Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Nfamara v. McCabe, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Sylla Nfamara filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Robert J. McCabe, John F. Clark, and Deputy Baro which was denied by the district court. Nfamara appealed the denial. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's denial of relief for the reasons stated in its January 28, 2005 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-07-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-6305

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Sylla Nfamara filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Robert J. McCabe, John F. Clark, and Deputy Baro which was denied by the district court. Nfamara appealed the denial. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's denial of relief for the reasons stated in its January 28, 2005 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Nfamara v. McCabe, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Sylla Nfamara filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Robert J. McCabe, John F. Clark, and Deputy Baro which was denied by the district court. Nfamara appealed the denial. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's denial of relief for the reasons stated in its January 28, 2005 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-6305

    SYLLA NFAMARA,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    ROBERT J. MCCABE, City Sheriff; JOHN F. CLARK,
    United States Marshal; DEPUTY BARO,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
    Judge. (CA-05-42)

    Submitted:

    June 8, 2005

    Decided:

    July 5, 2005

    Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Sylla Nfamara, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Sylla Nfamara appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
    1915A(b) (2000).

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by


    the district court.
    Jan. 28, 2005).

    Nfamara v. McCabe, No. CA-05-42 (E.D. Va.

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like