Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research and Analysis Project: Honda Atlas Cars (Pak) LTD
Research and Analysis Project: Honda Atlas Cars (Pak) LTD
Research Approach:
To initiate I will gather general information about the Automobile
industry to gain an understanding of current and future prospects of
the industry and the factors that are affecting it.
Then I will develop an understanding about the Company that I require
for the purpose of my analysis. After that I will calculate and then
interpret financial ratios using information that I gathered during my
initial research. Then, using appropriate business models and
techniques I will try to comprehend the effects of the macroenvironment on the policies and operations of the Company. I will also
try to verify and validate my assumptions through different information
sources. I intend to use both primary and secondary sources to gather
and validate information about the Company.
Then on the basis of my analysis I will draw conclusions and will give
recommendations accordingly.
Information Gathering:
Primary Information:
Followed by telephonic calls I paid a visit to the Companys office seeking to
arrange a meeting with the management. I managed to obtain an
appointment for meeting with the Companys finance manager
MrAsadMurad, in which I interviewed him according to the questionnaire I
prepared beforehand to resolve my queries and to collect information about
the Company.
Secondary Information:
Wide range of secondary sources was used to corroborate the information
and to validate the interpretations made in the financial and business
analysis. The following sources were used:
Annual Audited Reports: These reports provided general information about
the Company and data to be used for purpose of ratios calculation.
Internet: Though relatively less reliable, internet provided vast knowledge &
information about the industry, Company and much about the macroenvironment surrounding such as Governments policies and economic
factors.
Newspapers, Journals & Articles: They were used to get the related
information about the automobile industry and the Company.
Ethical Issues:
Being Professional accountants we need to observe ACCAs code of ethics so
I remained prudent throughout preparation of this RAP.
Confidentiality was not an issue as all the information used was publicly
available.
During the preparation of thesis, I interacted with certain people of
undesirable attitudes but I
maintained professional behaviour.
Referring to latest editions of the books and student accountant magazines I
kept myself upgrade with professional updates.
The techniques and models that I used for the purpose of Business and
Financial analysis are:
Ratio Analysis:
Its a tool for F/S analysis. It can be used to develop a set of statistics that
reveal key financial characteristics of a Company. (Droms and Wright, 2010)
Advantages:
Limitations:
SWOT Analysis:
SWOT Analysis is a careful evaluation of an organizations internal strengths
and weaknesses as well as its environmental opportunities and threats.
(Griffin, 2011)
Advantages:
Limitations:
PEST Analysis:
Its a tool for analysing a business and, in particular understanding market
growth or decline. (Chapman, 2011)
Advantages:
Limitations:
Limitations:
Profitability Ratios
2011
HACPL
2010
2009
2011
TOYOTA
2010
2009
%
Gross
Profit
Margi
n
Net
Profit
Margi
n
ROCE
0.90
-1.51
1.25
6.63
8.08
6.14
-1.35
-5.38
-2.84
4.45
5.73
3.66
-4.42
-16.10
-9.23
28.73
42.44
20.13
0
2009
-5
2010
2011
GP
NP
-10
ROCE
-15
-20
GP Margin:
FY 09:
The GP decreased by 71.87% led by the huge decrease in sales of
3.85% and relatively lower decrease in COS of merely 0.82%.
10
6
HACPL
TOYOTA
0
2009
2010
2011
-2
Competitor Comparison
Toyota has been the foremost competitor of HACPL and has been
performing way better than HACPL in GP over the years due to its
higher market share and costs management. Toyotas management
has been controlling costs through application of Kaizen costing
methodology (Toyota, 2011b) which include the elimination of waste in
the production, assembly and distribution process as well as
elimination of work steps in any of these areas (M. Bragg, 2009).
Higher sales resulted in better capacity utilization and lower fixed costs
than HACPL.
NP Margin:
FY 09:
The NP ratio reduced dramatically to -2.84% as compared to the last
years 0.5%.
