ponds
Open wells
Bore wells
Canal irrigation
Natural spring head
5
12
22
1
0
Silbari
Ponds
Open wells
Bore wells
Canal irrigation
Natural spring head
1
9
13
0
0
1
2
3
4
5
Monakosha
Ponds
Open wells
Bore wells
Canal irrigation
Natural spring head
4
7
4
0
0
Katribari
Ponds
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
64
2
3
4
5
Open wells
Bore wells
Canal irrigation
Natural spring head
14
8
0
0
1
2
3
4
5
Bashbari Ambari-1
Ponds
Open wells
Bore wells
Canal irrigation
Natural spring head
3
11
4
0
0
Bashbari Ambari-2
Ponds
Open wells
Bore wells
Canal irrigation
Natural spring head
0
12
35
0
0
Chorapat No.1
Ponds
Open wells
Bore wells
Canal irrigation
Natural spring head
5
7
9
0
0
Ponds
Open wells
Bore wells
Canal irrigation
Natural spring head
3
7
12
1
0
Ponds
Open wells
Bore wells
Canal irrigation
2
4
6
8
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
Gelasugaon
Bholatal-1
65
Natural spring head
1
2
3
4
5
Ponds
Open wells
Bore wells
Canal irrigation
Natural spring head
5
6
9
1
0
Majrabari No.1
Fig: 3.5: Irrigation facilities at project area
66
Table 3.14: Status of water table

1
S.No
2
Source (open well)**
1 Malipara (Open well)

2 Malipara (Open well)
(Open well)
(open well)
5 Subaijarh (Open well)
6 Subaijarh (open well)
7 Golapara (Open well)
8 Golapara (open well)
9 Saraikhusra (Open well)
10 Saraikhusra (open well)
11 Dimajhara (Ring Well)
3
Plot No
of the
source
-
S. Brahma
B. Bassumtary
Sambar Bty
Lalmohan Bty
P. Basumatry
B. Bono

5
16

26
37
16 Katuribari (Open well)

17 Katuribari (open well)
4
Name of the
Owner*
B. Basumotary
T. Basumotary
Biren
Basumotary
Bipin Basumotary
Padrasoor
Basumotary
Narayan Daher
Gangaprasad
Chetri
Kada Masahany
Andash
Masahany
5
Date of
recording
7
Source located at
(ridge/middle/valley)
2011
2011
6
Depth of water
table from
ground level (in
mts)
6.0
3.5
2011
5.0
Valley
2011
7.0
ridge
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
6.0
7.0
9.0
2.5
7.0
9.0
Valley
ridge
2011
9.5
middle
2011
10.0
2011
8.0
2011
7.0
2011
8.0
2011
7.0
2011
8.0
8
Remarks
Valley
ridge
Valley
ridge
67
18 Dagarapara 2 (Open well)
19 Dagarapara 2 (Open well)

20 Dagarapara 1(Open well)
21 Dagarapara 1 (Open
well)
22 Uttarapar 2 (Open well)
23 Uttarapara 2 (Open well)
24 Betnapara (Open well)
25 Betnapara (Open well)

26 Monakosha (Open well)
27
Bimal
Basumatary
Niabanam Bono
Doren Brahma
Bimot Brahma
Monakosha (Open well)
Kinon Brahma
Upen Musahorny
Bimal
Basumatary
Niabanam Bono
Ranjit
Basumatary
Jara Basumatory
2011
7.0
Valley
2011
2011
7.5
5.5
ridge
Valley
2011
6.0
ridge
2011
2011
8.0
7.5
Valley
ridge
2011
7.5
Valley
2011
8.0
ridge
2011
2.5
Valley
2011
8.5
ridge
Dagarpara
No.2
Uttarpara
No.1
Uttarpara
No.2
Deotari
Subaijhar
Dagarpara
No.1
3000
2500
1850
3500
30000 2251
2051
2043
2083
3541
3050
Ltrs/
2200 2680
day
796
1500
1350
3100
2500
0
681
876
8242
1806
3313
2826
Nos
21
17
18
15
12
17
54
17
15
19
13
43
16
Nos
17
15
10
12
14
26
11
10
18
14
40
10
Kumarsali
Pathar
Choto
Ladanguri
No.1
Choto
Ladanguri
No.2
Boro
Ladanguri
No.1
Boro
Drinking water
requirement
Present
2 availability of
drinking water
No. of drinking
3 water sources
available
a) Functional
1
3040
Units
S.
No
.
Total
Kumarsali
Item
Ladanguri
No.2
Dimajhora
Table 3.15: Assessment of drinking water facility
Ltrs/
2800
day
68
b) Need Repairing
Nos
18
18
c) Defunct
Nos
Ltrs
/da
y
12
19
600
360
2204
1000
500
400
5000
1570
1175
801
277
228
224
Nos
.
Nos.
18
16
12
15
16
18
20
20
19
4 Short fall if any

No. of families
getting drinking
5 water from out
side the Micro
watershed area
Requirement of
new drinking
6
water sources (if
any)
Silbari
Katribari
Bashbari
Ambari-1
Bashbari
Ambari-2
Chorapat
No.1
Gelasugao
n
Bholatal-1
Majrabari
No.1
2051
2038
4053
3500 3070
2264
2010
2300
2800
3020
2053
2000
Ltrs/
day
631
876
1809
3201
2800
2782
2040
1100
1700
2000
2620
788
801
Nos
17
15
22
30
24
18
21
43
25
35
16
16
16
Nos
15
10
18
20
18
12
15
19
19
29
16
10
12
b) Need Repairing
Nos
12
c) Defunct
Nos
Ltrs
/da
20
1485
0
1175
0
229
5
852
2
700
0
288
1
224
12
910
3
600
2
800
0
400
0
1265
0
1199
4 Short fall if any
Monakosh
a
Malipara 2
Ltrs/
2116
day
Saraikhusr
a
Drinking water
requirement
Present
2 availability of
drinking water
No. of drinking
3 water sources
available
a) Functional
Units
Golapara
Item
Betnapara
S.
No
.
Total
69
y
No. of families
getting drinking
Nos
5 water from out
0
.
side the Micro
watershed area
Requirement of
new drinking
6
Nos. 16
water sources (if
any)
16
15
20
19
24
12
10
12
19
17
15
70
Table 3.16: Surface water resources

1
2
S. No. Type of water resource
1
Tank
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
Pond
Lake
Check dam
Percolation tank
Channel/Canal
Any others (specify----------)
Tank
2
3
4
5
6
Pond
Lake
Check dam
Percolation tank
Channel/Canal
Any others (specify-------------)
7
1
Tank
2
3
4
5
6
Pond
Lake
Check dam
Percolation tank
Channel/Canal
Any others (specify-------------)
Tank
7
1
Name of village
Kumarsali Pathar
Kumarsali
Choto Ladanguri
No.1
3
Nos.
0
2
4
Area irrigated (Ha)
0
0
5
Storage capacity (Cu.m)
0
0
1
3
0
0
0
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
3
0
0
4
Choto Ladanguri
71
No.2
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
Pond
Lake
Check dam
Percolation tank
Channel/Canal
Any others (specify-----------)
Tank
Pond
Lake
Check dam
Percolation tank
Channel/Canal
Tank
Pond
Lake
Check dam
Percolation tank
Channel/Canal
Any others (specify--------)
Tank
Pond
Lake
Check dam
Percolation tank
Channel/Canal
Any others (specify---------)
Tank
5
1
0
0
1
0
Boro Ladanguri No.1
Boro Ladanguri No.2
Dimajhora
-
Dagarpara No.1
5
2
0
0
1
0
0
5
0
1
0
0
5
0
8
0
3
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
72
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
Pond
Lake
Check dam
Percolation tank
Channel/Canal
Tank
Pond
Lake
Check dam
Percolation tank
Channel/Canal
Tank
Pond
Lake
Check dam
Percolation tank
Channel/Canal
Tank
Pond
Lake
Check dam
Percolation tank
Channel/Canal
Tank
Pond
Dagarpara No.2
Uttarpara No.1
Uttarpara No.2
Deotari
3
0
0
0
1
12
0
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
1
5
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
73
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
Lake
Check dam
Percolation tank
Channel/Canal
Tank
Pond
Lake
Check dam
Percolation tank
Channel/Canal
Tank
Pond
Lake
Check dam
Percolation tank
Channel/Canal
Any others (specify------------)
Tank
Pond
Lake
Check dam
Percolation tank
Channel/Canal
Tank
Pond
Lake
Subaijhar
Saraikhusra
Betnapara
Golapara
0
3
0
0
0
1
5
0
0
0
0
12
0
8
0
2
0
0
10
0
8
2
0
0
1
0
0
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
74
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
4
Check dam
Percolation tank
Channel/Canal
Tank
Pond
Lake
Check dam
Percolation tank
Channel/Canal
Any others (specify------------)
Tank
Pond
Lake
Check dam
Percolation tank
Channel/Canal
Tank
Pond
Lake
Check dam
Percolation tank
Channel/Canal
Tank
Pond
Lake
Check dam
Malipara 2
Silbari
Monakosha
Katribari
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
1
0
0
5
2
10
0
0
0
1
0
3
8
0
2
0
1
0
2
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
75
5
6
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Percolation tank
Channel/Canal
Any others (specify-------Tank
Pond
Lake
Check dam
Percolation tank
Channel/Canal
Any others (specify-------)
Tank
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
4
5
Pond
Lake
Check dam
Percolation tank
Channel/Canal
Any others (specify------)
Tank
Pond
Lake
Check dam
Percolation tank
Channel/Canal
Tank
Pond
Lake
Check dam
Percolation tank
Bashbari Ambari-1
Bashbari Ambari-2
Chorapat No.1
Gelasugaon
0
0
12
0
12
2
0
0
1
8
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
2
0
0
0
0
12
2
3
0
0
0
0
4
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
76
Table 3.17: Ground Water Structures to be repaired

S.
No.
Name of Village
Type of structure
Kumarsali Pathar
No. available
No. with no interventions
required
No. to be
Repaired
No. to be
rejuvenated
Open Well
Tube Well
11
Canal
1
12
0
5
0
3
Total
Total
77
Open Well
Tube Well
Canal
Total
Open Well
Tube Well
Canal
Total
Boro Ladanguri No.1
Open Well
Tube Well
Canal
Total
Boro Ladanguri No.2
Open Well
Tube Well
Canal
Total
Dimajhora
Open Well
Tube Well
Total
Dagarpara No.1
Open Well
Tube Well
Canal
Total
Dagarpara No.2
Open Well
Tube Well
Canal
Total
Uttarpara No.1
Open Well
Tube Well
Canal
Total
Uttarpara No.2
Open Well
2
4
1
7
5
3
1
9
7
4
0
11
4
2
2
4
3
9
4
2
1
7
2
1
0
3
2
1
4
2
5
11
2
0
0
2
2
0
0
2
1
0
8
10
9
27
11
5
2
18
11
5
0
16
7
3
6
2
2
4
4
3
4
11
3
3
1
7
4
2
1
7
3
3
1
3
4
5
3
4
12
6
4
3
13
2
4
6
12
2
1
0
0
0
3
1
4
8
2
2
2
6
4
6
5
15
4
10
3
5
8
8
5
6
19
11
9
6
26
10
12
12
34
9
78
Tube Well
Canal
Total
Deotari
Open Well
Tube Well
Canal
Total
Subaijhar
Open Well
Tube Well
Canal
Total
Saraikhusra
Open Well
Tube Well
Canal
Total
Betnapara
Open Well
Tube Well
Canal
Total
Golapara
Open Well
Tube Well
Canal
Total
Malipara2
Open Well
2
1
6
9
3
5
17
3
2
4
9
3
4
2
9
2
3
1
6
5
3
4
12
7
4
5
11
6
9
7
22
3
3
1
7
5
6
1
12
3
2
3
8
8
2
4
14
3
2
3
9
3
5
8
16
4
2
1
7
3
2
6
11
2
2
1
5
6
2
8
16
5
8
9
26
18
17
20
55
10
7
6
23
11
12
9
32
7
7
5
19
19
7
16
42
15
79
Tube Well
Canal
Total
Katribari
Open Well
Tube Well
Canal
Total
Bashbari Ambari1
Open Well
Tube Well
Canal
Total
Bashbari Ambari1
Open Well
Tube Well
Canal
Total
Charapet1
Open Well
5
6
15
8
4
3
15
6
4
8
18
3
7
1
11
3
4
1
5
9
4
3
16
3
5
6
14
2
1
0
3
1
4
2
11
7
6
21
34
6
2
5
13
12
5
0
17
0
13
9
31
24
14
27
65
15
11
19
45
17
13
1
31
4
80
Table 3.18: Details of existing livelihoods

