This paper is part of an examination of the College counting towards
the award of a degree. Examinations are governed by the College Regulations under the authority of the Academic Board.
LLB EXAMINATION 4FFLK903 CRIMINAL LAW SUMMER 2015 TIME ALLOWED: 2 HOURS
ANSWER TWO OF THE FOLLOWING FOUR QUESTIONS.
THIS IS A CLOSED BOOK EXAMINATION.
IN THE EXAM YOU WILL BE PROVIDED WITH SOME RELEVANT STATUTES.
PLEASE ENSURE YOU WRITE THE NUMBER OF THE QUESTION YOU
ARE ANSWERING ON EACH PAGE AND THE EXAM COVER SHEET. PLEASE WRITE LEGIBLY. DO NOT REMOVE THIS EXAM PAPER FROM THE EXAMINATION ROOM TURN OVER WHEN INSTRUCTED 2015 Kings College London
4FFLK903 SUMMER 2015
1. Steve runs a business. His profits and lifestyle have in recent years been badly hit by the success of a newer rival business run by Moz, and he starts to consider ways of bringing Moz down. Steve learns from Sleuth, a private investigator, that Moz is having a secret affair with Carol, the wife of Mozs best friend, Dan. Sleuth also reports that Moz and Dan share a passion for mountaineering and once a month or so, the two of them attempt a challenging climb together. Steve tells Dan that Moz is sleeping with Carol and when Dan refuses to believe him, shows him evidence caught on film by Sleuth. Dan becomes beside himself with anger. Steve offers to introduce Dan to someone who can advise [him] what to do. Dan meets with Steve and Trev. Steve tells Dan, Trev will get you a knife that is perfect for killing a man cleanly. You could do it when you next go climbing with Moz; get him in the tent at night or something. You can disguise the knife as part of the gear you need. Steve adds to Trev, take the knife to Dans house tomorrow, to which Trev agrees. At the end of the conversation Dan nods and says to Steve and Trev, Yes, I think we all understand each other. Unknown to Steve, Dan and Trev, the conversation is caught on camera by Sleuth. The next day Trev fails to turn up, but Sleuth goes to see Dan and shows him more footage of Carol and Moz in intimate moments. Unseen by Dan, Sleuth slips a knife into Dans rucksack and says goodbye. Dan and Moz set off the next morning. Dan had left behind the knife Sleuth put in his rucksack in favour of his own knife, having concluded that the knife he mysteriously found in his rucksack was one Moz would realise was not meant for mountaineering. After the first days climbing, Dan has a sleepless night in which he does a lot of soul searching. He gets up early and leaves the tent and phones Carol. He tells her that he knows about her affair with Moz, that at first he was angry, but has now thought hard about it and he wants to talk about the matter in a calm fashion with her and Moz when he and Moz have returned home from their climb. He concludes the call by saying: Ive come to my senses I was going to do something really crazy! I love you. It will work out.
Question continues on next page
4FFLK903 SUMMER 2015
The next day Dan and Moz attempt an especially difficult climb on the Ben Nevis Mountain. Dan goes first as usual and Moz is attached to him by a rope. Moz falls into difficulties and entirely loses his footing and falls off so that he is dangling in mid-air, with only the rope connecting him to Dan preventing him from continuing his fall to the bottom of the mountain. Dan holds onto the rope with all his strength for a considerable period, but steadily feels himself weaken, aware that eventually he will be pulled down together with Moz to a certain death. He can make out Moz shouting from below, cut the rope, save yourself. Eventually as he feels his final strength disappearing Dan cuts the rope. Mozs dead body is found a day later by a search party and Dan is rescued by a helicopter. When questioned, Trev says he missed the meeting he was supposed to attend because hed changed his mind about supplying anything to a ridiculous scheme he never believed could succeed anyway. Consider the criminal liability of Steve, Dan, Sleuth and Trev.
