Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
The central part of the Carolina terrane in western South Carolina comprises a 30 to 40 km wide zone of
high grade gneisses that are distinct from greenschist facies metavolcanic rocks of the Carolina slate belt
(to the SE) and amphibolite facies metavolcanic and metaplutonic rocks of the Charlotte belt (to the
NW). This region, termed the Silverstreet domain, is characterized by penetratively deformed felsic
gneisses, granitic gneisses, and amphibolites. Mineral assemblages and textures suggest that these rocks
formed under high-pressure metamorphic conditions, ranging from eclogite facies through high-P
granulite to upper amphibolite facies.
Mac rocks occur as amphibolite dykes, as metre-scale blocks of coarse-grained garnet-clinopyroxene
amphibolite in felsic gneiss, and as residual boulders in deeply weathered felsic gneiss. Inferred
omphacite has been replaced by a vermicular symplectite of sodic plagioclase in diopside, consistent with
decompression at moderate to high temperatures and a change from eclogite to granulite facies conditions. All samples have been partially or wholly retrograded to amphibolite assemblages. We infer the
following P-T-t history: (1) eclogite facies P-T conditions at 1.4 GPa, 650730 C (2) high-P granulite
facies P-T conditions at 1.21.5 GPa, 700800 C (3) retrograde amphibolite facies P-T conditions at
0.91.2 GPa and 720660 C. This metamorphic evolution must predate intrusion of the 415 Ma
Newberry granite and must postdate formation of the Charlotte belt and Slate belt arcs (620 to 550 Ma).
Comparison with other medium temperature eclogites and high pressure granulites suggests that these
assemblages are most likely to form during collisional orogenesis. Eclogite and high-P granulite facies
metamorphism in the Silverstreet domain may coincide with a 570535 Ma event documented in the
western Charlotte belt or to a late Ordovician-early Silurian event. The occurrence of these high-P
assemblages within the Carolina terrane implies that, prior to this event, the western Carolina terrane
(Charlotte belt) and the eastern Carolina terrane (Carolina Slate belt) formed separate terranes. The
collisional event represented by these high-pressure assemblages implies amalgamation of these formerly
separate terranes into a single composite terrane prior to its accretion to Laurentia.
Key words: amphibolite; Carolina terrane; southern Appalachians; eclogite; HP granulite.
INTRODUCTION
during collision (e.g. Carswell, 1990; OBrien & Rotzler, 2003). In many areas, these rocks are commonly
associated with retrogressed felsic gneisses that were
originally cofacial with the enclosed eclogites (e.g.
Cuthbert & Carswell, 1990; Cuthbert et al., 2000;
OBrien et al., 1990).
The eastern margin of North America in the
southern and central Appalachians comprises a tectonic collage of terranes that formed in exotic locations
during the late Neoproterozoic through early Palaeozoic, and were subsequently accreted to Laurentia
during the mid- to late Palaeozoic (Williams &
Hatcher, 1983; Secor et al., 1983; Horton et al., 1989,
1991; van Staal et al., 1998). These exotic terranes
evolved independently of Laurentia for much of their
existence, and preserve evidence of orogenic and
magmatic events that are not observed in Laurentia.
65
66 J. W. SHERVAIS ET AL.
One of the most extensive of these exotic periGondwana terranes is the Carolina terrane, which
comprises a large portion of the southern Appalachian
orogen east of the Blue Ridge province (Secor et al.,
1983; Fig. 1). The Carolina terrane is an exotic
Avalonian terrane that originally formed adjacent to
Gondwana in the late Neoproterozoic, and was not
accreted to Laurentia until the mid- to late Palaeozoic
(Secor et al., 1983; Williams & Hatcher, 1983).
We have recently re-examined a little known
occurrence of high-P granulite and amphibolite, with
an inferred MT eclogite precursor, within the central
part of the Carolina terrane (Dennis et al., 2000).
These rocks, which were originally interpreted as
pyroxene-bearing garnet amphibolites, contain relict
garnet-pyroxene-plagioclase assemblages that record a
previously unrecognized episode of eclogite transitional to medium temperature HP granulite facies
metamorphism within the Carolina arc terrane. This
event has broad implications for the evolution of the
southern Appalachians, and for models of metamorphism and exhumation in accreted arc terranes
in general. We present here a rst look at these
newly discovered high pressure rocks, their inferred
PTt history and some tectonic implications of their
occurrence.
ECLOGITES AND GRANULITES OF THE
CAROLINA TERRANE
Regional Setting
The Carolina terrane in the southern Appalachians is a calc-alkaline
island arc that is exotic to Laurentia and does not share a common
history with North America until the late Palaeozoic Alleghanian
orogeny (Fig. 1). It is largely Neoproterozoic in age but includes
sections of early to middle Cambrian age (Secor et al., 1983; Samson
et al., 1990; Shervais et al., 1996; Dennis & Shervais, 1996; Wortman
et al., 2000). Recent eld and geochronological studies show
that the Carolina terrane formed during two major episodes of arc
magmatism at 620 Ma and 550 Ma (Dennis & Wright, 1997;
Heatherington et al., 1996).
The Carolina terrane has been divided into three belts with different metamorphic and petrological characteristics: (1) the Kings
Mountain belt, which consists of greenschist facies mac metavolcanic rocks and forms the north-western margin of the Carolina
terrane; (2) the Charlotte belt, which consists largely of lower to
middle amphibolite facies, dominantly mac metavolcanic and metaplutonic rocks; and (3) the Carolina Slate belt, which is dominated by
low-grade (greenschist to subgreenschist) felsic metavolcanic rocks
with subordinate mac lavas and mudstones (Fig. 1).
The Carolina terrane was metamorphosed and ductilely deformed
during the latest Neoproterozoic to early Cambrian (Dennis &
Wright, 1995, 1997; Hibbard & Samson, 1995; Barker et al., 1998).
Metamorphism and ductile deformation resulting from the Alleghanian (320 Ma) collision of Laurentia and Gondwana is
restricted to narrow shear zones which separate broad zones containing older fabric and mineral assemblages (e.g. Secor et al., 1986;
Dallmeyer et al., 1986; Horton et al., 1989; Horton & Dicken, 2001).
The Charlotte belt was intruded by a suite of undeformed Devonian
gabbros and granitoids (400 Ma; McSween et al., 1991) that crosscut regional foliation and mark the upper age limit of penetrative
deformation within most of the terrane.
