Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Patricia M. Smith v. Hunt Manufacturing Company, 107 F.3d 867, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views1 page
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a plaintiff, Patricia M. Smith, who filed a Title VII discrimination and retaliation claim against her former employer, Hunt Manufacturing Company, based on race. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendant. Upon reviewing the district court's decision, the Court of Appeals found no reversible error and affirmed the lower court's ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-02-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 107 F.3d 867 Docket: 96-1097

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a plaintiff, Patricia M. Smith, who filed a Title VII discrimination and retaliation claim against her former employer, Hunt Manufacturing Company, based on race. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendant. Upon reviewing the district court's decision, the Court of Appeals found no reversible error and affirmed the lower court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views1 page

    Patricia M. Smith v. Hunt Manufacturing Company, 107 F.3d 867, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a plaintiff, Patricia M. Smith, who filed a Title VII discrimination and retaliation claim against her former employer, Hunt Manufacturing Company, based on race. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendant. Upon reviewing the district court's decision, the Court of Appeals found no reversible error and affirmed the lower court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    107 F.

    3d 867

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Patricia M. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    HUNT MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 96-1097.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Feb. 13, 1997.
    Decided Feb. 25, 1997.

    Patricia M. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Randel Eugene Phillips, Karin Marie
    McGinnis, MOORE & VAN ALLEN, Charlotte, NC, for Appellee.
    Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment for the
    Defendants in her Title VII discrimination and retaliation claims based on race.
    We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Smith v. Hunt Manufacturing Co., No. CA-94-131-5-H (W.D.N.C. Nov. 28,
    1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like