Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Franklin S. Pacheco v. Sears Roebuck and Company, 108 F.3d 1373, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views1 page
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes an employment discrimination case where Franklin Pacheco sued Sears Roebuck and Company. The district court granted summary judgment for Sears. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's decision. The Fourth Circuit cited the reasoning of the district court case and dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-03-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 108 F.3d 1373 Docket: 96-1763

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes an employment discrimination case where Franklin Pacheco sued Sears Roebuck and Company. The district court granted summary judgment for Sears. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's decision. The Fourth Circuit cited the reasoning of the district court case and dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views1 page

    Franklin S. Pacheco v. Sears Roebuck and Company, 108 F.3d 1373, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes an employment discrimination case where Franklin Pacheco sued Sears Roebuck and Company. The district court granted summary judgment for Sears. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's decision. The Fourth Circuit cited the reasoning of the district court case and dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    108 F.

    3d 1373

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Franklin S. PACHECO, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    SEARS ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 96-1763.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Feb. 27, 1997.
    Decided March 10, 1997.

    Franklin S. Pacheco, Appellant Pro Se.


    James Bernard Spears, Jr., Aaron M. Christensen, John D. Cole,
    HAYNSWORTH, BALDWIN, JOHNSON & GREAVES, Charlotte,
    North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment for
    Defendant in his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the
    record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
    we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pacheco v. Sears Roebuck &
    Co., No. CA-95-298-3-P (W.D.N.C. May 2, 1996). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like