Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Robbie Collins v. Anthony Padula, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views3 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Robbie Collins on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The three judge panel reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The panel dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid their decision. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-09-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-6533

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Robbie Collins on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The three judge panel reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The panel dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid their decision. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views3 pages

    Robbie Collins v. Anthony Padula, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Robbie Collins on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The three judge panel reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The panel dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid their decision. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-6533

    ROBBIE COLLINS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    ANTHONY PADULA, Warden; MICHAEL MCCALL, Warden; SERGEANT
    KEITH MCBRIDE; LIEUTENANT JASON DAVIS; CLEVLAND DEMARIE; AW
    BROOKS; BRUCE OBERMAN; SERGEANT CHARLIE BROWN; MISS DESAI,
    Librarian;
    HERMAN
    FINKLEY;
    JAMES
    DEAN;
    LIEUTENANT
    BUTERBAUGH; NURSE MCDONALD; CAPTAIN THOMAS COMMANDER; DOCTOR
    PATE, a/k/a John Pate; W. MILLER, Librarian; NURSE STEPHANIE
    BROWN; NURSE LINDA ROMAN; NURSE T. HUBBARD, a/k/a Tonya
    Hubbard; OFFICER MCCONICO; NURSE NORAH, f/k/a Nurse North,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
    (2:12-cv-03112-DCN-BHH)

    Submitted:

    August 28, 2014

    Decided:

    September 3, 2014

    Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Robbie Collins, Appellant Pro Se.


    David Cornwell Holler, LEE
    ERTER WILSON HOLLER & SMITH, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina;
    Stephen Lynwood Brown, Russell Grainger Hines, YOUNG CLEMENT
    RIVERS, LLP, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Robbie

    Collins

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge in part and


    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    See Collins v. Padula, No. 2:12-cv-03112-DCN-BHH (D.S.C.

    Mar. 31, 2014).


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions

    are

    adequately

    this

    and

    argument

    court

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like