1
S.
N.
Paddy Cultivation
Goatery
Sericulture
SC
35
0
42
3
No. of beneficiaries
ST
Others
Total
25
0
60
0
0
0
15
10
67
Paddy Crops
Dal
20
25
40
30
0
0
Mustard Oil
15
21
Choto Ladanguri
No.1
Paddy Crops
Dal
Mustard Oil
0
0
0
Choto Ladanguri
No.2
Paddy Crops
Fishery
Poultry
Boro Ladanguri
No.1
Name of village
4
Women
12
0
18
Pre-project average
income per HH (Rs.)
14000
0
12000
60
55
16
8
17000
8000
36
12000
80
50
40
0
0
0
80
50
40
15
10
7
23000
20000
15000
22
25
15
35
30
21
0
0
0
60
55
36
16
8
5
18000
12000
12000
Poultry
Cultivation
Handloom
15
42
10
40
18
12
12
10
0
67
70
22
10
15
17
14000
22000
15000
Boro Ladanguri
No.2
Cultivation
Business
Poulatry
15
10
12
48
5
6
12
15
12
75
4
5
18
19
35
24000
14000
11000
Dimajhora
Cultivation
Gottery
21
25
32
30
0
0
53
55
16
8
18000
15500
Kumarsali Pathar
Kumarsali
Name of activity
81
Dagarpara No.1
Dagarpara No.2
Uttarpara No.1
Uttarpara No.2
Deotari
Subaijhar
Saraikhusra
Betnapara
Business
15
21
36
12000
Cultivation
Gottery
Fishery
32
22
18
25
12
12
10
5
10
67
39
40
15
8
12
20000
12000
24000
Cultivation
Fishery
Bamboo Plantation
24
28
14
26
12
15
12
15
8
62
55
5
14
15
42
25000
16000
18000
Cultivation
Fishery
Bamboo Plantation
32
10
12
15
5
10
10
0
5
57
15
27
10
5
3
35000
21000
17000
Gottery
Bamboo Plantation
Agriculture
10
13
28
12
15
22
8
12
11
30
40
61
4
6
8
12000
18000
24000
Cultivation
Bamboo Plantation
Handloom
32
18
10
14
12
15
8
6
0
54
36
25
14
12
14
35000
15500
17500
Paddy Crops
Dal
Mustard Oil
0
0
0
66
53
40
0
0
0
66
53
40
12
3
5
23000
18300
19320
Paddy Cultivation
Vegetables
Carpentry
34
19
10
12
11
2
18
12
0
64
42
12
16
14
0
28500
16800
12500
Cultivation
Poultry
18
0
14
0
5
0
37
0
4
0
17500
0
82
Carpentry
Golapara
Cultivation
Bamboo Plantation
Business
25
12
2
15
17
0
5
2
4
45
31
6
11
10
1
26500
22500
12500
Malipara 2
Cultivation
Bamboo Plantation
28
12
11
17
10
0
49
29
12
8
37500
23500
Cultivation
Supari Processing
Unit
32
15
10
57
27500
Silbari
10
14
24
Cultivation
Dairy
Supari Processing
Unit
18
5
25
8
42
0
85
13
15
2
12
14
26
Cultivation
Bamboo Plantation
Fishery
Carpentry
18
5
9
2
10
8
5
0
0
2
0
7
28
15
14
9
8
4
2
0
17500
22000
12500
11000
Cultivation
Bashbari Ambari-1 Bamboo Plantation
Fishery
27
12
10
0
15
5
13
0
0
40
27
15
8
5
3
32500
24500
18500
Cultivation
Bashbari Ambari-2 Bamboo Plantation
Fishery
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Chorapat No.1
38
12
10
60
15
26500
Monakosha
Katribari
Cultivation
20500
28500
14500
17500
83
Poultry
Carpentry
10
12
13500
Gelasugaon
Paddy Crops
Bamboo Plantation
Mustard Oil
0
0
0
50
35
80
0
0
0
50
35
80
20
15
40
18000
11000
13000
Bholatal-1
Cultivation
Fishery
Business
35
15
5
17
10
0
20
12
4
72
37
9
14
8
2
24500
15700
12000
Majrabari No.1
Cultivation
Piggery
Carpentry
34
19
10
12
11
2
18
12
0
64
42
12
16
14
0
28500
16800
12500
Fig. 3.6: Proportion of existing livelihoods

84
Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: Project area Vs District Vs State Vs country Vs
world
The purpose of this section is to provide comparative analysis of watershed area with reference to world, India, Assam and Chirang
District. The term productivity means the total output per unit of factor input. For example land productivity means output per hectare
of land. Productivity is an average and is calculated by dividing the total output of a particular crop by the total cultivated area under
that crop.
Data made available by baseline survey (for all villages), comprehensive district agricultural plan of district Handbook (C- DAP), website
of Govt. of Assam, Directorate of Economics and Statistics (http://ecostatassam.nic.in/) and website of Food Agriculture Organization of
United Nations (http://faostat.fao.org/). The results show that productivity is important not only because we observe a strong
relationship with profits but that watershed area that should be taken to improve the production. These results indicate that the
farmers do rainfed farming. They sow crops like rice, jute, lentil in kharif which is depending on rainfall. While in winter season crops
like Rapeseed, Blackgram, Green gram vegetables like potato, chilly, brinjal etc. Taken by farmers based on tubewell irrigation.
The world productivity for Rice is 4003.8 kg/ha. In India, it is grown in about 9.2 million ha with a production of 280.56 lakh tonnes and
productivity 3049.6 kg/ha. At national level assam contributes over 5 per cent of rice area and 4 per cent of rice production. Assam
covers 2/3rd of the total cropped area in the state with productivity of around 1456 kg/ha. Chirang has lower productivity compared to
Diasumjhora watershed area has similar productivity of around 1900 kg/ha.
Fig. 3.7: Comparative rice productivity

85
Mustard is the oilseed crop in the area. The worlds Mustard productivity is 1981 kg/ha covering area of 30.47 million hectares. In India,
it is grown in about 2.5 million ha with a production of 0.52 lakh tones and productivity 1143 kg/ha. Assam has productivity of around
523 kg/ha. Chirang has productivity of about 555 kg/ha. While Diasumjhora watershed area has productivity of around 1050 kg/ha.
Fig. 3.8: Comparative mustard productivity
86
Table 3.19: Problem Typology of the Watershed

1
S.No
1
2
Problem area
3
Problem analysis
Soil Conservation (slope, erosion, soil
Topography of the watershed is flat, but some
4
Proposed interventions to
overcome problems
Intervention of boulder pitching,
loss, rainfall, productivity, etc)
villages are facing severe erosion problem due to
vegetation etc will help to avoid
rivers, rainfall of the area is also erratic which
soil erosion problem as well as
leads to flood in project area, crop production is
increase in water storage will
also less so there is ample scope to increase crop
help to improve crop
productivity.
productivity.
Water conservation (Water budget,
Exploitation of water thereby water level also
Need of artificial recharge of
Ground water norms, productivity)
decreases.
water will help to improve

quantity and quality of water.
Crop coverage {80% of w/s area
There is no irrigation facility in Rabi season and
Need to implement of relevant
should be with canopy}
lack of any scheme related to water and fertilizer. scheme for improve the status of
crops. There is tremendous scope
of agriculture.
Agriculture productivity (crop wise
Seed is not getting through any scheme.
compare with dist. average)
Supply of seed .With increase in

water storage capacity due to
water harvesting structures more
water will be available for
irrigation purpose, which results
in increased productivity in rabi
season.
Livestock productivity (Milk Yield, Meat Insufficient of cow, buffalo and goat.
There will be improving cow,
yield, Eggs, Wool Yield, Kidding etc.)
buffalo, piggery. Credit service,

bank linkage.
87
Existing Livelihood activities for Asset
There is lack of activities.
less persons
Formation of SHGs and

promotion of new livelihood
activities will help assetless
persons.
Community Based Organizations &
No building or land available for training
Social capital base

8
Formation of more SHG groups,

strengthing the groups.
Capacity Building (participation,
Peoples and watershed community are
training, awareness of watershed
interested in improve the problem.
Need of relevant trainings.
community
9
Others (specify)
88
CHAPTER 4
INSTITUTIONAL BUILDING AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Table 4.1: Details of SHGs & UGs newly formed under IWMP
1
Total no. of CBOs

Sl. Type of
No. Group
No. of members
With
With
With
only
only
Total
both
Men Women
SHG
Total
UGs
No. of ST in No. of SC in
each
each
category
category
No. of
Others in
each
category
No. of BPL
in each
category
9
Bank linkage
No.
Amount
M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total of
(Rs)
SHGs
(i)
Landless
42
(ii) MF
357
(iii) SF
101
(iv) LF
100
500
(i)
Landless
(ii) MF
(iii) SF
(iv) LF
Total
89
Watershed Committees
The Village communities/Gram Sabha will constitute the Watershed Committee (WC) to implement the Watershed project with the
technical support of the WDT in the village. The Watershed Committee (WC) has to be registered under the Society Registration Act,
1860. The Gram Sabha may elect/appoint any suitable person from the village as the Chairman of Watershed Committee. The secretary
of the Watershed Committee (WC) will be a paid functionary of the Watershed Committee (WC). The Watershed Committee (WC) will
comprise of at least 10 members, half of the members shall be representatives of SHGs and User Groups, SC/ST community, women and
landless persons in the village. One member of the WDT shall also be represented in the Watershed Committee (WC). Where the
Panchayat covers more than one village, they would constitute a separate subcommittee for each village to manage the watershed
development project in the concerned village. Where a watershed project covers more than one Gram Panchayat, separate committees
will be constituted for each Gram Panchayat. The Watershed Committee (WC) would be provided with an independent rented office
accommodation.
Date of Registration
as a Society
(dd/mm/ yyyy)
No. of members in
WC
SC ST
Emelshwar
Musahari
Banikunda
Secretary
Basumathery
Someshwar
Member
Basumathery
Jayashal
Member
Basumathery
Apen
Member
Basumathery
President
Kumarsali
Name
Designation
1
Name of WCs
Table 4.2: Details of Watershed Committees (WC)
M/F
10 11
12
13
14 15
16
17
18
LandAny
UG SHG GP
less
other Educl
Function/
qualifis assigned
cation
Write Yes if applicable
SF MF LF
M
M
M
M
M
90
Mrs. Doibsal
Musahary
Mrs.Bimola
Member
Basumathery
Murgram
President
Basumathery
Member
Secretary Jhalih Musahary

Member
Ladanguri
Member
Member
Member
Deotari
Leuis Musahary
Sukur Brahmo
Mrs. Kasam Goari

Mrs.Butabari
Member
Basumathery
Member Bonic Brahmo
President Purna Boro
Mrs.Sabala Boro
Mrs.Promala
Member
Narjary
Mital
President
Basumathery
Navnath
Secretary
Basumathery
Shambaru
Member
Basumathery
Member
Mimsalong
Musahary
Lankeshwar
Basumathery
Member
Daugapar
a
F
F
M
M
M
M
F
F
M
91
Secretary
92
Member
Mohamad Albanu
Ali
Member
Nooresh Ali
Mrs.Arghi
Basumathery
Mrs.Kshali
Basumathery
Member
Member
A.
C.
E.
G.
I.
F
F
PNP and PRA

Maintenance of Accounts
Supervision of construction activities
Verification & Measurement
Social Audit
B.
D.
F.
H.
J.
Planning
Signing of cheques and making payments
Cost Estimation
Record of labour employed
Any other (please specify).
Table 4.3: WDT Particulars

1
S.No
1
2
2
Names of WDT
members
Kumud Kakoti
M/F#
Age
Qualification /
Experience
Description of
professional training
Role/ Function*
M
M
Hiran Kumar
Soughary
Promo Kumar Deka
Ranju Narjary
A.
C.
E.
G.
I.
Team Leader
Field Officer
PNP and PRA

Maintenance of Accounts
Supervision of construction activities
Verification & Measurement
Social Audit
Field Officer
B.
D.
F.
H.
J.
Planning
Signing of cheques and making payments
Cost Estimation
Record of labour employed
Any other (please specify).
93
Table 4.4: PIA particulars

1
2
94
Institutional Mechanisms:
Flow Chart of Institutional Arrangement from District to watershed level
Fund Flow mechanisms flow chart
95
List of Watershed Records to be maintained
DWDU:
Cheque book register

Grants received from Centre/State
Grants Distribution Register
UCs register for UCs received from
PIA/watershed committees
Activities wise Physical and Financial Progress
Details
PIA Level
Register for grants received from states

UCs register for UCs to be sent to DWDUs
Bank pass book/cheque resgister
Bank Reconciliation statement register
UCs register for UCs received from different
watershed committees
Physical and financial progress report
Watershed Committee Level
Cash book
Contingency bill register
Voucher register
Bank Pass Book
Bank Reconciliation statement register
Advances/Adjustment register
Bank cheque book register
Asset Register
Income register (from watershed assets)
WDF Account Register
Revolving Fund Register
Register showing physical and financial progress
96
Project Implementation
The project will be implemented by the PIA i.e. the Divisional Officer, The Soil Conservation Department, Chirang and the Assam
Government. Watershed Development Team (WDT) plays a regular responsible role though not a full time part. They will provide
training for the village communities, supervise watershed development activities, inspect and authenticate project accounts, encourage
adoption of low cost technologies and build upon indigenous technical knowledge, monitor and review the overall project
implementation and set up institutional arrangements for post-project operation and maintenance and further development of the
assets created during the project period.
The PIA, after careful study, shall submit the Action Plan for Watershed Development Project for approval of the DWDU/DRDA and
other arrangements. The PIA shall submit the periodical progress report to DWDU. The PIA shall also arrange physical, financial and
social audit of the work undertaken. It will facilitate the mobilization of additional financial resources from other government
programmes, such as NREGA, BRGF, SGRY, National Horticulture Mission, Tribal Welfare Schemes, Artificial Ground Water Recharging,
Greening India, etc.
Table 4.6: Convergence plan with IWMP
1
S. No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
3
Name of activity/task/structure
proposed under convergence
Names of Departments
(a) Structures
with Schemes
(b) livelihoods
converging with IWMP
(c) Capacity Building
(d) Any other (pl. specify)
RCC Drop
Agriculture
Plantation
Social Forestry
Earthen Dam
Soil Conservation
Road Construction
DRDA
Period of
Support
(Years)
Reference no. of
activity/ task/
structure in DPR
6
Estimated
Fund
Proposed
Under
Convergence
(in Rs.)
7
Level of
decision taken
for
convergence
Block/district
Irrigation
Social Forestry
Total
97
CHAPTER 5
MANAGEMENT/ACTION PLAN
Description on methodology of plan adopted
A) Awareness generation interventions (Nukkad Natak, Video show, Exposure, Wall painting, door to door campaign, posters,
pamphlets, village meeting etc)
B) Initial Orientation program (Concept seeding, About Watershed? /Watershed Management? Importance of peoples
participation in planning and implementation.)
Concept seeding/About Watershed
Watershed:
A watershed is the area of land where all of the water that is under it or drains off of it goes into the same place. It can be defined as the
area of land that drains to a particular point along a stream. The boundary of a watershed is defined by the highest elevations surrounding
the stream. In recent decades, watershed has been recognized as a unit for Integrated Resource Management (IRM) where management
is not merely of land, water and biomass, rather integration for self reliance and holistic development of the rural poor.
A prime feature of watershed management is that it is more community-based, than just technology oriented leading to empowerment
and self reliance of the primary stakeholders.
Watershed Management:
In recent years, watershed management has become the focal point of agricultural and rural development in rainfed areas of India.
Farming and allied activities have been promoted keeping in mind conservation and regeneration of resources. Animal resources
have the potential to become a major source of income hence; a comprehensive animal husbandry component would contribute
significantly to ensuring a better and sustainable livelihood for the people.
Importance of peoples participation in planning and implementation:

98
It is now widely accepted that if the productivity of natural resources is to be enhanced in a sustainable fashion, the communities must
participate in plans for rehabilitation and management. Their participation will generate a stake in the process and enhance the prospects
of both institutional and ecological sustainability. Thus, there has been a shift in focus in management that accepts increased attention on
community participation in planning and management.
C ) Formation process UGs & Watershed Committee
Watershed Committee:
The Gram Sabha will constitute the Watershed Committee (WC) to implement the Watershed project with the technical support of the
WDT in the village. The Watershed Committee (WC) has to be registered under the Society Registration Act, 1860. The Gram Sabha may
elect/appoint any suitable person from the village as the Chairman of Watershed Committee. The secretary of the Watershed Committee
(WC) will be a paid functionary of the Watershed Committee (WC). The Watershed Committee (WC) will comprise of at least 10 members,
half of the members shall be representatives of SHGs and User Groups, SC/ST community, women and landless persons in the village. One
member of the WDT shall also be represented in the Watershed Committee (WC). Where the Panchayat covers more than one village,
they would constitute a separate subcommittee for each village to manage the watershed development project in the concerned village.
Where a watershed project covers more than one Gram Panchayat, separate committees will be constituted for each Gram Panchayat.
The Watershed Committee (WC) would be provided with an independent rented office accommodation.
User Groups:
The Watershed Committee (WC) shall also constitute User Groups in the watershed area with the help of WDT. These shall be
homogenous groups of persons most affected by each work/ activity and shall include those having land holdings within the watershed
areas. Each User Group shall consist of those who are likely to derive direct benefits from a particular watershed work or activity. The
Watershed Committee (WC) with the help of the WDT shall facilitate resource-use agreements among the User Groups based on the
principles of equity and sustainability. These agreements must be worked out before the concerned work is undertaken. It must be
regarded as a pre-condition for that activity. The User Groups will be responsible for the operation and maintenance of all the assets
created under the project in close collaboration with the Gram Panchayat and the Gram Sabha
D) DPR preparation process

99
Data Collection: Primary and Secondary Data Collection, SE Survey, PRA tools (Social map, matrix ranking, wealth ranking,
seasonality of labour, migration, crop, disease, Resource map, Transect walk), sample collection & testing. The Baseline survey work was
carried out in 5 micro watersheds located in Kalaigaon block, Udalguri district. In general, participatory approach of data collection was
made based on PRA observation during the site visits, survey with prescribed household and field formats and discussion with focus group
in all the watershed areas. The information required for Baseline survey have been collected both from primary and secondary data
sources.
The primary data sources involved the watershed beneficiaries from different watersheds in the village by door to door survey. The
officers of Agriculture Department of Udalguri, district, Village President in different VCDC, Panchayat union offices in the above
watershed, in addition this, the coordinator and Organizing Secretary involved the Watershed committee members allotted for various
watersheds. Moreover the soil analysis and rainfall particulars were collected from nearby soil survey organisation and IMD, Guwahati.
Field to field Survey: Field to field survey was also carried out in the farms, community land, pasture land and land under Gram
Panchayat. It also includes the soil profiles, No. of wells in the area, crop taken in the field, cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various
sources of irrigation in the field. The details of agriculture as well as pasture lands of the village where the existing condition and
structures to be proposed, were written down. Most of the farmers of the village were there to support the survey team. The purpose of
the survey was also to understand water availability, patterns of water use and peoples understanding & perceptions about both surface
and groundwater resources in this area. Village agreements will be done on the basis of such detailed work. This survey focuses on the
pattern of surface and groundwater use and the basic understanding of farmers regarding groundwater recharge and discharge. This
understanding was expected to help in improved planning for any watershed programme and to develop longer-term protocols of
groundwater management in respective areas.
PRA and Transect walk: The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the
stakeholders towards the programme. This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and
Indigenous Technological Knowledge (ITK) while planning for any activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for planning,
implementing, monitoring and post-withdrawal activities with a complete accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA techniques like
resource mapping, social mapping, transect walk and season calendars were used to understand the physical and social orientation of the
village in general and watershed in specific. These tools put the villagers in ease than the complicated questionnaires. Various tools like
Matrix ranking, Venn diagram were used to identify various local vegetations, fodders crops and even various institutions to identify their
significance in the life of the farmers.
100
Planning Process- PNP, FGDs, IB and CB plans:

PNP: Participatory Net Planning (PNP) is a planning, mobilization, project formulation, training and monitoring tool that is also invaluable
for evaluation purposes. The PNP methodology puts the stakeholder at the centre of the process; introduces him to tested scientific
practices and knowledge; engages him in a dialogue with a view to arriving at informed choices and allows him the final word in regard to
measures to be undertaken. It focuses primarily on resource management and is concerned with the conservation, productivity
enhancement and sustainable management of all natural and biotic resources available in the watershed.
At the time of undertaking PNP, the planning team together with the farmer or land owning couple and/or adult members of the farmer
household study the farm or plot of land from all aspects, including that of proposed land use after treatment. They discuss, agree to and
finalise in writing the
T
activity that is planned provided it does not adversely affect the neighbours or may result in damage.
FGDs: Focused Group Discussions were organized based on the typologies derived through the data collected and entered to the
computer. From such discussions interventions for productivity enhancement in agriculture, livestock; livelihood development were
derived at.
IB and CB plans: Based on the observations during the DPR process, PRA exercises, LUP and Household data analysis, Focused Group
Discussions plans we were prepared Institution Building and Capacity Building plan.
Problems Identification: After analysis the information collected during PRA exercise, the main problems identified as:
Low agricultural productivity
Soil Erosion from farm land
Improper Crop Rotation
Less use of bio-fertilizers
Almost negligible cultivation of arid fruits
Low milk production
No use of vermi compost
Lack of value addition practices
Migration
Sanitation Problems
Less Nutritional Level & Malnutrition in few farm families
101
Mapping:
GIS and Remote sensing plays an important role in the study of natural resources mapping and helps in planning of water resources
development in study area One of the greatest advantages of using remote sensing data for hydrological investigations and monitoring is
its ability to generate information in spatial and temporal domain, which is very crucial for successful analysis, prediction and validation.
With the help of GIS we are mapped number of features such as drainage, land slope, soil classification, and landuse. By using remote
sensing we interpret order of watershed, direction of drainages, surface elevation, rate of slope and interpretation of soil types and
landuse planning. Global positioning system (GPS) was used for locating suitable place for soil and water conservation structures.
Preparation of contour map by using survey of India.
Hydro-geological Survey:
Hydro-geologically, the district is underlain by semiconsolidated to unconsolidated formations ranging in age from Upper Tertiary to
Recent. Most of the microwatersheds in the project are situated on plain areas thereby the water can percolate to ground. We observed
existing water resources structure during the site reconnaissance and site mapping. The main source of water is from rainwater and few
perennial and seasonal rivers. The rainwater is harnessed for use by constructing water harvesting structures, which serves as source for
both drinking and recharging groundwater. The water from perennial and seasonal rivers is use for minor irrigation by cutting channels
along the field. Mechanism of harvesting water by mini storage tanks, drain and other structure will be explored under the project.
Public-Private Partnership:
Public-Private Partnership (PPP) is a mode of implementing government programmes /schemes in partnership with the private sector. The
term private in PPP is often understood to stan
enterprises. This institution has a critical role to play in linking agricultural and allied sectors with national and international markets to
achieve the objective of faster and more inclusive growth.
The private sector could be interpreted to encompass all non-government agencies such as the corporate sector, voluntary organizations,
self-help groups, partnership firms, individuals and community based organizations, the roles and responsibilities of the partners may vary
from sector to sector. While in some schemes/projects, the private provider may have significant involvement in regard to all aspects of
implementation; in others s/he may have only a limited role.
102
The voluntary sector or NGOs may be broadly classified as traditional, community based and government sponsored. Traditional sector
comprises the various religious and charitable trusts dedicated to spread of education, health care, orphanages and rehabilitation homes
etc. The Community based Organizations (CBOs) comprise societies for relief from natural disasters, neighborhood societies, micro-Credit
SHG
G
y sector comprises agencies
engaged in welfare programmes such as rural development, afforestation programmes, watershed management, health and education
services(Parent Teacher associations, Village Education Committees) as well as those engaged in research and evaluation.
Consolidation & preparation of DPR document A
PRA
problems, all data has been complied and Detailed Action plan has been prepared. Action Plan includes year wise allocation of funds for
each component of watershed, phasing of activities, capacity building and benefit cost ratio calculations.
Approval by Aam Sabha/Gram Sabha: After all survey has been completed and activities identified in co-ordination with village people
and village watershed committee, action plan has been developed and approved in Gram sabha.
Details of Natural Resource Management Activities

The physical treatments are to be carried on during the watershed development work phase. While implementing the project it is
necessary that the treatments are carried out starting form ridge and progressing towards the valley. This approach is followed with the
following objectives
1. Protect the upper reaches to avoid erosion and reduce runoff
2. Avoid siltation of structures in the middle and lower catchments.
3. Ensure the cost effectiveness of structures in the valley and
4. Improve overall efficiency of the measures.
Mainly the watershed development works are divided into three stages such as ridge area treatments, Slope treatment, Plains or flat level
(Area treatment) and Drainage line treatments, Different treatments are planned for each village to see the geographical and socio
economic condition of that specific area. The details are briefly described below:
A. Ridge Area Treatment Plans
103
For the ridge area treatment of project villages area following structure are been Proposed after interaction between the villagers,
watershed committee, Range Forest Officer (RFO) and other field staff of forest.
1. Afforestation /Plantation
2. Contour bund
3. Gully Plug
B. Slope Treatment: The second tier treatment is the slope treatment. This is generally done on agricultural land or waste land. This
generally includes water conservation or surface water storage structures. This being highly labor intensive, will involve more of manual
labour, so, funds from National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGA) can be taken.
Following structures are been proposed in these areas
1. Earth filling
2. Plantation
3. Diversion drain
C. Plains or Flat Level Treatment:
D. Water conservation Structures and activity:
104
Table 5.1: Soil and Moisture Conservation structures

S.
No
1
MicroWatershe
d
Ladanguri
Dagarpara
Amgori
2
Name of the
Activities
(Structures)
3
Name of
the Hamlet
/ Village
Earthern
bund
6
Area (in Ha)/
Dimension ( in
M/ Sq. M /
CuM) of
Structure
7
Unit Cost
8
Total
Cost (in
Rs.)
No. 2
Latongguri
600 m
543/ m
325525
3rd Year
Pond
repairing
Dimajora
330.93 sq. m.
163/ sq.
m.
53946
3rd Year
Boulder
pitching at
Gagla Bandh
Subaijhar
60 sq. m.
1408/ sq.
m.
84483
2nd Year
300 sq. m.
1154/ sq.
m.
346249
2nd Year
120 sq. m.
1408/ sq.
m.
168966
2nd Year
Boulder
pitching
4
Plot
Numbers
5
Name
of
Benefi
ciaries
9
10
11
Co Total
Year of
nt Grant Implementatio
rib Amou
n
uti nt (in (1st/2nd/3rd/4t
on
Rs)
h/5th)
Boulder
pitching at
Hanshudaba
river
Malipara 2
Bund
No. 2
Dagarpara
800 m
543/ m
434034
3rd Year
Gelasugaon
60 sq. m.
1937/ sq.
m.
116245
2nd Year
Boulder
pitching
105
Table 5.2: Water Harvesting Structures

1
Name of the
Activities
(Structures)
Name of
the
Hamlet /
Village
S.
N
MicroWatersh
ed
Check dam
Kumar
Sali
Ring Well
Kumarsa Well( Bathao

Mandir)
li
Rain water
storage(10ft.de
ep pond)
Kumarsali
(pathar)
Drain cleaning
100 mtr.
1 Biga pond
,deep 10 ft
Chotolato
nguri 1
Well at Ram
Plot
Noumb
ers
Name of
Beneficiar
ies
6
Area (in
Ha)/
Dimensi
on ( in
M/ Sq.
M/
CuM) of
Structur
e
1327.5
cum
10
11
Unit
Cost
Total
Cost
(in
Rs.)
Contributi
on
Total
Grant
Amou
nt (in
Rs)
Year of
Implementation
(1st/2nd/3rd/4th
/5th)
115/
cum
1520
41
4th Year
18 m
Depth
333
3/ m
Dept
h
6000
0
5th Year
18 m
Depth
333
3/ m
Dept
h
6000
0
4th Year
416.56
cum
67/
cum
2779
4
3rd Year
800 m
248/
m
1980
00
2nd Year
3405.46
cum
56/
cum
1891
95
3rd Year
18 m
333
6000
4th Year
106
temple
Depth
3/ m
Dept
h
107
mtr)
Drain cleaning
(Khingkhra
dong)
1200 m
267/
m
3207
60
2nd Year
Check dam at
Sawbari bandh
1212
cum
113/
cum
1366
77
4th Year
800 m
79/
m
6310
3
2nd Year
18 m
Depth
333
3/ m
Dept
h
6000
0
4th Year
Check dam
repairing
1246.88
cum
42/
cum
5273
3
4th Year
Check dam
2224.69
cum
116/
cum
2582
55
4th Year
1500
cum
123/
cum
1850
50
4th Year
18 m
Depth
333
3/ m
Dept
h
6000
0
4th Year
766 m
181/
m
1386
46
3rd Year
Sawbaidisa
Mathauri
bandh repairing
(800 mtr)
Dagarpa
ra
Subaijhar
Well at
Sobaijhar
Brahma
Mandir.
Check dam at
Owasong
bandh.
No 2
Dagarpara
Well at Bathao
temple
Fishery
repairing
109
Well at
Deothangpara
LP school
Bandh
repairing (
Umashi bandh)
Well at
Malipara
Brahma Mandir
Dagarpara
no. 1
Dagarpara
no. 1
Malipara 2
Bandh
repairing
Amgori
Check dam
Gelasugao
n
Check dam at
Kudunguri jan
18 m
Depth
333
3/ m
Dept
h
6000
0
4th Year
30 m
79/
m
2361
2nd Year
18 m
Depth
333
3/ m
Dept
h
6000
0
4th Year
35 m
79/
m
2754
2nd Year
1215.47
cum
115/
cum
1397
38
4th Year
1325.06
cum
116/
cum
1533
67
4th Year
Table 5.3: Vegetative Covers

