Professional Documents
Culture Documents
+-CONSTRUCTION
KEY TERMS
POLITICS
ARTICLE BRIEF
EQUALITY
Ability
Hope
Mind
COMPETITION
GAIN
DIFFIDENCE
Insecurity
Safety
GLORY
Reputation
MISERY
1.1 Hobbes: begins with a basic idea then develops that idea into a
series of beliefs about human nature and our social environment.
Emphasizes the equality of men. A gun the Great equalizer.
1.2 Infallible rules, called science Infallible means perfect. Wherever
there is room for human intervention, there can be a mistake.
1.3 Domination of one man over another is necessary condition in
human nature and this should be allowed- a general belief Is that
two men who desire the same thing will become enemies if
both cannot enjoy it
1.4 KEY IDEAS: In human nature we find three principal causes of people
fighting one another. Competition makes people fight, invade or
attack for gain, Diffidence (Insecurity) makes someone fight for
SAFETY, GLORY- makes someone fight for reputation.
1.5 The notion of time is to be considered the notion of war
1.6 pre-emptive strike meaning I hit you before I give you the potential to
become a threat to me.
1.7 Where there is no common power, there is no law: where no law, no
injustice. Force, fraud are wars two cardinal virtues
1.8 no propriety, no domination, no mine and thine distinct; but only that
to be every mans that he can get
1.9 These articles, are they, which otherwise are called the Laws of
Nature.
Persian Letters, which criticized the lifestyle and liberties of the wealthy
French as well as the church
Persian kings were seeking luxury (huge monuments, huge buildings) //
crisis during the Persian king time when they wanted everything for show
or design
Persian Letters criticized the lifestyle and liberties of the wealthy French
as well as the church
Luxury can lead to weakness (you dont become resilient, you become
dependent)
MONTESQUIEU
Separation of powers:
According to Montesquieu there were three types of governments
monarchy (ruled by king or queen), Republic (ruled by an elected
leader), Despotism (ruled by a dictator)
He believed that the best type of government was the government
elected by the people. As long as people are involved in some sort of
relationship with their leaders and thats why democracy was
successful
Connection to their leadership
An important factor in this relationship is the separation of powers
Separate powers between three groups
Montesquieu gave a good example of the separation of powers with
England as an example
King (who enforced laws), Parliament (which made laws), Judges of
English courts (who interpreted laws)
KIN
G
PARLIAME
NT
JUDGES OF THE ENGLISH
COURT
How will you discover the will of God when you reject the church?
The church was the House of morality in French society
They studied the universe, they felt b studying the universe you can
discover Gods worth
Analysis and examination of what would make a good society can help
humans know Gods will
How did European scholars discover the will of God when they rejected the
will of god? (question for exam) answers are above two dot points
Two ways of discovering the will of god through your heart and mind
through the scientific method research, evidence (study of universe
through the scientific method)
A human would think of the preservation of his being before he would
investigate its origin
The human would feel fear
With fear there would be no danger of attacking one another as everyone
is terrified because both individuals may feel inferior to one another,
they may choose to cooperate (thus peace would be the first law of
nature)
Savage is only rarely used for men. It is only negative. Can refer to
animals.
Opposites: Noble and Savage
He criticises all philosophers before. He claims they talk about the alone
men in jungle in terms of freedom, fear, inequality and justice/injustice
None of them have shown how those ideas develop. How does the idea
that youre free form? How does the idea of whats just or unjust develop?
He does not look at the noble avage as a savage. Is talking about these people
how people would talk about these people in society (Europeans would consider
non-Caucasians as savages). He uses that description but calls them noble
savages.
He flips it
Lets not confuse the people we have in front of us with whats alone in the
jungle
-
Example of the horse, cat, bull any animal that is big has more strength
when they are raised in the wild than when they are raised in stables
Domestication can also apply to people
Youre changing the nature of something into something else
Can you really domesticate certain animals??
By dressing pets, you deprave them means make them lower than their
real value. It means to make them worse.
Being in the wild has its advantages, people will become tougher and
stronger
Love provided to domesticated pets is depraving them of their real value
In the same way that animals are spoiled when they are domesticated,
human beings are spoiled too
However there is a difference, the manner in which men become worse
and that is the manner in which we indulge, treat and paper ourselves
Deeper problem within the human being is that we pamper OURSELVES
Waste and luxury is destructive to the European society
Deception of luxury that there is this initial comfort that is good in the
beginning but over self-indulgence is bad
(important to remember the above few points)
He is addressing European scholars and states that Europeans look at
Africans and other races as savages just because they lack luxuries
But really the other races are MORE NOBLE as they are not over indulging
in luxuries
If luxuries were necessary, then men in the jungle would not have survived
The two fears of man are pain and suffering NOT DEATH
Russo argues that Hobbes is incorrect in saying that human beings want to
dominate. humans are neutral
Main idea/focus: there is one point we should not forget There is a
principle that Hobbes forgot man is a creature with an ego. There is a
quality to lessen the ego. Before the human wants to protect himself, selfpreservation, survival. Even before a man thinks about nourishing himself,
there is one idea that is inexplicably human is the disgust (repugnance)
when you see someone suffer (that is human. The more you can see
someone suffering, the more human you are) COMPASSION
According to Russo there is one natural virtue, a quality we are made out
of is compassion.
(Mistake in Russos analysis this is a quality of goodness, Russo said
humans are neutral. But Russo did say that humans feel it but as to
whether compassion is good or bad is dependent on the education of the
human)
Russo argues that he is not afraid of the contradiction against his own
argument
There is no state of war but a state of compassion (the less compassion a
society has, the more sick it will become.)
The jungle is not a jungle at all (contrary to the image people associate
with the jungle)
A close view of the jungle shows that the animals are compassionate
(horses are reluctant to trample on human bodies)
Survival is not the whole experience of the jungle, it is a part of it
An animal passing the corpse of another animal pause (ants carry or eat
the body but they dont leave it lying around)
The purest emotion is compassion. The worst human being has not
succeeded in destroying compassion.
A society that reflects this moral is more civil
Restaurant example, noble savage. Nobility disappears the closer you get
to the city.