0% found this document useful (0 votes)
108 views9 pages

PACE Performance Review for E2 Grade

This document is a performance review form for Deepthi Agarwal for the period of January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014. It reviews her performance on various Key Performance Areas (KPAs) related to sustainable development, special projects, human resource management, management support, and costs. Overall, her reporting officer Kamal Kumar Verma rated her performance as 0/80 and noted that she did not achieve any of the targets for the KPAs. The mid-year review in July 2014 documented Deepthi's self-assessment of progress and areas requiring management support. For the annual assessment, all sections of the form including competency evaluation, core values assessment, and potential appraisal were completed with overall scores of 0.

Uploaded by

Deepti Agarwal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
108 views9 pages

PACE Performance Review for E2 Grade

This document is a performance review form for Deepthi Agarwal for the period of January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014. It reviews her performance on various Key Performance Areas (KPAs) related to sustainable development, special projects, human resource management, management support, and costs. Overall, her reporting officer Kamal Kumar Verma rated her performance as 0/80 and noted that she did not achieve any of the targets for the KPAs. The mid-year review in July 2014 documented Deepthi's self-assessment of progress and areas requiring management support. For the annual assessment, all sections of the form including competency evaluation, core values assessment, and potential appraisal were completed with overall scores of 0.

Uploaded by

Deepti Agarwal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Performance and Competence for Excellence

(PACE)
Form for Grade: E2

Year

2014

Period

01.01.2014 to 31.12.2014

Name

DEEPTI AGARWAL

Employee No.

101412

Designation

ASST.MANAGER(SD)

Department

Systems Group

Section

Name of Reporting Officer

Kamal Kumar Verma

Employee No.

002183

Designation

AGM(SUSTAINABLE

Grade

E7

Location/Unit

CC - EOC

KPA Setting Date

29.01.2014

Mid Year Review Date

17.07.2014

Grade

E2

Annual Assessment Date

PART I : Performance Planning and Assessment


Part IA Details of KPA
Maximum Marks

80

Dashboard of the Key Performance Areas


S.No.
1
2
3
4
5

KPA Index
Sustainable development index
Special Projects
HRM index
Management Support
Cost Index
Total

KPA Marks ( Max. Marks -80 ) = 0.00 / 100 * 80

Maximum Marks Marks Obtained


81
0.00
4
0.00
5
0.00
5
0.00
5
0.00
100
0.00
0.00

Employee No.

Part IA - Details of KPA


S.
No.

KPA Index

Sustainable
development index

Constituents of KPA

KPA
Weightage
Measure
of
(%, Time, Constituents
Nos. only)

Coordinating with stations regions


Nos.
and corporate centre for the
sustainability report 2013-14 data (no.
of stations)
Data compilation , giving inputs for
Time
sustainability report 2013-14,
discussing the discrepancies if any
with the reports at stations and
regional level and write up for the
sustainable report
Preparation of Sustainability Report
Time
2013-14 for management approval
External Assurance of Sustainability
Time
Report 2012-13
SD report 2012-13 designing and Percentage
priniting
Preparation of Business
Time
Responsibility report 2013-14
Preparation of SD website and its Percentage
updation periodically
Sensitizing WR-I and WR-II regions Percentage
and stations for implementation of SD
as per company act 2013 through
presentation and meeting.
Planning of data collection online
Nos.
(no.of stations)
SD Coordiantors meet
Nos.

Target Performance

Actual
Marks Marks by
Target Obtained
RO
Achieved

Stretch

Intermediate

Base

To be filled during annual


assessment

10

100% marks
22.00

80% marks
19.00

60% marks
17.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

10

30.11.2014

15.12.2014

30.12.2014

..

0.00

0.00

10

01.12.2014

15.12.2014

31.12.2014

..

0.00

0.00

10

30.04.2014

15.05.2014

30.05.2014

..

0.00

0.00

100.00

95.00

90.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

17.07.2014

20.07.2014

25.07.2014

..

0.00

0.00

100.00

90.00

80.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

100.00

90.00

80.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

22.00

19.00

15.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

2.00

1.00

1.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Employee No.

S.
No.

KPA Index

Constituents of KPA

KPA
Weightage
Measure
of
(%, Time, Constituents
Nos. only)

Preparation of monitoring formats & Percentage


revision of formats
Special Projects
Presentaion of different topics in
Nos.
knowledge management /
departmental meetings
HRM index
Training requirement as per
Nos.
department , application of core
values , vision & mission of NTPC
Management Support Inputs for the preparation of monthly Percentage
report , Steering Committee Meeting ,
BLDC meeting with MOU status, ED
review etc as required from time to
time
Cost Index
Reduction in cost by using emails, Percentage
soft copy for study ,keeping
documents in soft form and reusing
the paper to the extent possible

Target Performance

Actual
Marks Marks by
Target Obtained
RO
Achieved

Stretch

Intermediate

Base

100% marks
100.00

80% marks
90.00

60% marks
80.00

To be filled during annual


assessment
0.00

0.00

0.00

2.00

1.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

7.00

6.00

5.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

100.00

95.00

90.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

100.00

95.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Employee No.

PART IB
Mid Year Review
Insructions:
At the mid-year review:
(i) Reporting officer & executive to review & discuss the progress on KPA
achievements, competencies, values actualization & potential & document
discussions in the space provided.
(ii) In case of change in KPAs, edit the KPAs in the space provided.