Subsequent to fall in GP, Company reduced advertisement expenses
despite launch of new models keeping costs under control. Achieved
257% rise in profits on deposits owing to high deposit rates (Figure 3,
Appendix) was advantageous; however fuel & power prices went up
during the year increasing operating costs. Up to 31% increase in
electricity prices (The Nation, 2008) and 127.43% in Gas prices (Daily
Times, 2010) occurred. Company faced huge exchange losses during
the period as currency miserably weakened against Japanese Yen and
US $ (Figure 1 and 2, Appendix). PPE and old Honda Citys parts
written-off further contracted profitability. FC remained unchanged as
borrowing costs of raised long-term loans were capitalized to PPE.
(Honda Atlas Cars (Pakistan) Limited, 2009d) Effective tax rate was
-35.43% as compared to 17.90% last year to due to 83.37% reduction
in current tax because of Company making loss (under section 113 of
income tax ordinance, 2001 a Company is charged minimum tax on
turnover in case of losses) and 69% increase in deferred tax assets
mainly comprising unused tax losses aided profitability slightly.
FY 10:
NP declined to -5.38%.
Following huge fall in GP, management extensively reduced
advertisement expenses keeping costs under check. Profit on bank
deposits sharply decreased shrinking profitability as after huge
investments last year, Company commenced year with a heavy
overdraft (Interview, Appendix). Despite rise in costs of electricity
(Business News, 2010) and gas (Aqeel, 2010) fuel & power expenses
lowered slightly sinking costs as the production level decreased. Since
last year exchange losses lessen as currency became relatively stable
(Figure 1 and 2, Appendix) and Companys overall exposure to
currency risk reduced. Narrowing profitability, FC increased by 104%
due to newly availed loans by Company to finance investment for new
car models. Enlarged sales raised current tax by 654.14% with lesser
FY 11:
NP rose by 65% to -1.35%.
As GP attained health, Company enhanced spending on advertisement
of new car models with new accessories, burdening costs. With
healthier cash-flow status, Company gained enormous rise in profit on
deposits enjoying high deposit rates (Figure 3, Appendix) improving NP.
Production rose and electricity and gas prices went up by 15% (Umeed,
2010) and 8% (Zeeshan, 2010) respectively, fuel & power expenses
ascended raising costs. The currency further depreciated and increase
in Companys currency risk exposure increased exchange losses. Aided
by liquidity support on CKD supplies by the Holding Company, HACPL
repaid short-term & long-term borrowings achieving reduction in FC.
Effective tax rate reached 21.90%. 103.77% rise in current tax was the
upshot of increased sales with increase of 15.42% in deferred tax
assets available to net off.
8
6
4
2
HACPL
TOYOTA
0
2009
2010
2011
-2
-4
-6
Competitor Comparison
Toyotas strong performance in GPs cushioned it from inflated prices
and preserved the NP ratios. Toyotas profits on bank deposits were
grander than HACPLs due to stronger cash position. Unlike HACPL,
Toyota kept its currency risk low by entering foreign exchange
Honda Atlas Cars [Pak] Ltd
contracts (Toyota, 2011c) and so lower exchange losses. Toyota has not
been using borrowings and so had much lesser FC than HACPL
consisting only of mark-up on advances from customers and the bank
charges.
ROCE:
FY 09:
ROCE was -9.23% compared to the last years 8.81%.
OP fell by 234% and the Company went to loss, unable to generate
return on Capital invested. Equity decreased due to increased
accumulated losses yet CE increased due to raised long-term finance
for the investment in Capital expenditure (Honda Atlas Cars (Pakistan)
Limited, 2009e) of the new model of Honda City.
Company thus appeared to be underutilizing resources.
FY 10:
ROCE even deteriorated to -16.10%.
