Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Murray J. Klauber v. City of Sarasota, 350 F.3d 1301, 11th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views1 page
    The document is an appeals court ruling that affirms the lower court's judgment for the defendants in a case regarding alleged intentional discrimination by the City of Sarasota and other defendants against the plaintiff, Dr. Murray J. Klauber. While not deciding if the district court's full analysis was correct, the appeals court conducted its own review and determined there was no reversible error as the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a genuine issue of material fact regarding intentional discrimination by the defendants. The appeals court ruling concludes by affirming the judgment for the appellees.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-11-18 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 350 F.3d 1301 Docket: 02-16762

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is an appeals court ruling that affirms the lower court's judgment for the defendants in a case regarding alleged intentional discrimination by the City of Sarasota and other defendants against the plaintiff, Dr. Murray J. Klauber. While not deciding if the district court's full analysis was correct, the appeals court conducted its own review and determined there was no reversible error as the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a genuine issue of material fact regarding intentional discrimination by the defendants. The appeals court ruling concludes by affirming the judgment for the appellees.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views1 page

    Murray J. Klauber v. City of Sarasota, 350 F.3d 1301, 11th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an appeals court ruling that affirms the lower court's judgment for the defendants in a case regarding alleged intentional discrimination by the City of Sarasota and other defendants against the plaintiff, Dr. Murray J. Klauber. While not deciding if the district court's full analysis was correct, the appeals court conducted its own review and determined there was no reversible error as the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a genuine issue of material fact regarding intentional discrimination by the defendants. The appeals court ruling concludes by affirming the judgment for the appellees.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    350 F.

    3d 1301

    Murray J. KLAUBER, Dr., Plaintiff-Appellant,


    v.
    CITY OF SARASOTA, Sarasota Community Redevelopment
    Agency, David R. Sollenberger, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 02-16762.

    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.


    Filed November 18, 2003.

    Donald Edward Hemke, Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith &


    Cutler P.A., Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Robert M. Fournier, Sarasota, FL, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of
    Florida (No. 00-02475-CV-T-17-MAP); Elizabeth A. Kovachevich, Judge.
    Before BLACK, HULL and COX, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    We find it unnecessary to decide whether the district court's analysis was


    correct in all respects. Based upon our de novo review of the record, we have
    determined there was no reversible error in the judgment entered for Appellees.
    Our determination is based upon several reasons including, but not limited to,
    Appellant's failure to demonstrate a genuine issue of material fact as to whether
    Appellees intentionally discriminated against him.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like