Mid Year assessment (self evaluation by executive):


Progress on KPAs: Achievements: 1)Coordinated with stations , regions and corporate centre to get inouts for
Sustainability Report 13-14. Inputs from stations and regions received. inputs from CC yet to be received. 2)
External assurance of SR 12-13 done 3 Designing and printing of S
Roadblocks / Management Support Required:
Other Achievements:
Reason for Change in KPAs(if any): Additional responsibility given. 1)Sensitizing WR-I and WR-II regions and
stations for implementation of SD as per company act 2013 through presentation and meeting. 2)Preparation of
SD website and its Updation periodically 3) Preparation of monitoring

Comments of reporting officer:

Employee No.

PART II
Competency Assessment
PART IIA
Functional/ Technical Competencies
Instructions:
At the begining of the year:
1. Reporting officer & executive to agree upon at least 5 competencies
comprising functional & cross-functional competencies by referring to
appropriate Functional competency directory.
2. To be evaluated on a continuous scale of 1 - 10, with 1 being minimum &
10 being maximum.

S.No.
Competencies
Marks Obtained
1
Kowledge of efficiency testing process and CERC and CEA
0.00
guidelines
2
Knowledge of Sustainable development and its various
0.00
process takein in NTPC
3
Knowledge of Governmnet guidelines, and regulations of
0.00
Sustainable developmentincluding G4, GRI 3.0 , GRI 3.1,
EUSS , BRR and NVG guidelines for Sustainable reporting
4
Knowledge of Environmental norms and regulations
0.00
5
Knowledge of FINANCE, HR, and IT
0.00
Total
0.00
Functional/ Technical Marks ( Max. Marks - 10 ) = 0.00 * 10 / ( 10 * 5 )

0.00

PART IIB
Executive/ Managerial Competencies
Instructions:
At the begining of the year:
1. Reporting officer & executive to choose three competencies in addition to
mandatory competencies based upon direct & significant relevance to the
executive's area of responsibilities.
2. Add optional 3 competencies by selecting from the list available.
3. To be evaluated on a continuous scale of 1 - 10, with 1 being minimum &
10 being maximum.

S.No.
1
2
3
4
5
6

Competencies
Team Player
Analytical Ability
Learning
Innovation/ Creativity
Adaptability
Cost Consciousness
Total

Executive/ Managerial Marks ( Max. Marks - 5 ) = 0.00 * 5 / ( 10 * 6 )

Marks Obtained
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

Employee No.

PART III
Core Values
Instructions:
1. To be filled at the end of the year.
2. To be evaluated on a continuous scale of 1 - 10, with 1 being minimum &
10 being maximum.

S.No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Core Values
Business Ethics
Environmentally&Economically Sustainable
Customer Focus
Organizational & Professional Pride
Mutual Respect & Trust
Motivating Self and Others
Innovation & Speed
Total Quality for Excellence
Transparent & Respected Organization
Enterprising
Devoted
Total

Core Values Marks ( Max. Marks - 5 ) = 0.00 * 5 / ( 10 * 11 )

Marks Obtained
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

PART IV
Potential Appraisal
Instructions:
1. To be filled at the end of the year.
2. To be evaluated on a continuous scale of 1 - 10, with 1 being minimum &
10 being maximum.

S.No.

Competencies
Total

Potential Appraisal Marks ( Max. Marks - 0 ) = 0.00 * 0 / ( 10 * 0 )

Integrity
Nothing adverse :
Questionable
:

Marks Obtained
0.00
0.00

Employee No.

PART V
Special Achievements
Instructions:
To be filled at the end of the year:
(1) Individual & Team Achievements & Contributions
Examples: Handling of emergengy situations, process improvements, mentoring,
in-house training faculty, winning awards, representing NTPC, writing white
papers, office bearer of NTPC councils/ forums/ committees, suggestions made,
etc., including contribution towards encouragement of Hindi.

Area of Achievement

Description of Contributions

Comments of reporting officer(Including overall assessment):

Employee No.

PART VI
Total Marks
Section A: By Reporting Officer
Part
Part I
Part II (A+B)
Part III
Part IV

Components
Performance
Competencies
Values
Potential
Total Marks:

Maximum Marks
80
15
5
0
100

Marks Obtained
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

Section B: By Reviewing Officer - 1


Marks Awarded
(After discussions with Reporting Officer)
Rationale for change in marks (Mandatory):

Part IV
0.00

Total
0.00

Part IV
0.00

Total
0.00

Part I
Part II
Part III
Part IV
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Rationale for change in marks (Mandatory if changes >= 5% than given by Reporting Officer):

Total
0.00

Section C: By Reviewing Officer - 2 (PMC Member)


Marks Awarded
(After discussions with Reporting Officer - 1)
Rationale for change in marks (Mandatory):

Part I
0.00

Part II
0.00

Part III
0.00

First Stage Normalization


Part I
0.00

Part II
0.00

Part III
0.00

Section C: By Performance Management Committee


Marks Awarded

Employee No.

PART VII
Individual Training and Development Plan

Training as per Jobcode


S.No.

Training

Priority

Training from Catalog


S.No.

Training
Others

Accredited Certified Sustainability Assurance Practitioner organized


by CII

Priority

You might also like