OP even worsened by 33% and despite decreased CE due to reduction
in renewed long-term finance with part of it becoming current and
decrease in equity on account of increased accumulated losses and
transfer of reserves to P/L, ROCE further shrunk representing further
underutilization.
FY 11:
ROCE improved to -4.42%.
Companys improved performance achieved a reduction in operating
loss of 83% but Company still failed to produce return. The year added
lesser to accumulated losses but due to large transfer from reserves to
P/L, equity reduced. Company reduced its long-term finance (Honda
Atlas Cars (Pakistan) Limited, 2011d) by 69% as well and therefore
overall CE reduced.
Consequently, ROCE became better but the persisted negative figure
still presented poor utilization of resources.
50
40
30
20
TOYOTA
HACPL
10
0
2009
2010
2011
-10
-20
Competitor Comparison
Toyota remained profitable and ungeared and has been earning much
higher returns on CE than HACPL thus, much better ROCE.
Liquidity Ratios
2011
HACPL
2010
2009
2011
times
TOYOTA
2010
2009
Curren
t Ratio
0.67
0.62
0.70
1.84
1.67
1.69
Quick
Ratio
0.26
0.21
0.17
1.38
1.31
1.28
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
Current Ratio
0.4
Quick Ratio
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
2009
2010
2011
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
2009
2010
2011
Competitor Comparison
Toyota maintained almost twice the CA than CL by having high cash & bank
and stock levels due to high market share than HACPL. Whereas HACPLs CA
have been lesser than CL due to much lower cash and bank and stock levels
than Toyotas. Unlike HACPL, Toyota did not rely on short-term borrowings.
Therefore Toyotas current and quick ratios have been much superior to
HACPLs.
Solvency Ratios
2011
Gearin
g
Ratio
(%)
Intere
st
Cover
(times
)
HACPL
2010
2009
2011
TOYOTA
2010
2009
19.90
40.29
34.66
0.00
0.00
0.00
-0.61
-1.17
-1.79
88.77
53.50
78.02
45
40
35
30
25
Gearing
20
Interest Cover
15
10
5
0
-5
2009
2010
2011
Gearing:
FY 09:
Gearing Ratio of the Company rose to 34.66% led not only by
decreased equity but also by huge increase in long-term liabilities.
Besides reduction in equity due to huge rise in accumulated losses the
large increment in long-term debt as Company obtained new loans for
Honda Atlas Cars [Pak] Ltd
45
40
35
30
25
HACPL
20
TOYOTA
15
10
5
0
2009
2010
2011
Competitor Comparison
Toyotas Capital Structure only consisted of equity and so it was not
geared whereas HACPL`s gearing kept fluctuating by the use of
borrowings to finance their capital & working capital requirements
keeping the gearing high.
Interest Cover:
FY 09:
Interest Cover turned -1.79 times from 1.3 times last year due to
Company making loss.
Although, substantial loans obtained did not affect FC as the borrowing
costs were capitalized to PPE,(Honda Atlas Cars (Pakistan) Limited,
2009g) OP since last year decreased by 234% turning into loss which
turned interest cover negative reducing investors confidence and
raised questions about management of the Company.
FY 10:
Interest Cover was -1.17 times.
Although Companys FC raised owing to long-term and short-term
loans obtained for the Capital and Working capital requirements of the
new Honda City model but as operating loss increased by lesser
percentage of 33% than 234% last year resulting in lesser difference
between FC and Operating loss, interest cover demonstrated a minor
improvement. Company couldnt cover its FC indicating profitability
was too low given the gearing of the Company.
FY 11:
Interest Cover improved to -0.61 times with decreased FC and reduced
loss.
As Company reduced its loans helped by credit payment facility by the
Holding Company, there was a large decrease in FC. Operating loss too
achieved 83% reduction improving ratio, but improvement was yet not
enough for the Company to cover its FC.
Shareholders thus remained disappointed.