The exotic nature of the Carolina terrane is shown clearly by the
occurrence of a diverse Middle Cambrian peri-Gondwanan trilobite
fauna in the Carolina Slate belt (Samson et al., 1990). In addition,
combined eld-geochronological studies have shown that metamorphic fabric in most of the Carolina terrane formed prior to 535 Ma,
approximately coeval with the rift-drift transition on the Laurentian
margin (Dennis & Wright, 1995, 1997; Hibbard & Samson, 1995;
Barker et al., 1998).
e nt
re R e
tmi
Whi Clinton
Joanna
Newberry NW
Whitmire S
Blair
3430'N
edmont
ear zone
er Pi
ek sh
e
n
r
n
E
C
I
r
:
eave E
r a nt
81W
Clinton
+
+
+
+
Salem X-roads
Wateree L.
Newberry granite
414 8 Ma U-Pb z.
Cross Hill
L.
Bush River
re
en
wo
od
S t o ne
Pomaria
Newberry E
Newberry W
Winnsboro granite
295 2 Rb-Sr w.r.
y H i ll
Jenkinsville
ss
ognei
orth
Little Mtn
metatonalite 550 4 Ma U-Pb z.
82W
Dyson
Chappells
Silverstreet
34N
Kiokee b
Prosperity
Little Mtn
elt
Chapin
Lake Murray
Columbia
Good Hope
Saluda N
Denny
Delmar
Fig. 2. Geological map showing location of eclogite high pressure granulite-bearing Silverstreet domain of the Charlotte belt relative
to the Carolina Slate belt and the Whitmire reentrant of the Inner Piedmont. Capital E shows location of known eclogite granulite
blocks.
boundary between the high-grade gneisses of the Silverstreet domain
and the Carolina Slate belt is a fault over much of its length, but its
geometry and kinematics are not known (e.g. Dennis et al., 2000;
Ofeld, 1995; Ofeld & Sutphin, 2000; Secor et al., 1988, 1989). It is
inferred to be a normal fault in part because it juxtaposes high-grade
Charlotte belt rocks against low-grade Slate belt rocks. Locally,
however, it can be demonstrated that most recent ductile motion
along the Stony Hill orthogneiss was right lateral, based on composite planar fabric and asymmetric porphyroclasts (Dennis et al.,
2000). The northern margin of the Silverstreet domain is a 10-km
wide, E-W trending ductile shear zone (Beaver Creek shear zone)
with dextral shear sense indicators that separates it from less
deformed rocks of the Charlotte belt (West, 1998).
Mac rocks in less deformed parts of the Silverstreet domain form
amphibolite dykes up to 20 cm thick that are oriented parallel to
regional foliaton. In more deformed areas, isolated metre-scale
blocks within felsic gneiss are interpreted to represent boudinaged
mac dykes (Fig. 3). In many areas, these blocks form residual
boulders that have weathered out of the felsic gneisses; where these
occur in at upland terrain they are interpreted to be approximately
in place.
Retrogressed eclogite and high-P granulite assemblages commonly
are preserved in the cores of these isolated blocks. Blocks with relict
high-pressure assemblages are found within the Beaver Creek shear
zone along the north side of the Silverstreet domain and as residual
boulders near the centre of the terrane, south of the Newberry
granite, and clearly outside of the Beaver Creek shear zone (Fig. 2).
Foliation in the shear zone wraps around the eclogite blocks and
clearly postdates eclogite formation.
and minor epidote. Calcite forms irregular veins and patches. Epidote, quartz, plagioclase, hornblende and oxides are also found as
inclusions in garnet, with epidote being the dominant inclusion
phase. Representative electron microprobe analyses from one sample
are presented in Table 1; these data are presented graphically in
Fig. 5. Analytical methods are presented in Appendix A: Methods.
Where it has been well preserved, diopside is characterized by a
vermicular symplectite of sodic plagioclase (An15)22) that we infer
represents the breakdown of omphacite; this is clearly shown by both
BSE images and high-resolution X-ray composition maps of the
symplectites (Fig. 6). The diopside contains about 15% jadeite
component, but modal reconstruction (see Appendix A: Methods)
suggests that primary omphacite contained 30% jadeite. The
reconstructed omphacite is presented in Table 1.
The breakdown of omphacite to diopside + plagioclase symplectite is commonly observed in high-P granulites after a medium
68 J. W. SHERVAIS ET AL.
inner zone (0 to 55% of radius) that is low in Grs and Prp, and high
in Alm and Sps, and (b) an outer zone (60 to 100%) that is higher in
Grs and Prp, and lower in Alm and Sps (Fig. 9). All grains exhibit a
sharp increase in Grs and decrease in Alm at the transition (c. 60% of
grain radius) that implies an abrupt change in growth history.
RESULTS
Geothermobarometry
Table 1a. Garnet analyses, prole of single large garnet crystal in sample NEW-1. Garnet formulae per 12 oxygen.
