Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views1 page
    Robert Calvin Craig, Jr. filed a Section 1983 complaint against the North Carolina Department of Corrections and a prison superintendent which was denied by the district court. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit to Craig's appeal based on their review of the district court opinion adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-03-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 50 F.3d 5 Docket: 95-6033

    Original Title

    Robert Calvin Craig, Jr. v. North Carolina Department of Corrections Fred R. Wrangham, Superintendent Stanley Correctional Center, 50 F.3d 5, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Robert Calvin Craig, Jr. filed a Section 1983 complaint against the North Carolina Department of Corrections and a prison superintendent which was denied by the district court. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit to Craig's appeal based on their review of the district court opinion adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views1 page

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Robert Calvin Craig, Jr. filed a Section 1983 complaint against the North Carolina Department of Corrections and a prison superintendent which was denied by the district court. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit to Craig's appeal based on their review of the district court opinion adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    50 F.

    3d 5

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Robert Calvin CRAIG, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;
    Fred R. Wrangham,
    Superintendent; Stanley Correctional Center,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 95-6033.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: February 16, 1995.
    Decided: March 23, 1995.

    Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that
    this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
    district court. Craig v. North Carolina Dep't of Corrections, No. CA-94-467-4
    (M.D.N.C. Nov. 16, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like