Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Philip Cooper, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Philip Martin Cooper's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its December 6, 2011 order. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-05-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-6155

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Philip Martin Cooper's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its December 6, 2011 order. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Philip Cooper, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Philip Martin Cooper's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its December 6, 2011 order. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-6155

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    PHILIP MARTIN COOPER,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda Wright Allen, District
    Judge. (2:99-cr-00138-AWA-1)

    Submitted:

    May 17, 2012

    Decided:

    May 25, 2012

    Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Philip Martin Cooper, Appellant Pro Se. Neil H. MacBride, United


    States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Philip

    Martin

    Cooper

    appeals

    the

    district

    order denying his motion to proceed in forma pauperis.


    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly,

    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.


    States

    v.

    2011).
    legal
    before

    Cooper,

    No.

    2:99-cr-00138-AWA-1

    (E.D.

    courts

    Va.

    United
    Dec.

    6,

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like