Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Freddy Sylvestor Campbell v. Sam Pennington, 50 F.3d 5, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views1 page
    Freddy Campbell appealed a district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Sam Pennington. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing that the appeal was without merit based on the record and the district court's opinion adopting the magistrate's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-03-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 50 F.3d 5 Docket: 95-6000

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Freddy Campbell appealed a district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Sam Pennington. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing that the appeal was without merit based on the record and the district court's opinion adopting the magistrate's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views1 page

    Freddy Sylvestor Campbell v. Sam Pennington, 50 F.3d 5, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Freddy Campbell appealed a district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Sam Pennington. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing that the appeal was without merit based on the record and the district court's opinion adopting the magistrate's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    50 F.

    3d 5

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Freddy Sylvestor CAMPBELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Sam PENNINGTON, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 95-6000.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: Feb. 16, 1995.
    Decided: March 22, 1995.

    Freddy Sylvestor Campbell, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that
    this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
    district court. Campbell v. Pennington, No. CA-94-91-1 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 21,
    1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like