Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Al-Amin v. Johnson, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views3 pages
    This document summarizes an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal filed by Rashid Qawi Al-Amin of a district court order dismissing one of the defendants in a case. The Court of Appeals found that the district court order being appealed was not a final order and did not fall into the limited categories of appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Therefore, the Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-11-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-6786

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal filed by Rashid Qawi Al-Amin of a district court order dismissing one of the defendants in a case. The Court of Appeals found that the district court order being appealed was not a final order and did not fall into the limited categories of appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Therefore, the Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views3 pages

    Al-Amin v. Johnson, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal filed by Rashid Qawi Al-Amin of a district court order dismissing one of the defendants in a case. The Court of Appeals found that the district court order being appealed was not a final order and did not fall into the limited categories of appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Therefore, the Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-6786

    RASHID QAWI AL-AMIN,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    GENE JOHNSON, in his official capacity; LINDA SHEAR, in her
    individual and official capacities; RUFUS FLEMING, in his
    individual and official capacities; G. P. WILLIAMS, in his
    individual and official capacities; S. J. ADVENT, in his
    individual and official capacities; S. BAYLOR, in his
    individual and official capacities; D. M. FERGUSON, in
    his/her individual and official capacities; M. L. POPE, in
    his individual and official capacities; MR. FERROW, in his
    individual and official capacities; CHARLIE DAVIS, in his
    individual and official capacities; BLAINE BROCK, Food
    Service Manager, an employee of Compass Group USA, Inc.
    d/b/a Canteen Correctional Services; CLYDE ALDERMAN, in his
    individual and official capacities,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
    Judge. (2:04-cv-00346-RAJ)

    Submitted:

    November 18, 2010

    Before SHEDD and


    Circuit Judge.

    AGEE,

    Circuit

    Decided:

    Judges,

    and

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    November 30, 2010

    HAMILTON,

    Senior

    Rashid Qawi Al-Amin, Appellant Pro Se. Mark R. Davis, Assistant


    Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Paul Graham Beers, GLENN,
    FELDMANN, DARBY & GOODLATTE, Roanoke, Virginia; Peter M.
    Coppinger, Gregory D. Cote, MCCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP, Boston,
    Massachusetts, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Rashid

    Qawi

    Al-Amin

    seeks

    to

    appeal

    the

    district

    courts order dismissing one of the defendants as a party.


    court

    may

    exercise

    jurisdiction

    only

    over

    final

    This

    orders,

    28

    U.S.C. 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral


    orders, 28 U.S.C. 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
    Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).

    The

    order Al-Amin seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an


    appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
    dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    Accordingly, we
    We dispense with
    contentions
    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    DISMISSED

    You might also like