1
S. N.
Microwat
ershed
Name of the
Activities
Name of
the
Hamlet
/ Village
Plot
Number
s
(includi
ng Name
of the
local
Patch)
5
Name of
Beneficiari
es
6
Area
(in
Ha)
Unit Cost Total Cost

(in Rs.)
9
Contribu
tion
10
11
Total
Grant
Amou
nt (in
Rs)
Year of
Implementation
(1st/2nd/3rd/4th/
5th)
3rd Year
110
Afforestation
2nd Year
2nd Year
2nd Year
4th Year
3rd Year
5th Year
3rd Year
2nd Year
5th Year
3rd Year
3rd Year
4th Year
2nd Year
111
112
3rd Year
Boro
Ladam
guri -2
5th Year
3rd Year
5th Year
3rd Year
3rd Year
3rd Year
2nd Year
5th Year
5th Year
3rd Year
4th Year
3rd Year
113
3rd Year
2nd Year
5th Year
3rd Year
3rd Year
3rd Year
2nd Year
3rd Year
4th Year
3rd Year
3rd Year
2nd Year
114
3rd Year
4th Year
3rd Year
Fuel Wood
Plantation
2nd Year
Road side
plantation
5th Year
Bamboo
plantation
3rd Year
Turmeric
Plantation
5th Year
2nd Year
2nd Year
Assam Lemon
Papaya
3rd Year
5th Year
3rd Year
2nd Year
116
4th Year
3rd Year
3rd Year
2nd Year
3rd Year
3rd Year
4th Year
5th Year
3rd Year
3rd Year
3rd Year
2nd Year
3rd Year
117
5th Year
3rd Year
2nd Year
3rd Year
5th Year
3rd Year
5th Year
3rd Year
4th Year
2nd Year
3rd Year
5th Year
5th Year
118
3rd Year
2nd Year
3rd Year
3rd Year
3rd Year
5th Year
4th Year
5th Year
2nd Year
3rd Year
4th Year
3rd Year
5th Year
119
2nd Year
Fuel wood
Plantation
2nd Year
3rd Year
4th Year
3rd Year
2nd Year
5th Year
3rd Year
3rd Year
Fuel wood
Plantation
2nd Year
Road side
plantation
5th Year
Medicinal
Plantation
3rd Year
4th Year
120
3rd Year
3rd Year
3rd Year
3rd Year
5th Year
3rd Year
4th Year
3rd Year
5th Year
3rd Year
3rd Year
5th Year
3rd Year
121
4th Year
Structure or Activity Wise Details of Engineering Structure and Vegetative Measures

Table 5.4: Engineering structures for Soil Conservation Measures (SMC)
Proposed plan
Area
S.
No.
Name of
structures
Farmers
UNIT COST
Total units
(ha)
(No./ cu.m./
rmt)
(Rs)
Farmers
contribution
Estimated cost* (Rs. in lakh)
Grant
Portion
(Rs. in lakh) (Rs. in lakh)
330.9 sq. m.
1400 m
540 sq. m.
122
Table 5.5: Details of engineering structures for Water Harvesting WHS

1
Proposed plan
S. No.
Name of structures
Total units (No./

cu.m./ rmt)
UNIT COST
Estimated cost*
Farmers contribution
(Rs)
(Rs. in lakh)
(Rs)
15 wells- 18m
Depth each
3333/ m
Depth
9.00000
79/ m
2.65083
118/ cum
15.05701
1246.88 m
42/ m
0.52732
2700 m
246/ m
6.74685
3822.02 cum
61/ cum
2.16989
766 m
181/ m
1.38646
3365 m
12821.72 cum
Table 5.6: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works
1
S.
No.
2
Name of the Activities
Area
(ha)
No. of
Plants
5
Proposed plan unit cost
(Rs.)
6
Estimated cost (Rs. In
Lakhs)
7
Farmer
Contribution
(Rs. In
8
Grant (Rs. In
Lakhs)
123
Lakhs)
16100
48300
Aromatic Plantation
12.49
94600
1181554
Assam Lemon Papaya
14.5
51000
739500
18.162
42770
776788.74
5.5
27200
149600
11.035
157900
1742426.5
9.398
144500
1358011
Medicinal Plantation
6.364
109000
693676
Pasture Development
28.1
16200
455220
1800
2772000
94810
663670
9.879
148900
1470983.1
Bamboo Plantation
Fuel wood Plantation
Ginger Plantation
Road Side
Development
Rubber Plantation
Turmeric Plantation
1540
124
CHAPTER 6
CAPACITY BUILDING PLAN
Capacity Building:
Capacity Building is the process of assisting the group or individuals to identify and address issues and gain the insights, knowledge and
experience needed to solve problems and implement change. There is a realization in the development sector that there is a need to
appraise the success of development interventions by going beyond the conventional development targets and measures of success (e.g.
in the form of commodities, goods and services) to take into account improvements to human potential. Capacity building of stakeholders
is also increasingly viewed as an important factor in developmental projects that involve participation of stakeholders at all levels for
effective implementation of projects.
Table 6.1: Details of Capacity Building

1
SN
Name of the Training &

Exposure ( Knowledge,
Skill, etc. at both Being
and Doing level)
Number
of
events
Total
Total
Number Trainee
Number of
of days days (=
Cost per
Participants
per
3x4x
Trainee
in an event
event
5)
day (in Rs)
SHG/ UG / WC / PI related
10
Total Cost
required
for the
programm
e (= 6 x7 ;
in Rs.)
Total
Grant
Amount
(in Rs)
Year of
Implementation
(1st/2nd/3rd/4t
h/5th)
Orientation program
50
1050
25000
175000
1st , 2nd and 3rd
WC meetings
Institutional building
training for WC, SHGs,
UG
Subtotal
30
10
300
1000
30000
1st to 5th year
6
43
30
90
2
360
6
1710
NRM related
10000
36000
60000
265000
2nd, 3rd, 4th and

5th
125
UG trainings
UG meetings
Subtotal
183
190
SHGs training
17
SHG meetings
Subtotal
166
183
30
630
4
1
732
34
4
1362
Production Enhancement related
17
1445
830
1
137780
847
6
139225
Livelihoods / Micro-enterprises related
26
1690
20000
140000
1000
21000
183000
323000
20000
340000
1000
21000
166000
506000
2nd, 3rd, 4th and

5th
2nd, 3rd, 4th and
5th
2nd, 3rd, 4th

and 5th
2nd and 4th
2nd, 3rd, 4th

and 5th
SHGs training
13
20000
260000
SHGs meetings
Subtotal
158
790
1
124820
1000
171
816
6
126510
21000
Convergence / Rights & entitlement / Well Being related
158000
418000
2nd and 3rd
Convergence Meetings
1000
8000
On Gender Training
Subtotal
4
12
5000
6000
20000
28000
1st to 5th year

2nd, 3rd, 4th and
5th
15000
15000
90000
90000
1
1
2
For PIA / WDT staffs level
Subtotal
Others
TOT/CRP/CSP/Related
1
Exposure visits
Subtotal
GRAND TOTAL
6
6
3
3
1st to 5th
126
CHAPTER 7
PHASING OF PROGRAMME AND BUDGETING
S.No
Component
Table 7.1: Phasing of the action plan

Activities
Unit
Unit Cost
(Rs.)
1st year
Phy
Fin (Rs.)
(No)
2nd year
Phy
Fin (Rs.)
(No)
3rd year
Phy
Fin (Rs.)
(No)
4th year
Phy
Fin (Rs.)
(No)
5th year
Phy
Fin (Rs.)
(No)
Total
Phy (No)
Fin (Rs.)
1 Entry Point Activities (4%)

1
Books for School Library
brick channel for water

distribution to agricultural
field(R.M)
Books for School Library
Pasture Development
Percolation tank
Repairing common well
Water storage tank
Roof rain water harvesting
Furniture for school
Nos.
10000
ii)
Poor HHs in Watersheds to

be covered under SHGs
SC
ST
BC
OC
Awareness
Generation
(events) to be conducted
Pamphlets distribution
Terracon Ecotech Pvt.Ltd.Mumbai
10000
rm
Nos.
ha
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
680
240
163200
10000
10000
11200
17.75
198800
68000
408000
17440
26
453440
38500
346500
275
120
33000
45000
45000
Sub Total of Entry Point

Activity
2 Institution & Capacity Building (5%)
i)
421.75 1667940
10000
240
163200
10000
17.75
198800
408000
26
453440
346500
120
33000
45000
421.75
1667940
4160
41600
810
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
10
390
3900
390
3900
390
3900
390
3900
2600
26000
127
Wall posters
Wall writings
Rallies
No.
No.
No.
5000
30000
30000
30000
30000
24
120000
1000
8000
26
6
26000
48000
26
6
26000
48000
26
6
26000
48000
26
6
26000
48000
104
24
104000
192000
Kalajatha
No.
Small Group meetings
No.
Others (specify-----------)
No.
175000
57
57000
6000
25000
iii)
Orientation programs to GP,

WC,UG, SHG,VO, VSS, WUA,
Societies, Elected reps.
No.
iv)
Formation of UGs
No.
1000
v)
Formation of LGs
Formation of Watershed
Committee
Regular Meetings to be
conducted
No.
1000
Watershed Committee
UGs/LGs
No.
No.
VO/SHGs
No.
1000
1000
No.
1000
vi)
vii)
Gram Panchayat
viii) No. of Planning events
ix) Registration of WC
x)
xi)
xii)
xiii)
1000
No.
No.
No.
Social Audit events

Trainings & Exposures
No.
b) On Gender
On Natural Resource
c) Management
d) On Enterprise Promotion
On Productivity
e) Enhancement
f)
Exposure Visits
75000
50000
57
57000
50000
6000
No.
Self Monitoring events

(planning, review of
activities through tool)
Convergence meetings with
LDs/other institutions
a) On Institutional Building
No.
1000
3000
1000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
30
30000
57
162
57000
162000
57
79
57000
79000
57
83
57000
83000
12
12000
183
324
183000
324000
18000
2000
8000
0
0
60000
18000
2000
2000
1000
1000
No.Trgs
10000
30000
10000
10000
10000
0
0
6
No. trgs
5000
5000
5000
5000
5000
20000
No. trgs
20000
60000
20000
40000
20000
140000
No. trgs
No. trgs
20000
20000
5
7
100000
140000
2
4
40000
80000
3
3
60000
60000
3
3
60000
60000
13
17
260000
340000
Nos
15000
30000
15000
15000
15000
90000
15000
128
Sub Total IB & CB {Do not sum Men

& Women under CB events (a to
f)}[1]
3
229900
735
806900
583
470900
586
444900
2630
216000
4986
2168600
116000
80000
80000
24150
1.5
24150
123552
4.992
123552
4.992
5
60000
60000
30000
30000
2
1
162000
25000
718200
1.596
718200
300000
300000
0.13
46540
108000
Productivity Enhancement (10%)
Aggroforestry
Bee Keeping
Crop Demonstration Rice

Crop Demonstration
Vegetable
4
5
Duck Rearing Scheme

Eri food plant with supply
of Start Up tools
Eri Rearing House
Establishment of Goat
Farming
Fish Pond Development
(Pisiculture)
10
Fruit Processing Unit
11
12
Horticulture nursery
Muga food plant with
supply of farming tools
13
14
6
7
8
15
16
17
4
1262
116000
116000
20000
16100
1.5
Nos.
12000
Nos.
Nos.
30000
81000
24750
Nos.
Area
(ha)
1.596
50000
6
0.13
46540
358000
108000
100000
Poultry
Nos.
10000
25000
450000
Nos.
Aromatic Plantation
Assam Lemon Papaya
162000
25000
Piggery
Vermi Compost
Sub-Total PE
2
1
Nos.
Area
(ha)
36000
Rice Processing Unit

(Individual)
Sufari Processing Unit
(Individual)
Nos.
Area
(ha)
Area
(ha)
Nos.
Natural Resource Management

(56%)
Afforestation
1
2
Area
(ha)
Nos.
95000
Nos.
63000
Nos.
3
3
300000
300000
22
220000
22
220000
665000
665000
693000
11
693000
190000
20
190000
94.218
3861442
48300
11
9500
0
17.622
389242
48300
8.596
1134200
32
1185000
20
36
1153000
ha
16100
ha
ha
94600
12.49
1181554
12.49
1181554
51000
14.5
739500
14.5
739500
129
4
5
Bamboo Plantation
Fuel wood Plantation
ha
ha
42770
27200
6
7
8
9
Ginger Plantation
Horticultural Plantation
Medicinal Plantation
Pasture Development
ha
ha
ha
ha
10
Road Side Development
Nos.
157900
144500
109000
16200
1800
11
Rubber Plantation
ha
94810
12
Turmeric Plantation
ha
148900
13
Pond Repairing
sq. m.
163
330.9
14
Earthen bund
543
1400
17
Boulder Pitching
sq. m.
1477
20
Well
21
Bandh Repairing
22
23
Check Dam
Check Dam Repairing
24
25
m Depth
5.5
776788.74
18.162
5.5
11.035
776789
149600
1742427
9.398
6.364
28.1
1540
1358011
693676
455220
2772000
663670
9.879
1470983
53946.02
330.93
53946
759559.15
1400
759559
540
715942
900000
3365
265084
12821.72
1505702
149600
11.035 1742426.5
9.398
6.364
28.1
1358011
693676
455220
1540
7
9.879
540
79
cum
m
118
Drain Cleaning
246
Surface Pond
cum
Fishery Repairing
Sub Total NRM:
5 Administration
3365
2772000
663670
1470983.1
715942.32
15
wells
each 18
3333
26
18.16
265083.5
12822
900000
1505702
1247
52732.98
1246.88
2700
52733
674685
61
3822
216989.3
3822.02
216989
181
766
138646
766
138646
28657.978
17335016
42
2700
674685
2308830.82
6635073.19
3248128.5
5142983.1
WC office expenditure
Month
4000
72
288000
72
288000
72
345600
72
345600
72
403200
72
403200
432
2073600
WS Secretary Salary
Month
1500
72
108000
72
108000
72
144000
72
144000
72
180000
72
180000
432
864000
c
d
Stationary & miscellaneous

