Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ORIGINAL PAPER
Introduction: Analysis was carried out on cases of fetal and perinatal mortality from 2007-2011, on fetuses and
newborns in the Pathology Department at San Ignacio University Hospital (HUSI), in Bogota. Typical characteristics of the umbilical cord, their abnormalities and clinical outcomes were studied. Methods: A prospective
study was performed for neonatal and fetal autopsies; placentas were also studied, and HUSI clinical cases were
reviewed. Results: A total of 914 cases including fetuses, embryos, placentas and newborns made up the study.
323 cases (35.33%) had umbilical cord abnormalities: length abnormalities (7.87%): short (3.39%), long (4.48%);
abnormal insertion (23.63%): velamentous (4.04%), furcate (0.43%), marginal- paramarginal (19.14%); coiled cords
(6.01%): hypocoiled (0.65%), hypercoiled (5.36%); number of vessels (single umbilical artery) (0.43%); entanglements in fetal parts (0.54%); true knots (0.21%). In 4.81% more than one alteration was found: hypercoiled, the
most frequent, appeared in six cases with marginal insertion, in five cases with long cords, in four cases with short
cords. Cause of death attributable to umbilical cord (umbilical cord collision) occurred in 3.82%; there were
thrombosis of the fetal circulation in 6,6%. Umbilical cord abnormalities were significantly associated with chromosomal abnormalities (p < 0.003, OR 2.53), multiple gestations (OR 5.78, 59.3%) and maternal hypertension
(mainly preeclampsia) (p < 0.018, OR 1.85). Conclussions: Every anatomical feature of the umbilical cord has
a meaning. The abnormalities of the umbilical cord associated with undesirable outcomes are varied and should
be recognized and described. Among the factors recognized as predisposing are chromosomal abnormalities,
multiple gestations and as a like a new item, we found preeclampsia.
Key words: stillbirth, umbilical cord, cord accident, fetal thrombotic vasculopathy, intrauterine growth restriction
(IUGR), preeclampsia.
Introduction
Infant mortality is considered to be one of the pillars
for planning and programming health related activities.
It is considered to be a universal indicator for both living
conditions and the level of quality and access to health
services in any country. Neonatal mortality greatly influences infant mortality. Moreover, many handicaps of
neurological origin are attributable to complications
during birth. Umbilical cord abnormalities are observed
in around 35% of spontaneous abortions [1]; in stillbirth
autopsies, fetal circulation compromise is suspected in
at least 20% [2]. Intrauterine deaths originating from umbilical cord abnormalities are estimated at around 22.5%
[3]. Umbilical cord collisions are considered to be the
main cause of intrauterine anoxia in 28.8% [4]. This importance given to the umbilical cord is understandable
since it is the vital extension of the fetal circulatory system, which regulates blood flow, in both directions, thus
allowing for mother child immunological communication, oxygenation, fetal nutrition and in utero cardiac
1
Department of Pathology, Medical School, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana San Ignacio University Hospital, Bogot, Colombia
2
Institute of Human Genetics, the Medical School, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia
23
Results
Between 2007 and 2011 there were 914 perinatal
cases including fetuses, embryos, placentas and newborns at HUSI. There were 487 (53.27%) placentas,
which arrived individually (because the children were alive or because the parents did not accept post mortem
examination); 413 (45.18%) cases of fetuses and newborns and 14 cases (1.53%) of embryos. Of all of these,
323 cases (35.33%) presented umbilical cord abnormalities, divided among 72 cases (7.87%) of length abnormalities: 41 long cord cases (4.48%), 31 short cord
cases (3.39%); 216 cases of abnormal insertion (23.63%):
37 cases of velamentous insertion (4.04%); 4 cases of
furcate insertion (0.43%), 175 cases of marginal and paramarginal insertions (19.14%); abnormal cord coiling in
55 cases (6.01%): 6 hypocoiled cases (0.65%) and 49
cases of hypercoiled cords (5.36%) (Fig 1); number of
vessels: 4 bivascular cords (0.43%) (Fig 2); entanglements in the fetal body: 5 cases (0.54%) and true knots:
2 cases (0.21%).Presented above abnormalities are summarized in Fig 3. In 44 cases (4.81%) there was more
than one alteration. The most frequent association was
hypercoiling: marginal insertion in 6 cases, long cords in
5 cases and short cords in 4 cases.