Distance from
Centre lm
SiO2
TiO2
Al2O3
FeO
MnO
MgO
CaO
Na2O
K2O
Cr2O3
Sum
Si
Ti
Al
Fe2+
Mn
Mg
Ca
Na
K
Cr
Pyrope
Almandine
Spessartine
Grossular
Core
1
Core
51
Core
204
Core
255
Core
306
Core
508
Core
559
Core
610
Core
762
Core
813
Core
863
Core
914
Core
1016
Mantle
1117
Mantle
1168
Mantle
1270
Mantle
1371
Mantle
1472
37.54
0.11
21.37
29.37
1.60
2.41
8.62
0.03
0.00
0.00
101.03
2.968
0.006
1.991
1.942
0.107
0.284
0.730
0.004
0.000
0.000
9.3
63.4
3.49
23.8
37.48
0.10
21.40
28.82
1.49
2.33
9.28
0.03
0.00
0.00
100.94
2.963
0.006
1.995
1.906
0.100
0.275
0.786
0.005
0.000
0.000
9.0
62.1
3.26
25.6
37.64
0.09
21.59
28.86
1.27
2.36
9.34
0.03
0.00
0.00
101.19
2.965
0.005
2.004
1.901
0.085
0.277
0.789
0.005
0.000
0.000
9.1
62.3
2.79
25.9
37.67
0.12
21.37
29.07
1.14
2.39
9.41
0.03
0.00
0.00
101.20
2.969
0.007
1.985
1.916
0.076
0.281
0.795
0.004
0.000
0.000
9.2
62.5
2.48
25.9
37.35
0.12
21.54
29.00
1.07
2.40
9.44
0.04
0.00
0.00
100.94
2.952
0.007
2.006
1.917
0.071
0.282
0.799
0.006
0.000
0.000
9.2
62.5
2.31
26.0
37.42
0.10
21.71
28.93
0.81
2.38
9.73
0.03
0.00
0.00
101.11
2.949
0.006
2.017
1.907
0.054
0.280
0.821
0.004
0.000
0.000
9.1
62.3
1.76
26.8
36.94
0.10
21.46
28.88
0.75
2.39
9.87
0.03
0.00
0.00
100.42
2.937
0.006
2.011
1.920
0.051
0.283
0.841
0.005
0.000
0.000
9.1
62.0
1.65
27.2
36.89
0.07
21.44
28.82
0.68
2.48
9.92
0.00
0.00
0.00
100.30
2.936
0.004
2.011
1.918
0.046
0.294
0.845
0.000
0.000
0.000
9.5
61.8
1.48
27.2
37.28
0.13
21.32
28.97
0.47
2.62
9.88
0.01
0.00
0.00
100.68
2.951
0.007
1.989
1.918
0.031
0.309
0.838
0.002
0.000
0.000
10.0
62.0
1.00
27.1
37.27
0.10
21.25
28.93
0.37
2.68
9.84
0.02
0.00
0.01
100.46
2.956
0.006
1.986
1.918
0.025
0.317
0.836
0.003
0.000
0.000
10.2
62.0
0.81
27.0
37.10
0.12
21.30
29.05
0.38
2.76
9.79
0.04
0.00
0.00
100.54
2.943
0.007
1.991
1.927
0.025
0.326
0.832
0.005
0.000
0.000
10.5
62.0
0.80
26.8
37.54
0.07
21.30
29.17
0.32
2.93
9.64
0.00
0.00
0.00
100.98
2.959
0.004
1.979
1.923
0.021
0.345
0.814
0.000
0.000
0.000
11.1
62.0
0.68
26.2
37.39
0.11
21.27
28.46
0.20
3.09
9.90
0.02
0.00
0.00
100.43
2.957
0.007
1.982
1.882
0.013
0.365
0.839
0.003
0.000
0.000
11.8
60.7
0.42
27.1
37.21
0.07
21.46
27.69
0.12
3.34
10.38
0.05
0.00
0.00
100.31
2.941
0.004
1.998
1.830
0.008
0.394
0.878
0.007
0.000
0.000
12.7
58.8
0.26
28.2
37.24
0.17
21.27
27.27
0.12
3.25
10.73
0.06
0.00
0.00
100.12
2.947
0.010
1.984
1.805
0.008
0.383
0.910
0.010
0.000
0.000
12.3
58.1
0.26
29.3
37.81
0.08
21.49
27.20
0.13
3.33
10.71
0.04
0.00
0.03
100.81
2.964
0.005
1.985
1.783
0.009
0.389
0.899
0.006
0.000
0.002
12.6
57.9
0.29
29.2
37.81
0.09
21.46
26.68
0.10
3.39
11.10
0.02
0.00
0.01
100.65
2.964
0.005
1.983
1.750
0.006
0.396
0.932
0.003
0.000
0.001
12.8
56.7
0.19
30.2
37.86
0.17
21.31
26.53
0.12
3.47
11.10
0.04
0.00
0.00
100.59
2.969
0.010
1.970
1.740
0.008
0.405
0.933
0.005
0.000
0.000
13.1
56.4
0.26
30.2
Table 1b. Pyroxene (6 oxygen), hornblende (23 oxygen), and feldspar (8 oxygen) analyses from eclogite granulite sample NEW-1.
Di
Omp
Hbl adj
Hbl adj
actinolite
Pl in Di
50.64
0.32
4.2
11.85
0.1
11.45
19.45
1.42
0.05
0.01
99.43
1.917
0.009
0.187
0.375
0.003
0.646
0.789
0.1042
0.002
0.000
51.66
0.18
3.47
11.03
0.07
10.69
20.27
1.74
0.01
0.00
99.10
1.958
0.005
0.155
0.350
0.002
0.604
0.823
0.128
0.001
0.000
51.50
0.26
9.36
9.61
0.08
9.21
16.51
3.47
0.07
0.01
100.00
1.937
0.007
0.415
0.302
0.003
0.516
0.665
0.253
0.003
0.000
42.17
1.11
11.95
18.90
0.07
9.46
11.53
1.93
0.36
0.00
97.48
6.400
0.127
2.137
2.399
0.009
2.140
1.874
0.568
0.070
0.000
41.52
1.11
12.72
18.87
0.08
9.34
11.26
2.08
0.43
0.01
97.41
6.311
0.127
2.278
2.398
0.010
2.116
1.834
0.613
0.083
0.001
48.42
0.73
6.20
15.63
0.06
13.01
11.89
1.01
0.19
0.02
97.14
7.172
0.081
1.083
1.936
0.008
2.871
1.887
0.290
0.035
0.003
62.16
0.51
22.55
0.33
0.00
0.01
4.25
8.24
0.08
0.00
98.14
2.796
0.017
1.196
0.013
0.000
0.001
0.205
0.719
0.005
0.000
63.60
0.02
22.36
0.23
0.02
0.01
3.19
9.10
0.09
0.00
98.61
2.838
0.001
1.176
0.009
0.001
0.001
0.153
0.787
0.005
0.000
64.75
0.00
22.41
0.25
0.00
0.00
3.14
9.00
0.12
0.00
99.66
2.854
0.000
1.165
0.009
0.000
0.000
0.148
0.769
0.007
0.000
63.57
0.02
23.09
0.38
0.00
0.00
3.63
8.87
0.11
0.00
99.67
2.812
0.001
1.203
0.014
0.000
0.000
0.172
0.761
0.006
0.000
63.85
0.00
22.50
0.25
0.00
0.00
3.23
9.06
0.07
0.01
98.97
2.838
0.000
1.179
0.009
0.000
0.000
0.154
0.781
0.004
0.001
63.78
0.02
23.06
0.26
0.00
0.00
3.77
8.83
0.09
0.00
99.80
2.815
0.001
1.200
0.009
0.000
0.000
0.179
0.755
0.005
