Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Tomlin v. Chesapeake Bay Fish, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Clifton Tomlin sued Chesapeake Bay Fishing Company for a job-related injury allegedly caused by their negligence. A jury found in favor of Chesapeake Bay Fishing Company. Tomlin appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's entry of judgment in accordance with the jury's verdict, finding no reversible error in the record. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-04-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-2597

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Clifton Tomlin sued Chesapeake Bay Fishing Company for a job-related injury allegedly caused by their negligence. A jury found in favor of Chesapeake Bay Fishing Company. Tomlin appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's entry of judgment in accordance with the jury's verdict, finding no reversible error in the record. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Tomlin v. Chesapeake Bay Fish, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Clifton Tomlin sued Chesapeake Bay Fishing Company for a job-related injury allegedly caused by their negligence. A jury found in favor of Chesapeake Bay Fishing Company. Tomlin appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's entry of judgment in accordance with the jury's verdict, finding no reversible error in the record. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-2597

    CLIFTON B. TOMLIN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CHESAPEAKE BAY FISHING COMPANY, L.C.,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CA-94-790)
    Submitted:

    April 15, 1996

    Decided:

    April 22, 1996

    Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Clifton B. Tomlin, Appellant Pro Se.
    Edward James Powers,
    VANDEVENTER, BLACK, MEREDITH & MARTIN, Norfolk, Virginia, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order entering
    judgment in accordance with the jury's verdict in a civil action,
    wherein the Appellant asserted that he suffered a job-related
    injury as a result of the Appellee's negligence. We have reviewed
    the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like