TA/DA
Rs.
Month
1500
800
1
144
1500
115200
1
144
1500
115200
1
144
1700
172800
1
144
1700
172800
1
144
2000
230400
1
144
2000
230400
6
864
10400
1036800
Contingency (10%)
Sub Total Admin
1734
398480
4383280
10
750000
160000
192000
108000
108000
125000
125000
6 Livelihood
1
Bamboo Craft
7800
Nos.
75000
Bee Keeping
Nos.
20000
Carpentry
Nos.
24000
Duck Rearing Scheme

Establishment of Goat
Farming
Nos.
12000
289
512700
289
289
664100
10
750000
160000
8
25000
Nos.
512700
192000
289
664100
289
815600
241
815600
130
Nos.
50000
Handloom and Weaving
Nos.
50000
11
Mat / Jute/ Pati Making
Nos.
50000
Mobile repairing
Nos.
30000
9
3
10
Nos.
75000
11
Pottery
Rural Backyard Poultry
Rearing
12
Wood Craft making
Nos.
75000
13
Cycle Repairing
Nos.
40000
Sub Total Livelihood

Grand Total (sum of all
sub-totals 1 to 6)
250000
250000
550000
11
550000
450000
450000
90000
90000
75000
50000
525000
240000
87
3565000
10000
75000
50000
Nos.
7
0
0
2410540
22
393000
4410672.82
240000
34
1482000
10386273
23
1090000
6632128.5
525000
600000
7927583.1
0
815600
32981278
131
Table 7.2: Estimated Benefit Cost Ratio

SN
Name of the activity

1 EPA
2 NRM
Total Cost
(Rs.) lakhs
16.67940
173.35016
Total Benefit expected *(Rs.) lakhs

-Pasture development: Increase in grazing land,
Increase in soil moisture retention, increase in
milk production
-Repairing common well, Storage tank,
percolation tank, roof water harvesting, brick
channel for water distribution : Increase in water
storage (> 1000 cum), Enhancing agricultural
productivity and irrigable area, ground water
recharge, water availability during lean months,
better health and hygiene,
-Building for School, books for library, furniture:
Improved educational facilities, increase in
literacy rate and social and economic well being.
-Improved irrigation facilities and agricultural
production
-To augment the ground water recharge
-Will reduce top soil erosive activity
-Reduction in runoff & Increase soil moisture
-Reduced soil nutrient loss
-Boost economic activity eg. Fish farming
-Stabilize banks of streams
-Plantation activities like fuel wood, aromatic,
rubber etc. will create new markets for local
people
-Enhanced transportation facilities/accessibility by
causeways and culverts
-Creating culturable land by leveling parcels of
land by earth filling
-Alleviate poverty
-Motivate local farmers
BCR
Remarks
-
Non quantifiable in
monetary terms
Economic analysis is not

feasible for Small
irrigation structures and
has many intangible
benefits
132
3 Production
Enterprise
38.61442
79.76115
2.07
Reduction in
migration
Social economic
security
Additional income
apart from
agriculture
4 Livelihood for Asset

less
35.65000
84.91570
2.38
Reduction in
migration
Social economic
security
Additional income
apart from
agriculture
5 Institution and
Capacity building
21.68600
Non quantifiable in
monetary terms
6 Overall
355.73277
Beneficial
Awareness and skill development
Source:
State institute for Rural Development (SIRD), Assam.
1. Websites:
a. www.assamagribusiness.nic.in
b. www.ecostatassam.nic.in
c. www.rkmp.co.in
d. www.irrigassam.nic.in
e. www.db.nedfi.com
f. www.agricultureinformation.com
g. www.nabard.org
133
CHAPTER 8
CONSOLIIDATIION AND COMPLETIION OF VARIIOUS WORKS
Table 8.1: Consolidation of Action Plan
1
S. No
Implementation Phase
st
Component
Phy
(No)
1 Entry Point Activities (4%)
1 year
Fin (Rs.)
421.8
2 DPR Preparation by PIA (1%)

3 Institution & Capacity
Building (5%)
SLNA-.3%
DWDU-.9%
PIA-3.8%
4 Productivity Enhancement
(10%)
5 Livelihoods for Assetless (9%)
6 Natural Resource
Management (56%)
7 Monitoring (1%)
nd
2 year
Phy (No) Fin (Rs.)
Phy
(No)
3 year
Fin (Rs.)
th
Phy
(No)
4 year
Fin (Rs.)
th
Phy
(No)
5 year
Fin (Rs.)
1667940
216000
Total
Phy (No)
Fin (Rs.)
421.75
1667940
216000
432000
1262
229900
735
806900
583
470900
586
444900
2630
216000
4986
2168600
17.622
389242
8.596
1134200
32
1185000
36
1153000
94.218
3861442
22
393000
34
1482000
23
1090000
600000
87
3565000
2308831
6635073.19
3248128.5
5142983.1
8 Evaluation (1 %)
9 Consolidation phase (3%)
10 Administration (10%)
rd
Consolidation/
exit Phase
6th year
Phy Fin (Rs.)
(No)
289
512700
289
28657.978 17335016
216000
108000
108000
432000
216000
108000
108000
432000
1296000
1296000
512700
289
664100
289
664100
289
815600
241
815600
1734
4383280

134
CHAPTER 9
EXPECTED OUTCOMES
The aim of this project is to improve the economy and ecology of watershed. Benefit cost ratio is the simple method of evaluating the
economic performance of the projects. The analysis has been done by the primary data collected from the project area and using Net
Present Value (NPV), Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR) and sensitivity analyses. The study shows that the expected full benefits are realized, the
benefits derived from the watershed project are quite high. The benefits can be ascertained based on employment generated, area
irrigated, increase in production, area under cultivation etc. However it is difficult to convert this information into quantitative and
monetary evaluation involved through the CBA. The formula used for quantifiable activities is B/C, i.e. benefits/ costs.
For livelihood activities and production activities, the calculated BC ratio is based on total project cost, maintenance and operation cost
and benefits are based on annual production and market prices. The BC ratio however does not includes certain non measurable benefits
like increased earning power of locals, increase in social capital, health improvement etc. The overall benefit cost ratio of production
activities and livelihood activity proposed was found to be approx 2.07 and 2.38 respectively.
For NRM (Natural resource management), the structures proposed are in small scale and therefore the benefits are difficult to be
quantified in monetary terms. However there will be high benefits that range from increased productivity, water availability to reduction
in migration.
Ground Water:
The overall terrain condition of the district can be divided into two categories i.e. flat and somewhere undulating land. The average
rainfall is about 1900 mm per annum of which 75% is received during June and September. During Monsoon the climate is normally wet
and dry during winter. Both pre and post-monsoon months have unpredictable and erratic rainfall. Most of the terrain is flat thereby
surface water will be percolate in the ground. Groundwater is around 7.00 m, reflecting very fluctuating ground water level. During winter
this needs be replenished for better productivity.
Proper water harvesting structure check dam, percolation tank, opens well, diversion drain and surface pond are proposed in project area
for water harvesting thereby we can maintain or increase the water level. It is expected to raise 3 to 4 m after proper implementation and
maintenance of proposed structures.
135
Vegetative/Crop:
There is negligible area under forest cover area. Types of vegetation are also proposed in project area such as bamboo plantation,
horticultural, rubber plantation and pasture development. Vegetation is an important role in soil conservation process. Vegetation will
enhance the water table in the area and restore the ecological balance of the area. They play an important role in soil conservation and
moisture retention process. From the studies, we can say the Benefit cost ratio ranges from 2.35 to 3.73 for different agro forestry
projects.
Migration:
Employment is an important problem in the watershed area at all times. The main occupations of the people of the watershed area are
agriculture, animal husbandry and casual labour work. In most of the areas in the watershed, it is observed that only single crop
cultivation has done, which keeps the workers partially engaged for about 8 months and for another 4 months the peoples are migrated
to other cities or towns. The activities identified for the watershed area are mainly focused on making of both wage employment and self
employment opportunities. The watershed work has increase more availability of works like construction of earthen bunds, farm bunds,
village pond, plantation, etc. and self employment would be created by livelihood and production activities. More employments shall be
generated after the proper implementation of the proposed interventions.
136
Table 9.1: Expected outcome: Quantifiable indicators

1
1
2
3
4
5
6
Status of water table (Depth to Ground water level)

Ground water structures repaired/ rejuvenated
Quality of drinking water
Availability of drinking water
Increase in irrigation potential
Change in cropping/ land use pattern
3
Unit of
measurement
Meters
No.
Description
Description
Hec.
Description
Area under agricultural crop

I
Area under single crop
Ii
Area under double crop
iii
Area under multiple crop
Net increase in crop production area
Increase in area under Vegetation/Forest
Hec.
Hec.
Hec.
Hec.
Hec.
Hec.
10
11
12
13
14
Increase in area under horticulture

Increase in area under fuel
Increase in area under Fodder
Increase in milk production
Environmental Impact
Change in Soil Loss
Perenniality of flow and change in Run-off
Recharge of ground water
Hec.
Hec.
Hec.
Liters/day
14
No. of SHGs Promoted
No.
S.No. Item
8
9
4
Pre-project
Status
6.9
268/242
Not safe
Shortage
5
Expected Post-project
Status
3 to 4
Present land
used in paddy
and potato.
Along with paddy

Vegetable would be
promoted.
6
Remarks
WHS proposed
Safe
Adequate Available
It is expected by 20 %
more
Information not
available
0
sufficient
4650
Runoff=
1329 mm/year
Average soil
loss=54.25
Mt/ha/yr
79.43
5.464
9.398
5.5
28.1
sufficient
With soil conservation
measures, expected to
reduce by 80 %
137
15
16
17
Increase in no. of livelihoods

Increase in income
Status of Migration
No.
Rs.
No.
18
19
20
21
22
SHG Federations formed

Credit linkage with banks
Resource use agreements
WDF collection & management
Summary of lessons learnt
No.
Rs.
Rs.
Description
205
Migration will be
decrease
As per the guidelines
Table 9.2: Backward and Forward Linkages

1
Type of Marketing Facility
(A) Backward linkages
(i) Seed certification
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
(vii)
(viii)
(ix)
(x)
(xi)
(xii)
(B)
Seed supply system

Fertilizer supply system
Pesticide supply system
Credit institutions
Water supply
Extension services
Nurseries
Tools/machinery suppliers
Price Support system
Labour
Any other (please specify)
Forward linkages
2
Name of the institution
3
Pre-project (no.)
4
Expected post project status
As per scheme
As per scheme
Assam state seed certification

company
Through Govt.Channel
Private store
Bank
Govt. Service
Govt. on subsidy
138
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
(vii)
Harvesting/threshing machinery
Storage (including cold storage)
Road network
Transport facilities
Markets / Mandis
Agro and other Industries
Milk and other collection centres
Walk able
Poor
Nil
Nil
No any remarkable
information
Carable
Average
Weekly
Household basis
20% milk will be increased
(viii) Labour
(ix) Any other (please specify)
139
CHAPTER 10
M A PS
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
ANNEXURE A
ENGINEERING ESTIMATES
BETNAPARA
EARTH BANDH REPAIRING
BANDH DIMENSIONS
LENGTH
BREADTH
HEIGHT
SLANT HEIGHT
BOTTOM WIDTH
Sr. No.
1
2
Description Of Item
Site clearance
Earth work in excavation including removing the up
to a distance of 100m including dressing, cambering
gradingthe surface etc all completed as per direction.
deduct 12.5% shrinkage
TOTAL
Furnishing & laying of the live sods of perennial
turfing forming grass on embankment slope, verges
or other locations preparation of ground fetching of
rods and watering etc.on the drawing or as directed
by the engineering including shown
CONSIDERING REPAIRING COST = 1/3rd of CONSTRUCTION COST
800
2.14
1.22
1.73
4.58
IDEAL DIMENSIONS
TOP WIDTH
1
BOTTOM WIDTH 3
HEIGHT
1
SLANT HEIGHT 1.4
m
m
m
m
m
Item No.
Length
2.2/201
800
2.14
3.1 (301)
800
3.36
3.22/307
800
Breadth Depth
1.73
1.22
m
m
m
m
Quantity
Unit
Rate in Rs.
Amount
1712
Sq.m.
0.72
1232.64
3279.36
cu.m
409.92
2869.44
cum
cu.m
54
154949.8
1380.27
sq. m
24
33126.54
TOTAL
HENCE REPAIRING COST = Rs.
189308.9
63103
A-1
BETNAPARA
DRAINCLEANING
No.
1
CHANNELDIMENSIONS
LENGTH
BOTTOMWIDTH
HEIGHT
TOPWIDTH
1200
3.6
1
7.2
Description
Item
Excavationinordinarysoilbyheadload
infillingthebankofpondwithalllift
3.1/301(a)
1.5mandleadupto100min
accordancewithrequirementlinesand
m
m
m
m
No.
Length Breadth
1200
5.4
Depth
Quantity
Rate
unit
Amount
0.5
3240
99
cum
320760
TOTAL
320760
A-2
BETNAPARA
EARTHENCHECKDAM
LENGTH
BREADTH
DEPTH
SOILSEPTH
LOWERBREADTH
(CONSIDERINGSLOPE2.5:1)
S.No.
Item
Earth work in excavation
including removing the spoil as
directed up to a distance of 100m
including dressing, cambering
grading the surface etc all
completed as per direction.
Earthworkinfittingforcoreof
embankmentbyheadloadwithsoil
ofapprovedqualitywithaleadupto
30mandliftupto1.5minlayersnot
exceeding20cmthickincluding
breakingclods,dressing,gradingto
requiredshapeandcompactingto
meetrequirementetc
30
4.6
4.0
0.6
22.6
m
m
m
m
m
COREWALLDIMENSIONS
TOPWIDTH
1
BOTTOMWIDTH
3
HEIGHT
1
No.
ItemNo. Length Breadthepth/Thickne Quantity
m
m
m
Unit
Rate
Amount
3.1(301)
30
2.50
0.5
37.5
m3
54
2025
17.48
30
2.0
0.5
30
m3
81
2430
A-3
Earthworkbyheadloadfittingin
layersnotexceeding20cmthick
includingbreakingclods,dressing
andsectioningcamberingand
rammingwithinaleadupto30m
andliftupto1.5mincluding
paymentoflandcompensationfor
obtainingearthetc.(b)&(c)extra
leadbeyond30mandextraliftfor
each1.5m
Providingandlayingpitchingon
slopeslaidinwirecratesmadewith
4mmdiaGI4826in100mmx
100mmmesh(Weaveddiagonally)
including10%extraforlapsand
jointslaidwithstoneboulders
(weightingnotlessthan40Kgeach)
U/Sside
Furnishing&layingofthelivesodsof
perennialturfingforminggrasson
embankmentslope,vergesorother
locationsshownonthedrawingoras
directedbytheengineeringincluding
preparationofgroundfetchingof
rodsandwateringetc.
U/Sside
D/Sside
Costofsignboard,publicityetc.
17.47/(II)
30
13.6
4.0
1632
m3
62
101184
30
4.0
0.3
36
m3
2085
75060
30
30
7.8
8.94
Total
233.11
268.33
501.44
m2
m2
m2
LS
24
500
TOTAL
12034.51
500
193233.51
15.2(2503
3.22/307
1
1
A-4
CHOTOLATONGURI 1
SURFACE POND
Sr. No.
TOP LENGTH
36.52
BOTTOM LENGTH
30.424
TOP WIDTH
36.52
BOTTOM WIDTH
30.424
DEPTH
3.048
SLANT HEIGHT
4.311
AVG. LENGTH
33.472
AVG. WIDTH
33.472
Description Of Item
Item No.
directed for excavated pondup to
3.1
a distance of 100m including
(301)(b)
dressing , cambering, grading the
surface etc all
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
Considering slope of pond 1:1
Depth
3.048
Area
Quantity
Unit
Rate
Amount
1117.278 3405.463
cum.
54
183895
Planting of trees in the