0.000
64.11
0.01
22.68
0.30
0.00
0.00
3.29
8.89
0.13
0.00
99.43
2.836
0.001
1.183
0.011
0.000
0.000
0.156
0.763
0.007
0.000
64.65
0.03
22.41
0.24
0.00
0.00
2.94
9.29
0.10
0.00
99.65
2.851
0.001
1.165
0.009
0.000
0.000
0.139
0.794
0.005
0.000
63.81
0.08
22.63
0.28
0.00
0.00
3.43
8.91
0.10
0.00
99.24
2.830
0.003
1.183
0.010
0.000
0.000
0.163
0.766
0.006
0.000
59.76
0.04
25.27
0.18
0.00
0.00
6.46
7.39
0.03
0.00
99.13
2.678
0.001
1.335
0.007
0.000
0.000
0.311
0.642
0.002
0.000
58.52
0.06
26.32
0.21
0.00
0.00
7.51
6.87
0.05
0.00
99.54
2.621
0.002
1.390
0.008
0.000
0.000
0.361
0.596
0.003
0.000
60.83
0.00
25.55
0.26
0.00
0.00
5.81
6.92
0.07
0.00
99.43
2.703
0.000
1.338
0.010
0.000
0.000
0.277
0.597
0.004
0.000
60.06
0.00
25.19
0.09
0.00
0.00
5.89
6.75
0.04
0.00
98.02
2.705
0.000
1.337
0.004
0.000
0.000
0.284
0.590
0.002
0.000
58.82
0.00
26.31
0.16
0.00
0.00
7.35
6.42
0.04
0.00
99.09
2.638
0.000
1.390
0.006
0.000
0.000
0.353
0.559
0.002
0.000
54.44
0.00
28.75
0.28
0.00
0.00
10.34
5.22
0.01
0.00
99.04
2.473
0.000
1.539
0.011
0.000
0.000
0.503
0.460
0.001
0.000
SiO2
TiO2
Al2O3
FeO
MnO
MgO
CaO
Na2O
K2O
Cr2O3
Sum
Si
Ti
Al
Fe2+
Mn
Mg
Ca
Na
K
Cr
Di
70 J. W. SHERVAIS ET AL.
Table 1c. Hornblende-plagioclase pairs from retrograded eclogite granulite sample NEW-1.
Sample#
Hb-1a
Hb-2a
Hb-2b
Hb-3a
Hb-4a
Hb-5b
Hb-6a
Hb-6c
Hb-8
Hb-8a
Hb-9
Hb-10
Hb-11
Hb-12
SiO2
TiO2
Al2O3
Cr2O3
Fe2O3
FeO
MnO
MgO
CaO
Na2O
K2O
H2O
Total
Si
Ti
Al
Cr
Fe3+
Fe2+
Mn
Mg
Ca
Na
K
39.97
1.28
13.58
0.02
6.01
12.56
0.04
9.27
11.61
2.09
0.55
2.00
98.98
6.053
0.146
2.425
0.002
0.685
1.592
0.006
2.092
1.885
0.614
0.106
37.91
1.28
16.39
0.01
6.19
11.83
0.05
8.64
11.72
2.22
0.66
2.00
98.90
5.749
0.146
2.929
0.001
0.707
1.501
0.006
1.952
1.904
0.654
0.128
39.84
1.45
14.33
0.01
5.56
11.86
0.05
9.65
11.65
2.17
0.54
2.00
99.11
5.998
0.164
2.544
0.002
0.630
1.493
0.007
2.165
1.879
0.633
0.103
42.00
0.87
11.69
0.01
6.26
12.34
0.04
10.01
11.72
1.85
0.38
2.00
99.17
6.316
0.098
2.074
0.001
0.709
1.552
0.004
2.243
1.889
0.540
0.073
40.88
1.31
12.54
0.02
6.30
12.97
0.03
9.42
11.55
2.04
0.45
2.00
99.51
6.162
0.149
2.228
0.002
0.715
1.635
0.004
2.115
1.866
0.597
0.087
40.82
0.54
13.80
0.01
6.72
12.95
0.08
8.88
11.63
2.00
0.49
2.00
99.92
6.124
0.061
2.441
0.001
0.759
1.625
0.010
1.987
1.869
0.581
0.093
40.65
0.88
13.16
0.02
6.84
13.96
0.08
8.48
11.67
2.03
0.46
2.00
100.23
6.120
0.100
2.335
0.002
0.775
1.757
0.010
1.902
1.883
0.592
0.088
42.44
1.32
10.33
0.02
5.77
14.21
0.06
9.50
11.42
1.89
0.37
2.00
99.33
6.419
0.151
1.842
0.002
0.656
1.798
0.008
2.141
1.851
0.555
0.072
42.57
1.41
11.03
0.00
5.13
11.81
0.03
11.03
11.44
1.93
0.55
2.00
98.93
6.384
0.159
1.951
0.000
0.579
1.481
0.004
2.465
1.839
0.560
0.105
43.46
1.33
10.22
0.00
5.05
11.42
0.01
11.52
11.83
1.75
0.36
2.00
98.95
6.490
0.149
1.800
0.000
0.567
1.426
0.001
2.563
1.893
0.507
0.069
39.38
0.88
14.98
0.00
7.02
12.28
0.05
8.74
11.54
2.15
0.51
2.00
99.53
5.935
0.100
2.661
0.000
0.796
1.548
0.006
1.964
1.863
0.627
0.097
40.76
0.96
13.43
0.00
6.75
11.44
0.00
10.01
11.97
1.99
0.48
2.00
99.79
6.092
0.108
2.367
0.000
0.760
1.430
0.000
2.229
1.917
0.577
0.092
42.99
1.11
11.04
0.00
5.27
12.31
0.04
10.68
11.79
1.80
0.42
2.00
99.45
6.419
0.125
1.944
0.000
0.592
1.537
0.005
2.377
1.887
0.522
0.080
40.97
1.00
12.97
0.00
6.52
11.93
0.02
9.87
11.85
1.99
0.46
2.00
99.58
6.145
0.112
2.293
0.000
0.736
1.497
0.003
2.206
1.905
0.577
0.089
Plagioclase
SiO2
Al2O3
CaO
Fe2O3
Na2O
K2O
Total
Si
Al
Ca
Fe3+
Na
K
Xalbite
Pl-1a
64.89
23.30
3.03
0.21
7.61
0.06
99.10
2.855
1.209
0.143
0.008
0.649
0.004
0.82
Pl-2a
54.44
28.75
10.34
0.28
5.22
0.01
99.04
2.473
1.540
0.503
0.011
0.460
0.001
0.48
Pl-2b
60.06
25.19
5.89
0.09
6.75
0.04
98.02
2.705
1.337
0.284
0.004
0.590
0.002
0.67
Pl-3a
64.71
23.60
3.23
0.13
7.46
0.07
99.19
2.845
1.223
0.152
0.005
0.636
0.004
0.80
Pl-4a
58.82
26.31
7.35
0.16
6.42
0.04
99.09
2.638
1.391
0.353
0.006
0.559
0.002
0.61
Pl-5b
57.81
26.85
7.99
0.22
6.41
0.04
99.31
2.597
1.422
0.385
0.008
0.558
0.002
0.59
Pl-6a
58.09
27.44
8.50
0.18
6.24
0.03
100.47
2.582
1.437
0.405
0.007
0.538
0.001
0.57
Pl-6c
64.30
23.35
3.29
0.25
8.68
0.09
99.95
2.825
1.209
0.155
0.009
0.739
0.005
0.82
Pl-8
64.70
23.46
2.75
0.13
7.46
0.09
98.56
2.856
1.221
0.130
0.005
0.639
0.005
0.83
Pl-8a
65.71
23.49
2.70
0.15
7.42
0.10
99.56
2.869
1.209
0.126
0.005
0.628
0.005
0.83
Pl-9
62.40
24.69
4.84
0.18
7.14
0.06
99.30
2.7620
1.288
0.230
0.007
0.613
0.003
0.73
Pl-10
63.95
23.88
3.53
0.22
7.40
0.07
99.04
