Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Kevin McCray v. Officer Harrell, in His Individual and Official Capacity, 73 F.3d 358, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views1 page
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Kevin McCray filed a civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Officer Harrell. The district court denied relief to McCray, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's decision. The Fourth Circuit relied on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-12-21 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 73 F.3d 358 Docket: 95-7279

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Kevin McCray filed a civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Officer Harrell. The district court denied relief to McCray, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's decision. The Fourth Circuit relied on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views1 page

    Kevin McCray v. Officer Harrell, in His Individual and Official Capacity, 73 F.3d 358, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Kevin McCray filed a civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Officer Harrell. The district court denied relief to McCray, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's decision. The Fourth Circuit relied on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    73 F.

    3d 358
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    Kevin McCRAY, Plaintiff-Appellant,


    v.
    OFFICER HARRELL, in his individual and official capacity,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 95-7279.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: December 14, 1995.
    Decided: December 21, 1995.

    Kevin McCray, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Wilson Buyck, Jr., L. Hunter
    Limbaugh, Robert Thomas King, Willcox, McLeod, Buyck, Baker &
    Williams, P.A., Florence, SC, for Appellee.
    Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    McCray v. Harrell, No. CA-94-2338-6-3AK (D.S.C. Aug. 1, 1995). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like