On February 29, 2016, I taught a 10th grade English/Language
Arts lesson on characterization in The Monkeys Paw, a fictional short story. I demonstrated the following two of the Wisconsin Teacher Standards for Licensure and Development: Teachers know how to teach and Teachers are able to evaluate themselves. In planning for this lesson, I determined a short story that I thought the students would enjoy before determining which elements of short fiction the students should learn from reading the story. I then determined the learning target/objective that students would be able to analyze characters as they develop throughout the course of a short story and use evidence from the text to support their claim. After determining the learning target, I found the Common Core and ACT Standards that would meet my instructional objectives. Finally, I planned my lesson, incorporating learning strategies (such as the Character Analysis handout) to reinforce the learning target. I demonstrated my ability to evaluate myself by realizing what I could have done better within my lesson. For instance, I believe I should have incorporated more time for comprehension questions and character analysis while reading the text (as opposed to discussing characters after finishing the text). Therefore, when I teach the follow up to this lesson, I will spend more time on character analysis and delve deeper into comprehension. Two of the Alverno Graduate Advanced Education Abilities that I demonstrated in my lesson are Coordination and Communication. I was able to demonstrate coordination by setting a clear instructional objective/learning target for the lesson and utilize resources that were appropriate to reaching those goals (PowerPoint, Character Analysis handout). While I believe I could have used more class time to focus on comprehension questions and further character analysis, instead we finished reading the story and will be able to delve deeper into those matters during our follow-up class. I showed self-confidence while teaching and maintained my professionalism. In addition, I collaborated with my Cooperating Teacher on the lesson prior to teaching it and assessed my own performance after teaching it. I believe I demonstrated communication by making the goals of the activities clear. The learning target was explicitly stated prior to beginning our lesson, thus all students were able to understand why we were filling out a character chart to analyze character traits. I presented materials that would hold student attention and used popcorn reading to engage all students to follow along as we read the text aloud. I communicated thoroughly through my written words (PowerPoint) and through my spoken words by using proper volume, pitch, speed, and pacing in my communication. I consistently maintained enthusiasm and maintained eye contact with students while instructing. Finally, I provided examples to support learning. Not
only did I explain my own example of how I analyzed Mr. White in
The Monkeys Paw, but I paused while reading aloud to provide an example of a character trait of Sergeant Major Morris to further emphasis what they should be looking for as we read the text. I believe that I successfully demonstrated the Common Core Standard Literacy.RL.9-10.3: Analyze how complex characters develop over the course of a text, interact with other characters, and advance the plot or develop the theme. I also believe this lesson demonstrated the ACT Standard CLR 202: Draw simple logical conclusions about the main characters in somewhat challenging literary narratives. This lesson focused on analyzing quotes/passages within the story to analyze specific character traits. As the students were filling out their charts, I asked them to think about how the characters changed throughout the text. For example, How did Mrs. White behave in the beginning of the story? How did she behave at the end of the story? What evidence do you have to support your claim? This lesson fit into the curriculum by working as an introduction to the new fiction short story unit they are starting. I utilized several Depth of Knowledge questions. Level one questions included: What is theme? How do you identify theme? and How would you write a thematic statement? Level three questions included: What facts would you select to support your analysis of the character? and What would happen if one of your wishes came true but went horribly wrong?