2.822
1.242
0.167
0.008
0.633
0.004
0.79
Pl-11
65.38
24.52
2.98
0.20
7.26
0.10
100.46
2.834
1.253
0.139
0.007
0.610
0.006
0.81
Pl-12
60.83
25.55
5.81
0.26
6.92
0.07
99.43
2.703
1.338
0.277
0.010
0.597
0.004
0.68
Wo 50
Diopside
Jadeite
600 C
800 C
1000 C
B
1200 C
1000 C
Enstatite
Reconstructed
Omphacite
Interstitial Plagioclase
Exsolved
Diopside
DiHd
Plagioclase Symplectite
in Pyroxene
to EnFs
centre of the grain in Table 1a (but not the rim), corresponding to the analysis at 1371 lm. For the garnet
rim compositions, we used the garnet rim from
Table 1a (at 1472 lm) and the average rims of the
three garnet shown in Fig. 9. Garnet-pyroxene temperatures were calculated using the calibrations of Ellis
& Green (1979) and Powell (1985).
Because there is no indication of primary plagioclase
in equilibrium with omphacite, only minimum pressures are estimated for the inferred eclogite assemblage
using the plagioclase in diopside symplectite as a
proxy, using the diopside-plagioclase-garnet-quartz
(Newton & Perkins, 1982; Powell & Holland, 1988;
Moecher et al., 1988), and albite-jadeite-quartz geobarometers (Holland, 1980). For the high-P granulite
assemblage, we used diopside-plagioclase-garnetquartz (Newton & Perkins, 1982; Powell & Holland,
1988; Moecher et al., 1988) to estimate pressure, and
the jadeite content of clinopyroxene geobarometer of
Carswell & Harley (1990), to give a minimum pressure
for the eclogite assemblage.
For hornblende-bearing assemblages, the garnethornblende (Graham & Powell, 1984) thermometer and
garnet-plagioclase-hornblende-quartz geobarometer
(Kohn & Spear, 1989, 1990), were used, taking only the
Fig. 6. X-ray composition maps of diopside-sodic plagioclase symplectites ( former omphacite) surrounded by hornblende, plagioclase, garnet, and calcite. (A) Mg map,
New-1; (B) Ca map, New-1; (C) Al map, 3080E (D) Al map, 3080E. (A, B) Field of view 5 mm, hotter colours equal higher concentrations. Note shapes of the diopsideplagioclase-hornblende aggregates, which seem to pseudomorph the primary omphacite. (C, D) Field of view 2.5 mm. Lighter shades higher concentrations.
Fig. 7. X-ray maps of zoned garnet surrounded by hornblende with minor plagioclase and ilmenite. A Fe, B Mn, C Mg, D Ca. Garnet has high Mn and Fe
in core, with higher Mg and Ca in mantle. Note the sharp contact between the inner garnet core and the outer garnet mantle seen clearly in the Fe and Ca X-ray maps.
Note also the small garnet cores (high Mn and Fe, low Ca and Mg) that have been subsumed by the garnet mantle. Hotter colours equal higher concentration in Fe, Mn,
and Mg; darker blue equals higher Ca. Black line in A is approximate location of line prole (Table 1a). Field of view is 5 mm in all maps.
72 J. W. SHERVAIS ET AL.
(Fig. 5). The results from this graphical solvus thermometer 700800 C, or up to 50 C higher than
results from the garnet rim-diopside thermometers
(700750 C). Garnet-clinopyroxene temperatures
were calculated using stoichiometry to partition total
Fe between Fe2+ and Fe3+; calculation of Fe3+ stoichiometrically is strongly dependent on analytical
precision and generally overestimates Fe3+ in pyroxene
due to vacancies in the pyroxene lattice (e.g. Robinson,
1980). Calculation of garnet-diopside temperatures
assuming total Fe as Fe2+ results in temperatures
5080 C higher than those using calculated Fe3+
(Table 2). The c. 50 C difference between the pyroxene solvus temperatures and garnet-diopside temperatures calculated here probably results from the
overestimation of Fe3+ using stoichiometry.
Variations in hornblende-plagioclase temperatures
correlate with texture and composition, as noted earlier. Aluminous pargasite and calcic plagioclase that
replace diopside-plagioclase symplectites formed at
higher temperatures than the magnesian pargasite and
sodic plagioclase that replace garnet and form the
groundmass in highly amphibolitized samples. Figure 10 shows hornblende-plagioclase temperatures as a
function of plagioclase composition at 1.2 GPa, which
is the mean pressure calculated for these assemblages.
The high temperature hornblende-plagioclase assemblage clearly replaces pre-existing diopside-plagioclase
symplectites, but formed at similar temperatures and
pressures, probably in response to increased PH2O
during the thermal peak; we speculate that this water
must have come from dehydration reactions in the
enclosing felsic gneisses.
