Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • William Matchem v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General United States Postal Service, 68 F.3d 460, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    16 views2 pages
    The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes an employment discrimination case brought by William Matchem against the United States Postal Service that was dismissed by the district court as time-barred. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no error in the determination that the case was filed after the statute of limitations or that appointment of a guardian or attorney for the plaintiff was not necessary.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-10-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 68 F.3d 460 Docket: 94-2625

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes an employment discrimination case brought by William Matchem against the United States Postal Service that was dismissed by the district court as time-barred. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no error in the determination that the case was filed after the statute of limitations or that appointment of a guardian or attorney for the plaintiff was not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    16 views2 pages

    William Matchem v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General United States Postal Service, 68 F.3d 460, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes an employment discrimination case brought by William Matchem against the United States Postal Service that was dismissed by the district court as time-barred. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no error in the determination that the case was filed after the statute of limitations or that appointment of a guardian or attorney for the plaintiff was not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    68 F.

    3d 460

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    William MATCHEM, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Anthony M. FRANK, Postmaster General; United States Postal
    Service, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 94-2625.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: Sept. 19, 1995.
    Decided: Oct. 17, 1995.

    William Matchem, Appellant Pro Se.


    G. Norman Acker, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
    ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing this employment
    discrimination action as time-barred and finding it unnecessary to appoint either
    a guardian ad litem or an attorney for Appellant. We have reviewed the record
    and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
    judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
    the district court. Matchem v. Frank, No. CA-91-811 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 28,
    1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like