Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Michael Alan Dickens, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    Michael Dickens was convicted of a crime in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama. His appointed counsel, Brandy Hambright, filed a motion to withdraw representation and an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues with merit to appeal. Upon independent review of the record, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit found counsel's assessment to be correct and identified no issues of merit. The Court therefore granted the motion to withdraw and affirmed both Dickens's conviction and sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-03-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-10171

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Michael Dickens was convicted of a crime in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama. His appointed counsel, Brandy Hambright, filed a motion to withdraw representation and an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues with merit to appeal. Upon independent review of the record, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit found counsel's assessment to be correct and identified no issues of merit. The Court therefore granted the motion to withdraw and affirmed both Dickens's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    11 views2 pages

    United States v. Michael Alan Dickens, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Michael Dickens was convicted of a crime in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama. His appointed counsel, Brandy Hambright, filed a motion to withdraw representation and an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues with merit to appeal. Upon independent review of the record, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit found counsel's assessment to be correct and identified no issues of merit. The Court therefore granted the motion to withdraw and affirmed both Dickens's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    Case: 14-10171

    Date Filed: 03/13/2015

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]


    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 14-10171
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D. C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00122-WS-C-1
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    MICHAEL ALAN DICKENS,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Alabama
    ________________________
    (March 13, 2015)
    Before MARCUS, JULIE CARNES and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.

    PER CURIAM:
    Brandy Hambright, appointed counsel for Michael Dickens, has moved to
    withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant

    Case: 14-10171

    Date Filed: 03/13/2015

    Page: 2 of 2

    to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our
    independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel=s assessment of the
    relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
    entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel=s motion to withdraw is
    GRANTED, and Dickenss conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like