Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Geminas Brown, 11th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case involving Geminas Brown. Brown's appointed counsel, Rosemary Cakmis, filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and submitted an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the record, the court agreed there were no meritorious issues and granted the motion to withdraw. The court affirmed both Brown's convictions and sentences.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-07-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-13377

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case involving Geminas Brown. Brown's appointed counsel, Rosemary Cakmis, filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and submitted an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the record, the court agreed there were no meritorious issues and granted the motion to withdraw. The court affirmed both Brown's convictions and sentences.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    United States v. Geminas Brown, 11th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case involving Geminas Brown. Brown's appointed counsel, Rosemary Cakmis, filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and submitted an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the record, the court agreed there were no meritorious issues and granted the motion to withdraw. The court affirmed both Brown's convictions and sentences.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    Case: 13-13377

    Date Filed: 07/08/2014

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]


    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 13-13377
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00257-JDW-AEP-1

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    GEMINAS BROWN,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Florida
    ________________________
    (July 8, 2014)
    Before HULL, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    Rosemary Cakmis, appointed counsel for Geminas Brown in this direct
    criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

    Case: 13-13377

    Date Filed: 07/08/2014

    Page: 2 of 2

    appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
    1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
    that counsels assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
    independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
    counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Browns convictions and
    sentences are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like