Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Larry Copeland, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming a district court's denial of Larry Michael Copeland's fourth motion for free transcripts. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's ruling for the reasons stated in its March 17, 2015 order denying Copeland's request. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-06-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-6573

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming a district court's denial of Larry Michael Copeland's fourth motion for free transcripts. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's ruling for the reasons stated in its March 17, 2015 order denying Copeland's request. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    0 views2 pages

    United States v. Larry Copeland, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming a district court's denial of Larry Michael Copeland's fourth motion for free transcripts. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's ruling for the reasons stated in its March 17, 2015 order denying Copeland's request. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-6573

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    LARRY MICHAEL COPELAND,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
    District Judge. (1:08-cr-00082-MR-2)

    Submitted:

    June 25, 2015

    Decided:

    June 30, 2015

    Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Larry Michael Copeland, Appellant Pro Se.


    Amy Elizabeth Ray,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Larry Michael Copeland appeals the district courts order
    denying his fourth motion for transcripts at Government expense.
    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    United

    States

    (W.D.N.C. Mar. 17, 2015).

    v.

    Copeland,

    No.

    1:08-cr-00082-MR-2

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    this

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like