100
80
60
HACPL
40
TOYOTA
20
0
2009
2010
2011
-20
Competitor Comparison
As Toyota remained un-geared its FC has been much lesser than
HACPLs consisting only of mark up on advances from the customers
and the bank charges. Earning delightful OP, Toyotas Interest Cover
has been exceptionally well than HACPLs over these periods.
Efficiency Ratios
2011
HACPL
2010
2009
2011
Days
TOYOTA
2010
2009
Payabl
e Days
10
Invento
ry Days
58
53
77
36
34
42
90
80
70
60
50
Payable Days
40
Inventory Days
30
20
10
0
2009
2010
2011
Payable Days:
FY 09:
Payable days were 10 rose from 3 days last year as creditors raised.
Trade Creditors rose by 204.35% from last year. Due to the economic
recession Companys sales fell together with colossal cash used in
operations. Furthermore, Company heavily invested during the year in
NCA. Therefore, due to feeble cash position, Company faced difficulty
in payments increasing creditors affecting WC management adversely.
Honda Atlas Cars [Pak] Ltd
FY 10:
Payable days halved to 5 owing to reduced creditors.
Despite 15% rise in COS, Trade creditors reduced by 40.02% reflecting
tightening credit facilities after HACPLs deteriorated financial
performance and cash position last year. However, with sales rising,
cash position grew stable and Company timely paid back its creditors
and improved its WC management.
FY 11:
Payable days became 7 as creditors rose.
There was an increase of 36% in COS and 67.19% in creditors. Due to
future doubt over CKDs supply chain being affected due to tsunami in
Japan, Company was increasing stock of CKDs (Interview, Appendix) in
attempt to avoid future stock outs, and thus raised trade payables.
Companys revived financial performance and Cash position earned it
extended credit period.
12
10
8
HACPL
TOYOTA
4
2
0
2009
2010
2011
Competitor Comparison
Toyotas Payable days were not much different from HACPLs.
Honda Atlas Cars [Pak] Ltd
Inventory Days:
FY 09:
Inventory days were 77 compared to 42 days last year as stock rose.
There was a huge increase in finished goods stock due to steep fall in
Honda City sales representing slowdown in trading due to the models
decline stage and economic fall down.
The inventory days hence increased, undermining WC.
FY 10:
Inventory days fell to 53 with decreased stock.
There was a vast decrease in finished goods stock indicating of re
growth of sales following introduction of new car model and re-entry of
consumer financing services with slight improvement in economy. The
working capital thus improved.
FY 11:
Inventory days rose to 58 with increased stock.
Immense increase in raw material described this rising. Major supplier,
Japan struck by natural disaster was going to affect future CKD
supplies and so Company was acquiring as much as it could to avoid
stock outs (Interview, Appendix).
90
80
70
60
50
HACPL
40
TOYOTA
30
20
10
0
2009
2010
2011
Competitor Comparison
Due to higher sales and thus higher inventory turnover than HACPL,
Toyotas inventory days remained better than HACPLs over these
years displaying better WC performance by Toyota than HACPL.
Investor's Ratios
2011
HACPL
2010
2009
Earning
per
Share
(PKR)
-2.09
-5.97
-2.81
34.90
43.81
17.62
Share
Price
(PKR/Sha
re)
10.00
16.00
12.00
220.00
262.38
107.72
Price
Earning
Ratio
(times)
-4.78
-2.68
-4.26
6.30
5.99
6.11
2011
TOYOTA
2010
2009
20
15
10
EPS
5
Share Price
P/E
0
2009
2010
2011
-5
-10
EPS:
Number of shares did not change during the three years therefore the
change in EPS has been solely because of the earnings. HACPL being in
Honda Atlas Cars [Pak] Ltd
40
30
HACPL
20
TOYOTA
10
0
2009
2010
2011
-10
Competitor Comparison
Toyota with healthy profits generated attractive EPS in all three years
of 17.62, 43.81 and 34.90/share respectively while HACPLs losses
produced negative EPS.