embankments 4 Nos. in each
embankment
16
nos.
300
4800
Cost of signboard, publicity etc.
LS
500
500
TOTAL
189195
A-5
NO 2 DAGARPARA
EARTHEN CHECK DAM REPAIRING
LENGTH
BREADTH
DEPTH
SOIL SEPTH
LOWER BREADTH
(CONSIDERING SLOPE 2.5:1)
S. No.
30
4
3.5
0.6
19.75
Item
Earth work in excavation including removing
the spoil as directed up to a distance of 100m
including dressing, cambering grading the
surface etc all completed as per direction.
Earth work in fitting for core of embankment by

head load with soil of approved quality with a
lead up to 30m and lift up to 1.5 m in layers not
exceeding 20cm thick including breaking clods,
dressing, grading to required shape and
compacting to meet requirement etc
2
m
m
m
m
m
CORE WALL DIMENSIONS

TOP WIDTH
1
BOTTOM WIDTH
3
HEIGHT
1
No.
Item No.
3.1 (301)
30
17.48
17.47 /(II)
Earth work by head load fitting in layers not

dressing and sectioning cambering and ramming
within a lead up to 30m and lift up to 1.5m
including payment of land compensation for
obtaining earth etc. (b) & (c) extra lead beyond
30m and extra lift for each 1.5m
Length Breadth
Depth
Quantity
Unit
2.50
0.5
37.5
30
2.0
0.5
30
30
11.9
3.5
1246.875
30
3.5
0.3
31.5
m
m
m
Rate
Amount
54
2025
81
2430
62
77306.25
m3
2085
65677.5
Providing and laying pitching on slopes laid in wire

crates made with 4mm dia GI 4826 in 100mm x
100mm mesh (Weaved diagonally) including 10%
extra for laps and joints laid with stone boulders
(weighting not less than 40 Kg each)
U/S side
15.2 (2503)
A-6

turfing forming grass on embankment slope,
verges or other locations shown on the drawing
or as directed by the engineering including
preparation of ground fetching of rods and
watering etc.
3.22/307
U/S side
D/S side
30
30
1
1
6.42
7.83
Total
m
m2
427.51
m2
LS
192.72
234.79
24
500
TOTAL
10260.20
500
158198.949
52733
NO 2 DAGARPARA
EARTHEN CHECK DAM
LENGTH
BREADTH
DEPTH
SOIL SEPTH
LOWER BREADTH
S. No.
Item
35
4
4.5
0.6
24.25
m
m
m
m
m
No.
Item No.
3.1 (301)

TOP WIDTH
1
BOTTOM WIDTH
3
HEIGHT
1
Length Breadth
Depth/Thickness
Quantity
35
2.50
0.5
43.75
Unit
m
m
m
Rate
Amount
54
2362.5
A-7

2

17.48
35
2.0
0.5
35
m3
81
2835
17.47 /(II)
35
14.1
4.5
2224.69
62
137930.625
35
4.5
0.3
47.25
m3
2085
98516.25
35
35
9.12
10.06
319.08
352.18
m
m2
671.26
m2
LS
24
500
TOTAL
16110.30
500
258254.6734

15.2 (2503)
U/S side
watering etc.
U/S side
D/S side
1
1
3.22/307
Total
5
NO 2 DAGARPARA
EARTHEN CHECK DAM
A-8
S. No.
LENGTH
BREADTH
DEPTH
SOIL SEPTH
LOWER BREADTH
30
3.5
4.0
0.6
21.5
Item
No.
Item No.
3.1 (301)
30
2.50
0.5
37.5
17.48
30
2.0
0.5
30
17.47 /(II)
30
12.5
4.0
1500
30
4.0
0.3
36

2

m
m
m
m
m

TOP WIDTH
1
BOTTOM WIDTH
3
HEIGHT
1
Length Breadth
Depth/Thickness
Quantity
Unit
m
m
m
Rate
Amount
54
2025
81
2430
62
93000
m3
2085
75060

U/S side
15.2 (2503)
A-9

watering etc.
3.22/307
U/S side
30
7.77033
233.11
m2
D/S side
30
8.94427
268.33
501.44
m2
Total
5
m2
LS
24
500
TOTAL
12034.51
500
185049.5131
NO 2 DAGARPARA
REPAIR OF FISHERY BANK
COST OF REPAIR OF FISHERY BANK PER R.M. = Rs.
181
LENGTH
766 m
TOTAL REPAIRING COST
138646 Rs.
S. No.
Item
Earth work in excavation including removing the
spoil as directed up to a distance of 100m
including dressing, cambering grading the surface
etc all completed as per direction.

25 Bigha Area = 33250 sq. m. Assuming a Fishery pond of 133 X 250 sq. m.
Item No.
No.
Length Breadth
Depth
3.1 (301)
150
0.3
17.48
150
0.5
Quantity
Unit
Rate
Amount
45
m3
54
2430
75
m3
81
6075
A-10