See next page
4FFLK903 SUMMER 2015
2. Sally decided to burn her own house down. Her house is semidetached, making up half of a building, the other half of which is occupied by the four members of the Jenkins family. Sally had become depressed about the overwhelming number of repairs the house needed, most of which she could not currently afford. She figured that the insurance company would pay out to rebuild the house if it were to have an accident and burn down. Sally began by writing a letter to the insurance company saying her house had burned down for a reason she could not fathom, an electricity fault, a gas leak, who knows? She gave the letter together with two others related to her work to her secretary instructing her Ive prepared these three letters. Please put the right postage on them but dont post them until I tell you to, please, which Ill do by email. Next, she gave the Jenkins family four tickets to go to the funfair at the seaside the following Saturday. First thing on Saturday, Mrs Jenkins told Sally that only she and one of her children would be going to the seaside since her other child had taken ill and Mr Jenkins would stay home to look after her. Sally decided to go ahead with her plan anyway, telling herself that she would call the fire brigade comfortably before the fire could spread next door. She reasoned that any risk to her neighbours was vanishingly small, especially as Mr Jenkins, a highly responsible adult, was present. Sally turned on all the gas on the hob of her cooker, lit the gas and threw newspaper onto the flames intending that the wooden shelf units would catch light and spread the flames to the rest of the house. However, despite continually lighting newspaper, she could not get the wooden units to catch light; the newspaper repeatedly burned itself out. Eventually, overcome by the gas, Sally fled the building. Mr Jenkins had been out in his familys garden at the time and was unaffected, but Joanna, his daughter (aged 11), who was in bed, breathed in gas fumes that had escaped from next door and became sick, vomiting for around 15 minutes.
Question continues on next page
4FFLK903 SUMMER 2015
Although Joanna suffered no further ill effects of the gas fumes, Mr and Mrs Jenkins remain very concerned about her. She has turned from a hardworking and happy girl into a lethargic and moody one, who refuses to go to school. Psychologists have reported that Joanna is constantly fearful and subject to panic. They believe she was traumatised by the dishonesty of Sally, an adult she had adored and looked up to. Advise Sally on her potential criminal liability. 3. Barney, a kitchen fitter by trade, made two bookings at the Strand Palace Hotel in London, the first for the night of 15 April as an overnight stop on his way to Birmingham, the second for his return journey for the night of 21 April, on his way back. On the 15th, he realised that if he paid his bill for the first night immediately on checking out the next day he would be short of cash while in Birmingham. On checking out, therefore, he spoke to the hotel manager, telling her that he was clean out of cash and in a hurry. The manager agreed that he could defer his payment until his return stay on his way back from Birmingham. Soon after, he heard news of the cancellation of a big contract and so resolved neither to return to the Strand Palace Hotel, nor to pay his outstanding bill. He phoned the hotel and left a message on the answering machine cancelling his booking for 21 April. While in Birmingham, Barney went to see a potential client interested in having a kitchen fitted in his house. The client suggested that the sale should be made in cash off the books at around 20% under Barneys price (the 20% covering value added tax). Barney had never agreed before to do work that he would not be declaring on his annual tax return, thinking it a cheat to do so, but he decided to do so on this occasion. He had many reasons for this, he told himself: no one else seemed to think avoiding value added tax was cheating, all the other kitchen fitters he knew were doing this, all clients seemed to think it fair enough and, finally, he desperately needed a sale.
Question continues on next page
4FFLK903 SUMMER 2015
Back home at Barneys house, Bella, Barneys wife, was working on a
daily basis as a carer for Doris, for which she was paid monthly by direct debit. Doris (aged 84) was frail and often confused. Bella successfully applied for a local council grant to pay for a stairlift to be fitted in Doriss house on the basis that Doris could not climb the stairs, except with extreme discomfort. Bella phoned Stan after finding his number by googling Stairlift fitters. Though describing himself in his online advertisement as a stairlift fitter Stan explained to Bella and Doris that he had never fitted a stairlift before. He asked for a price that he (rightly) suspected was nearly four times higher than the usual rate charged by experienced stairlift fitters, to which Bella and Doris immediately agreed. However, a week before the lift was due to be installed, Doris returned from an operation at the hospital with her mobility much improved and with the advice of her doctor to climb the stairs at every opportunity in order to exercise her legs. Bella decided to say nothing in case Doriss condition deteriorated again, had the stairlift installed and sent the bill to the local council, which it duly paid. Doris had an extensive collection of jewellery which she had often told Bella would be left in her will to Anita, Doriss daughter, who lived in New Zealand. On the 21st April as Bella was going home, Doris said Id like to give you something for payment and pressed the box with her entire collection of jewellery onto Bella. Bella said no I couldnt accept that. But Doris insisted, saying I need to pay you. Bella took the jewellery in order to think about whether to keep it or not, eventually taking it to a pawn shop, where she was given a 4,000 loan, which she was to repay in six months time in exchange for the return of the jewellery. Advise Barney, Bella and Stan on any potential criminal liability.
