Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Jo Ann Rehfuss v. State of South Carolina Department of Social Services, 107 F.3d 867, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views1 page
    Jo Ann Rehfuss filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the South Carolina Department of Social Services which was denied by the district court. Rehfuss appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-02-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 107 F.3d 867 Docket: 96-2646

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Jo Ann Rehfuss filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the South Carolina Department of Social Services which was denied by the district court. Rehfuss appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    10 views1 page

    Jo Ann Rehfuss v. State of South Carolina Department of Social Services, 107 F.3d 867, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Jo Ann Rehfuss filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the South Carolina Department of Social Services which was denied by the district court. Rehfuss appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    107 F.

    3d 867

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Jo Ann REHFUSS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    STATE of South Carolina Department of Social Services,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 96-2646.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Feb. 13, 1997.
    Decided Feb. 25, 1997.

    Jo Ann Rehfuss, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C.
    1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Rehfuss v. South Carolina Dep't of Social Servs., No. CA-96-2825-3-17BC
    (D.S.C. Oct. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like