watering etc.
17.47/(II)
150
3.22/307
150
3.5
0.3
LS
90
m3
62
5580
525
24
12600
500
TOTAL
COST PER R.M.
500
27185
181
A-11
NO 2 DAGARPARA
EARTH BANDH/ EARTH BUND
BANDH DIMENSIONS
LENGTH
BREADTH
HEIGHT
SLANT HEIGHT
BOTTOM WIDTH
Sr. No.
1
2
Description Of Item
800
3
2
2.83
7
Item No.
Site clearance
2.2/201
up to a distance of 100m including dressing,
3.1 (301)
cambering gradingthe surface etc all completed as
per direction.
TOTAL
verges or other locations preparation of ground
3.22/307
fetching of rods and watering etc.on the drawing
or as directed by the engineering including shown
m
m
m
m
m
Length
Breadth
800
800
800
2.83
Depth
Quantity
Unit
Rate in Rs.
Amount
2400
Sq.m.
0.72
1728
8000
cu.m
1000
7000
cum
cu.m
54
378000
2262.74
sq. m
24
54305.8
TOTAL
434033.8
A-12
DEOTARI
COSTESTIMATEFOREARTHENCHECKDAM
S.No.
1
LENGTH
BREADTH
DEPTH
SOILSEPTH
LOWERBREADTH
30
5
3.0
0.6
18.5
Item
Earthworkinexcavationincludingremovingthe
spoilasdirecteduptoadistanceof100m
includingdressing,camberinggradingthe
surfaceetcallcompletedasperdirection.
No.
ItemNo.
3.1(301)
30
2.50
0.5
17.48
30
2.0
17.47/(II)
30
30
Earthworkinfittingforcoreofembankmentby
headloadwithsoilofapprovedqualitywitha
leadupto30mandliftupto1.5minlayersnot
exceeding20cmthickincludingbreakingclods,
dressing,gradingtorequiredshapeand
compactingtomeetrequirementetc
Earthworkbyheadloadfittinginlayersnot
dressingandsectioningcamberingandramming
withinaleadupto30mandliftupto1.5m
includingpaymentoflandcompensationfor
obtainingearthetc.(b)&(c)extraleadbeyond
30mandextraliftforeach1.5m
Providingandlayingpitchingonslopeslaidin
wirecratesmadewith4mmdiaGI4826in
100mmx100mmmesh(Weaveddiagonally)
including10%extraforlapsandjointslaidwith
stoneboulders(weightingnotlessthan40Kg
each)
U/Sside
m
m
m
m
m
COREWALLDIMENSIONS
TOPWIDTH
m
1
m
BOTTOMWID
3
HEIGHT
m
1
Length Breadth Depth/Thicknes Quantity
Unit
Rate
Amount
37.5
m3
54
2025
0.5
30
m3
81
2430
11.8
3.0
1057.5
m3
62
65565
3.0
0.3
27
m3
2085
56295
15.2(2503)
A-13
Furnishing&layingofthelivesodsofperennial
turfingforminggrassonembankmentslope,
vergesorotherlocationsshownonthedrawing
orasdirectedbytheengineeringincluding
preparationofgroundfetchingofrodsand
wateringetc.
3.22/307
U/Sside
30
5.08
152.33
m2
D/Sside
30
6.71
201.25
m2
353.58
m2
LS
Total
5
24
500
TOTAL
8485.88
500
135300.9
A-14
DEOTARI
LENGTH
BREADTH
DEPTH
SOILSEPTH
LOWERBREADTH
S.No.
Item
Earth work in excavation including
removing the spoil as directed up to a
distance of 100m including dressing,
cambering grading the surface etc all
each)
30
8
3.0
0.6
21.5
m
m
m
m
m
COREWALLDIMENSIONS
TOPWIDTH
m
1
m
BOTTOMWID
3
HEIGHT
m
1
Length Breadth Depth/Thicknes Quantity
Unit
Rate
Amount
37.5
m3
54
2025
0.5
30
m3
81
2430
3.0
1327.5
m3
62
82305
No.
ItemNo.
3.1(301)
30
2.50
0.5
17.48
30
2.0
17.47/(II)
30
14.8
15.2(2503)
A-15
27
m3
5.08
152.33
m2
6.71
201.25
m2
353.58
m2
LS
30
3.0
30
30
U/Sside
wateringetc.
U/Sside
D/Sside
0.3
56295
24
500
TOTAL
8485.88
500
152040.9
3.22/307
Total
5
2085
A-16
GELASUGAON
EARTHENCHECKDAM
LENGTH
BREADTH
DEPTH
SOILSEPTH
LOWERBREADTH
S.No.
27
7.7
3.1
0.6
21.551
Item
m
m
m
m
m
COREWALLDIMENSIONS
TOPWIDTH
1
BOTTOMWIDTH
3
HEIGHT
1
No.
ItemNo.
Length
Breadth
Depth
Quantity
Unit
Rate
Amount
3.1(301)
27
2.50
0.5
33.75
m3
54
1822.5
17.48
27
2.0
0.5
27
81
2187
17.47/(II)
27
14.6
3.1
1215.4668
m3
62
75358.94179
27
3.1
0.3
24.9318
2085
51982.803
27
27
5.29
6.88
142.77
185.83
m
2
m
328.60
m
LS
24
500
TOTAL
7886.410046
500
139737.6548
Providingandlayingpitchingonslopeslaidinwire
cratesmadewith4mmdiaGI4826in100mmx
100mmmesh(Weaveddiagonally)including10%
extraforlapsandjointslaidwithstoneboulders
15.2(2503)
U/Sside
wateringetc.
U/Sside
D/Sside
1
1
3.22/307
Total
5
m
m
m
A-17
GELASUGAON
EARTHENCHECKDAM
S.No.
LENGTH
BREADTH
DEPTH
SOILSEPTH
LOWERBREADTH
Item
25
6
3.7
0.6
22.65
m
m
m
m
m
COREWALLDIMENSIONS
TOPWIDTH
1
BOTTOMWIDTH
3
HEIGHT
1
No.
ItemNo.
Length
Breadth
Depth
Quantity
Unit
Rate
Amount
3.1(301)
25
2.50
0.5
31.25
m3
54
1687.5
17.48
25
2.0
0.5
25
81
2025
17.47/(II)
25
14.3
3.7
1325.1
62
82153.875
25
3.7
0.3
27.75
2085
57858.75
25
25
6.96
8.27
174.06
206.84
m
2
m
380.90
m
LS
24
500
TOTAL
9141.60
500
153366.73
15.2(2503)
U/Sside
wateringetc.
U/Sside
D/Sside
1
1
3.22/307
Total
5
m
m
m
A-18
GELASUGAON
EARTHENCHECKDAM
LENGTH
BREADTH
DEPTH
SOILSEPTH
LOWERBREADTH
S.No.
Item
each)
U/Sside
wateringetc.
27
7.7
3.1
0.6
21.551
m
m
m
m
m
COREWALLDIMENSIONS
TOPWIDTH
1
BOTTOMWIDTH
3
HEIGHT
1
m
m
m
No.
ItemNo.
Length
Breadth
Depth
Quantity
Unit
Rate
Amount
3.1(301)
27
2.50
0.5
33.75
m3
54
1822.5
17.48
27
2.0
0.5
27
m3
81
2187
17.47/(II)
27
14.6
3.1
1215.4668
m3
62
75358.94179
27
3.1
0.3
24.9318
m3
2085
51982.803
15.2(2503)
3.22/307
A-19
U/Sside
D/Sside
1
1
27
27
5.29
6.88
Total
142.77
185.83
m2
m2
328.60
m2
LS
24
500
TOTAL
7886.410046
500
139737.6548
A-20
GELASUGAON
EARTHENCHECKDAM
LENGTH
BREADTH
DEPTH
SOILSEPTH
LOWERBREADTH
S.No.
25
6
3.7
0.6
22.65
Item
COREWALLDIMENSIONS
TOPWIDTH
1
BOTTOMWIDTH
3
HEIGHT
1
m
m
m
No.
ItemNo.
Length
Breadth
Depth
Quantity
Unit
Rate
Amount
3.1(301)
25
2.50
0.5
31.25
m3
54
1687.5
17.48
25
2.0
0.5
25
m3
81
2025
17.47/(II)
25
14.3
3.7
1325.1
m3
62
82153.875
25
3.7
0.3
27.75
m3
2085
57858.75
each)
U/Sside
m
m
m
m
m
15.2(2503)
A-21
wateringetc.
3.22/307
U/Sside
25
6.96
174.06
m2
D/Sside
25
8.27
206.84
m2
380.90
m2
LS
Total
5
24
500
TOTAL
9141.60
500
153366.73
A-22
KUMARSALI(PATHAR)
SURFACEPOND
TOPLENGTH
Sr.No.
2
3
10
BOTTOMLENGTH
TOPWIDTH
10
BOTTOMWIDTH
20
DEPTH
3.048
SLANTHEIGHT
4.31
AVG.LENGTH
9
m
AVG.WIDTH
15
m
DescriptionOfItem
ItemNo. Depth
Earthworkinexcavationincluding
removingthespoilasdirectedfor
3.1
excavatedponduptoadistanceof100m
3.048
(301)(b)
includingdressing,cambering,gradingthe
surfaceetcall
Plantingoftreesintheembankments4
Nos.ineachembankment
Area
Quantity
Unit
Rate
Amount
136.67
416.56
cum.
54
22494.24
16
nos.
300
4800
LS
500
TOTAL
500
27794.24
Depth
Quantity
Rate
KUMARSALI(PATHAR)
DRAINCLEANING
No.
DRAINDIMENSIONS
LENGTH
BOTTOMWIDTH
HEIGHT
TOPWIDTH
800
4
1
6
Description
Item
m
m
m
m
No.
Length
Breadth
unit
Amount
A-23
Excavationinordinarysoilbyheadload
infillingthebankofpondwithalllift
1.5mandleadupto100min
3.1/301(a)
accordancewithrequirementlinesand
crosssection.
800
0.5
2000
99
cum
198000
TOTAL
198000
A-24
KUMARSALI
S.No.
1
LENGTH
BREADTH
DEPTH
SOILSEPTH
LOWERBREADTH
30
8
3.0
0.6
21.5
Item
Earth work in excavation including removing the spoil as
directed up to a distance of 100m including dressing,
cambering grading the surface etc all completed as per
direction.
No.
ItemNo.
Length
Breadth
Depth
Quantity
Unit
Rate
Amount
3.1(301)
30
2.50
0.5
37.5
m3
54
2025
17.48
30
2.0
0.5
30
m3
81
2430
17.47/(II)
30
14.8
3.0
1327.5
m3
62
82305
30
3.0
0.3
27
m3
2085
56295
30
30
5.08
6.71
Total
152.33
201.25
353.58
m2
m2
m2
LS
24
500
TOTAL
8485.88
500
152040.88
Earthworkinfittingforcoreofembankmentbyheadloadwithsoil
ofapprovedqualitywithaleadupto30mandliftupto1.5min
layersnotexceeding20cmthickincludingbreakingclods,dressing,
gradingtorequiredshapeandcompactingtomeetrequirementetc
m
m
m
m
m
COREWALLDIMENSIONS
TOPWIDTH
1
BOTTOMWIDTH
3
HEIGHT
1
m
m
m
Earthworkbyheadloadfittinginlayersnotexceeding20cmthick
includingbreakingclods,dressingandsectioningcamberingand
rammingwithinaleadupto30mandliftupto1.5mincluding
paymentoflandcompensationforobtainingearthetc.(b)&(c)
extraleadbeyond30mandextraliftforeach1.5m
Providingandlayingpitchingonslopeslaidinwirecratesmadewith
4mmdiaGI4826in100mmx100mmmesh(Weaveddiagonally)
including10%extraforlapsandjointslaidwithstoneboulders
U/Sside
Furnishing&layingofthelivesodsofperennialturfingforminggrass
onembankmentslope,vergesorotherlocationsshownonthe
drawingorasdirectedbytheengineeringincludingpreparationof
groundfetchingofrodsandwateringetc.
U/Sside
D/Sside
15.2(2503)
1
3.22/307
1
1
A-25
KUMARSALI
OPENWELL
DIAMETER
DEPTH
Sr.No. DescriptionOfItem
Sitepreparationincludinguprootingwildvegetation,grass,bushes
andshrubs,removalofrubbishanddisposalofunserviceable
materials.
i)ByManualMeans
A)Inareaofnonthornyjungle
Earthworkinexcavationforfoundationetc.includingbailingout
waterwherenecessaryasdirectedandspecifieduptoadepthof
5.00m(i)Inhard/densesoil
10 m
20 m
Item
No.
Length
Breadth
Depth
Quantity
Unit
LS
1.1(b)
78.5
20
L.S.
1570
cu.m
Rate
Amount
550
550
82.03
128787
500
TOTAL
500
129837
A-26
CHOTOLATONGURI 1
SURFACE POND
Sr. No.
TOP LENGTH
36.52
BOTTOM LENGTH
30.424
TOP WIDTH
36.52
BOTTOM WIDTH
30.424
DEPTH
3.048
SLANT HEIGHT
4.311
AVG. LENGTH
33.472
AVG. WIDTH
33.472
Description Of Item
Item No.
directed for excavated pondup to
3.1
a distance of 100m including
(301)(b)
dressing , cambering, grading the
surface etc all
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
Considering slope of pond 1:1
Depth
3.048
Area
Quantity
Unit
Rate
Amount
1117.278 3405.463
cum.
54
183895
Planting of trees in the

embankments 4 Nos. in each
embankment
16
nos.
300
4800
LS
500
500
TOTAL
189195
A-27
MALIPARA2
BOULDERPITCHING
LENGTH
BREADTH
DEPTH
SOILDEPTH
S.No.
1
2
100
3
3.0
0.6
Item
Easingofbankforboulderpitching
Providingandlayingofsandgravelas
filtermediabelowpitching
Providing&layingbouldersapronon
riverbedforprotectionagainstscour
withstoneboulders
weighingnotlessthan40KGeach
completeasperdrawingand
technicalspecification.
m
m
m
m
Itemno.
No.
Length
Breadth
Depth
Quantity
Unit
Rate
Amount
3.1(301)(b)
100
1.20
360
cum
54
19440
15.5/2504
100
2.9
0.1
28.87
cum
1263
36459.67
1
1
1
100
100
100
2.9
0.75
2
0.3
1
0.45
86.60
75
90
251.60
cum
cum
cum
cum
15.1/2403
Forslopingbank
Fornoseportion
Forriverbankportion
Total
1154
TOTAL
290349.3316
346249.0011
A-28
MALIPARA2
BOULDERPITCHING
LENGTH
BREADTH
DEPTH
SOILDEPTH
S.No.
1
2
60
3
2.0
0.6
Item
Providingandlayingofsandgravelas
filtermediabelowpitching
m
m
m
m
Itemno.
No.
Length
Breadth
Depth
Quantity
Unit
Rate
3.1(301)(b)
60
0.87
104.00
cum
54
15.5/2504
60
1.7
0.1
10.39
cum
1263
Amount
5616
13125.48
Providing&layingbouldersapronon
riverbedforprotectionagainstscour
withstoneboulders
weighingnotlessthan40KGeach
completeasperdrawingand
technicalspecification.
Forslopingbank
Fornoseportion
Forriverbankportion
15.1/2403
1
1
1
60
60
60
1.7
0.75
2
0.3
1
0.45
Total
31.18
45
54
130.18
cum
cum
cum
cum
1154
TOTAL
150224.1594
168965.6404
A-29
MALIPARA2
EARTHBANDHREPAIRING
BANDHDIMENSIONS
LENGTH
BREADTH
HEIGHT
SLANTHEIGHT
BOTTOMWIDTH
Sr.No.
DescriptionOfItem
35
2.13
1.22
1.73
4.57
IDEALDIMENSIONS
TOPWIDTH
BOTTOMWIDTH
HEIGHT
SLANTHEIGHT
m
m
m
m
m
ItemNo.
Length
Breadth
Siteclearance
2.2/201
35
2.13
removingtheuptoadistanceof
100mincludingdressing,cambering
gradingthesurfaceetcallcompleted
asperdirection.
3.1(301)
35
3.35
deduct12.5%shrinkage
TOTAL
Furnishing&layingofthelivesodsof
perennialturfingforminggrasson
embankmentslope,vergesorother
locationspreparationofground
fetchingofrodsandwateringetc.on
thedrawingorasdirectedbythe
engineeringincludingshown
3.22/307
CONSIDERINGREPAIRINGCOST=1/3rdofCONSTRUCTIONCOST
35
1.73
Depth
1.22
1
3
1
1.4
m
m
m
m
Quantity
Unit
RateinRs.
Amount
74.55
Sq.m.
0.72
53.676
143.05
cu.m
17.88
125.16
cum
cu.m
54
6758.88
60.39
sq.m
24
1449.29
TOTAL
HENCEREPAIRINGCOST=Rs.
8261.8383
2754
A-30
MALIPARA2
OPENWELL
DIAMETER
DEPTH
Sr.No.
DescriptionOfItem
10 m
20 m
ItemNo.
Length
Breadth
Sitepreparationincludinguprooting
wildvegetation,grass,bushes
andshrubs,removalofrubbishand
disposalofunserviceablematerials.
Depth
Quantity
Unit
LS
Rate
Amount
550
550
82.03
128787.1
500
500
TOTAL
129837.1
i)ByManualMeans
A)Inareaofnonthornyjungle
Earthworkinexcavationfor
foundationetc.includingbailingout
waterwherenecessaryasdirected
andspecifieduptoadepthof5.00m
(i)Inhard/densesoil
1.1(b)
78.5
20
L.S.
1570
cu.m
A-31
BANDHDIMENSIONS
LENGTH
BREADTH
HEIGHT
SLANTHEIGHT
BOTTOMWIDTH
Sr.No.
1
DescriptionOfItem
600
3
2
2.83
7
ItemNo.
Siteclearance
2.2/201
removingtheuptoadistanceof100m
includingdressing,camber8Tj
/C2 _11Tf3.68including
m
m
m
m
m
Length
Breadth
600
Depth
Quantity
Unit
1800
Sq.m.
Ratein
Rs.
0.72
Amount
1296
SUBAIJHAR
LENGTH
BREADTH
DEPTH
SOILSEPTH
LOWERBREADTH
S.No.
20
6.15
4.0
0.6
24.15
Item
spoil as directed up to a distance of 100m
Earthworkinfittingforcoreofembankmentbyhead
loadwithsoilofapprovedqualitywithaleadupto
30mandliftupto1.5minlayersnotexceeding20cm
thickincludingbreakingclods,dressing,gradingto
requiredshapeandcompactingtomeetrequirement
etc
withinaleadupto30mandliftupto1.5mincluding
paymentoflandcompensationforobtainingearth
etc.(b)&(c)extraleadbeyond30mandextraliftfor
each1.5m
ItemNo.
Length
Breadth
Depth
Quantity
Unit
3.1(301)
20
2.50
0.5
25
17.48
20
2.0
0.5
17.47/(II)
20
15.2
20
4.0
20
20
7.77
8.94
m
m
m
Rate
Amount
54
1350
20
m3
81
1620
4.0
1212
62
75144
0.3
24
m3
2085
50040
Total
155.41
178.89
334.29
m2
2
m
2
m
LS
24
500
TOTAL
8023.008732
500
136677.0087
15.2(2503)
U/Sside
D/Sside
1
1
COREWALLDIMENSIONS
TOPWIDTH
1
BOTTOMWIDTH
3
HEIGHT
1
No.
U/Sside
turfingforminggrassonembankmentslope,verges
orotherlocationsshownonthedrawingoras
directedbytheengineeringincludingpreparationof
groundfetchingofrodsandwateringetc.
m
m
m
m
m
3.22/307
A-33
SUBAIJHAR
BOULDERPITCHING
LENGTH
BREADTH
DEPTH
SOILDEPTH
S.No.
1
2
30
2.5
2.0
0.6
Item
Itemno.
3.1(301)(b)
Providingandlayingofsandgravelasfiltermedia
15.5/2504
belowpitching
Providing&layingbouldersaprononriverbedfor
protectionagainstscourwithstoneboulders
15.1/2403
weighingnotlessthan40KGeachcompleteasper
drawingandtechnicalspecification.
Forslopingbank
Fornoseportion
Forriverbankportion
m
m
m
m
No.
1
Length
30
Breadth
0.87
Depth
2
Quantity
52
Unit
cum
Rate
54
Amount
2808
30
1.7
0.1
5.20
cum
1263
6562.74051
1
1
1
30
30
30
1.7
0.75
2
0.3
1
0.45
Total
15.59
22.5
27
65.09
cum
cum
cum
cum
1154
TOTAL
75112.07969
84482.8202
A-34
SUBAIJHAR
BANDHREPARING
BANDHDIMENSIONS
LENGTH
BREADTH
HEIGHT
SLANTHEIGHT
BOTTOMWIDTH
Sr.No.
1
DescriptionOfItem
Siteclearance
Earthworkinexcavationincludingremovingtheup
toadistanceof100mincludingdressing,cambering
gradingthesurfaceetcallcompletedasper
direction.
deduct12.5%shrinkage
TOTAL
turfingforminggrassonembankmentslope,verges
orotherlocationspreparationofgroundfetchingof
rodsandwateringetc.onthedrawingorasdirected
bytheengineeringincludingshown
800
2.14
1.22
1.73
4.58
m
m
m
m
m
ItemNo.
2.2/201
Length
800
Breadth
2.14
Depth
Quantity
1712
Unit
Sq.m.
3.1(301)
800
3.36
1.22
3279.36
cu.m
409.92
2869.44
1380.27
3.22/307
800
1.73
RateinRs.
0.72
Amount
1232.64
cum
cu.m
54
154949.76
sq.m
24
33126.53849
Total
CONSIDERINGREPAIRINGCOST=1/3rdofCONSTRUCTIONCOST
HENCEREPAIRINGCOST=Rs.
189308.9385
63103
A-35
No.2 UTTARPARA
DRAIN CLEANING
No.
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS
LENGTH
BOTTOM WIDTH
HEIGHT
TOP WIDTH
700
2.5
1
6.5
Description
Item
No.
Length
Breadth
Depth
Quantity
Rate
unit
Amount
3.1/301(a)
700
4.5
0.5
1575
99
cum
155925
TOTAL
155925
Excavation in ordinary soil by