The cause of death was attributable to the umbilical
cord (umbilical cord collision) in 35 cases (3.82%). Umbilical cord abnormality was significantly associated with
Furcate
insertion, 0.43
Marginal and paramarginal insertion, 19.14
24
length for each fetal age given the fact that it grows asynchronously throughout pregnancy; this is faster prior to
week 28. Long cords: Excessively long cords in our
study represented 4.48%, which corresponds to figures
reported in relevant literature. Long cords have been
associated with entanglement (in any part of the body),
narrowness, increased coiling, reverse coiling, true
knots, single artery and thrombosis [5, 21, 22]. The
latter is related to neonatal and fetal mortality and poor
neurological outcomes [23, 24]. Excessive cord length
requires greater perfusion pressure those resulting in
greater resistance against flow. This in turn demands
greater myocardial effort, which may induce fetal cardiac
abnormalities such as ventricular hypertrophy and
cardiomegaly [21, 25] with signs of intrauterine hypoxia,
IUGR, degenerative cerebral changes, altered imaging
studies, neurological damage and poor fetal prognosis
[21]. These neurological abnormalities have been explained through germinal matrix or intraventricular hemorrhage, gliosis or necrosis of the white matter and
neuronal necrosis [26], neurological complications which
come together in fetal thrombotic vasculopathy [27, 28].
In our study 61 cases were found with fetal circulation
obstruction and thrombi were observed in cord vessels
or chorionic vessels; these abnormalities were associated
with long cords (4 cases), short cords (4 cases), hypercoiled cords (9 cases) hypocoiled cords (1 case), bivascular cord (1 case) and abnormal cord insertion into the
placenta (42 cases).
In autopsies with no apparent cause of death, frequently the only finding may have been abnormal umbilical cord length [21]. Additionally, there are obstetric
complications such as umbilical cord prolapse and true
cord knots. In our study the long cords were not associated with true knots or with observed entanglements.
Short cords: Cords shorter than 32 cm at the end of
pregnancy were considered abnormally short, which implies increased risk of complications during birth and
fetal morphological abnormalities [15]; these have an
approximate incidence rate of 1% to 2% [6]; our study
showed a rate of 3.39%. They have a high association
rate with fetal abnormalities, such as abdominal wall defects and defects in the extremities and spine [20] (One
of our short cords corresponded to limb-body wall
complex). They are also associated with unsatisfactory
fetal state, central nervous system complications and low
APGAR and IQ scores [29]. Obstetric complications
associated with short umbilical cords include: cord rupture, abruptio placentae, uterine inversion, cord hematomas and fetal descent disorders during labor.
25
26
portance over the last few years given the interest in identifying them and, eventually, modifying them. Furthermore, the recognition of severe neurological sequelae originating from an inappropriate neonatal period has also contributed to an increase in lawsuits for medical malpractice
stemming from unfortunate peripartum outcomes.
Each anatomical umbilical cord characteristic has
had evolutionary significance and plays an important role
in successfully contributing to reproduction for the
preservation of the species.
Risk factors associated with umbilical cord abnormalities, such as twin pregnancies and chromosomal disorders, are well known. Additionally, in this study we
found significant association of these abnormalities with
pregnancy hypertensive disorders. Therefore, in fetal
and neonatal autopsies, as well as in newborn examination, strict attention must be paid to umbilical cord features, given the fact that they are highly important in
newborn diagnoses, counseling on reproductive aspects
and can provide answers to unexpected adverse outcomes such as neurological abnormalities and neonatal
mortality.
References
[1] Blackburn W. (2006) Umbilical cord. [In:] Stevenson R.E.,
Hall J.G. Human malformation and related anomalies.
Second edition. New York: Oxford University Press,
p.1413-1495.
[2] Tantbirojn P., Saleemuddin A., Sirois K., Crum C., Boyd
T. (2009) et al. Gross Abnormalities of the umbilical cord:
Related Placental Histology and Clinical Significance. Placenta 30(12): 1083-8.
[3] Horn L.C., Langner A., Stiehl P., Wittekind C., Faber R.
(2004) Identification of the causes of intrauterine death
during 310 consecutive autopsies. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 113(2): 134-8.
[4] Collins J.H., Collins C.L., Collins C.C. (2010) Silent risk
November 2011.
[5] Stefos T., Sotiriadis A., Vasilios D., Tsirkas P., Korkontzelos I. et al. (2003) Umbilical cord length and parity
the Greek experience. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod.