Using the data and methods described above, the
following equilibration conditions are suggested for
each stage of metamorphism, with each diagnostic
assemblage shown in parentheses:
(1) Eclogite facies metamorphism of a mac protolith
(garnet mantle + omphacite + rutile) at 650730 C
and 1.4 GPa.
(2) HP granulite facies conditions during decompression (garnet rim + diopside + pargasite I + plagioclase) at 700800 C and 1.21.5 GPa.
(3) Amphibolite facies conditions (pargasite II +
plagioclase + ilmenite epidote) at 660 C to 720 C
and 0.91.2 GPa.
These data are summarized in Table 2 and Fig. 11,
which depicts the calculated equilibria for various
mineral associations and facies with ellipses that
overlie the intersection of geothermometer and geobarometer equilibria for each stage of metamorphism.
In the absence of primary plagioclase, the pressure
estimated for the eclogite assemblage (P 1.4 GPa)
is a minimum equilibration pressure; this may be
lowered somewhat based on the high Fe content of the
sample, but may also be considerably higher (Carswell
& Harley, 1990). The equilibration pressures of the
HP granulite assemblage (1.21.5 GPa) are well
3.5
2.5
1.5
0.5
Fig. 9. Combined proles of three garnet grains in sample NEW-1, scaled to percent
radius of grain. Note sharp increase in Grs (CaO) and decrease in Alm (FeO) at around
60% of total radius. Pyr (MgO) shows less precipitous increase, Sps (MnO) decays
exponentially toward rim.
Table 2. Summary of T-P data for high-P mac lithology from Silverstreet domain. Numbers in brackets refer to references listed
below.
Assemblage
Facies
Themometer
Eclogite
Grt-Cpx
Grt-Cpx-Pl-Qtz
Jd-Ab-Qtz
High P Granulite
Grt-Cpx
Grt-Cpx
Cpx Solvus
Grt-Hbl
Hbl-Pl
Grt-Hbl
Hbl-Pl
Grt-Cpx-Pl-Qtz
Amphibolite
Temperature
Barometer
Grt-Hbl-Pl-Qtz
GRIPS
Grt-Cpx-Pl-Qtz
GRIPS
Pressure
> 1.3 GPa @700 C [6]
> 1.5 GPa @700 C [7,8]
> 1.4 Gpa @700 C [9]
1.2 GPa @800 C [6,7]
1.5 GPa @800 C [7,8]
1.21.5
1.21.5
1.01.2
1.01.2
GPa
GPa
GPa
GPa
@800
@800
@700
@675
C
C
C
C
[10]
[11]
[10]
[11]
References [1] Ellis & Green (1979); [2] Powell (1985); [3] Lindsley & Anderson (1983); [4] Graham & Powell (1984); [5] Holland & Blundy (1994); [6] Newton & Perkins (1982); [7] Powell &
Holland (1988); [8] Moecher et al. (1988); [9] Holland (1980); [10] Kohn & Spear (1989); [11] Bohlen & Liotta (1986). All temperatures with Fe3+ correction except *.
74 J. W. SHERVAIS ET AL.
840
Hbl-Pl Temperatures
820
T@1.0 GPa
800
780
760
740
720
700
680
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
Albite
Fig. 10. Plot of hornblende-plagioclase temperatures at 1.0 GPa
pressure, using Holland & Blundy (1994), as a function of
plagioclase composition. The strong correlation of calculated
temperature with composition is consistent with observed
changes in assemblage and texture.
1.6
1
High-P
2 Granulite
P GPa
1.2
3
Amphibolite
0.8
1 = Eclogite Gt-Omp
2 = Granulite Gt-Cpx-Hb-Pl
3 = Amphibolite Gt-Hb-Pl-Ilm
0.4
0
400
500
600
700
800
900
T C
Fig. 11. P-T-t plot showing clockwise path, with isobaric
heating from granulite to hornblende granulite assemblages.
1 inferred eclogite (reconstructed omphacite-plagioclase-garnet mantles; minimum pressures only); 2 high-pressure
granulite (diopside-pargasite-plagioclase-garnet rims-ilmenite);
3 amphibolite (pargasite II-plagioclase-ilmenite-epidote).
basalts. Two samples are somewhat unusual ferrobasalts, with SiO2 41%, MgO 6%, FeO*
1518%, and TiO2 2.53.5% (Fig. 12). They are
chemically equivalent to evolved tholeiitic basalts, with
very low Cr and Ni (<50 p.p.m). Similar ferrobasaltic
compositions were reported by Dal Piaz & Lombardo
(1986), Galan & Marcos (2000), and Will & Schmadicke (2001). All of the basalts and ferrobasalts studied
here can be classied as mid-ocean ridge basalts or
ocean island basalts using geochemical discrimination
plots such as Ti-V and Ti-Zr (Fig. 13; Shervais, 1982;
Pearce & Cann, 1973). This oceanic afnity contrasts
with the characteristic arc-related compositions of the
surrounding felsic to intermediate gneisses and other
rocks of the Charlotte belt (Dennis & Shervais, 1991,
1996). Similar relationships are observed in the Proterozoic Nagssugtoqidan mobile belt of east Greenland
(Messiga et al., 1990).
DISCUSSION
Tectonic setting of high pressure metamorphism
Table 3. Whole rock major and trace element analyses by X-ray uorescence.
Sample#
Rock
type
3080
Ferrobasalt
NEW-2
Ferrobasalt
30701
Basalt
30702
Basalt
30703
Basalt
30704
Basalt
3071UP
Amphibolite dyke
3071 A
Mac
boudin
3071B
Mac
boudin
3071C
Mac
boudin
30714
Amphibolite dyke
30715
Amphibolite dyke
3071 FG
Felsic
Gneiss
3025 A
Felsic
Gneiss
3025B
Felsic
Gneiss
SiO2
TiO2
Al2O3
Fe2O3
MnO
MgO
CaO
Na2O
K2 O
P2O5
Total
p.p.m.