head load in filling the bank of
pond with all lift 1.5m and lead
up to 100m in accordance with
requirement lines and cross
section.
m
m
m
m
No.2 UTTARPARA
EARTH BANDH REPAIRING
BANDH DIMENSIONS
LENGTH
BREADTH
HEIGHT
SLANT HEIGHT
BOTTOM WIDTH
Sr. No.
1
Description Of Item
100
2.13
1.22
1.73
4.57
Item No.
Site clearance
2.2/201
Earth work in excavation including
removing the up to a distance of
100m including dressing, cambering
3.1 (301)
gradingthe surface etc all
m
m
m
m
m
Length
Breadth
100
2.13
100
3.35
Depth
1.22
Quantity
Unit
213
Sq.m.
408.7
cu.m
51.09
cum
Rate in
Rs.
0.72
Amount
153.36
A-36
TOTAL
Furnishing & laying of the live sods
of perennial turfing forming grass
on embankment slope, verges or
other locations preparation of
ground fetching of rods and
watering etc.on the drawing or as
directed by the engineering
including shown
3.22/307
100
1.73
357.6125
cu.m
54
19311.08
172.53
sq. m
24
4140.82
TOTAL
23605.25
7868
A-37
ANNEXURE B
MICRO-WATERSHEDWISE ACTION PLAN-PRODUCTION & MICROENTERPRISE
Name of the Micro-Watershed
Village
Kumarsali Pathar
Kumarsali
Chotoladanguri No.1
Poultry
Vermi Compost
Poultry
Supari Processing Unit (Individual)
Fish Pond Development (Pisiculture)
Crop Demonstration Vegetable
Poultry

Village
Chotoladanguri No.2
Dimajhora
Boroladanguri No.1
Activities
Activities
Poultry
Rice Processing Unit (Individual)
Duck Rearing Scheme
Poultry
Bee Keeping
Vermi Compost
Poultry
Unit
Unit Cost
(Rs.)
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Area (ha)
10000
50000
9500
50000
10000
63000
450000
24750
10000
Area (ha)
Nos.
Unit
Unit Cost
(Rs.)
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Area (ha)
Area (ha)
Nos.
Nos.
10000
95000
95000
12000
10000
20000
16100
450000
9500
10000
Kumarsali MWS
Phy (No)
Fin (Rs.)
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.266
1
2
10000
50000
9500
50000
10000
63000
119700
24750
20000
Ladanguri MWS
Phy (No)
Fin (Rs.)
2
1
1
2
1
2
0.5
0.1995
2
2
20000
95000
95000
24000
10000
40000
8050
89775
19000
20000
Year of Implementation
1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th
Year
4th Year
3rd Year
5th Year
3rd Year
4th Year
5th Year
5th Year
2nd Year
4th Year
1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th
Year
4th Year
5th Year
5th Year
5th Year
4th Year
5th Year
2nd Year
5th Year
5th Year
4th Year
B-1

Village
Uttarpara No.1
Uttarpara No.2

Vermi Compost
Vermi Compost

Village
Deotori
Saraikhusra
Betnapara
Golapara
Katuribari
Activities
Activities

Eri Rearing House
Vermi Compost
Poultry
Duck Rearing Scheme
Piggery
Aggroforestry
Eri Rearing House
Eri food plant with supply of Start Up tools
Unit
Unit Cost
(Rs.)
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
95000
9500
63000
9500
Unit
Unit Cost
(Rs.)
Area (ha)
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Area (ha)
Nos.
Nos.
Area (ha)
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Area (ha)
Area (ha)
Nos.
Area (ha)
Nos.
450000
63000
50000
81000
9500
10000
12000
450000
63000
100000
116000
50000
63000
81000
24750
450000
95000
24750
30000
Uttarpara MWS
Phy (No)
Fin (Rs.)
1
1
1
1
95000
9500
63000
9500
Deotari MWS
Phy (No)
Fin (Rs.)
0.3325
1
1
1
2
1
1
0.133
1
1
0.5
1
1
1
1
0.133
1
0.133
1
149625
63000
50000
81000
19000
10000
12000
59850
63000
100000
58000
50000
63000
81000
24750
59850
95000
3291.75
30000
1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th
Year
5th Year
5th Year
5th Year
5th Year
1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th
Year
5th Year
5th Year
3rd Year
5th Year
5th Year
4th Year
5th Year
5th Year
5th Year
5th Year
3rd Year
3rd Year
5th Year
5th Year
2nd Year
5th Year
5th Year
2nd Year
5th Year
B-2

Village
Dagarpara No.1
Dagarpara No.2
Subaijhar
Malipara
Silbari
Monakosha
Bashbari Ambari 1
Activities

Piggery
Poultry
Poultry
Vermi Compost
Piggery
Aggroforestry
Poultry
Bee Keeping
Vermi Compost
Vermi Compost
Vermi Compost
Poultry
Muga food plant with supply of farming tools
Vermi Compost
Poultry
Unit
Unit Cost
(Rs.)
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Area (ha)
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Area (ha)
Nos.
Area (ha)
Nos.
Area (ha)
Nos.
Nos.
Area (ha)
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Area (ha)
63000
100000
10000
24750
10000
9500
63000
95000
24750
100000
116000
10000
16100
20000
9500
450000
63000
9500
50000
63000
9500
10000
36000
63000
9500
10000
450000
Dagarpara MWS
Phy (No)
Fin (Rs.)
1
1
3
1.862
2
1
1
1
1
1
0.5
1
1
2
2
0.266
1
2
1
1
4
2
1
1
2
1
0.133
63000
100000
30000
46084.5
20000
9500
63000
95000
24750
100000
58000
10000
16100
40000
19000
119700
63000
19000
50000
63000
38000
20000
36000
63000
19000
10000
59850
1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th
Year
5th Year
5th Year
4th Year
2nd Year
4th Year
5th Year
5th Year
5th Year
2nd Year
5th Year
3rd Year
4th Year
2nd Year
2nd Year
5th Year
5th Year
5th Year
5th Year
3rd Year
5th Year
5th Year
4th Year
5th Year
5th Year
5th Year
4th Year
5th Year
B-3

Village
Gelasugaon
Majrabari
Chorapat No.1
Activities

Poultry
Vermi Compost
Poultry
Horticulture nursery
Unit
Unit Cost
(Rs.)
Area (ha)
Nos.
450000
95000
Nos.
36000
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
10000
9500
36000
95000
50000
10000
Area (ha)
358000
Amguri MWS
Phy (No)
Fin (Rs.)
0.133
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
0.133
59850
95000
36000
10000
19000
36000
95000
50000
10000
47614
1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th
Year
5th Year
5th Year
5th Year
4th Year
5th Year
5th Year
5th Year
3rd Year
4th Year
5th Year
B-4
ANNEXURE C
MICRO-WATERSHEDWISE ACTION PLAN-LIVELIHOOD ACTIVITIES
Village
Kumarsali Pathar
Kumarsali
Chotoladanguri No.1
Bee Keeping
Establishment of Goat Farming
Carpentry
Cycle Repairing
Bee Keeping
Rural Backyard Poultry Rearing

Village
Chotoladanguri No.2
Dimajhora
Boroladanguri No.1
Activities
Activities
Bamboo Craft
Duck Rearing Scheme
Bee Keeping
Wood Craft making
Cycle Repairing
Bamboo Craft
Unit
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Unit
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Kumarsali MWS
Unit Cost Phy (No) Fin (Rs.)
(Rs.)
20000
25000
24000
40000
50000
20000
10000
50000
50000
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
20000
25000
24000
40000
50000
20000
20000
50000
50000
Ladanguri MWS
(Rs.)
75000
12000
20000
75000
50000
10000
40000
75000
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
75000
12000
20000
75000
50000
10000
40000
75000
Year of
Implementation
1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th
Year
2nd Year
2nd Year
3rd Year
3rd Year
4th Year
2nd Year
3rd Year
4th Year
4th Year
Year of
Implementation
1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th
Year
3rd Year
2nd Year
2nd Year
5th Year
4th Year
3rd Year
3rd Year
3rd Year
C-1

Village
Uttarpara No.1
Uttarpara No.2
Carpentry
Mobile repairing
Carpentry
Mobile repairing

Village
Deotori
Saraikhusra
Betnapara
Golapara
Katuribari
Activities
Activities
Cycle Repairing
Wood Craft making
Bee Keeping
Bamboo Craft
Bee Keeping
Duck Rearing Scheme
Bamboo Craft
Pottery
Goat Farming
Bamboo Craft
Cycle Repairing
Bamboo Craft
Duck rearing scheme
Unit
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Unit
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Uttarpara MWS
(Rs.)
24000
50000
30000
24000
10000
30000
1
1
1
1
1
1
24000
50000
30000
24000
10000
30000
Deotari MWS
(Rs.)
40000
75000
50000
20000
75000
20000
12000
75000
75000
25000
50000
50000
75000
50000
40000
75000
50000
50000
12000
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
40000
75000
100000
20000
75000
20000
24000
75000
75000
50000
100000
50000
75000
50000
40000
75000
50000
50000
12000
Year of
Implementation
1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th
Year
3rd Year
4th Year
4th Year
3rd Year
3rd Year
4th Year
Year of
Implementation
1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th
Year
3rd Year
5th Year
4th Year
2nd Year
3rd Year
2nd Year
2nd Year
3rd Year
5th Year
2nd Year
3rd Year
4th Year
3rd Year
4th Year
3rd Year
3rd Year
4th Year
3rd Year
2nd Year
C-2

Village
Gelasugaon
Majrabari
Chorapat No.1
Activities
Wood Craft making

Bamboo Craft
Goat Farming
Wood Craft making
Carpentry
Unit
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Amguri MWS
(Rs.)
75000
50000
75000
50000
25000
50000
75000
24000
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
75000
50000
75000
50000
25000
50000
75000
24000
Year of
Implementation
1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th
Year
5th Year
3rd Year
3rd Year
4th Year
2nd Year
4th Year
5th Year
3rd Year
C-4

Chirang (II) 2010 11 Daisamjhora Iwmp

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Chirang (II) 2010 11 Daisamjhora Iwmp

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DPR Formats

DETAILED PROJECT REPORT OF IWMP

Terracon Ecotech Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

Project Advisor, Financial Analyst

Project Head, Environment Planner

PRA coordinator and Data Analyst

GIS and GPS Expert and Documentation

Data Analyst , Engineering Expert

Socio Economic coordinator

Mr. Saburam & Team

Terracon Ecotech Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

Micro Watershed Name & Code No.:

Terracon Ecotech Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

Delegation of powers to the States for sanctioning and implementation of projects.

Treatment area and details

Terracon Ecotech Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

Terracon Ecotech Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

Terracon Ecotech Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

Table 2.4: Details of Agro-climatic condition .......................................................................................................................................... 15

Table 3.10: Crop Classification ................................................................................................................................................................... 46

Flow Chart of Institutional Arrangement from District to watershed level ........................................................................................... 95

Table 7.2: Estimated Benefit Cost Ratio ............................................................................................................................................... 132

APPENDIX C MICRO-WATERSHEDWISE ACTION PLAN - LI ELIHOOD ACTI ITIES

Terracon Ecotech Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

Fig. 2.1: Landscape and vegetation of project area

Fig. 3.6: Proportion of existing livelihoods

Terracon Ecotech Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

Name of the District

Names of the Blocks

Name of the project

: Daisumjhora IWMP project

Financial Year of sanction

: From 2010 to 2014

Terracon Ecotech Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

Terracon Ecotech Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

Profile of the watershed project

Name of the State

Terracon Ecotech Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

Four major reasons for selection of

Name, Address, Phone No and Reg. No. of

1. The area preponderance of degraded land.7(c),

Terracon Ecotech Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

Ranges and Scores

More than 40% (10)

Less than 20% (3)

Actual wages are

Actual wages are equal

Less than 50 (3)

Sub critical (5)

Over exploited (15)

Problematic village (7.5)

Partially covered (5)

High above 20% (15)

Low less than 10 % of TGA

Lands with low production

Terracon Ecotech Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

the plains (more than

Table 1.3: Watershed information

Terracon Ecotech Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

Table 1.4: Status of other development project in the area

Awas yojana (IAY)

Swarnjayanti gram Swarojgar GOI,

Terracon Ecotech Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai