Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Wattleton v. Beeler, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    David Wattleton appealed the district court's denial of relief on his Bivens complaint against prison officials. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible errors. The appeals court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying relief as stated in its March 23, 2005 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-09-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-6586

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    David Wattleton appealed the district court's denial of relief on his Bivens complaint against prison officials. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible errors. The appeals court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying relief as stated in its March 23, 2005 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Wattleton v. Beeler, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    David Wattleton appealed the district court's denial of relief on his Bivens complaint against prison officials. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible errors. The appeals court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying relief as stated in its March 23, 2005 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-6586

    DAVID WATTLETON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    ARTHUR F. BEELER, Warden, FMC-Butner; STEPHEN
    WILLIAMS, Institutional Counselor, FMC-Butner,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Malcolm J. Howard,
    District Judge. (CA-05-52-5)

    Submitted:

    August 25, 2005

    Decided:

    September 2, 2005

    Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    David Wattleton, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    David

    Wattleton

    appeals

    the

    district

    denying relief on his Bivens* complaint.


    record and find no reversible error.

    courts

    order

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court. See Wattleton v. Beeler,


    No. CA-05-52-5 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 23, 2005).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    Bivens v. Six Unknown Named


    Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
    - 2 -

    Agents

    of

    Fed.

    Bureau

    of

    You might also like