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Sc
V
Cr
Ni
Cu
Zn
Ba
41.7
2.77
16.24
16.70
0.13
5.61
13.51
2.09
0.176
0.100
99.03
41.5
3.60
13.01
20.36
0.18
6.48
11.30
2.10
0.209
0.076
98.84
50.1
0.54
16.86
7.38
0.13
8.65
11.48
2.72
0.606
0.045
98.47
49.8
1.20
13.50
12.11
0.20
8.00
12.31
2.57
0.39
0.106
100.18
49.1
1.31
13.70
11.71
0.22
7.83
12.87
2.20
0.398
0.094
99.43
50.4
1.32
13.32
13.12
0.20
5.83
13.18
2.03
0.132
0.163
99.71
51.0
1.14
15.10
10.69
0.17
6.67
10.92
2.91
1.091
0.090
99.79
49.3
2.56
16.20
11.66
0.17
5.81
10.43
1.70
0.956
0.498
99.25
50.4
3.15
15.36
12.70
0.16
5.84
9.46
1.78
0.495
0.450
99.82
49.3
3.12
15.67
12.37
0.20
5.82
10.10
1.57
0.697
0.481
99.36
50.3
2.05
12.69
14.23
0.25
5.83
10.36
2.21
1.228
0.224
99.40
48.0
1.24
15.01
11.66
0.20
6.75
13.06
1.99
0.707
0.112
98.76
54.9
1.16
19.88
9.93
0.08
2.49
2.96
4.98
2.948
0.031
99.31
60.6
0.89
16.53
8.37
0.33
1.17
3.69
4.16
3.006
0.123
98.84
60.0
0.88
16.79
8.54
0.33
1.24
3.87
4.29
2.903
0.145
98.94
2.4
66
17
937
5
50.1
666
30
8
46
117
34
2.5
32
14
100
4
52.6
734
43
18
107
124
19
1.4
33
14
180
19
40.3
171
259
158
107
47
13
2.8
60
23
59
7
38.3
309
288
78
96
88
85
3.3
64
23
116
6
44.2
324
283
63
90
87
117
3.2
61
20
85
5
41.7
341
76
69
44
93
12
4.7
65
22
210
15
36.1
293
125
65
62
86
77
21.1
230
37
548
47
35.1
363
160
67
31
90
bdl
25.9
273
42
367
13
39.2
438
185
49
9
98
bdll
25.2
244
37
436
33
37.6
397
186
55
30
89
bdl
9.5
122
37
133
20
39.2
406
65
48
138
112
26
3.3
69
28
274
15
51.2
325
268
112
148
99
168
23
177
13
255
160
10.2
172
123
79
121
116
365
12.1
259
59
422
55
8
70
10
8
41
81
659
12.3
273
63
418
53
9.4
82
15
10
29
85
586
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
Fig. 12. Harker diagrams for eclogite high-P granulites of the Silverstreet domain, along with three felsic gneiss host rocks. Plots show
SiO2 vs. (a) TiO2 (b) FeO* (c) MgO and CaO (d) Na2O and K2O (e) Cr and Ni p.p.m., and (e) Zr p.p.m.
rocks were preserved in thrust sheets during the Alleghanian collision of North America with Gondwana in
the late Palaeozoic (Stewart et al., 1997).
Regional Implications
from Laurentia, and prior to accretion of the Carolina terrane to the Laurentian margin (Late Palaeozoic). Since the Silverstreet domain appears to be part
of the Charlotte belt and may represent in part the
infrastructure of the Charlotte belt arc, subduction
polarity during amalgamation of the Charlotte belt
arc with the Carolina slate belt arc must have been to
the SE (present day co-ordinates; Fig. 14). That is,
the Charlotte belt arc formed part of the lower plate
assemblage that was over-ridden by the Carolina slate
belt arc (which formed part of the upper plate of the
subduction zone).
76 J. W. SHERVAIS ET AL.
800
V ppm
700
600
10
20
Ferrobasalts
ARC
MORB
500
50
400
Basalts
300
200
Felsic Gneiss
100
0
0
5000
25000
10000
15000
Ti ppm
20000
25000
Ti ppm
20000
ferro-basalts
15000
MORB
10000
felsic gneiss
5000
Calc-alkaline
IAT
0
50
100
150
Zr ppm
200
250
300
Fig. 13. Ti-V and Ti-Zr plots for eclogite granulite blocks
from Silverstreet domain, showing MORB OIB afnities of
the mac rocks.
Alternatively, Hibbard & Samson (1995) have suggested that collision between Carolina and the Grenville-aged Goochland terrane of eastern Virginia
(Farrar, 1984) might be responsible for the metamorphic fabric of the western Carolina terrane.
Mueller et al. (1996) and Heatherington et al. (1996)
have presented results based on their work in North
Carolina that suggest a swing in Nd isotopic compositions of Carolina lavas from strongly positive eNd to
near 0 or even negative at approximately the Cambrian
boundary. A complex collision between a c. 1.1 Ga
continental fragment and some portion of the Carolina
composite terrane could explain this observed swing in
isotopic compositions and some of the xenocrystic
zircon in Albemarle Group lavas from the North
Carolina slate belt. Subsequent terrane dispersal
during postcollisional strike-slip faulting could be
responsible for the present disposition of high pressure
rocks far from the present outcrop belt of the
Goochland terrane. However, since the Charlotte beltSilverstreet arc must have been in the lower plate of the
collision, the upper plate would have to include an arc
High-pressure, MT granulites eclogites of the Silverstreet domain were exhumed and cooled extremely
rapidly, as shown by the preservation of prograde
zoning proles in garnet that formed at 660820 C
(e.g. OBrien, 1997). These proles could not persist if
the boudins were held for long times at such high
temperatures. Exhumation of high-P metamorphic
rocks involves two related problems: (1) a driving force
for uplift of the crust, and (2) the dominant mechanism
for exhumation erosion vs. low-angle normal faulting
(Jamieson & Beaumont, 1989). In this context, uplift
refers to upward movement with respect to a xed
datum, whereas exhumation refers to unroong and
movement to lower lithostatic pressures (Jamieson &
Beaumont, 1989; Ring et al., 1999).
There are two possible models that may drive the
uplift of deeply buried rocks in subduction zones or
collision zones, both related to the buoyancy of crustal
rocks at depth: (1) the buoyancy of tectonically thicken
crust when material is removed from the upper crust
by erosion or faulting, or (2) break-off of the subducting slab, thus removing slab pull and allowing the
subducting crust to return buoyantly to the surface
(von Blanckenburg & Davies, 1995; Ernst et al., 1997).
