Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Michael McNatt v. Frank Coleman Brunswick Correctional Center Columbus Correctional Center, 46 F.3d 1125, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from January 18, 1995. It involves a plaintiff, Michael McNatt, appealing the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action in district court against defendants Frank Coleman, Brunswick Correctional Center, and Columbus Correctional Center. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding the appeal was without merit based on the district court's reasoning. The court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-01-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 46 F.3d 1125 Docket: 94-7034

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from January 18, 1995. It involves a plaintiff, Michael McNatt, appealing the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action in district court against defendants Frank Coleman, Brunswick Correctional Center, and Columbus Correctional Center. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding the appeal was without merit based on the district court's reasoning. The court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Michael McNatt v. Frank Coleman Brunswick Correctional Center Columbus Correctional Center, 46 F.3d 1125, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from January 18, 1995. It involves a plaintiff, Michael McNatt, appealing the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action in district court against defendants Frank Coleman, Brunswick Correctional Center, and Columbus Correctional Center. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding the appeal was without merit based on the district court's reasoning. The court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    46 F.

    3d 1125

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Michael MCNATT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Frank COLEMAN; Brunswick Correctional Center; Columbus
    Correctional Center, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 94-7034.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: Dec. 13, 1994.
    Decided: Jan. 18, 1995.

    Michael McNatt, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec.
    1983 (1988) action. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court.* McNatt v. Coleman, No. CA-93-506 (E.D. Va.
    Aug. 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    We also deny, as moot, Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel

    You might also like