See next page
4FFLK903 SUMMER 2015
4. After a series of brushes with the law in relation to his driving, Rob has just begun a six month period disqualified from driving. One Monday morning, on hearing that there was a strike on the Underground, he decided to risk it and drive his car to work. Rob finds the motorway is extremely crowded on the lanes going into the city centre, although nearly empty in the lanes going in the opposite direction out of the city. For a seemingly endless period, Robs car is either stationary in the traffic or moving no faster than 5 mph. All of a sudden, a car travelling in the opposite direction appears in view. The car is travelling extremely fast and very erratically and is being driven by Dwain, who has consumed large quantities of heroin. As Robs car was moving at around 4 mph in the near gridlocked traffic, Dwains car veers off the opposite lane of the motorway and crashes at great speed into Robs car. Miraculously Rob only suffers a few minor cuts and bruises, but Dwain is very badly hurt indeed. Dwain is cut out of his wrecked car and, still conscious but in agony, put in an ambulance. Inside the ambulance Dwain is able to make out a supply of drug X, something he has often purchased illegally, and he asks Patrick, the paramedic, to give him a dose to relieve his pain as he does not believe what Patrick has already given him will be effective. Patrick tries to calm him telling him he must wait until they get to the hospital. He explained that he (Patrick) is not authorised to give out that drug except on the instruction of a qualified doctor and that it would be extremely dangerous for him to give it to him without understanding its effects. After repeated requests from Dwain, Patrick finally relents and gives him a dose of Drug X. The drug has the effect of calming Dwain, but a little after arriving at the hospital, Dwain dies. Experts agree that Dwain had no more than a 10% chance of surviving the car crash, but that 10% chance completely vanished on his ingesting Drug X in combination with the heroin already in his system (as a suitably qualified doctor would have immediately recognised).
Question continues on next page
4FFLK903 SUMMER 2015
After having been arrested and released on bail and on hearing the news of Dwains death, Rob is highly depressed. He took some of the valium that his girlfriend had on prescription in her bathroom in order to calm himself down and since his girlfriend was abroad, decided to go out for a drink on his own. In the bar, there was a large crowd waiting to be served and Rob is continually poked in the ribs by Gail behind him in the queue who repeatedly says move forward, we havent got all night! After having been poked in the ribs for the fourth time in two minutes, Rob angrily swings round planning to shout at Gail and maybe frighten her a bit. As a result of the valium, however, his movement is rather faster than he realised it would be and his face smashes into Gails, breaking her nose. It emerges that in the couple of hours prior to Rob and Gails altercation, Gail had consumed 10 gin and tonics and 5 large glasses of wine. Advise Rob, Gail and Patrick on their potential criminal liability. (Note: under 3ZB of the Road Traffic Act 1988 A person is guilty of an offence ...if he causes the death of another person by driving a motor vehicle on a road and, at the time when he is driving, the circumstances are such that he is...driving otherwise than in accordance with a license [or] driving while disqualified [or] using a motor vehicle while uninsured or unsecured against third party risks. No further knowledge of the provisions of the Road Traffic Act is expected for the purposes of answering this question.)
Final page of questions
Kings College London
This paper is part of an examination of the College counting towards the award of a degree. Examinations are governed by the College Regulations under the authority of the Academic Board.
LLB EXAMINATION 4FFLK903 CRIMINAL LAW MAY 2015 TIME ALLOWED: 2 HOURS
PLEASE ENSURE YOU WRITE THE NUMBER OF THE QUESTION YOU
ARE ANSWERING ON EACH PAGE AND THE EXAM COVER SHEET. PLEASE WRITE LEGIBLY. DO NOT REMOVE THIS EXAM PAPER FROM THE EXAMINATION ROOM TURN OVER WHEN INSTRUCTED 2015 Kings College London
Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology, Kenya - BSC Computer Security & Forensics MSC IT Security & Audit, PHD IT Security & Audit