P/E Ratio:
FY 09:
MP of HACPLs shares fell to PKR 12 from PKR 44 last year. The P/E ratio
became -4.27 times compared to last years 83.02 times.
Reduction in earnings played havoc on performance of the Company
along with difficulties in management of liquidity and recession in the
country reduced investors confidence leading to sudden slump in MP.
Together with negative EPS, P/E fell exceedingly.
FY 10:
Share price rose to PKR 16. The P/E ratio became -2.68 times.
Though Company made further loss increasing loss per share together
with continued delicate liquidity, investors confidence rose after huge
investment by Company in new Honda City that resulted in increased
sales (Interview, Appendix). MP of shares hence rose in expectancy of
future success and P/E became better.
FY 11
Share price fell to PKR 10 and P/E ratio to -4.78 times.
Despite notable rise in sales HACPL yet remained lossmaking as even
costs rose significantly along with continuous poor liquidity. Company
also not declaring dividends for a longer period reduced investors trust
and share price and P/E ratio thus fell.
8
6
4
2
HACPL
TOYOTA
0
2009
2010
2011
-2
-4
-6
Competitor Comparison
Toyotas profits over these years and payment of dividends kept
investors trust and thus MP high. Together with Toyotas attractive
EPS, its P/E has been much better than HACPLs.
STRENGHTS:
Strong brand loyalty and smart
marketshare.
ISO 9001(QMS) and EMS
certified and therefore
maximum quality focused and
environmental friendly.
Providing greatest passenger
safety through ABS, SRS & GCON technology and fuel
efficient cars via i-VTEC
technology.
Countrywide sales, services
and spare parts dealership
networks and therefore
presence and sales in all the
major cities.
Credit support from the Holding
Company on CKD supplies
comforting cash position.
WEAKNESSES:
Higher car pricesacting
adversely on market share.
(Daily Times, 2011)
Capacity underutilization
creating high fixed costs.
Inefficient costs management.
Not providing smaller cars that
have the maximum demand.
(Pak Top 10, 2011a)
Reliance on borrowings and
therefore high FC.
stock outs.
Cheap imitates and
smuggled auto-parts
harming Companys autoparts business. (The Dawn,
2012)
POLITICAL:
Political factors are connected with government and its policies relating
business.
Government is attempting to knot-up long-term automobile policies with
Japan (KHAN, 2011). Government is also providing free of cost seeds to boost
up agriculture to advance economy and spending (Asif, 2011). However,
continued changing government policies are unpleasant for the auto sector
(Interview, Appendix) and government is not trusted by foreign investors.
Government raised sales tax and age and depreciation limit of imported used
cars to inspire competition. AIDP which was set to take the auto sector up is
expiring in near future and needs to be redeveloped (Rind,2012). Power
shortage has not for long been resolved by government keeping industry
under operational constraints.
ECONOMICAL:
Economic factors relates to general state of countrys economy.
Economy has gone down. In recent years inflation has run very high. This
means expensive inputs, increased selling price and affected sales. Interest
rates have gone up generating higher return on deposits but resulting in
higher borrowing costs. Regularly rising fuel prices are making use and
manufacturing of cars uneconomical. Recent floods left devastating effects
on agriculture sector massively declining farm income though government is
promoting the sector that will rise future spending. Although car financing
facilities are growing (Sabir, 2011), economy has touched the worst
extensively weakening purchasing power with worst effects on imports.
SOCIAL:
Social factors are related to the culture and trends of the countrys
population.
Most Pakistani population are middle class families (Jafri, 2011) mostly being
able to afford small economical compact cars. HACPL only offers subcompact
luxurious cars with high maintenance and prices. Japan tsunami has
disrupted the supply chain raising car and spare parts prices which will
Honda Atlas Cars [Pak] Ltd
Recommendations:
I would recommend that HACPL should: