Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Cameron Bryant Harris, 11th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    20 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of Cameron Harris's appointed counsel, Robert Ratliff, to withdraw from representing Harris in his direct criminal appeal. After independently reviewing the record, the panel of judges agreed with Ratliff's assessment that there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. Therefore, the court affirmed both Harris's conviction and sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-10-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-10443

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of Cameron Harris's appointed counsel, Robert Ratliff, to withdraw from representing Harris in his direct criminal appeal. After independently reviewing the record, the panel of judges agreed with Ratliff's assessment that there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. Therefore, the court affirmed both Harris's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    20 views2 pages

    United States v. Cameron Bryant Harris, 11th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of Cameron Harris's appointed counsel, Robert Ratliff, to withdraw from representing Harris in his direct criminal appeal. After independently reviewing the record, the panel of judges agreed with Ratliff's assessment that there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. Therefore, the court affirmed both Harris's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    Case: 13-10443

    Date Filed: 10/21/2013

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 13-10443
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00293-WS-C-1

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    CAMERON BRYANT HARRIS,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Alabama
    ________________________
    (October 21, 2013)
    Before CARNES, Chief Judge, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Case: 13-10443

    Date Filed: 10/21/2013

    Page: 2 of 2

    Robert Ratliff, appointed counsel for Cameron Harris in this direct criminal
    appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
    filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18
    L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
    counsels assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
    independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
    counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Harriss conviction and sentence
    are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like