Biol. 107(1): 41-4.
[6] Baergen R.N. (2005) Pathology of the Umbilical Cord
[In:] Baergen R.N. Manual of and Kaufmanns Pathology
of the Human Placenta. New York Springfield p. 249-276.
[7] Ji Q., Luo Z.X., Yuan C.X., Wible J.R., Zhang J.P., Georgi
J.A. (2002) The earliest known eutherian mammal.
Nature 416(6883): 816-22.
[8] Godfrey K.M., Barker D.J. (2001) Fetal programming and
adult health. Public Health Nutr. 4(2B): 611-24.
[9] Stein C.E., Fall C.H., Kumaran K., Osmond C., Cox V.,
Barker D.J. (1996) Fetal growth and coronary heart disease in south India. Lancet 348(9037): 1269-73.
[12] Martin de Llano J., Fuertes G., Torr I., Garca C., Fayos
J., Lurbe E. (2009) Birth weight and characteristics of en-
[14] Lahti J., Rikknen K., Heinonen K., Pesonen A.K., Kajantie E., Forsn T., Osmond C., Barker D.J., Eriksson
J.G. (2008) Body size at birth and socio-economic status
in childhood: implications for Cloninger's psychobiological model of temperament at age 60. Psychiatry Res. 15;
160(2): 167-74.
[15] Heijmans B.T., Tobi E.W., Stein A.D., Putter H., Blauw
G.J., Susser E.S., Slagboom P.E., Lumey L.H. (2008) Per-
botic vasculopathy associated with excessively long umbilical cord and fetal demise: case report and literature
review. Pediatr. Dev. Pathol. 13(2):112-5.
tetricians just enough (umbilical) cord to hang themselves. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 195 (4): 888-90.
[31] Hasegawa J., Matsuoka R., Ichizuka K., Sekizawa A., Okai
T. (2006) Velamentous Cord Insertion: Significance of prenatal detection to predict perinatal complications. Taiwanese J. Obstet. Gynecol. 45(1): 21-25.
[32] Baergen R.N. (2005) Multiple Gestation: General Aspects
logic criteria for umbilical blood flow restriction in unexplained stillbirth. Hum. Pathol. 39(6): 948-53.
[35] Kaplan C. (2007) Umbilical cord. [In:] Color Atlas of Gross
Placental Pathology. Second edition. New York: Springer;
p. 25-44.
[36] Kalish R., Hunter T., Sharma G., Baergen R. (2003). Clinical significance of the umbilical cord twist. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 189(3): 736-9.
[37] Predanic M., Perni S., Chasen S., Baergen R., Chervenak
F. (2005) Ultrasound evaluation of abnormal umbilical
cord coiling in second trimester of gestation in association with adverse pregnancy outcome. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 193(2): 387-94.
27
[38] De Laat M., van Alderen E., Franx A., Visser G., Bots M.
et al. (2007) The umbilical coiling index in complicated
pregnancy. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 130:
66-72.
[39] De Laat M., Franx A., Bots M., Viser G.H., Nikkels G.J.
(2006) Umbilical Coiling Index in Normal and Complicated Pregnancies. Obstet. Gynecol. 107(5): 1049-55.
[40] Otsubo Y., Yoneyama Y., Suzuki S., Sawa R., Araki T.
(1992) Sonographic evaluation of umbilical cord insertion
with umbilical coiling index. J. Clin. Ultrasound. 27 (6):
341-4.
[41] Kashanian M., Akbarian A., Kouhpayehzadeh J. (2006)
The umbilical coiling index and adverse perinatal outcome. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 95(1), 8-13.
[42] Robillard P.Y., Dekker G., Chaouat G., Hulsey T.C., Saftlas A. (2011) Epidemiological studies on primipaternity
104-17.
[43] Verwoerd G.R., Hall D.R., Grov D., Maritz J.S., Odendaal H.J. (2002) Primipaternity and duration of exposure
to sperm antigens as risk factors for pre-eclampsia. Int.
J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 78(2): 121-6.
[44] Olaya-C. M., Bernal J.E. Umbilical Cord Length and Clinical Associations in Newborns in Latin America. In press.
Mercedes Olaya
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
Facultad de Medicina, Departmento de Patologa
Carrera 7a 40-62 Bogota, Colombia
e-mails: olaya.m@javeriana.edu.co