The document is an appeals court ruling from 1996 regarding a civil case where Clifton Tomlin asserted he suffered a job-related injury due to negligence by Chesapeake Bay Fishing Company. The appeals court reviewed the case and found no reversible errors, so they affirmed the district court's judgment based on the jury's verdict. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided to the court.
The document is an appeals court ruling from 1996 regarding a civil case where Clifton Tomlin asserted he suffered a job-related injury due to negligence by Chesapeake Bay Fishing Company. The appeals court reviewed the case and found no reversible errors, so they affirmed the district court's judgment based on the jury's verdict. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided to the court.
The document is an appeals court ruling from 1996 regarding a civil case where Clifton Tomlin asserted he suffered a job-related injury due to negligence by Chesapeake Bay Fishing Company. The appeals court reviewed the case and found no reversible errors, so they affirmed the district court's judgment based on the jury's verdict. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided to the court.
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation
of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Clifton B. TOMLIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHESAPEAKE BAY FISHING COMPANY, L.C., DefendantAppellee. No. 95-2597.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 15, 1996. Decided April 22, 1996.
Clifton B. Tomlin, Appellant Pro Se. Edward James Powers,
VANDEVENTER, BLACK, MEREDITH & MARTIN, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order entering judgment in
accordance with the jury's verdict in a civil action, wherein the Appellant asserted that he suffered a job-related injury as a result of the Appellee's negligence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Timothy Lamont Williams v. Dan R. Lawson, Warden Jim Beale, Assistant Warden C. Irving, Lieutenant Wayne Brown, Operations Officer, 56 F.3d 63, 4th Cir. (1995)