We favour the slab breakoff model as the release
mechanism for uplift, because it is a logical consequence of the partial subduction of a buoyant block
attached to oceanic lithosphere, and because the two
arcs involved in this collision (Charlotte belt, Slate
Fig. 14. Model for collision and amalgamation of the Charlotte belt Slate belt arcs. Stage 1: convergence of Charlotte belt and Slate
belt arcs, separated by mid-ocean ridge spreading centre; Stage 2: collision of Charlotte belt with MOR, emplacement of MORB
composition dykes into infrastructure of the arc; Stage 3: continued convergence of Charlotte belt and Slate belt arcs, with detachment
and sinking of subducted lithosphere; Stage 4: collision of Charlotte belt and Slate belt arcs, with eclogite facies metamorphism of
Charlotte belt arc infrastructure; Stage 5: delamination and sinking of oceanic lithosphere at leading edge of Charlotte belt arc,
followed by rapid uplift and exhumation of Charlotte belt infrastructure; granulite and then amphibolite facies overprint during
exhumation; Stage 6: postcollisional Carolina terrane compositer arc; later arc volcanism and sedimentation may represent overlap
assemblages that postdate suture; later reactivation of suture during Alleghanian sinistral shear?
progressive retrogressive metamorphism under eclogite, high pressure granulite, and amphibolite facies
conditions. These rocks dene a clockwise P-T-t path,
consistent with collision and partial subduction. We
suggest that this collision may have occurred during
amalgamation of the Charlotte belt to the Carolina
Slate belt to form the composite Carolina terrane that
was later accreted to Laurentia.
Our conceptual model for this collision, based on the
data discussed above, is outlined in Fig. 14. In stage 1,
the Charlotte belt arc and the Slate belt arc face one
another across an active spreading centre. The Charlotte belt arc over-rides this spreading centre in stage 2,
leading to the emplacement of MORB composition
dykes in the dominantly felsic arc basement. By stage
3, the Charlotte belt arc became extinct and attached
to oceanic crust still subducting beneath the Slate belt
arc. Collision occurred during stage 4, with the
Charlotte belt arc in the lower plate being partially
over-ridden by the Slate belt arc, leading to the highpressure metamorphism at eclogite and high-P granulite facies conditions. During stage 5 the subducting
oceanic slab broke off, allowing rapid exhumation
of the Charlotte belt arc basement, possibly along a
low-angle normal fault. Finally (stage 6) subduction
was re-established beneath the combined Charlotte
belt-Slate belt arc with renewed volcanism and plutonism, and possible reactivation of the suture as a
high-angle transcurrent structure. Further work is
needed to rene and test this model in other parts of
the Carolina terrane.
78 J. W. SHERVAIS ET AL.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
80 J. W. SHERVAIS ET AL.
Spear, F. S. & Kohn, M. A., 2001. GTB: Program Geothermobarometry, Version 2.1. February 2001. computer program.
http://ees2.geo.rpi.edu/MetaPetaRen/Frame_software.html.
van Staal, C. R., Dewey, J. F., MacNiocaill, C. & McKerrow,
W. S., 1998. The Cambrian-Silurian tectonic evolution of the
northern Appalachians and British Caledonides: history of a
complex, west and southwest Pacic-type segment of Iapetus.
In: Lyell: the Past Is the Key to the Present. Special
Publication, 143, (eds Blundell, D. J. & Scott, A. C.),
pp. 199242. Geological Society, London.
Stewart, K. G., Adams, M. G. & Trupe, C. H., 1997.
Paleozoic structural evolution of the Blue Ridge thrust
complex, western North Carolina. In: Paleozoic Structure,
Metamorphism, and Tectonics of the Blue Ridge of Western
North Carolina, Field Trip Guide, (eds Stewart, K. G., Adams,
M. G. & Trupe, C. H.), pp. 2131. Carolina Geological
Society, Banner Elk.
West, T. E., 1998. Structural analysis of the CarolinaInner
Piedmont terrane boundary: Implication for the age and
kinematics of the central Piedmont suture, a terrane boundary
that records Paleozoic LaurentiaGondwana interactions.
Tectonics, 17, 379394.
Will, T. M. & Schmadicke, E., 2001. A rst nd of retrogressed
eclogites in the Odenwald crystalline complex, mid-German
Crystalline Rise, Germany: evidence for a so far unrecognized
high-pressure metamorphism in the central Variscides. Lithos,
59, 109125.
Willard, R. A. & Adams, M. G., 1994. Newly discovered
eclogite in the southern Appalachian orogen, northwestern
North Carolina. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 123,
6170.
Williams, H. & Hatcher, R. D. 1983. Appalachian suspect
terranes. In: Contributions to the Tectonics and Geophysics of
Mountain Chains. Memoir 158, (eds Hatcher, R. D., Williams,
H. & Zietz, I.), pp. 3353. Geological Society of America,
Boulder.
Wortman, G. L., Samson, S. D. & Hibbard, J. P., 1996.
Discrimination of the Milton belt and Carolina terrane in the
southern Appalachians: a Nd isotopic approach. Journal of
Geology, 104, 239247.
Wortman, G. L., Samson, S. D. & Hibbard, J. P., 2000. Precise
U-Pb zircon constraints on the earliest magmatic history of
the Carolina terrane. Journal of Geology, 108.
APPENDIX: METHODS
Omphacite was reconstructed from diopside-plagioclase symplectite by acquiring a series of BSE images on different diopside grains,
which were then segmented in the Cameca image analysis software to
recover the proportion of plagioclase in diopside. Results for all
grains imaged were around 20% modal plagioclase. The inferred
omphacite composition was reconstructed by converting the average
composition of plagioclase in symplectite to a mineral formula
and subtracting one mole of SiO2 to create jadeite. The jadeite
formula was converted back to weight% oxide and mixed with the
average composition of diopside in 20 : 80 proportions to create
omphacite.
Calculation of Fe3+/Fe2+ by stoichiometry for thermobarometry
followed method of Spear (1993).
All minerals were analyzed on the Cameca SX-50 electron microprobe at the University of South Carolina using natural and synthetic mineral standards from the Smithsonian Institution;
operating conditions were typically 20 KV at 25 nA. Data reduction
was carried out using the Cameca implementation of the phi-rho-z
algorithm (Pouchou & Pichoir, 1991). Large area X-ray composition mapping was carried out in stage mode using four xed
wavelength spectrometers in conjunction with the backscattered
electron (BSE) diodes. Typical maps are 512 512 pixels with a step
size 10 lm and dwell time of 200 milliseconds, for a total area scanned
of 5.0 5.0 mm and an analysis time of about 14 h per map.