Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Neal, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion dismissing James Neal III's appeal of the district court's denial of his motions for reconsideration of the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. Accordingly, the court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's rulings.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-12-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7108

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion dismissing James Neal III's appeal of the district court's denial of his motions for reconsideration of the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. Accordingly, the court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's rulings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Neal, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion dismissing James Neal III's appeal of the district court's denial of his motions for reconsideration of the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. Accordingly, the court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's rulings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7108

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    JAMES NEAL, III,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
    Judge. (CR-94-27, CA-96-1624-0)

    Submitted:

    November 29, 2001

    Decided:

    December 5, 2001

    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    James Neal, III, Appellant Pro Se.
    Marvin Jennings Caughman,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    James Neal, III, seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying his motions for reconsideration of the denial of his 28
    U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 2001) motion.

    We have reviewed the

    record and the district courts opinion and find no reversible


    error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

    dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    See

    United States v. Neal, Nos. CR-94-27; CA-96-1624-0 (D.S.C. Apr. 27


    & June 15, 2001).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like